Facilitatory conditioning of the supplementary motor area in humans enhances the corticophrenic responsiveness to transcranial magnetic stimulation

2010 ◽  
Vol 108 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathieu Raux ◽  
Haiqun Xie ◽  
Thomas Similowski ◽  
Lisa Koski
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Supplementary Motor Area ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Area ◽  
Motor Threshold ◽  
Functional Connection ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold

Inspiratory loading in awake humans is associated with electroencephalographic signs of supplementary motor area (SMA) activation. To provide evidence for a functional connection between SMA and the diaphragm representation in the primary motor cortex (M1DIA), we tested the hypothesis that modulating SMA activity using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) would alter M1DIA excitability. Amplitude and latency of diaphragm motor evoked potentials (MEPDIA), evoked through single pulse M1DIA stimulation, before and up to 16 min after SMA stimulation, were taken as indicators of M1DIA excitability. MEPs from the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI, MEPFDI) served as a control. Four SMA conditioning sessions were performed in random order at 1-wk intervals. Two aimed at increasing SMA activity (5 and 10 Hz, both at 110% of FDI active motor threshold; referred to as 5Hz and 10Hz, respectively), and two aimed at decreasing it (1 Hz either at 110% of FDI active or resting motor threshold, referred to as aMT or rMT, respectively). The 5Hz protocol increased MEPDIA and MEPFDI amplitudes with a maximum 11–16 min poststimulation ( P = 0.04 and P = 0.02, respectively). The 10Hz protocol increased MEPFDI amplitude with a similar time course ( P = 0.03) but did not increase MEPDIA amplitude ( P = 0.32). Both aMT and rMT failed to decrease MEPDIA or MEPFDI amplitudes ( P = 0.23 and P = 0.90, respectively, for diaphragm and P = 0.48 and P = 0.14 for FDI). MEPDIA and MEPFDI latencies were unaffected by rTMS. These results demonstrate that 5-Hz rTMS over the SMA can increase the excitability of M1DIA. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis of a functional connection between SMA and M1DIA.

scholarly journals Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Dysesthesia Caused by Subacute Myelo-Optico-Neuropathy: A Case Report

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-174
Author(s):  
Tomoo Mano ◽  
Satoshi Kuru
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Antibacterial Drug ◽  
Motor Threshold ◽  
Neuromuscular Dysfunction ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold ◽  
Sensory Disturbances

Subacute myelo-optico-neuropathy (SMON) is caused by the ingestion of clioquinol (5-chloro-7-iodo-8-hydroxyquinoline), which is an intestinal antibacterial drug. Patients with SMON typically suffer from abnormal dysesthesia in the lower limbs, which cannot explain the mechanism only in pathology and electrophysiology. Neuromodulation therapies are increasingly being investigated as a means of alleviating abnormal sensory disturbances. We report here the response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for dysesthesia in a patient with SMON. The patient underwent rTMS treatment once per week for 12 weeks. rTMS was administered at 10 Hz, 90% of the resting motor threshold over the bilateral primary motor cortex foot area, for a total of 1,500 stimuli per day. After the treatment had finished at 12 weeks, the abnormal dysesthesia gradually declined. At first, there were improvements only in the area with a feeling of adherence. Later, this sensation was eliminated. Three months following the application, most of the feeling of adherence had disappeared and the feeling of tightness was slightly reduced. In contrast, the throbbing feeling had not changed during this period. Dysesthesia may indicate a process of central sensitization, which would contribute to chronic neuromuscular dysfunction. This case suggests that rTMS is a promising therapeutic application for dysesthesia.

scholarly journals Comparison of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation parameters on motor cortex excitability in normal subjects

2016 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 002-006
Author(s):  
Lara Schrader ◽  
Sima Sadeghinejad ◽  
Jalleh Sadeghinejad ◽  
Movses Kazanchyan ◽  
Lisa Koski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Motor Threshold ◽  
Motor Cortex Excitability ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold

