Company News

2001 ◽  
Vol 05 (13) ◽  
pp. 259-269

US-based Peregrine to Continue With Tumor Necrosis Therapy in China. CardioDynamics' Proprietary Technology Available in Taiwan. Gilead Initiates Phase I Clinical Trial for Hepatitis B Drug in China. China's Medical Glass Manufacturer Imports Production Line from US-based EM. Japan's Kyowa Hakko Aims to be Top Bio-pharmaceutical Company by 2010. Australian Biotech Company Invests US$2.65 million in US Firm. Qugen — Singapore's First Gene Therapy Company. Roche Launches Cancer Drug in Japan. ChemBridge Corporation Forms Combinatorial Chemistry Alliance with Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals. Indian Pharma Company Receives US FDA Approval for Pentoxifyline. Dr. Reddy's to Launch Generic Version of Prisolec in US. US Patent Granted for Heparanese Gene. Taiwan Tobacco and Wine Board to Collaborate with Mainland China. Taiwan Company Develops Rapid Blood Test for Enterovirus. Ranbaxy Laboratories: An Update.

2004 ◽  
Vol 08 (12) ◽  
pp. 653-664

Rockeby Granted US Patent for Vaginal Thrush Test Kit. Nano Cancer Drug on Trial in Singapore. GTG Commences Its Strategic Alliance with Biotechnology Foundation. Rapid Development of Eiffel. Cerylid’s Acquisition of Kinacia Develops a Significant Drug Pipeline. Regulatory Measures Fail to Reduce Exorbitant Medicine Prices. Quick Stats: China’s New Drug in 2003. Agent Commission System Revolutionizes China’s Medical Distribution Industry. Positive 2004 Performance Forecast for China’s Medical Sector. Ranbaxy Receives US FDA Approval for Fenofibrate. Sun Pharma’s Manufacturing Units Receive US FDA Approval. Senju Enters Licensing Argeement for Allergan’s Glaucoma Drug.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 100151
Author(s):  
Qiaofeng Zhong ◽  
Yunxia Tao ◽  
Haizhu Chen ◽  
Yu Zhou ◽  
Liling Huang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mustafa Hashmi ◽  
Jeremy Rassen ◽  
Sebastian Schneeweiss

Aim: Single-arm trials with external control arms (ECAs) have gained popularity in oncology. ECAs may consist of primary data from previous trials, electronic health records (EHRs) or aggregate data from the literature. We sought to provide a description of how such studies achieve similarity of patients, comparability of data quality and outcome assessment. Materials & methods: In a stratified convenience sample of 15 studies, five used primary data from trials as ECAs, five used secondary data from EHRs and five used aggregate data from the literature. Data were collected from the published literature and public web resources, blinded to the eventual approval decision. Results: Studies using ECAs from primary data and EHR data displayed methods to achieve comparability of information, including matched baseline characteristics. Aggregate data from published studies did not attempt to match covariates. The EHR controls often showed calendar time overlap for collecting information while trial data were mostly historic. Outcome data were not consistently reported across studies. US FDA approval was only seen when primary data from trials or EHR data were used as the ECA, however no ECA in this sample directly contributed to approval. Discussion: In this nonsystematic review of ECAs for single-arm trials, the ECAs derived from primary data collected by other trials or EHRs show patterns of patient comparability, time overlap, and realistic methodological approaches to achieving balance between treatment arms. They are often submitted to regulators while literature-derived aggregate findings as ECA may serve as benchmarks for pipeline decisions.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Onyee Chan ◽  
Rami S Komrokji

Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signaling pathway is key to hematopoiesis regulation. Increased activation of this pathway contributes to ineffective terminal erythroid differentiation in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Luspatercept is a novel fusion protein that traps TGF-β ligands preventing them from binding to Type II TGF-β receptors, thereby decreasing phosphorylated SMAD2/3 resulting in the downstream effect of promoting erythropoiesis. Seminal clinical trials using luspatercept, PACE-MD and MEDALIST, demonstrated impressive efficacy in the treatment of transfusion-dependent anemia in intermediate risk or lower MDS had led to the US FDA approval for this indication. This review summarizes luspatercept mechanisms of action, efficacy/safety data supporting its use and ongoing clinical trials in MDS.


2003 ◽  
Vol 07 (22) ◽  
pp. 1391-1406

Alliance between AGT Biosciences and Starpharma. First Australian Biotech Company to List on HKSE. Breakthrough in Transdermal Drug Discovery Technology. Acrux Licenses MDTS Technology to Eli Lilly got Animal Health Products. Biota Secures SARS Testing Agreement with US Government Research Agencies. SysArris in Bio Partnering Europe 2003. Shantha Bio to Launch Streptokinase by Year-end. Lupin Receives US FDA Approval to Launch Ceftriaxone. MerLion Pharma Collaborates with Schering-Plough in Drug Discovery Research. Quest Pharmaceutical Sets up Taiwanese Subsidiary. BenQ to Invest in Nanjing's Medical Facilities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2071-2071 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Raza Khaki ◽  
Aakash Desai ◽  
Martin W. Schoen ◽  
Bishal Gyawali ◽  
Eddy J. Chen ◽  
...  

2071 Background: Publication of clinical trial results in peer reviewed literature is essential to inform clinicians regarding the use of new anti-cancer treatments, which often have a low therapeutic ratio and require careful assessment of risks and benefits. Publication of registration trials should precede FDA approval to facilitate evaluation and implementation of new therapies. The timing of trial publication relative to FDA drug approvals has not been systematically investigated. Methods: We collected all FDA drug approvals for a cancer indication between 2000-19. Trials were identified using FDA labels as well as drugs and publications indexed on HemOnc.org. Approvals for generics/biosimilars, non-oncology indications and label revisions without supportive evidence were excluded. Dates of approval, the approval pathway, approval type (new vs expansion), and the first full publication related to the registration were recorded. Trials and approvals were matched using available metadata. We calculated the proportion of drugs approved prior to publication overall and for those receiving accelerated approval (AA). We used logistic regression to compare rates of pre-publication approval by approval pathway and by new vs expanded approval. Results: Among a total of 378 drug approvals, 139 (37%) had pre-publication approval. Of these, the median overall time from approval to publication was 140 days (IQR 64-281 days). For those with approval after publication, median time from publication to approval was 157 days (IQR 72-359 days). The number of drugs approved pre-publication rose by 27% between the first and last quarters of the study period, though, the proportion decreased as more anti-cancer drugs have been approved in recent years (Table). More drugs were approved pre-publication through AA than regular approval (46% vs 34%, OR 1.66 [95% CI 1.03-2.70], p=0.04) and as new approvals vs. expanded approvals (45% vs 32%, OR 1.76 [95% CI 1.15-2.70], p=0.01). Conclusions: A substantial minority of FDA approvals occur before trial results are published, with the odds being higher for drugs receiving AA and for new approvals. Since clinicians rely upon published results to inform risk/benefit decisions, efforts are needed to ensure trial results are published by the time of FDA approval of new cancer drugs and indications. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document