scholarly journals Endothelial nitric oxide synthase control mechanisms in the cutaneous vasculature of humans in vivo

2008 ◽  
Vol 295 (1) ◽  
pp. H123-H129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean L. Kellogg ◽  
Joan L. Zhao ◽  
Yubo Wu
Keyword(s):  
Nitric Oxide ◽  
Heat Stress ◽  
Local Heating ◽  
Ringer Solution ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Control Mechanisms ◽  
Local Skin ◽  
Doppler Flowmetry ◽  
Whole Body Heat Stress ◽  
Body Heat

Nitric oxide (NO) participates in locally mediated vasodilation induced by increased local skin temperature (Tloc) and in sympathetically mediated vasodilation during whole body heat stress. We hypothesized that endothelial NOS (eNOS) participates in the former, but not the latter, response. We tested this hypothesis by examining the effects of the eNOS antagonist NG-amino-l-arginine (l-NAA) on skin blood flow (SkBF) responses to increased Tloc and whole body heat stress. Microdialysis probes were inserted into forearm skin for drug delivery. One microdialysis site was perfused with l-NAA in Ringer solution and a second site with Ringer solution alone. SkBF [laser-Doppler flowmetry (LDF)] and blood pressure [mean arterial pressure (MAP)] were monitored, and cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) was calculated (CVC = LDF ÷ MAP). In protocol 1, Tloc was controlled with LDF/local heating units. Tloc initially was held at 34°C and then increased to 41.5°C. In protocol 2, after a normothermic period, whole body heat stress was induced (water-perfused suits). At the end of both protocols, 58 mM sodium nitroprusside was perfused at both microdialysis sites to cause maximal vasodilation for data normalization. In protocol 1, CVC at 34°C Tloc did not differ between l-NAA-treated and untreated sites ( P > 0.05). Local skin warming to 41.5°C Tloc increased CVC at both sites. This response was attenuated at l-NAA-treated sites ( P < 0.05). In protocol 2, during normothermia, CVC did not differ between l-NAA-treated and untreated sites ( P > 0.05). During heat stress, CVC rose to similar levels at l-NAA-treated and untreated sites ( P > 0.05). We conclude that eNOS is predominantly responsible for NO generation in skin during responses to increased Tloc, but not during reflex responses to whole body heat stress.

scholarly journals Roles of nitric oxide synthase isoforms in cutaneous vasodilation induced by local warming of the skin and whole body heat stress in humans

2009 ◽  
Vol 107 (5) ◽  
pp. 1438-1444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean L. Kellogg ◽  
Joan L. Zhao ◽  
Yubo Wu
Keyword(s):  
Nitric Oxide ◽  
Heat Stress ◽  
No Synthase ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Doppler Flowmetry ◽  
Vasodilator Response ◽  
Cutaneous Vasodilation ◽  
Forearm Skin ◽  
Whole Body Heat Stress ◽  
Body Heat

Nitric oxide (NO) participates in the cutaneous vasodilation caused by increased local skin temperature (Tloc) and whole body heat stress in humans. In forearm skin, endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) participates in vasodilation due to elevated Tloc and neuronal NO synthase (nNOS) participates in vasodilation due to heat stress. To explore the relative roles and interactions of these isoforms, we examined the effects of a relatively specific eNOS inhibitor, Nω-amino-l-arginine (LNAA), and a specific nNOS inhibitor, Nω-propyl-l-arginine (NPLA), both separately and in combination, on skin blood flow (SkBF) responses to increased Tloc and heat stress in two protocols. In each protocol, SkBF was monitored by laser-Doppler flowmetry (LDF) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) by Finapres. Cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) was calculated (CVC = LDF/MAP). Intradermal microdialysis was used to treat one site with 5 mM LNAA, another with 5 mM NPLA, a third with combined 5 mM LNAA and 5 mM NPLA (Mix), and a fourth site with Ringer only. In protocol 1, Tloc was controlled with combined LDF/local heating units. Tloc was increased from 34°C to 41.5°C to cause local vasodilation. In protocol 2, after a period of normothermia, whole body heat stress was induced (water-perfused suits). At the end of each protocol, all sites were perfused with 58 mM nitroprusside to effect maximal vasodilation for data normalization. In protocol 1, at Tloc = 34°C, CVC did not differ between sites ( P > 0.05). LNAA and Mix attenuated CVC increases at Tloc = 41.5°C to similar extents ( P < 0.05, LNAA or Mix vs. untreated or NPLA). In protocol 2, in normothermia, CVC did not differ between sites ( P > 0.05). During heat stress, NPLA and Mix attenuated CVC increases to similar extents, but no significant attenuation occurred with LNAA ( P < 0.05, NPLA or Mix vs. untreated or LNAA). In forearm skin, eNOS mediates the vasodilator response to increased Tloc and nNOS mediates the vasodilator response to heat stress. The two isoforms do not appear to interact during either response.

