Paraventricular stimulation with glutamate elicits bradycardia and pituitary responses

1989 ◽  
Vol 256 (1) ◽  
pp. R112-R119 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. N. Darlington ◽  
M. Miyamoto ◽  
L. C. Keil ◽  
M. F. Dallman

The excitatory neurotransmitter, L-glutamate (0.5 M, pH 7.4), or the organic acid, acetate (0.5 M, pH 7.4), was microinjected (50 nl over 2 min) directly into the paraventricular nuclei (PVN) of pentobarbital sodium-anesthetized rats while arterial blood pressure and heart rate and plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), vasopressin, and oxytocin were measured. Activation of PVN neurons with L-glutamate led to increases in plasma ACTH, vasopressin, and oxytocin and a profound bradycardia (approximately 80 beats/min) with little change in arterial blood pressure. Microinjection of acetate had no effect on the above variables. The decrease in heart rate was shown to be dependent on the concentration of glutamate injected and the volume of injectate. The bradycardia was mediated through the autonomic nervous system because ganglionic blockade (pentolinium tartrate) eliminated the response; atropine and propranolol severely attenuated the bradycardia. The bradycardia was greatest when L-glutamate was microinjected into the caudal PVN. Injections into the rostral PVN or into nuclei surrounding the PVN led to small or nonsignificant decreases in heart rate. Focal electric stimulation (2-50 microA) of the PVN also led to decreases in heart rate and arterial blood pressure. These data suggest that activation of PVN neurons leads to the release of ACTH, vasopressin, and oxytocin from the pituitary and a bradycardia that is mediated by the autonomic nervous system.

2018 ◽  
Vol 121 (8) ◽  
pp. e98-e99
Author(s):  
Sercan Okutucu ◽  
Mustafa Civelekler ◽  
Hakan Aksoy ◽  
Begum Yetis Sayin ◽  
Cengiz Sabanoglu ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 442-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose M. Martinez ◽  
Amir Garakani ◽  
Horacio Kaufmann ◽  
Cindy J. Aaronson ◽  
Jack M. Gorman

2011 ◽  
pp. 141-148
Author(s):  
James R. Munis

Physiologist Claude Bernard lived in a time when very little was known about the mechanisms underlying physiologic findings, and he had ample access to clues garnered from observing machines. Let's consider homeostasis (a concept championed by Bernard), an example for which an engineered machine shed light on a fundamental principle of physiology. Homeostasis is simply the tendency of the body to maintain important physiologic variables (eg, heart rate, blood pressure, PACO2) at constant, preset values. An example is a simplified mechanical governor that could be used to regulate the rotational speed of a steam engine shaft. ‘Autoregulate’ might be a more apt word because the governor performs without external help or guidance, provided it is designed and built properly. It doesn't take much imagination to see an analogy between the mechanical governor and the autonomic nervous system. Both maintain specific variables at a constant set point through a process of feedback loops.


1983 ◽  
Vol 244 (1) ◽  
pp. H115-H120 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. C. Houck ◽  
M. J. Fiksen-Olsen ◽  
S. L. Britton ◽  
J. C. Romero

This study was designed to investigate the possible role of angiotensin and vasopressin in the maintenance of arterial blood pressure during acute blockade of the autonomic nervous system. Two groups of eight dogs each were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium, and autonomic ganglia were blocked with hexamethonium (20 mg/kg). Thirty minutes later group 1 received the vasopressin antagonist 1-(beta-mercapto-beta, beta-cyclopentamethylene propionic acid),2-(O-methyl)tyrosine arginine vasopressin (10 micrograms/kg) followed after a 30-min interval by captopril (1 mg/kg). Group 2 received the same drugs, except the order of administration of vasopressin antagonist and captopril was reversed. Vasopressin antagonist during ganglionic blockade (group 2) produced a greater fall in blood pressure than did captopril during ganglionic blockade (group 1). These data indicate that vasopressin plays a greater pressor role than angiotensin in the acute response to ganglionic blockade. Additional studies were performed to determine if the autonomic nervous system alone can support the resting blood pressure in the anesthetized dog. Combined blockade of angiotensin and vasopressin without autonomic blockade produced a significant decrease in blood pressure, suggesting that the autonomic nervous system alone is not able to support the control blood pressure in the anesthetized dog.


