The Catcher, Varadero and Burgman fields, Block 28/9a, UK North Sea

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 399-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Gibson ◽  
Dominic Riley ◽  
Stephen Kenyon-Roberts ◽  
Jacob Opata ◽  
Andy Beck ◽  
...  

AbstractThe Catcher area fields – Catcher, Varadero and Burgman – were discovered in the Central North Sea between 2010 and 2011. The three fields are found in Block 28/9a. Oil is produced from Eocene sandstones stratigraphically equivalent to the Cromarty and Tay Sandstone members of the Sele and Horda formations, respectively. The reservoir for the Catcher area fields was formed by the large-scale injection of sand from the Eocene Cromarty turbidite system into shallower Sele and Horda Formation mudstones to form the Greater Catcher area injectite complex. The Catcher area development is a floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) based development, with 18 production and injection wells drilled from two drilling templates per field, tied back to the centrally located BW Offshore Catcher FPSO. A further development well will be drilled in 2020 to complete the base development. A phased approach to development drilling, with focused data acquisition, allowed the well layout and count to be optimized as the fields were being developed. Excellent well results have meant that the well count has been reduced relative to the development plans at sanction while delivering an increase in predicted reserves. Further infill wells and satellite field development drilling is planned for the future.

2020 ◽  
pp. SP494-2019-61
Author(s):  
Stuart G. Archer ◽  
Tom McKie ◽  
Steven D. Andrews ◽  
Anne D. Wilkins ◽  
Matt Hutchison ◽  
...  

AbstractThe Triassic of the Central North Sea is a continental succession that contains prolific hydrocarbon-bearing fluvial sandstone reservoirs stratigraphically partitioned by mudstones. Within the Skagerrak Formation of the UK sector, hydrocarbon accumulations in the Judy, Joanne and Josephine Sandstone members are top sealed by the Julius, Jonathan and Joshua Mudstone members, respectively. However, UK and Norwegian stratigraphic correlations have been problematical for decades, largely due to biostratigraphic challenges but also due to the non-uniqueness of the lithotypes and because the cross-border stratigraphic nomenclature differs and has yet to be rationalized. This study focuses on mudstones rather than sandstones to unify cross-border correlation efforts at a regional scale. The mudstone members have been characterized by integrating sedimentological, petrophysical and geophysical data. The facies are indicative of playa lakes that frequently desiccated and preserved minor anhydrite. These conditions alternated with periods of marshy, palustrine conditions favourable for the formation of dolostones. Regional correlations have detected lateral facies changes in the mudstones which are important for their seismically mappable extents, resulting palaeogeographies and, ultimately, their competency as intraformational top seals. Significant diachroneity is associated with the lithological transitions at sandstone–mudstone member boundaries and although lithostratigraphic surfaces can be used as timelines over short distances (e.g. within a field), they should not be assumed to represent timelines over longer correlation lengths. Palaeoclimatic trends are interpreted and compared to those of adjacent regions to test the extent and impact of climate change as a predictive allogenic forcing factor on sedimentation. Mudstone member deposition occurred as a result of the retreat of large-scale terminal fluvial systems during a return to more arid ‘background’ climatic conditions. The cause of the member-scale climatic cyclicity observed within the Skagerrak Formation may be related to volcanic activity in large igneous provinces which triggered the episodic progradation of fluvial systems.


Clay Minerals ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 537-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Stewart

AbstractThe diagenetic history of the Upper Jurassic Fulmar Formation of the Central North Sea is described with emphasis on the Fulmar Field. The Fulmar Formation was deposited on a variably subsiding shallow-marine shelf under the influence of halokinetic and fault movements. The sediments are extensively bio-destratified although large-scale cross-bedding is locally preserved. The dominant mechanism of deposition is thought to have been storm-generated currents. Soft-sediment deformation structures are common and are attributed to syn- and post-depositional dewatering of the sandstones. The dewatering was associated with fractures and shear zones which reflect tectonic instability resulting from periodic salt withdrawal and/or graben fault movements. The dewatering may have been initiated by repacking of the sediments during earth movements or by the gradual build-up and sudden release of overpressures due to compaction and/or clay mineral dehydration during rapid burial at the end of the Cretaceous. The formation is composed of arkosic sandstone of similar composition to Triassic sandstones from which it was probably derived. The sandstones also contain limited amounts of marine biogenic debris including sponge solenasters, bivalve shells, rare ammonites and belemnites. Initial diagenesis began with an environment-related phase during which quartz and feldspar overgrowths and chalcedony and calcite cements were precipitated. These cements appear to form concretions adjacent to local concentrations of sponge debris and shell debris, respectively, and were disturbed after their formation by fracturing and dewatering. This was followed by an early burial stage of diagenesis which resulted in extensive dolomite cementation and minor clay mineral authigenesis (illite and chlorite). The last phase of mineral growth was probably pyrite. During early burial diagenesis, secondary porosity after feldspar and/or carbonate was produced, although the exact timing is not clear. The lack of both stylolitic developments and extensive illitization indicates that the late burial diagenesis stage was never reached, although sufficient clay diagenesis occurred to destroy all traces of mixed-layer illite-smectite (present in some shallower wells). The main control on reservoir behaviour is primary depositional fabric. Diagenesis only overprints these controls. Locally-cemented fracture sets act as baffles to fluid flow, but they are not extensive and the reservoir acts as one unit.


