A looming-sensitive pathway responds to changes in the trajectory of object motion

2012 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 1052-1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glyn A. McMillan ◽  
John R. Gray
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Firing Rate ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Compound Eye ◽  
Angular Acceleration ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Object Motion ◽  
Near Miss ◽  
Movement Detector ◽  
Contralateral Movement

Two identified locust neurons, the lobula giant movement detector (LGMD) and its postsynaptic partner, the descending contralateral movement detector (DCMD), constitute one motion-sensitive pathway in the visual system that responds preferentially to objects that approach on a direct collision course and are implicated in collision-avoidance behavior. Previously described responses to the approach of paired objects and approaches at different time intervals (Guest BB, Gray JR. J Neurophysiol 95: 1428–1441, 2006) suggest that this pathway may also be affected by more complicated movements in the locust's visual environment. To test this possibility we presented stationary locusts with disks traveling along combinations of colliding (looming), noncolliding (translatory), and near-miss trajectories. Distinctly different responses to different trajectories and trajectory changes demonstrate that DCMD responds to complex aspects of local visual motion. DCMD peak firing rates associated with the time of collision remained relatively invariant after a trajectory change from translation to looming. Translatory motion initiated in the frontal visual field generated a larger peak firing rate relative to object motion initiated in the posterior visual field, and the peak varied with simulated distance from the eye. Transition from translation to looming produced a transient decrease in the firing rate, whereas transition away from looming produced a transient increase. The change in firing rate at the time of transition was strongly correlated with unique expansion parameters described by the instantaneous angular acceleration of the leading edge and subtense angle of the disk. However, response time remained invariant. While these results may reflect low spatial resolution of the compound eye, they also suggest that this motion-sensitive pathway may be capable of monitoring dynamic expansion properties of objects that change the trajectory of motion.

Spatiotemporal stimulus properties modulate responses to trajectory changes in a locust looming-sensitive pathway

2014 ◽  
Vol 111 (9) ◽  
pp. 1736-1745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul C. Dick ◽  
John R. Gray
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Firing Rate ◽  
Translational Motion ◽  
Object Motion ◽  
Movement Detector ◽  
Natural Conditions ◽  
Avoidance Behaviors ◽  
Contralateral Movement ◽  
Direct Collision ◽  
Low Amplitude

The lobula giant movement detector (LGMD) and descending contralateral movement detector (DCMD) constitute one motion-sensitive pathway in the locust visual system that is implicated in collision-avoidance behaviors. While this pathway is thought to respond preferentially to objects approaching on a direct collision course, emerging studies suggest the firing rate is able to monitor more complicated movements that would occur under natural conditions. While previous studies have compared the response of the DCMD to objects on collision courses that travel at different speeds, velocity has not been manipulated for other simple or compound trajectories. Here we test the possibility that the LGMD/DCMD pathway is capable of responding uniquely to complex aspects of object motion, including translation and trajectory changes at different velocities. We found that the response of the DCMD to translational motion initiated in the caudal visual field was a low-amplitude peak in firing rate that occurred before the object crossed 90° azimuth that was invariant to different object velocities. Direct looms at different velocities resulted in peak firing rates that occurred later in time and with greater amplitude for higher velocities. In response to transitions from translational motion to a collision course, the firing rate change depended on both the location within the visual field and the velocity. These results suggest that this pathway is capable of conveying information about multiple properties of a moving object's trajectory.

Location and Functional Definition of Human Visual Motion Organization Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

2011 ◽  
pp. 18-27
Author(s):  
Tianyi Yan ◽  
Jinglong Wu
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Superior Temporal Sulcus ◽  
Object Motion ◽  
Posterior Limb ◽  
Medial Superior Temporal ◽  
Processing Abilities ◽  
Mst Neurons ◽  
Definition Of

In humans, functional imaging studies have found a homolog of the macaque motion complex, MT+, which is suggested to contain both the middle temporal (MT) and medial superior temporal (MST) areas in the ascending limb of the inferior temporal sulcus. In the macaque, the motion-sensitive MT and MST areas are adjacent in the superior temporal sulcus. Electrophysiology has identified several motion-selective regions in the superior temporal sulcus (STS) of the macaque. Two of the best-studied areas include the MT and MST areas. The MT area has strong projections to the adjacent MST area and is typically subdivided into the dorsal (MSTd) and lateral (MSTl) subregions. While MT encodes the basic elements of motion, MST has higher-order motion-processing abilities and has been implicated in the perception of both object motion and self motion. The macaque MST area has been shown to have considerably larger receptive fields than the MT area. The receptive fields of MT cells typically extend only a few degrees into the ipsilateral visual field, while MST neurons have receptive fields that extend well into the ipsilateral visual field. This study tentatively identifies these subregions as the human homologs of the macaque MT and MST areas, respectively (Fig. 1). Putative human MT and MST areas were typically located on the posterior/ventral and anterior/dorsal banks of a dorsal/posterior limb of the inferior temporal sulcus. These locations are similar to their relative positions in the macaque superior temporal sulcus.