1995 ◽  
Vol 268 (6) ◽  
pp. H2302-H2310 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Weichert ◽  
C. A. Courneya

We examined the response to hemorrhage in conscious normotensive and hypertensive rabbits under control conditions and during efferent blockade of 1) the hormones vasopressin (AVP) and angiotensin II (ANG II), 2) the autonomic nervous system, and 3) autonomic and hormonal inputs. We recorded mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and hindlimb conductance. The response to hemorrhage was unchanged with hormonal blockade alone. Blockade of the autonomic nervous system caused a faster rate of blood pressure decline, but the rate of decrease in hindlimb conductance was maintained at control levels. Blocking the autonomic nervous system and the hormones resulted in rapid blood pressure decline and an increase in hindlimb conductance. Although the three types of efferent blockade had a similar pattern of effects in normotensive and hypertensive rabbits, hypertensive rabbits exhibited less cardiovascular support during hemorrhage than normotensive rabbits. During hemorrhage, hypertensive rabbits had an attenuation of hindlimb vasoconstriction, a reduction in the heart rate-mean arterial pressure relationship, and reduced ability to maintain blood pressure compared with normotensive rabbits.


1991 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. S429
Author(s):  
C. Cerutti ◽  
M. Lo ◽  
Claude Julien ◽  
Madelaine Vincent ◽  
C. Paultre ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.Gert van Dijk ◽  
Monique Koenderink ◽  
Aeilko H. Zwinderman ◽  
Joost Haan ◽  
Cor G.S. Kramer ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 255 (3) ◽  
pp. H483-H491 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. H. Brand ◽  
P. J. Metting ◽  
S. L. Britton

The roles of the autonomic nervous system, vasopressin, and angiotensin II in support of blood pressure were evaluated in seven conscious, resting dogs while hydrated or dehydrated. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was monitored, and the dogs were given hexamethonium to block autonomic ganglia. Thirty minutes later, they were given captopril, and after another 30 min, a vasopressin V1 antagonist, d(CH2)5TyrMeAVP, was given. The order okf administration of captopril and d(CH2)5TyrMeAVP was alternated in different experiments. Hexamethonium had no effect on steady-state MAP in either hydrated or dehydrated dogs. In hydrated dogs, the average MAP was 100 mmHg; d(CH2)5TyrMeAVP decreased MAP by approximately 12 mmHg, and captopril decreased MAP by 24 mmHg. The magnitude of the effect of these two inhibitors was independent of the order of their administration. Dehydration doubled the effect of d(CH2)5TyrMeAVP on MAP but had no effect on the response to captopril. The results suggest that 1) autonomic function is not essential for maintenance of arterial blood pressure in resting dogs; 2) during autonomic ganglionic blockade, arterial blood pressure is supported by both angiotensin II and vasopressin; and 3) dehydration increases the role of vasopressin in control of blood pressure.


Author(s):  
Steffen Schulz ◽  
Mathias Bolz ◽  
Karl-Jürgen Bär ◽  
Andreas Voss

The autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysfunction has been well described in schizophrenia (SZ), a severe mental disorder. Nevertheless, the coupling between the ANS and central brain activity has been not addressed until now in SZ. The interactions between the central nervous system (CNS) and ANS need to be considered as a feedback–feed-forward system that supports flexible and adaptive responses to specific demands. For the first time, to the best of our knowledge, this study investigates central–autonomic couplings (CAC) studying heart rate, blood pressure and electroencephalogram in paranoid schizophrenic patients, comparing them with age–gender-matched healthy subjects (CO). The emphasis is to determine how these couplings are composed by the different regulatory aspects of the CNS–ANS. We found that CAC were bidirectional, and that the causal influence of central activity towards systolic blood pressure was more strongly pronounced than such causal influence towards heart rate in paranoid schizophrenic patients when compared with CO. In paranoid schizophrenic patients, the central activity was a much stronger variable, being more random and having fewer rhythmic oscillatory components. This study provides a more in-depth understanding of the interplay of neuronal and autonomic regulatory processes in SZ and most likely greater insights into the complex relationship between psychotic stages and autonomic activity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document