1991 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 369-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. J. McGann ◽  
S. C. H. Green ◽  
S. D. Harker ◽  
R. S. Romani

AbstractThe Scapa Field is located in UK North Sea Block 14/19 in the Witch Ground Graben, 112 miles northeast of Aberdeen. The field was discovered in 1975 by the 14/19–9 well which tested 32° API crude from the Scapa Sandstone Member of the Early Cretaceous Valhall Formation. The field is a combination structural/stratigraphic trap situated in a NW–SE trending syncline. Updip limit to the NE is by onlap termination of the reservoir sands onto the Claymore tilt block, and to the southwest by fault closure and/or sand pinch-out into tight conglomerates associated with the Halibut Shelf boundary fault. Two thinly bedded, fine- to medium-grained turbidite sand units, in partial pressure communication, form the oil–bearing zone within the Scapa Sandstone Member.Original oil in place was 206 MMBBL. In 1984, prior to development, a long-term production test was conducted via a deviated well drilled from the Claymore platform. Subsequent wells were thus drilled in a dynamic reservoir-pressure environment. Field development utilizes an integrated production/injection subsea template system tied back to the Claymore platform. Template production commenced in 1986 from currently estimated proved ultimate recoverable reserves of 63 MMBBL and averaged 28 000 BOPD in June 1988 from four production wells supported by four injection wells.


2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 770-779
Author(s):  
Ehsan Zabihi Naeini ◽  
Jalil Nasseri

Field appraisal and development plans aim to provide the best technical solution for optimizing hydrocarbon production and require integration between various disciplines including geology, geophysics, engineering, well planning, and environmental sciences. Seismic inversion could provide one essential component for reservoir modeling in support of appraisal and development evaluations. Therefore, it is important to quantitatively assess all of the possibilities and uncertainties involved in reservoir definition and extension. A probabilistic facies-based seismic inversion method has been utilized to achieve this goal in a recent Central North Sea discovery. The probabilistic nature of the inversion allows computation of various scenarios. We categorically selected, among others, most likely, optimistic, and pessimistic scenarios based on prior knowledge and calibration at the wells. Then, we performed a statistical analysis of all of the scenarios to identify the uncertainties. We also performed a postinversion forward-modeling study to assess uncertainties that may be related to thin layers of subseismic resolution.


2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 637-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Moore ◽  
James Archer ◽  
David Peavot

AbstractThe Alba Field is a relatively heavy oil accumulation lying in an Eocene deep-water channel complex in Block 16/26a of the Central North Sea. With an estimated 880 MMbbl in place, the reservoir is characterized by thick, high net/gross sands with excellent reservoir properties and rock physics favourable for seismic property detection. The field has been developed by horizontal production wells, with pressure support provided by seawater injectors. After 24 years of production, more than 427 MMbbl have been recovered.Over the course of the development, the results of development drilling and improved reservoir imaging from seismic have revealed greater reservoir complexity than anticipated at sanction. The highly irregular reservoir geometry is likely to reflect the internal stacking patterns of channel elements within the channel complex that are locally overprinted by post-depositional remobilization. This increased reservoir complexity has required more wells to effectively drain the expected volumes. Despite this, recovery has exceeded estimates from the initial field development plan, reflecting an extremely efficient waterflood. 4D seismic spectacularly images extensive sweep away from injectors and excellent reservoir connectivity. Throughout the development, the application of seismic technologies has been a key enabler for effective reservoir management and, looking forward, maximizing value.


2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 437-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Kilhams ◽  
Adam McArthur ◽  
Mads Huuse ◽  
Eyita Ita ◽  
Adrian Hartley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document