scholarly journals Perceptual precision of passive body tilt is consistent with statistically optimal cue integration

2017 ◽  
Vol 117 (5) ◽  
pp. 2037-2052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koeun Lim ◽  
Faisal Karmali ◽  
Keyvan Nicoucar ◽  
Daniel M. Merfeld
Keyword(s):  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Internal Representation ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Potential Contribution ◽  
Motion Direction ◽  
Filter Model ◽  
Ml Estimator ◽  
Roll Tilt

When making perceptual decisions, humans have been shown to optimally integrate independent noisy multisensory information, matching maximum-likelihood (ML) limits. Such ML estimators provide a theoretic limit to perceptual precision (i.e., minimal thresholds). However, how the brain combines two interacting (i.e., not independent) sensory cues remains an open question. To study the precision achieved when combining interacting sensory signals, we measured perceptual roll tilt and roll rotation thresholds between 0 and 5 Hz in six normal human subjects. Primary results show that roll tilt thresholds between 0.2 and 0.5 Hz were significantly lower than predicted by a ML estimator that includes only vestibular contributions that do not interact. In this paper, we show how other cues (e.g., somatosensation) and an internal representation of sensory and body dynamics might independently contribute to the observed performance enhancement. In short, a Kalman filter was combined with an ML estimator to match human performance, whereas the potential contribution of nonvestibular cues was assessed using published bilateral loss patient data. Our results show that a Kalman filter model including previously proven canal-otolith interactions alone (without nonvestibular cues) can explain the observed performance enhancements as can a model that includes nonvestibular contributions. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We found that human whole body self-motion direction-recognition thresholds measured during dynamic roll tilts were significantly lower than those predicted by a conventional maximum-likelihood weighting of the roll angular velocity and quasistatic roll tilt cues. Here, we show that two models can each match this “apparent” better-than-optimal performance: 1) inclusion of a somatosensory contribution and 2) inclusion of a dynamic sensory interaction between canal and otolith cues via a Kalman filter model.

Human ocular counter-rolling and roll tilt perception during off-vertical axis rotation after spaceflight

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 209-215
Author(s):  
Gilles Clément ◽  
Pierre Denise ◽  
Millard F. Reschke ◽  
Scott J. Wood
Keyword(s):  
Head Tilt ◽  
Internal Representation ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Otolith Organs ◽  
Otolith Function ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Axis Rotation ◽  
Roll Tilt

Ocular counter-rolling (OCR) induced by whole body tilt in roll has been explored after spaceflight as an indicator of the adaptation of the otolith function to microgravity. It has been claimed that the overall pattern of OCR responses during static body tilt after spaceflight is indicative of a decreased role of the otolith function, but the results of these studies have not been consistent, mostly due to large variations in the OCR within and across individuals. By contrast with static head tilt, off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) presents the advantage of generating a sinusoidal modulation of OCR, allowing averaged measurements over several cycles, thus improving measurement accuracy. Accordingly, OCR and the sense of roll tilt were evaluated in seven astronauts before and after spaceflight during OVAR at 45°/s in darkness at two angles of tilt (10° and 20°). There was no significant difference in OCR during OVAR immediately after landing compared to preflight. However, the amplitude of the perceived roll tilt during OVAR was significantly larger immediately postflight, and then returned to control values in the following days. Since the OCR response is predominantly attributed to the shearing force exerted on the utricular macula, the absence of change in OCR postflight suggests that the peripheral otolith organs function normally after short-term spaceflight. However, the increased sense of roll tilt indicates an adaptation in the central processing of gravitational input, presumably related to a re-weighting of the internal representation of gravitational vertical as a result of adaptation to microgravity.

scholarly journals The A-Effect and Global Motion

Vision ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Pearl Guterman ◽  
Robert Allison
Keyword(s):  
Optic Flow ◽  
Object Motion ◽  
The Body ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Global Motion ◽  
Motion Direction ◽  
And Shifts ◽  
Self Motion ◽  
Gravitational Vertical

When the head is tilted, an objectively vertical line viewed in isolation is typically perceived as tilted. We explored whether this shift also occurs when viewing global motion displays perceived as either object-motion or self-motion. Observers stood and lay left side down while viewing (1) a static line, (2) a random-dot display of 2-D (planar) motion or (3) a random-dot display of 3-D (volumetric) global motion. On each trial, the line orientation or motion direction were tilted from the gravitational vertical and observers indicated whether the tilt was clockwise or counter-clockwise from the perceived vertical. Psychometric functions were fit to the data and shifts in the point of subjective verticality (PSV) were measured. When the whole body was tilted, the perceived tilt of both a static line and the direction of optic flow were biased in the direction of the body tilt, demonstrating the so-called A-effect. However, we found significantly larger shifts for the static line than volumetric global motion as well as larger shifts for volumetric displays than planar displays. The A-effect was larger when the motion was experienced as self-motion compared to when it was experienced as object-motion. Discrimination thresholds were also more precise in the self-motion compared to object-motion conditions. Different magnitude A-effects for the line and motion conditions—and for object and self-motion—may be due to differences in combining of idiotropic (body) and vestibular signals, particularly so in the case of vection which occurs despite visual-vestibular conflict.