Nitric oxide concentration increases in the cutaneous interstitial space during heat stress in humans

2003 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
pp. 1971-1977 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Kellogg ◽  
J. L. Zhao ◽  
C. Friel ◽  
L. J. Roman
Keyword(s):  
Nitric Oxide ◽  
Heat Stress ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Microdialysis Probe ◽  
Doppler Flowmetry ◽  
Oxide Concentration ◽  
Nitric Oxide Concentration ◽  
Whole Body Heat Stress ◽  
Body Heat

To examine the role of nitric oxide (NO) in cutaneous active vasodilation, we measured the NO concentration from skin before and during whole body heat stress in nine healthy subjects. A forearm site was instrumented with a NO-selective, amperometric electrode and an adjacent intradermal microdialysis probe. Skin blood flow (SkBF) was monitored by laser-Doppler flowmetry (LDF). NO concentrations and LDF were measured in normothermia and heat stress. After heat stress, a solution of ACh was perfused through the microdialysis probe to pharmacologically generate NO and verify the electrode's function. During whole body warming, both SkBF and NO concentrations began to increase at the same internal temperature. Both SkBF and NO concentrations increased during heat stress (402 ± 76% change from LDF baseline, P < 0.05; 22 ± 5% change from NO baseline, P < 0.05). During a second baseline condition after heat stress, ACh perfusion led to increases in both SkBF and NO concentrations (496 ± 119% change from LDF baseline, P < 0.05; 16 ± 10% change from NO baseline, P < 0.05). We conclude that NO does increase in skin during heat stress in humans, attendant to active vasodilation. This result suggests that NO has a role beyond that of a permissive factor in the process; rather, NO may well be an effector of cutaneous vasodilation during heat stress.

scholarly journals Effect of whole body heat stress on peripheral vasoconstriction during leg dependency

2009 ◽  
Vol 107 (6) ◽  
pp. 1704-1709 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Matthew Brothers ◽  
Jonathan E. Wingo ◽  
Kimberly A. Hubing ◽  
Juan Del Coso ◽  
Craig G. Crandall
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Heat Stress ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Doppler Flowmetry ◽  
Local Mechanism ◽  
Whole Body Heat Stress ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
Absolute Decrease ◽  
Body Heat

The venoarteriolar response (VAR) increases vascular resistance upon increases in venous transmural pressure in cutaneous, subcutaneous, and muscle vascular beds. During orthostasis, it has been proposed that up to 45% of the increase in systemic vascular tone is due to VAR-related local mechanism(s). The objective of this project was to test the hypothesis that heat stress attenuates VAR-mediated cutaneous and whole leg vasoconstriction. During normothermic conditions, measurements of cutaneous blood flow (laser-Doppler flowmetry) and femoral artery blood flow (Doppler ultrasound) were obtained from both legs during supine and leg-dependent conditions. These measurements were repeated following a whole body heat stress (increase in internal temperature of 1.4 ± 0.2°C). Before leg dependency, cutaneous (CVC) and femoral vascular conductances (FVC) were significantly elevated in both legs during heat stress relative to normothermia ( P < 0.001). During leg dependency the absolute decrease in CVC was attenuated during heat stress ( P < 0.01) while the absolute decrease in FVC was unaffected ( P = 0.90). When CVC and FVC data were analyzed as a relative change from their respective baseline values, heat stress significantly attenuated the magnitude of vasoconstriction due to leg dependency in the cutaneous and femoral circulations ( P < 0.001 for both variables). These data suggest that an attenuated local vasoconstriction, evoked via the venoarteriolar response, may contribute to reduced blood pressure control and thus reduced orthostatic tolerance that occurs in heat-stressed individuals.

scholarly journals Antagonism of soluble guanylyl cyclase attenuates cutaneous vasodilation during whole body heat stress and local warming in humans

2011 ◽  
Vol 110 (5) ◽  
pp. 1406-1413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean L. Kellogg ◽  
Joan L. Zhao ◽  
Yubo Wu ◽  
John M. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Heat Stress ◽  
Guanylyl Cyclase ◽  
Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Local Skin ◽  
Cutaneous Vasodilation ◽  
Local Skin Temperature ◽  
Whole Body Heat Stress ◽  
Body Heat

