Human Updating of Visual Motion Direction During Head Rotations

2008 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 2558-2576
Author(s):  
Mario Ruiz-Ruiz ◽  
Julio C. Martinez-Trujillo
Keyword(s):  
Visual Motion ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Head Tilt ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Spatial Updating ◽  
Motion Direction ◽  
Direction Discrimination ◽  
Head Rotations ◽  
Stimulus Direction

Previous studies have demonstrated that human subjects update the location of visual targets for saccades after head and body movements and in the absence of visual feedback. This phenomenon is known as spatial updating. Here we investigated whether a similar mechanism exists for the perception of motion direction. We recorded eye positions in three dimensions and behavioral responses in seven subjects during a motion task in two different conditions: when the subject's head remained stationary and when subjects rotated their heads around an anteroposterior axis (head tilt). We demonstrated that after head-tilt subjects updated the direction of saccades made in the perceived stimulus direction (direction of motion updating), the amount of updating varied across subjects and stimulus directions, the amount of motion direction updating was highly correlated with the amount of spatial updating during a memory-guided saccade task, subjects updated the stimulus direction during a two-alternative forced-choice direction discrimination task in the absence of saccadic eye movements (perceptual updating), perceptual updating was more accurate than motion direction updating involving saccades, and subjects updated motion direction similarly during active and passive head rotation. These results demonstrate the existence of an updating mechanism for the perception of motion direction in the human brain that operates during active and passive head rotations and that resembles the one of spatial updating. Such a mechanism operates during different tasks involving different motor and perceptual skills (saccade and motion direction discrimination) with different degrees of accuracy.

Ocular Responses to Head Rotations During Mirror Viewing

2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 2323-2329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanning Han ◽  
Jeffrey T. Somers ◽  
Jae I. Kim ◽  
Arun N. Kumar ◽  
R. John Leigh
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Control Experiment ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Contextual Cues ◽  
Motion Vision ◽  
Stationary Target ◽  
Vestibular Response ◽  
Geometric Relationship ◽  
Head Rotations

The gain of the human vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) is influenced by the proximity of the object of regard. In six human subjects, we measured the eye rotations induced by passive, sinusoidal, horizontal head rotations at 2.0 Hz during binocular fixation of a stationary far target at 7 m; a stationary target close to the subject's near point of fixation (<15 cm); and the bridge of the subject's own nose, viewed through a mirror positioned so that, for each subject, the angle of vergence was similar to that during viewing of the near target. The median gain of compensatory eye movements for the group of subjects during far viewing was 0.99 (range 0.80–1.04), during near viewing was 1.21 (range 0.88–1.47), and during mirror viewing was 0.85 (range 0.71–1.01). The gain during near and mirror viewing was significantly different for each subject ( P < 0.001) even though the vergence angles were similar. The lower gain values during mirror viewing can be attributed to the geometric relationship between the head rotation, the position of the eyes in the head, and the movement of the subject's virtual image in the mirror. To determine whether visually mediated eye movements were responsible for the observed gain values, we conducted a control experiment in which subjects were rotated using a sum-of-sines stimulus that minimized the effects of predictive visual tracking; differences of gain values between near- and mirror-viewing conditions were similar to those during rotation at 2 Hz. We conclude that, in these experiments, target proximity and vergence angle were not the key determinants of gain of the visuo-vestibular response during head rotation while viewing a near target but that contextual cues from motion vision were more important in generating the appropriate response.

Influence of Gaze Rotation on the Visual Response of Primate MSTd Neurons

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 2764-2786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna V. Shenoy ◽  
David C. Bradley ◽  
Richard A. Andersen
Keyword(s):  
Visual Motion ◽  
Visual Image ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Intermediate Stage ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Visual Response ◽  
Retinal Position ◽  
Gaze Tracking ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Head Rotations