Head Orientation Involvement in Assessment of the Subjective Vertical during Whole Body Tilt

1998 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 643-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Guerraz ◽  
Didier Poquin ◽  
Marion Luyat ◽  
Theophile Ohlmann
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Multiple Regression Analysis ◽  
Head Tilt ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Head Orientation ◽  
Subjective Vertical ◽  
Tilt Condition ◽  
Roll Tilt

The aim of this research was to investigate the involvement of head tilt in the assessment of the subjective vertical during whole body tilt. For inclinations up to 28°, it appears that the whole body tilt gives rise to more important deviations towards its direction (A-effect) than when the tilt was restricted to the head. A multiple regression analysis shows that errors in head-tilt condition partially account for the global errors observed in condition of whole body tilt. Other factors (relative to the degree of inclination) also played a role in the determination of the subjective vertical in whole body tilt but were Jess important than head tilt. These results are highly compatible with the assumption of head orientation as the major determinant in roll-tilt effects.

How to use body tilt for the simulation of linear self motion

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 375-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.L. Groen ◽  
W. Bles
Keyword(s):  
Visual Motion ◽  
Detection Threshold ◽  
Stimulus Frequency ◽  
Flight Simulation ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Motion Percept ◽  
Self Motion ◽  
Rate Limit ◽  
Pitch Tilt

We examined to what extent body tilt may augment the perception of visually simulated linear self acceleration. Fourteen subjects judged visual motion profiles of fore-aft motion at four different frequencies between 0.04âĂŞ0.33 Hz, and at three different acceleration amplitudes (0.44, 0.88 and 1.76 m / s 2 ). Simultaneously, subjects were tilted backward and forward about their pitch axis. The amplitude of pitch tilt was systematically varied. Using a two-alternative-forced-choice paradigm, psychometric curves were calculated in order to determine: 1) the minimum tilt amplitude required to generate a linear self-motion percept in more than 50% of the cases, and 2) the maximum tilt amplitude at which rotation remains sub-threshold in more than 50% of the cases. The results showed that the simulation of linear self motion became more realistic with the application of whole body tilt, as long as the tilt rate remained under the detection threshold of about 3 deg/s. This value is in close agreement with the empirical rate limit commonly used in flight simulation. The minimum required motion cue was inversely proportional to stimulus frequency, and increased with the amplitude of the visual displacement (rather than acceleration). As a consequence, the range of useful tilt stimuli became more critical with increasing stimulus frequency. We conclude that this psychophysical approach reveals valid parameters for motion driving algorithms used in motion base simulators.

Responses of interneurons in the cat cervical cord to vestibular tilt stimulation

1986 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 1147-1156 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. H. Schor ◽  
I. Suzuki ◽  
S. J. Timerick ◽  
V. J. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spinal Cord ◽  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Cervical Cord ◽  
Otolith Organs ◽  
Phase Lag ◽  
Response Dynamics ◽  
Decerebrate Cat ◽  
Propriospinal Neurons

The responses of interneurons in the cervical spinal cord of the decerebrate cat to whole-body tilt were studied with a goal of identifying spinal elements in the production of forelimb vestibular postural reflexes. Interneurons both in the cervical enlargement and at higher levels, from which propriospinal neurons have been identified, were examined, both in animals with intact labyrinths and in animals with nonfunctional semicircular canals (canal plugged). Most cervical interneurons responding to tilt respond best to rotations in vertical planes aligned within 30 degrees of the roll plane. Two to three times as many neurons are excited by side-up roll tilt as are excited by side-down roll. In cats with intact labyrinths, most responses have dynamics proportional either to (and in phase with) the position of the animal or to a sum of position and tilt velocity. This is consistent with input from both otolith organs and semicircular canals. In animals without functioning canals, the "velocity" response is absent. In a few cells (8 out of 76), a more complex response, characterized by an increasing gain and progressive phase lag, was observed. These response dynamics characterize the forelimb reflex in canal-plugged cats and have been previously observed in vestibular neurons in such preparations.

ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF SPINE STABILIZATION EXERCISES USING A WHOLE BODY TILT DEVICE ON MUSCLE FORCES IN THE SPINE

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (06) ◽  
pp. 1440003
Author(s):  
KAP-SOO HAN ◽  
CHANG HO YU ◽  
MYOUNG-HWAN KO ◽  
TAE KYU KWON
Keyword(s):  
Inverse Dynamics ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Muscle Forces ◽  
Activation Patterns ◽  
Muscle Strengthening ◽  
Spine Stabilization ◽  
Inverse Dynamics Analysis ◽  
The Right

The objective of the study was to investigate the effects of 3D stabilization exercises using a whole body tilt device on forces in the trunk, such as individual muscle forces and activation patterns, maximum muscle activities and spine loads. For this sake, a musculoskeletal (MS) model of the whole body was developed, and an inverse dynamics analysis was performed to predict the forces on the spine. An EMG measurement experiment was conducted to validate the muscle forces and activation patterns. The MS model was rotated and tilted in eight different directions: anterior (A), posterior (P), anterior right (AR), posterior right (PR), anterior left (AL), posterior left (PL), right (R) and left (L), replicating the directions of the 3D spine balance exercise device, as performed in the experiment. The anterior directions of the tilt primarily induced the activation of long and superficial back muscles and the posterior directions activated the front muscles. However, deep muscles, such as short muscles and multifidi, were activated in all directions of the tilt. The resultant joint forces in the right and left directions of the tilt were the least among the directions, but higher muscle activations and more diverse muscle recruitments than other positions were observed. Therefore, these directions of tilt may be suitable for the elderly and rehabilitation patients who require muscle strengthening with less spinal loads. In the present investigation, it was shown that 3D stabilization exercises could provide considerable muscle exercise effects with a minimum perturbation of structure. The results of this study can be used to provide safety guidelines for muscle exercises using this type of tilting device. Therefore, the proposed direction of tilt can be used to strengthen targeted muscles, depending on the patients' muscular condition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document