Abstract Background/objectives Optimal low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) parameters for treating epilepsy and other brain disorders are unknown. To address this question, a systematic study of the effects of LF-rTMS frequency and intensity on cortical excitability was performed. Methods Using a four-period crossover design, subjects were scheduled for four LF-rTMS sessions that were at least four weeks apart. LF-rTMS was delivered as 900 pulses directed at primary motor cortex using four protocols: 0.5 Hz at 90% resting motor threshold (RMT), 0.5 Hz at 110% RMT, 1 Hz at 90% RMT, and 1 Hz at 110% RMT. Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, resting motor threshold (RMT), and cortical silent period (CSP) were measured before, immediately after, and 60 min after LF-rTMS. Each of the four protocols was analyzed separately to compare baseline measurements to those after LF-rTMS. Results None of the four LF-rTMS protocols produced a trend or significant change in MEP amplitude, RMT, or CSP. Conclusion The lack of significant effect from the four LF-rTMS protocols indicates that none produced evidence for alteration of cortical excitability. The direct comparison of four LF-rTMS protocols is distinct to this investigation, as most similar studies were exploratory and studied only one or two protocols. The negative result relates only to the methods used in this investigation and does not indicate that LF-rTMS does not alter cortical excitability with other parameters. These results may be useful when designing additional investigations into the effect of LF-rTMS on epilepsy, other disorders, and cortical excitability.

scholarly journals The spectral features of EEG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex depend on the amplitude of the motor evoked potentials

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Fecchio ◽  
Andrea Pigorini ◽  
Angela Comanducci ◽  
Simone Sarasso ◽  
Silvia Casarotto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Spectral Features ◽  
Time Frequency ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold ◽  
Wide Range

ABSTRACTTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) can excite both cortico-cortical and cortico-spinal axons resulting in TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), respectively. Despite this remarkable difference with other cortical areas, the influence of motor output and its amplitude on TEPs is largely unknown. Here we studied TEPs resulting from M1 stimulation and assessed whether their waveform and spectral features depend on the MEP amplitude. To this aim, we performed two separate experiments. In experiment 1, single-pulse TMS was applied at the same supra-threshold intensity on primary motor, prefrontal, premotor and parietal cortices and the corresponding TEPs were compared by means of local mean field power and time-frequency spectral analysis. In experiment 2 we stimulated M1 at resting motor threshold in order to elicit MEPs characterized by a wide range of amplitudes. TEPs computed from high-MEP and low-MEP trials were then compared using the same methods applied in experiment 1. In line with previous studies, TMS of M1 produced larger TEPs compared to other cortical stimulations. Notably, we found that only TEPs produced by M1 stimulation were accompanied by a late (∼300 ms after TMS) event-related desynchronization (ERD), whose magnitude was strongly dependent on the amplitude of MEPs. Overall, these results suggest that M1 produces peculiar responses to TMS possibly reflecting specific anatomo-functional properties, such as the re-entry of proprioceptive feedback associated with target muscle activation.

Effects of the motor cortical quadripulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (QPS) on the contralateral motor cortex and interhemispheric interactions

2014 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryosuke Tsutsumi ◽  
Ritsuko Hanajima ◽  
Yasuo Terao ◽  
Yuichiro Shirota ◽  
Shinya Ohminami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Corpus Callosum ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Long Term Potentiation ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Motor Threshold ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold

Corpus callosum connects the bilateral primary motor cortices (M1s) and plays an important role in motor control. Using the paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigm, we can measure interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) and interhemispheric facilitation (IHF) as indexes of the interhemispheric interactions in humans. We investigated how quadripulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (QPS), one form of repetitive TMS (rTMS), on M1 affects the contralateral M1 and the interhemispheric interactions. QPS is able to induce bidirectional plastic changes in M1 depending on the interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of TMS pulses: long-term potentiation (LTP)-like effect by QPS-5 protocol, and long-term depression-like effect by QPS-50, whose numbers indicate the ISI (ms). Twelve healthy subjects were enrolled. We applied QPS over the left M1 and recorded several parameters before and 30 min after QPS. QPS-5, which increased motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by left M1 activation, also increased MEPs induced by right M1 activation. Meanwhile, QPS-50, which decreased MEPs elicited by left M1 activation, did not induce any significant changes in MEPs elicited by right M1 activation. None of the resting motor threshold, active motor threshold, short-interval intracortical inhibition, long-interval intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation, and short-interval intracortical inhibition in right M1 were affected by QPS. IHI and IHF from left to right M1 significantly increased after left M1 QPS-5. The degree of left first dorsal interosseous MEP amplitude change by QPS-5 significantly correlated with the degree of IHF change. We suppose that the LTP-like effect on the contralateral M1 may be produced by some interhemispheric interactions through the corpus callosum.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document