Influence of gaze rotation on the visual response of primate MSTd neurons. When we move forward, the visual image on our retina expands. Humans rely on the focus, or center, of this expansion to estimate their direction of heading and, as long as the eyes are still, the retinal focus corresponds to the heading. However, smooth rotation of the eyes adds nearly uniform visual motion to the expanding retinal image and causes a displacement of the retinal focus. In spite of this, humans accurately judge their heading during pursuit eye movements and during active, smooth head rotations even though the retinal focus no longer corresponds to the heading. Recent studies in macaque suggest that correction for pursuit may occur in the dorsal aspect of the medial superior temporal area (MSTd) because these neurons are tuned to the retinal position of the focus and they modify their tuning during pursuit to compensate partially for the focus shift. However, the question remains whether these neurons also shift focus tuning to compensate for smooth head rotations that commonly occur during gaze tracking. To investigate this question, we recorded from 80 MSTd neurons while monkeys tracked a visual target either by pursuing with their eyes or by vestibulo-ocular reflex cancellation (VORC; whole-body rotation with eyes fixed in head and head fixed on body). VORC is a passive, smooth head rotation condition that selectively activates the vestibular canals. We found that neurons shift their focus tuning in a similar way whether focus displacement is caused by pursuit or by VORC. Across the population, compensation averaged 88 and 77% during pursuit and VORC, respectively (tuning shift divided by the retinal focus to true heading difference). Moreover the degree of compensation during pursuit and VORC was correlated in individual cells ( P< 0.001). Finally neurons that did not compensate appreciably tended to be gain-modulated during pursuit and VORC and may constitute an intermediate stage in the compensation process. These results indicate that many MSTd cells compensate for general gaze rotation, whether produced by eye-in-head or head-in-world rotation, and further implicate MSTd as a critical stage in the computation of heading. Interestingly vestibular cues present during VORC allow many cells to compensate even though humans do not accurately judge their heading in this condition. This suggests that MSTd may use vestibular information to create a compensated heading representation within at least a subpopulation of cells, which is accessed perceptually only when additional cues related to active head rotations are also present.

scholarly journals Motion Direction Discrimination with Tactile Random-Dot Kinematograms

i-Perception ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 204166952110046
Author(s):  
Scinob Kuroki ◽  
Shin’ya Nishida
Keyword(s):  
Motion Detection ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Discrimination Performance ◽  
Sensory Function ◽  
Human Observer ◽  
Motion Sensing ◽  
Motion Direction ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Direction Discrimination ◽  
High Level

Motion detection is a fundamental sensory function for multiple modalities, including touch, but the mechanisms underlying tactile motion detection are not well understood. While previous findings supported the existence of high-level feature tracking, it remains unclear whether there also exist low-level motion sensing that directly detects a local spatio-temporal correlation in the skin-stimulation pattern. To elucidate this mechanism, we presented, on braille displays, tactile random-dot kinematograms, similar to those widely used in visual motion research, which enables us to independently manipulate feature trackability and various parameters of local motion. We found that a human observer is able to detect the direction of difficult-to-track tactile motions presented to the fingers and palms. In addition, the direction-discrimination performance was better when the stimuli were presented along the fingers than when presented across the fingers. These results indicate that low-level motion sensing, in addition to high-level tracking, contribute to tactile motion perception.

scholarly journals Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) of hMT+ Does Not Affect Motion Perception Learning

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie J. Larcombe ◽  
Christopher Kennard ◽  
Jacinta O’Shea ◽  
Holly Bridge
Keyword(s):  
Task Performance ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Training Session ◽  
Macaque Monkey ◽  
Anodal Tdcs ◽  
Motion Direction ◽  
Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Direction Discrimination

AbstractBackgroundHuman visual cortical area hMT+, like its homologue MT in the macaque monkey, has been shown to be particularly selective to visual motion. After damage to the primary visual cortex (V1), patients often exhibit preserved ability to detect moving stimuli, which is associated with neural activity in area hMT+. As an anatomical substrate underlying residual function in the absence of V1, promoting functional plasticity in hMT+ could potentially boost visual performance despite cortical damage.ObjectiveTo establish in healthy participants whether it is possible to use transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over hMT+ to potentiate learning of visual motion direction discrimination.MethodsParticipants were trained daily for five days on a visual motion direction discrimination task. Task difficulty was increased as performance improved, by decreasing the proportion of coherently moving dots, such that participants were always performing at psychophysical threshold. tDCS, either anodal or sham, was applied daily during the 20-minute training session. Task performance was assessed at baseline and at the end of the training period.ResultsAll participants showed improved task performance both during and after training. Contrary to our hypothesis, anodal tDCS did not further improve performance compared to sham stimulation. Bayesian statistics indicated significant evidence in favour of the null hypothesis.ConclusionAnodal tDCS to hMT+ does not enhance visual motion direction discrimination learning in the young healthy visual system.

scholarly journals Sensory and choice responses in MT distinct from motion encoding

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron J Levi ◽  
Yuan Zhao ◽  
Il Memming Park ◽  
Alexander C Huk
Keyword(s):  
Visual Motion ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Motion Direction ◽  
Population Activity ◽  
Motor Responses ◽  
Direction Discrimination ◽  
Multiple Components ◽  
Strategic Manipulation ◽  
Motion Responses ◽  
Correlated Signals

Macaque area MT is well known for its visual motion selectivity and relevance to motion perception, but the possibility of it also reflecting non-sensory functions has largely been ignored. Manipulating subjects' temporal evidence weighting revealed multiple components of MT responses that were, surprisingly, not interpretable as behaviorally-relevant modulations of motion encoding, nor as consequences of readout of motion direction. MT's time-varying motion-driven responses were starkly changed by our strategic manipulation, but with timecourses opposite the subjects' temporal weighting strategies. Furthermore, large choice-correlated signals were represented in population activity distinctly from motion responses (even after the stimulus) with multiple phases that both lagged psychophysical readout and preceded motor responses. These results reveal multiple cognitive contributions to MT responses that are task-related but not functionally relevant to encoding or decoding of motion for psychophysical direction discrimination, calling into question its nature as a simple sensory area.

