Olfactory bulb potentials evoked by electrical stimulation of the contralateral bulb

1959 ◽  
Vol 196 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond R. Walsh

A single, short-duration electrical stimulus delivered to one olfactory bulb evokes a potential in the contralateral bulb. As recorded with a unipolar electrode, the potential is negative central to, and positive peripheral to the external plexiform layer. Bipolar recordings from multiple sites show that the potential is not actively propagated. The potential summates in response to tetanic stimulation and is blocked by anoxia and dimethyl ether d-tubocurarine. In addition to confirming the existence of an interolfactory bulb system, the electrophysiological evidence in conjunction with known anatomical relationships strongly suggests that the evoked potential is a postsynaptic potential of the internal granular cells.

1990 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 932-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. P. Wellis ◽  
J. W. Scott

1. Intracellular recordings were made from 28 granule cells and 6 periglomerular cells of the rat olfactory bulb during odor stimulation and electrical stimulation of the olfactory nerve layer (ONL) and lateral olfactory tract (LOT). Neurons were identified by injection of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) or biocytin and/or intracellular response characteristics. Odorants were presented in a cyclic sniff paradigm, as reported previously. 2. All interneurons could be activated from a wide number of stimulation sites on the ONL, with distances exceeding their known dendritic spreads and the dispersion of nerve fibers within the ONL, indicating that multisynaptic pathways must also exist at the glomerular region. All types of interneurons also responded to odorant stimulation, showing a variety of responses. 3. Granule cells responded to electrical stimulation of the LOT and ONL as reported previously. However, intracellular potential, excitability, and conductance analysis suggested that the mitral cell-mediated excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) is followed by a long inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP). An early negative potential, before the EPSP, was also observed in every granule cell and correlated with component I of the extracellular LOT-induced field potential. We have interpreted this negativity as a "field effect," that may be diagnostic of granule cells. 4. Most granule cells exhibited excitatory responses to odorant stimulation. Odors could produce spiking responses that were either nonhabituating (response to every sniff) or rapidly habituating (response to first sniff only). Other granule cells, while spiking to electrical stimulation, showed depolarizations that did not evoke spikes to odor stimulation. These depolarizations were transient with each sniff or sustained across a series of sniffs. These physiological differences to odor stimulation correlated with granule cell position beneath the mitral cell layer for 12 cells, suggesting that morphological subtypes of granule cells may show physiological differences. Some features of the granule cell odor responses seem to correlate with some of the features we have observed in mitral/tufted cell intracellular recordings. Only one cell showed inhibition to odors. 5. Periglomerular (PG) cells showed a response to ONL stimulation that was unlike that found in other olfactory bulb neurons. There was a long-duration hyperpolarization after a spike and large depolarization or burst of spikes (20-30 ms in duration). Odor stimulation produced simple bursts of action potentials, Odor stimulation produced simple bursts of action potentials, suggesting that PG cells may simply follow input from the olfactory nerve.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


2018 ◽  
Vol 361 ◽  
pp. 23-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Pastras ◽  
Ian S. Curthoys ◽  
Ljiljana Sokolic ◽  
Daniel J. Brown

1993 ◽  
Vol 264 (3) ◽  
pp. G486-G491 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Tougas ◽  
P. Hudoba ◽  
D. Fitzpatrick ◽  
R. H. Hunt ◽  
A. R. Upton

Cerebral evoked responses following direct electrical stimulation of the vagus and esophagus were compared in 8 epileptic subjects and with those recorded after esophageal stimulation in 12 healthy nonepileptic controls. Direct vagal stimulation was performed using a left cervical vagal pacemaker, which is used in the treatment of epilepsy. Esophageal stimulation was obtained with the use of an esophageal assembly incorporating two electrodes positioned 5 and 20 cm orad to the lower esophageal sphincter. Evoked potential responses were recorded with the use of 20 scalp electrodes. The evoked potential responses consisted of three distinct negative peaks and were similar with the use of either vagal or esophageal stimulation. The measured conduction velocity of the afferent response was 7.5 m/s in epileptic subjects and 10 m/s in healthy controls, suggesting that afferent conduction is through A delta-fibers rather than slower C afferent fibers. We conclude that the cortical-evoked potential responses following esophageal electrical stimulation are comparable to direct electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve and involve mostly A delta-fibers. This approach provides a method for the assessment of vagal afferent gastrointestinal sensory pathways in health and disease.


1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 3373-3379 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. Moschovakis ◽  
Y. Dalezios ◽  
J. Petit ◽  
A. A. Grantyn

Moschovakis, A. K., Y. Dalezios, J. Petit, and A. A. Grantyn. New mechanism that accounts for position sensitivity of saccades evoked in response to stimulation of superior colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 3373–3379, 1998. Electrical stimulation of the feline superior colliculus (SC) is known to evoke saccades whose size depends on the site stimulated (the “characteristic vector” of evoked saccades) and the initial position of the eyes. Similar stimuli were recently shown to produce slow drifts that are presumably caused by relatively direct projections of the SC onto extraocular motoneurons. Both slow and fast evoked eye movements are similarly affected by the initial position of the eyes, despite their dissimilar metrics, kinematics, and anatomic substrates. We tested the hypothesis that the position sensitivity of evoked saccades is due to the superposition of largely position-invariant saccades and position-dependent slow drifts. We show that such a mechanism can account for the fact that the position sensitivity of evoked saccades increases together with the size of their characteristic vector. Consistent with it, the position sensitivity of saccades drops considerably when the contribution of slow drifts is minimal as, for example, when there is no overlap between evoked saccades and short-duration trains of high-frequency stimuli.


1988 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Inokuchi ◽  
Thomas V. Boran ◽  
Charles P. Kimmelman ◽  
James B. Snow

The effects of electrical stimulation of the olfactory bulb and the locus ceruleus on olfactory tubercle neurons were examined in rat models. Ipsilateral stimulation of the olfactory bulb produced excitation in 31% of olfactory tubercle neurons tested and inhibition in 17%. Twenty-two percent of the olfactory tubercle neurons were excited, whereas 9% were inhibited by ipsilateral stimulation of the locus ceruleus. Contralateral stimulation of the locus ceruleus produced similar responses in the same neuron entities. A negative-positive evoked potential was recorded in the olfactory tubercle after ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation of the locus ceruleus. Thirty-three percent of the olfactory tubercle neurons that responded orthodromically or antidromically to stimulation of the olfactory bulb were excited by ipsilateral stimulation of the locus ceruleus. In contrast, only 10% responded with excitation to ipsilateral stimulation of the locus ceruleus among the olfactory tubercle neurons that were unresponsive to stimulation of the olfactory bulb. These findings suggest that olfactory tubercle neurons that receive input from or sending output to the olfactory bulb are influenced by the noradrenergic system of the locus ceruleus. A possible role of the olfactory tubercle in olfactory transduction will also be discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document