We hypothesized that nitric oxide activation of soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) participates in cutaneous vasodilation during whole body heat stress and local skin warming. We examined the effects of the sGC inhibitor, 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ), on reflex skin blood flow responses to whole body heat stress and on nonreflex responses to increased local skin temperature. Blood flow was monitored by laser-Doppler flowmetry, and blood pressure by Finapres to calculate cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC). Intradermal microdialysis was used to treat one site with 1 mM ODQ in 2% DMSO and Ringer, a second site with 2% DMSO in Ringer, and a third site received Ringer. In protocol 1, after a period of normothermia, whole body heat stress was induced. In protocol 2, local heating units warmed local skin temperature from 34 to 41°C to cause local vasodilation. In protocol 1, in normothermia, CVC did not differ among sites [ODQ, 15 ± 3% maximum CVC (CVCmax); DMSO, 14 ± 3% CVCmax; Ringer, 17 ± 6% CVCmax; P > 0.05]. During heat stress, ODQ attenuated CVC increases (ODQ, 54 ± 4% CVCmax; DMSO, 64 ± 4% CVCmax; Ringer, 63 ± 4% CVCmax; P < 0.05, ODQ vs. DMSO or Ringer). In protocol 2, at 34°C local temperature, CVC did not differ among sites (ODQ, 17 ± 2% CVCmax; DMSO, 18 ± 4% CVCmax; Ringer, 18 ± 3% CVCmax; P > 0.05). ODQ attenuated CVC increases at 41°C local temperature (ODQ, 54 ± 5% CVCmax; DMSO, 86 ± 4% CVCmax; Ringer, 90 ± 2% CVCmax; P < 0.05 ODQ vs. DMSO or Ringer). sGC participates in neurogenic active vasodilation during heat stress and in the local response to direct skin warming.

scholarly journals Local heating, but not indirect whole body heating, increases human skeletal muscle blood flow

2011 ◽  
Vol 111 (3) ◽  
pp. 818-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilkka Heinonen ◽  
R. Matthew Brothers ◽  
Jukka Kemppainen ◽  
Juhani Knuuti ◽  
Kari K. Kalliokoski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Heat Stress ◽  
Local Heating ◽  
Muscle Blood Flow ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Skeletal Muscle Blood Flow ◽  
Whole Body Heat Stress ◽  
Body Heat ◽  
Indirect Heating

For decades it was believed that direct and indirect heating (the latter of which elevates blood and core temperatures without directly heating the area being evaluated) increases skin but not skeletal muscle blood flow. Recent results, however, suggest that passive heating of the leg may increase muscle blood flow. Using the technique of positron-emission tomography, the present study tested the hypothesis that both direct and indirect heating increases muscle blood flow. Calf muscle and skin blood flows were evaluated from eight subjects during normothermic baseline, during local heating of the right calf [only the right calf was exposed to the heating source (water-perfused suit)], and during indirect whole body heat stress in which the left calf was not exposed to the heating source. Local heating increased intramuscular temperature of the right calf from 33.4 ± 1.0°C to 37.4 ± 0.8°C, without changing intestinal temperature. This stimulus increased muscle blood flow from 1.4 ± 0.5 to 2.3 ± 1.2 ml·100 g−1·min−1 ( P < 0.05), whereas skin blood flow under the heating source increased from 0.7 ± 0.3 to 5.5 ± 1.5 ml·100 g−1·min−1 ( P < 0.01). While whole body heat stress increased intestinal temperature by ∼1°C, muscle blood flow in the calf that was not directly exposed to the water-perfused suit (i.e., indirect heating) did not increase during the whole body heat stress (normothermia: 1.6 ± 0.5 ml·100 g−1·min−1; heat stress: 1.7 ± 0.3 ml·100 g−1·min−1; P = 0.87). Whole body heating, however, reflexively increased calf skin blood flow (to 4.0 ± 1.5 ml·100 g−1·min−1) in the area not exposed to the water-perfused suit. These data show that local, but not indirect, heating increases calf skeletal muscle blood flow in humans. These results have important implications toward the reconsideration of previously accepted blood flow distribution during whole body heat stress.

scholarly journals Heat Stress and Cardiovascular, Hormonal, and Heat Shock Proteins in Humans

2012 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaki Iguchi ◽  
Andrew E. Littmann ◽  
Shuo-Hsiu Chang ◽  
Lydia A. Wester ◽  
Jane S. Knipper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Heat Stress ◽  
Heat Shock ◽  
Body Temperature ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Whole Body Heat Stress ◽  
Body Heat