The effect of TMS on visual motion sensitivity: an increase in neural noise or a decrease in signal strength?

2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 138-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuela Ruzzoli ◽  
Arman Abrahamyan ◽  
Colin W. G. Clifford ◽  
Carlo A. Marzi ◽  
Carlo Miniussi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Motion ◽  
Single Pulse ◽  
Visual Signal ◽  
Motion Direction ◽  
Motion Sensitivity ◽  
Neural Noise ◽  
Sensory Signal ◽  
Direction Discrimination ◽  
Motion Stimulus ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms

The underlying mechanisms of action of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are still a matter of debate. TMS may impair a subject's performance by increasing neural noise, suppressing the neural signal, or both. Here, we delivered a single pulse of TMS (spTMS) to V5/MT during a motion direction discrimination task while concurrently manipulating the level of noise in the motion stimulus. Our results indicate that spTMS essentially acts by suppressing the strength of the relevant visual signal. We suggest that TMS may induce a pattern of neural activity that complements the ongoing activation elicited by the sensory signal in a manner that partially impoverishes that signal.

scholarly journals Electrophysiological aftereffects of high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (hf-tRNS): an EEG investigation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Ghin ◽  
Louise O’Hare ◽  
Andrea Pavan
Keyword(s):  
High Frequency ◽  
Discrimination Task ◽  
Temporal Dynamics ◽  
Random Noise ◽  
Decomposition Analysis ◽  
Oscillatory Activity ◽  
Motion Direction ◽  
Time Frequency ◽  
Direction Discrimination ◽  
Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation

AbstractThere is evidence that high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (hf-tRNS) is effective in improving behavioural performance in several visual tasks. However, so far there has been limited research into the spatial and temporal characteristics of hf-tRNS-induced facilitatory effects. In the present study, electroencephalogram (EEG) was used to investigate the spatial and temporal dynamics of cortical activity modulated by offline hf-tRNS on performance on a motion direction discrimination task. We used EEG to measure the amplitude of motion-related VEPs over the parieto-occipital cortex, as well as oscillatory power spectral density (PSD) at rest. A time–frequency decomposition analysis was also performed to investigate the shift in event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) in response to the motion stimuli between the pre- and post-stimulation period. The results showed that the accuracy of the motion direction discrimination task was not modulated by offline hf-tRNS. Although the motion task was able to elicit motion-dependent VEP components (P1, N2, and P2), none of them showed any significant change between pre- and post-stimulation. We also found a time-dependent increase of the PSD in alpha and beta bands regardless of the stimulation protocol. Finally, time–frequency analysis showed a modulation of ERSP power in the hf-tRNS condition for gamma activity when compared to pre-stimulation periods and Sham stimulation. Overall, these results show that offline hf-tRNS may induce moderate aftereffects in brain oscillatory activity.

Quantitative assessment of self-treated canalith repositioning procedures using inertial measurement unit sensors

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Chiheon Kwon ◽  
Yunseo Ku ◽  
Shinhye Seo ◽  
Eunsook Jang ◽  
Hyoun-Joong Kong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Large Error ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
The Self ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Epley Maneuver ◽  
Head Rotations

BACKGROUND: Low success and high recurrence of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) after home-based self-treated Epley and Barbeque (BBQ) roll maneuvers is an important issue. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the cause of low success rate of self-treated Epley and BBQ roll maneuvers and provide a clinically acceptable criterion to guide self-treatment head rotations. METHODS: Twenty-five participants without active BPPV wore a custom head-mount rotation monitoring device for objective measurements. Self-treatment and specialist-assisted maneuvers were compared for head rotation accuracy. Absolute differences between the head rotation evaluation criteria (American Academy of Otolaryngology guidelines) and measured rotation angles were considered as errors. Self-treatment and specialist-treated errors in maneuvers were compared. Between-trial variations and age effects were evaluated. RESULTS: A significantly large error and between-trial variation occurred in step 4 of the self-treated Epley maneuver, with a considerable error in the second trial. The cumulative error of all steps of self-treated BBQ roll maneuver was significantly large. Age effect occurred only in the self-treated BBQ roll maneuver. Errors in specialist-treated maneuvers ranged from 10 to 20 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time feedback of head movements during simultaneous head-body rotations could increase success rates of self-treatments. Specialist-treated maneuvers can be used as permissible rotation margin criteria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document