A myogenic regulatory gene, qmf1, is expressed by adult myonuclei after injury

1993 ◽  
Vol 265 (2) ◽  
pp. C397-C405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. A. Eppley ◽  
J. Kim ◽  
B. Russell

Myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) induce differentiation in developing muscle. We examined the role of MRFs in the repair of adult muscle using a model of stretch-induced injury in 5-wk-old chickens. The anterior latissimus dorsi muscle was stretched by loading the wing with 10% of body weight, while the contralateral muscle served as a control. At various intervals (0.5-72 h), chickens were killed by CO2 asphyxiation and the muscles were frozen. Slot hybridizations showed that the onset of high qmf1 expression occurred as early as 0.5 h, which was before regenerative processes involving satellite cell proliferation were observed. Maximal qmf1 expression varied among animals from 3 to 16 h and returned to control levels by 72 h. Within a muscle, in situ hybridization showed that maximal qmf1 expression varied spatially with > 60% of the nuclei within active fascicles being positive. We interpret this high percentage to mean that many of the nuclei of preexisting muscle fibers must be expressing qmf1. The expression of the protooncogene c-myc (presumably by proliferating cells such as satellite cells, fibroblasts, and capillary epithelial cells) and the MRF qmf1 (by myoblasts and adult muscle nuclei) are among the early molecular responses of injured muscle. We conclude that myogenic regulatory factors are not permanently repressed after embryonic development and that derepression plays a role in the repair of terminally differentiated myofibers.

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 865
Author(s):  
H. Hagiwara ◽  
H. Shan ◽  
T. Masaki ◽  
M. Ikeda ◽  
T. Shimizu ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 263-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren S. Elcock ◽  
Joanna M. Bridger

Since the advent of FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization), there have been major advances in our understanding of how the genome is organized in interphase nuclei. Indeed, this organization is found to be non-random and individual chromosomes occupy discrete regions known as territories. Determining the factors that drive the spatial positioning of these territories within nuclei has caused much debate; however, in proliferating cells, there is evidently a correlation between radial positioning and gene density. Indeed, gene-poor chromosomes tend to be located towards the nuclear edge, while those that are more gene-rich are positioned more internally. These observations pose a number of questions: first, what is the function of this global organization and, secondly, is it representative of that occurring at a more local scale? During the course of this review, these questions will be considered, in light of the current literature regarding the role of transcription factories and the nuclear matrix in interphase genome organization.


1997 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 475-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Olive ◽  
J. A. Martinez-Matos ◽  
P. Pirretas ◽  
M. Povedano ◽  
C. Navarro ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolò Maria della Ventura ◽  
Szilvia Kalácska ◽  
Daniele Casari ◽  
Thomas Edward James Edwards ◽  
Johann Michler ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan N. Jordan ◽  
Eric P. Nichols ◽  
Alfred B. Cunningham

Bioavailability is herein defined as the accessibility of a substrate by a microorganism. Further, bioavailability is governed by (1) the substrate concentration that the cell membrane “sees,” (i.e., the “directly bioavailable” pool) as well as (2) the rate of mass transfer from potentially bioavailable (e.g., nonaqueous) phases to the directly bioavailable (e.g., aqueous) phase. Mechanisms by which sorbed (bio)surfactants influence these two processes are discussed. We propose the hypothesis that the sorption of (bio)surfactants at the solid-liquid interface is partially responsible for the increased bioavailability of surface-bound nutrients, and offer this as a basis for suggesting the development of engineered in-situ bioremediation technologies that take advantage of low (bio)surfactant concentrations. In addition, other industrial systems where bioavailability phenomena should be considered are addressed.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly D. Myers ◽  
◽  
Katrina Lee Jewell ◽  
P.S.K. Knappett ◽  
Mehtaz M. Lipsi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document