Context: Conditions such as osteoarthritis, obesity, and spinal cord injury limit the ability of patients to exercise, preventing them from experiencing many well-documented physiologic stressors. Recent evidence indicates that some of these stressors might derive from exercise-induced body temperature increases. Objective: To determine whether whole-body heat stress without exercise triggers cardiovascular, hormonal, and extra-cellular protein responses of exercise. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: University research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Twenty-five young, healthy adults (13 men, 12 women; age = 22.1 ± 2.4 years, height = 175.2 ± 11.6 cm, mass = 69.4 ± 14.8 kg, body mass index = 22.6 ± 4.0) volunteered. Intervention(s): Participants sat in a heat stress chamber with heat (73°C) and without heat (26°C) stress for 30 minutes on separate days. We obtained blood samples from a subset of 13 participants (7 men, 6 women) before and after exposure to heat stress. Main Outcome Measure(s): Extracellular heat shock protein (HSP72) and catecholamine plasma concentration, heart rate, blood pressure, and heat perception. Results: After 30 minutes of heat stress, body temperature measured via rectal sensor increased by 0.8°C. Heart rate increased linearly to 131.4 ± 22.4 beats per minute (F6,24 = 186, P &lt; .001) and systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased by 16 mm Hg (F6,24 = 10.1, P &lt; .001) and 5 mm Hg (F6,24 = 5.4, P &lt; .001), respectively. Norepinephrine (F1,12 = 12.1, P = .004) and prolactin (F1,12 = 30.2, P &lt; .001) increased in the plasma (58% and 285%, respectively) (P &lt; .05). The HSP72 (F1,12 = 44.7, P &lt; .001) level increased with heat stress by 48.7% ± 53.9%. No cardiovascular or blood variables showed changes during the control trials (quiet sitting in the heat chamber with no heat stress), resulting in differences between heat and control trials. Conclusions: We found that whole-body heat stress triggers some of the physiologic responses observed with exercise. Future studies are necessary to investigate whether carefully prescribed heat stress constitutes a method to augment or supplement exercise.

scholarly journals Carotid baroreflex control of heart rate is enhanced during whole‐body heat stress

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Davor Krnjajic ◽  
Cory L Butts ◽  
W Shane Warren ◽  
Mitchel R Samels ◽  
David M Keller
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Heat Stress ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Baroreflex Control ◽  
Carotid Baroreflex ◽  
Whole Body Heat Stress ◽  
Body Heat

Whole body heat stress fails to limit infarct size in the reperfused rabbit heart

1992 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M Yellon ◽  
E. Iliodromitis ◽  
D. S Latchman ◽  
D. M V. Winkle ◽  
J. M Downey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Stress ◽  
Infarct Size ◽  
Rabbit Heart ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Whole Body Heat Stress ◽  
Body Heat

scholarly journals Modelflow underestimates cardiac output in heat-stressed individuals

2011 ◽  
Vol 300 (2) ◽  
pp. R486-R491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manabu Shibasaki ◽  
Thad E. Wilson ◽  
Morten Bundgaard-Nielsen ◽  
Thomas Seifert ◽  
Niels H. Secher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Heat Stress ◽  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Lower Body Negative Pressure ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Arterial Cannulation ◽  
Artery Cannulation ◽  
Whole Body Heat Stress ◽  
Acute Changes ◽  
Body Heat

An estimation of cardiac output can be obtained from arterial pressure waveforms using the Modelflow method. However, whether the assumptions associated with Modelflow calculations are accurate during whole body heating is unknown. This project tested the hypothesis that cardiac output obtained via Modelflow accurately tracks thermodilution-derived cardiac outputs during whole body heat stress. Acute changes of cardiac output were accomplished via lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) during normothermic and heat-stressed conditions. In nine healthy normotensive subjects, arterial pressure was measured via brachial artery cannulation and the volume-clamp method of the Finometer. Cardiac output was estimated from both pressure waveforms using the Modeflow method. In normothermic conditions, cardiac outputs estimated via Modelflow (arterial cannulation: 6.1 ± 1.0 l/min; Finometer 6.3 ± 1.3 l/min) were similar with cardiac outputs measured by thermodilution (6.4 ± 0.8 l/min). The subsequent reduction in cardiac output during LBNP was also similar among these methods. Whole body heat stress elevated internal temperature from 36.6 ± 0.3 to 37.8 ± 0.4°C and increased cardiac output from 6.4 ± 0.8 to 10.9 ± 2.0 l/min when evaluated with thermodilution ( P < 0.001). However, the increase in cardiac output estimated from the Modelflow method for both arterial cannulation (2.3 ± 1.1 l/min) and Finometer (1.5 ± 1.2 l/min) was attenuated compared with thermodilution (4.5 ± 1.4 l/min, both P < 0.01). Finally, the reduction in cardiac output during LBNP while heat stressed was significantly attenuated for both Modelflow methods (cannulation: −1.8 ± 1.2 l/min, Finometer: −1.5 ± 0.9 l/min) compared with thermodilution (−3.8 ± 1.19 l/min). These results demonstrate that the Modelflow method, regardless of Finometer or direct arterial waveforms, underestimates cardiac output during heat stress and during subsequent reductions in cardiac output via LBNP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document