Attentional Modulation in Perception of Visual Motion Events

Perception ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1041-1054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsumi Watanabe ◽  
Shinsuke Shimojo
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Relative Frequency ◽  
Discrimination Task ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Object Motion ◽  
Moving Targets ◽  
Attentional Modulation ◽  
Visual Distractor ◽  
The Past ◽  
Motion Event

Identical visual targets moving across each other with equal and constant speed can be perceived either to bounce off or to stream through each other. This bistable motion perception has been studied mostly in the context of motion integration. Since the perception of most ambiguous motion is affected by attention, there is the possibility of attentional modulation occurring in this case as well. We investigated whether distraction of attention from the moving targets would alter the relative frequency of each percept. During the observation of the streaming/bouncing motion event in the peripheral visual field, visual attention was disrupted by an abrupt presentation of a visual distractor at various timings and locations (experiment 1; exogenous distraction of attention) or by the demand of an additional discrimination task (experiments 2 and 3; endogenous distraction of attention). Both types of distractions of attention increased the frequency of the bouncing percept and decreased that of the streaming percept. These results suggest that attention may facilitate the perception of object motion as continuing in the same direction as in the past.

scholarly journals Characterization of a reduced-eye mutant of the grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes

Development ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 189-211
Author(s):  
D. J. Emery ◽  
K. A. Bell ◽  
W. Chapco ◽  
J. D. Steeves
Keyword(s):  
Compound Eye ◽  
Optic Lobe ◽  
Compound Eyes ◽  
Movement Detector ◽  
Melanoplus Sanguinipes ◽  
Optic Chiasma ◽  
Morphological Alterations ◽  
Tactile Stimuli ◽  
Normal Manner ◽  
Contralateral Movement

A reduced-eye (re) mutant grasshopper of Melanoplus sanguinipes has been characterized by small flat compound eyes lacking facets, no lateral ocelli and only a remnant of the median ocellus. The re grasshoppers walk, jump, fly and feed in a normal manner, but do not respond to visual and auditory stimuli, suggesting they may be blind and deaf. Extracellular recordings from the ventral nerve cord of re mutants verified the lack of neural activity in response to visual and auditory inputs, yet the mutants detected mechanical and tactile stimuli. Electroretinograms implied that a visual deficit may be within the photoreceptors of the compound eye. Histological examination of the compound eyes and ocelli indicated that the cells of the mutant compound eye incompletely differentiate. The optic lamina underlying the retina is missing, as is the outer optic chiasma. The medulla and lobula of the mutant optic lobe are present, however, the neuropil of the medulla lacks the characteristic axonal projection patterns of wild-type grasshoppers. The re grasshopper also lacks all ocellar nerves. Ocellar nerves are normally formed from processes of second order ocellar neurons (SONs), suggesting that if the mutant SONs are present within the protocerebrum, their morphology is drastically altered. Comparison of embryos and juvenile nymphs supports the suggestion that the alterations in the re visual system are the result of abnormal differentiation during development. Even though there is clear evidence of morphological alterations in second and third order optic lobe interneurons, one higher order visual interneuron of the midbrain, the descending contralateral movement detector (DCMD), has the same morphology as the DCMD in a wildtype brain. In this instance, the complete deprivation of the primary sensory input does not appear to alter cellular development.

Background complexity affects response of a looming-sensitive neuron to object motion

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 218-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana C. Silva ◽  
Glyn A. McMillan ◽  
Cristina P. Santos ◽  
John R. Gray
Keyword(s):  
Flow Field ◽  
Locusta Migratoria ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Object Motion ◽  
Stimulus Complexity ◽  
Movement Detector ◽  
Behavioral Context ◽  
Firing Rates ◽  
Moving Stimulus ◽  
Contralateral Movement

An increasing number of studies show how stimulus complexity affects the responses of looming-sensitive neurons across multiple animal taxa. Locusts contain a well-described, descending motion-sensitive pathway that is preferentially looming sensitive. However, the lobula giant movement detector/descending contralateral movement detector (LGMD/DCMD) pathway responds to more than simple objects approaching at constant, predictable trajectories. In this study, we presented Locusta migratoria with a series of complex three-dimensional visual stimuli presented while simultaneously recording DCMD activity extracellularly. In addition to a frontal looming stimulus, we used a combination of compound trajectories (nonlooming transitioning to looming) presented at different velocities and onto a simple, scattered, or progressive flow field background. Regardless of stimulus background, DCMD responses to looming were characteristic and related to previously described effects of azimuthal approach angle and velocity of object expansion. However, increasing background complexity caused reduced firing rates, delayed peaks, shorter rise phases, and longer fall phases. DCMD responded to transitions to looming with a characteristic drop in a firing rate that was relatively invariant across most stimulus combinations and occurred regardless of stimulus background. Spike numbers were higher in the presence of the scattered background and reduced in the flow field background. We show that DCMD response time to a transition depends on unique expansion parameters of the moving stimulus irrespective of background complexity. Our results show how background complexity shapes DCMD responses to looming stimuli, which is explained within a behavioral context.

