Identifying Symptom Clusters in Breast Cancer and Colorectal Cancer Patients using EHR Data

Author(s):  
Priyanka Gandhi ◽  
Xiao Luo ◽  
Susan Storey ◽  
Zuoyi Zhang ◽  
Zhi Han ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4696-4696
Author(s):  
Scott Davi d Ramsey ◽  
Jeannine S McCune ◽  
David K Blough ◽  
Lauren C Clarke ◽  
Cara L McDermott ◽  
...  

Abstract Chemotherapy regimens, patient factors, and the use of colony stimulating factor (CSF) influence cancer patients’ risk for febrile neutropenia (FN) when they receive myelosuppressive chemotherapy. The incidence of FN and patient factors influencing that risk are relatively unknown in community settings. Using claims from Medicare, Medicaid and two private health insurance plan enrollees linked to the Puget Sound SEER registry, we examined the incidence of FN among breast, lung and colorectal cancer patients diagnosed 2002–05 who received adjuvant chemotherapy. We used logistic regression models to determine factors influencing the risk for FN within the first chemotherapy cycle, controlling for cancer stage, age, sex, race, comorbidities, chemotherapy-regimen related FN risk (as designated by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network), CSF use, health insurance type, and surgery or radiation ≤30 days from administration of first chemotherapy. Over the time horizon, 1096 breast, 1142 lung, and 755 colorectal cancer patients received chemotherapy. The incidence of any FN in the first chemotherapy cycle was (counts per 100 recipients by high, intermediate, and low-risk myelosuppressive chemotherapy according to NCCN categories respectively) 7.36, 10.0, 4.70 for breast cancer, 17.12, 14.15, 12.22 for lung cancer, and 25.0, 8.96, 6.37 for colorectal cancer. Significant predictors (p<0.05) of any FN were: breast cancer—radiation ≤ 30 days from first chemotherapy administration (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.21–6.94), other non-black race vs. white race (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.29–6.17), or Medicaid insurance (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.10–4.89); lung cancer—radiation ≤ 30 days from first chemotherapy administration (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.01–2.61), surgery ≤ 30 days from first chemotherapy administration (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.02–4.25), Medicaid insurance (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.08–4.84), or a Charlson comorbidity score ≥ 2 (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.11–5.91); colorectal cancer—female gender (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.02–3.41) or high myelosuppressive risk chemotherapy regimen (OR 7.66, 95% CI 2.95–19.89). In this analysis, predictors of FN varied between cancers. Limitations of this analysis include lack of information about chemotherapy and CSF doses, as this is not captured in the SEER registry or claims data. These results indicate that several factors may interact to influence a patient’s likelihood of developing FN in the first cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (22;3) ◽  
pp. E147-E155
Author(s):  
Michael T. Halpern

Background: Pain is common among cancer patients. Nonclinical factors may affect receipt of pain management among Medicaid beneficiaries with cancer. Objectives: To examine associations of patient characteristics and US state-level Medicaid policies on receipt of interventional pain management among Medicaid beneficiaries with breast or colorectal cancer. Study Design: A retrospective analysis of 2006-2008 Medicaid claims data. Setting: Claims data from facilities providing care to Medicaid beneficiaries. Methods: Interventional pain management among Medicaid beneficiaries aged 18-64 years with breast or colorectal cancer was identified using procedure codes in Medicaid claims data. State-level Medicaid policy variables included physician visit reimbursements, required patient copayments, and time period for Medicaid eligibility recertification (12 vs. < 12 months). Analyses also examined beneficiary race/ethnicity, age, comorbidities, and cancer treatment. Generalized estimating equations controlling for clustering by state assessed factors influencing receipt of interventional pain management. Results: The study included 8,438 Medicaid beneficiaries with breast or colorectal cancer. Colorectal cancer (vs. breast cancer) patients were significantly more likely to receive interventional pain management. Medicaid policies were not significantly associated with receipt of interventional pain services. Among breast cancer patients, older age and non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity were associated with decreased likelihood of receiving interventional pain management; more comorbidities and receipt of breast conserving surgery were associated with increased likelihood. Demographic characteristics were not significantly associated with receipt of interventional pain management among colorectal cancer patients. Limitations: Sample size of Medicare beneficiaries with cancer receiving interventional pain management; limited information included in Medicare claims data. Conclusions: State-level Medicaid policies were not significantly associated with receipt of interventional pain management for breast or colorectal cancer patients; disparities in receipt of these services were observed only for breast cancer patients. These results may help develop policies to enhance access to appropriate pain management services. Key words: Cancer pain, pain management, Medicaid, health care disparities, breast neoplasms, colorectal neoplasms, health policies, physician practice patterns, retrospective studies, claims analyses


2020 ◽  
pp. 107815522095184
Author(s):  
Jolene Guenter ◽  
Shirin Abadi ◽  
Howard Lim ◽  
Stephen Chia ◽  
Ryan Woods ◽  
...  