Responses of a Looming-Sensitive Neuron to Compound and Paired Object Approaches

2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 1428-1441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce B. Guest ◽  
John R. Gray
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Movement Detector ◽  
Azimuthal Position ◽  
Target Neuron ◽  
Object Edge ◽  
Contralateral Movement ◽  
Predicted Values ◽  
Firing Properties ◽  
Nonlinear Integration ◽  
Individual Objects

The lobula giant movement detector (LGMD) and its target neuron, the descending contralateral movement detector (DCMD), constitute a motion-sensitive pathway in the locust visual system that responds preferentially to objects approaching on a collision course. LGMD receptive field properties, anisotropic distribution of local retinotopic inputs across the visual field, and localized habituation to repeated stimuli suggest that this pathway should be sensitive to approaches of individual objects within a complex visual scene. We presented locusts with compound looming objects while recording from the DCMD to test the effects of nonuniform edge expansion on looming responses. We also presented paired objects approaching from different regions of the visual field at nonoverlapping, closely timed and simultaneous approach intervals to study DCMD responses to multiple looming stimuli. We found that looming compound objects evoked characteristic responses in the DCMD and that the time of peak firing was consistent with predicted values based on a weighted ratio of the half size of each distinct object edge and the absolute approach velocity. We also found that the azimuthal position and interval of paired approaches affected DCMD firing properties and that DCMDs responded to individual objects approaching within 106 ms of each other. Moreover, comparisons between individual and paired approaches revealed that overlapping approaches are processed in a strongly sublinear manner. These findings are consistent with biophysical mechanisms that produce nonlinear integration of excitatory and feed-forward inhibitory inputs onto the LGMD that have been shown to underlie responses to looming stimuli.

The Anatomy of a Locust Visual Interneurone; the Descending Contralateral Movement Detector

1974 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
M. O'SHEA ◽  
C. H. F. ROWELL ◽  
J. L. D. WILLIAMS
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Optic Lobe ◽  
Morphological Description ◽  
Movement Detector ◽  
Branching Pattern ◽  
Suboesophageal Ganglion ◽  
Metathoracic Ganglion ◽  
Prothoracic Ganglion ◽  
Contralateral Movement ◽  
The Brain

1. The DCMD neurone is physiologically well-known and runs from the brain to the metathoracic ganglion. It responds to novel movement of small contrasting objects in the visual field and synapses on metathoracic motoneurones which mediate the jump of the locust. Its anatomy, here reported, has been visualized by intracellular cobalt staining. 2. The soma is 50 µm in diameter and lies on the upper posterior face of the protocerebrum, lateral to the midline. A neurite runs to a thickened integrating segment 20 µm. in diameter, which bears numerous dendrites; none of these extends to the optic lobe. An axon leaves the integrating segment, crosses the brain, thickens to about 17µm and descends the contralateral nerve cord. 3. The descending axon terminates in the metathoracic ganglion, where it has three major branches both ipsi- and contralateral. Its branching in the mesothoracic ganglion is similar, but extends only ipsilaterally; in the prothoracic ganglion there is reduced branching, and in the suboesophageal ganglion none at all. 4. The branching pattern in the metathorax is compatible with, and entirely explicable by, the known synaptic connexions with motoneurones. 5. The morphological description of the cell has made possible intracellular recording from axon, integrating segment and soma.

scholarly journals Human visual motion perception shows hallmarks of Bayesian structural inference

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sichao Yang ◽  
Johannes Bill ◽  
Jan Drugowitsch ◽  
Samuel J. Gershman
Keyword(s):  
Motion Perception ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Probabilistic Reasoning ◽  
Choice Model ◽  
Human Motion ◽  
Object Motion ◽  
Ideal Observer ◽  
Structure Identification ◽  
Structural Inference ◽  
Visual Motion Perception

AbstractMotion relations in visual scenes carry an abundance of behaviorally relevant information, but little is known about how humans identify the structure underlying a scene’s motion in the first place. We studied the computations governing human motion structure identification in two psychophysics experiments and found that perception of motion relations showed hallmarks of Bayesian structural inference. At the heart of our research lies a tractable task design that enabled us to reveal the signatures of probabilistic reasoning about latent structure. We found that a choice model based on the task’s Bayesian ideal observer accurately matched many facets of human structural inference, including task performance, perceptual error patterns, single-trial responses, participant-specific differences, and subjective decision confidence—especially, when motion scenes were ambiguous and when object motion was hierarchically nested within other moving reference frames. Our work can guide future neuroscience experiments to reveal the neural mechanisms underlying higher-level visual motion perception.

Connexions Between a Movement-Detecting Visual Interneurone and Flight Motoneurones of a Locust

1980 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-97
Author(s):  
PETER SIMMONS
Keyword(s):  
Movement Detector ◽  
Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials ◽  
Schistocerca Americana ◽  
Postsynaptic Potentials ◽  
Contralateral Movement ◽  
Contralateral Eye ◽  
Stimulation Of

Both of the descending contralateral movement detector (DCMD) neurones of Schistocerca americana gregaria, which respond to stimulation of the contralateral eye or to loud noises, mediate excitatory postsynaptic potentials in most ipsilateral flight motoneurones.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document