Introduction Carcinogenesis is driven by an array of complex genomic patterns; these patterns can render an individual resistant or sensitive to certain chemotherapy agents. The Personalized Oncogenomics (POG) project at BC Cancer has performed integrative genomic analysis of whole tumour genomes and transcriptomes for over 700 patients with advanced cancers, with an aim to predict therapeutic sensitivities. The aim of this study was to utilize the POG genomic data to evaluate a discrete set of biomarkers associated with chemo-sensitivity or-resistance in advanced stage breast and colorectal cancer POG patients. Methods This was a retrospective multi-centre analysis across all BC CANCER sites. All breast and colorectal cancer patients enrolled in the POG program between July 1, 2012 and November 30, 2016 were eligible for inclusion. Within the breast cancer population, those treated with capecitabine, paclitaxel, and everolimus were analyzed, and for the colorectal cancer patients, those treated with capecitabine, bevacizumab, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin were analyzed. The expression levels of the selected biomarkers of interest ( EPHB4, FIGF, CD133, DICER1, DPYD, TYMP, TYMS, TAP1, TOP1, CKDN1A, ERCC1, GSTP1, BRCA1, PTEN, ABCB1, TLE3, and TXNDC17) were reported as mRNA percentiles. Results For the breast cancer population, there were 32 patients in the capecitabine cohort, 15 in the everolimus cohort, and 12 in the paclitaxel cohort. For the colorectal cancer population, there were 29 patients in the bevacizumab cohort, 12 in the oxaliplatin cohort, 29 in the irinotecan cohort, and 6 in the capecitabine cohort. Of the biomarkers evaluated, the strongest associations were found between Bevacizumab-based therapy and DICER1 (P = 0.0445); and between capecitabine therapy and TYMP (P = 0.0553). Conclusions Among breast cancer patients, higher TYMP expression was associated with sensitivity to capecitabine. Among colorectal cancer patients, higher DICER1 expression was associated with sensitivity to bevacizumab-based therapy. This study supports further assessment of the potential predictive value of mRNA expression of these genomic biomarkers.


1983 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
F J Ansfield ◽  
G J Kallas ◽  
J P Singson

A total of 65 patients with advanced colorectal or breast cancer were given oral tegafur in the phase I study. Of these, 28 patients had accurately measurable lesions and were entered into the phase II study. Patients with liver metastasis, compromised bone marrow, or a decreased oral intake to less than 50% of their normal intake were given a poor-risk schedule consisting of 0.75 g/m2/day divided into 4 doses/day X 28 day unless early toxicity developed. In the absence of any of the above deficits, patients were given a good-risk schedule of 1.25 g/m2/day X 21 days if no toxicity appeared. The courses were followed by a 2-3-wk rest period depending upon the speed to recovery from all reactions and then repeated. Compared with 5-FU, nausea and vomiting occurred more frequently with tegafur while hematologic toxicity was less common and less severe. The paucity of significant hematologic toxicity permitted courses of this drug to be given safely on an outpatient basis even to the point of slight reaction for optimal dosing. No serious reactions occurred in any of the 65 patients. The clinical results showed partial regressions in 6 of 21 colorectal cancer patients and 3 of 7 breast cancer patients. Six of the 9 responses occurred in patients who had previous 5-FU trials. The average duration of regression in the colorectal cancer patients on oral tegafur was 9 mo with a significantly increased survival of the responders.


2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.N. Tamkovich ◽  
N.V. Yunusova ◽  
M.N. Stakheeva ◽  
A.K. Somov ◽  
A.Y. Frolova ◽  
...  

A simple approach for isolation of exosomes from the blood plasma, which allows to obtain highly purified preparations of microvesicles no larger than 100 nm has been proposed. The presence of different subpopulations of exosomes in the blood plasma of healthy donors and cancer patients has been recognized. We found the presence of the universal markers CD9, CD24 and CD81 on exosomes isolated from blood plasma that can be used to their routine typing.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhou Jie ◽  
Zeng Zhiying ◽  
Li Li

AbstractUsing the method of meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the consistency of treatment schemes between Watson for Oncology (WFO) and Multidisciplinary Team (MDT), and to provide references for the practical application of artificial intelligence clinical decision-support system in cancer treatment. We systematically searched articles about the clinical applications of Watson for Oncology in the databases and conducted meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 software. A total of 9 studies were identified, including 2463 patients. When the MDT is consistent with WFO at the ‘Recommended’ or the ‘For consideration’ level, the overall concordance rate is 81.52%. Among them, breast cancer was the highest and gastric cancer was the lowest. The concordance rate in stage I–III cancer is higher than that in stage IV, but the result of lung cancer is opposite (P < 0.05).Similar results were obtained when MDT was only consistent with WFO at the "recommended" level. Moreover, the consistency of estrogen and progesterone receptor negative breast cancer patients, colorectal cancer patients under 70 years old or ECOG 0, and small cell lung cancer patients is higher than that of estrogen and progesterone positive breast cancer patients, colorectal cancer patients over 70 years old or ECOG 1–2, and non-small cell lung cancer patients, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Treatment recommendations made by WFO and MDT were highly concordant for cancer cases examined, but this system still needs further improvement. Owing to relatively small sample size of the included studies, more well-designed, and large sample size studies are still needed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 1015-1024
Author(s):  
Fabiola Müller ◽  
Marrit A. Tuinman ◽  
Ellen Stephenson ◽  
Ans Smink ◽  
Anita DeLongis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document