Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in S-1 vibrissa cortex of the awake rabbit: receptive fields and axonal properties

1989 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 288-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. A. Swadlow
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Field Analysis ◽  
Layer 2 ◽  
Efferent Neurons ◽  
High Stimulus ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
Frequency Burst ◽  
Stimulus Site ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. The behavioral tractability of the rabbit was exploited and enabled, in the fully awake state, receptive-field analysis of antidromically identified efferent neurons within the vibrissa representation of primary somatosensory cortex (S-1). Efferent neurons studied included ipsilateral corticocortical neurons (C-IC neurons, n = 56) that project to or beyond the second somatosensory cortical area (S-2) and corticofugal neurons of layer 5 (CF-5 neurons, n = 75) and layer 6 (CF-6 neurons, n = 92) that project to and/or beyond the thalamus. 2. An additional class of neurons was studied that was not activated antidromically from any stimulus site, but which responded synaptically to electrical stimulation of the ventrobasal (VB) thalamus with a burst of three or more spikes at frequencies of 600 to greater than 900 Hz. Most of these neurons also responded synaptically to stimulation of S-2. The action potentials of these neurons were much shorter (mean = 0.43 ms), than those of efferent neurons (mean = 0.98 ms). Such properties have been associated with interneurons found throughout the central nervous system, and these neurons are thereby referred to as suspected interneurons (SINs). Although SINs were found at all cortical depths, a strong peak in the distribution occurred just superficial to the peak in the distribution of CF-5 neurons. Most SINs located within this peak responded to deflection of only a single vibrissa. In contrast, SINs located in layer 6 and in layer 2-3 responded to deflection of many vibrissae (median = 11.0 and 5.5 vibrissae, respectively). In addition, SINs of layer 6 and layer 2-3 had significantly longer synaptic latencies to stimulation of VB thalamus than did SINs located at intermediate cortical depths. 3. The properties of efferent neurons and SINs differed considerably. Efferent neurons never responded to stimulation of VB thalamus with the high-frequency burst of spikes characteristic of SINs. Although greater than 70% of CF-6, CF-5 and C-IC neurons had receptive fields that were directionally selective, only 20% of SINs showed any degree of directional selectivity. Furthermore, SINs showed both much lower angular thresholds to vibrissa deflection and a much greater ability to follow high-stimulus frequencies than was seen in efferent neurons. The spontaneous firing rates of SINs had a mean value of 16.5 spikes/s, which was the highest seen in any population within S-1. 4. CF-5 neurons had a number of properties which contrasted with those of both CF-6 and C-IC neurons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

scholarly journals Cross-Whisker Adaptation of Neurons in Layer 2/3 of the Rat Barrel Cortex

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonatan Katz ◽  
Ilan Lampl
Keyword(s):  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Barrel Cortex ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Repetitive Stimulation ◽  
Complex Environments ◽  
Cortical Cells ◽  
High Responsiveness ◽  
Layer 2 ◽  
Layer 4 ◽  
Stimulation Of

Neurons in the barrel cortex respond preferentially to stimulation of one principal whisker and weakly to several adjacent whiskers. Such integration exists already in layer 4, the pivotal recipient layer of thalamic inputs. Previous studies show that cortical neurons gradually adapt to repeated whisker stimulations and that layer 4 neurons exhibit whisker specific adaptation and no apparent interactions with other whiskers. This study aimed to study the specificity of adaptation of layer 2/3 cortical cells. Towards this aim, we compared the synaptic response of neurons to either repetitive stimulation of one of two responsive whiskers or when repetitive stimulation of the two whiskers was interleaved. We found that in most layer 2/3 cells adaptation is whisker-specific. These findings indicate that despite the multi-whisker receptive fields in the cortex, the adaptation process for each whisker-pathway is mostly independent of other whiskers. A mechanism allowing high responsiveness in complex environments.

Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in motor cortex of the awake rabbit: axonal properties, sensory receptive fields, and subthreshold synaptic inputs

1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 437-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. A. Swadlow
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Sensory Stimulation ◽  
Spontaneous Firing ◽  
Firing Rates ◽  
Axonal Conduction ◽  
Conduction Velocities ◽  
Efferent Neurons ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Properties of antidromically identified efferent neurons within the cortical representation of the vibrissae, sinus hairs, and philtrum were examined in motor cortex of fully awake adult rabbits. Efferent neurons were tested for both receptive field and axonal properties and included callosal (CC) neurons (n = 31), ipsilateral corticocortical (C-IC) neurons (n = 34) that project to primary somatosensory cortex (S-1), and corticofugal neurons of layer 5 (CF-5) (n = 33) and layer 6 (CF-6) (n = 32) that project to and/or beyond the thalamus. Appropriate collision tests demonstrated that substantial numbers of corticocortical efferent neurons project an axon to both the corpus callosum and to ipsilateral S-1. 2. Suspected interneurons (SINs, n = 37) were also studied. These neurons were not activated antidromically from any stimulus site but did respond synaptically to electrical stimulation of the ventrolateral (VL) thalamus and/or S-1 with a burst of three or more spikes at frequencies from 600 to > 900 Hz. All of these neurons also responded synaptically to stimulation of the corpus callosum. The action potentials of these neurons were much shorter in duration (mean = 0.48 ms), than those of efferent neurons (mean = 0.90 ms). 3. CF-5 neurons differed from CC, C-IC, and CF-6 neurons in their spontaneous firing rates, axonal properties, and receptive field properties. Whereas CF-5 neurons had a mean spontaneous firing rate of 4.1 spikes/s, CC, C-IC, and CF-6 neurons all had mean values of < 1 spike/s. Axonal conduction velocities of CF-5 neurons were much higher (mean = 12.76 m/s) than either CC (1.47 m/s), C-IC (0.97 m/s), or CF-6 (mean = 1.96 m/s) neurons. A decrease in antidromic latency (the "supernormal" period) followed a single prior impulse in most CC, C-IC, and CF-6 neurons but was minimal or absent in CF-5 neurons. Although all but two CF-5 neurons responded to peripheral sensory stimulation, many CC (35%), C-IC (59%), or CF-6 (66%) neurons did not. CC, CF-5, and CF-6 neurons that did not respond to sensory stimulation had significantly lower axonal conduction velocities and spontaneous firing rates than those that responded to such stimulation. 4. Sensory receptive fields of neurons in motor cortex were considerably larger than those observed in S-1 but were similar in size to those seen in secondary somatosensory cortex (S-2).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in binocular visual cortex of the awake rabbit: receptive fields and binocular properties

1988 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 1162-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. A. Swadlow
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Visual Area ◽  
Orientation Tuning ◽  
Spontaneous Firing ◽  
Firing Rates ◽  
Axonal Conduction ◽  
Conduction Velocities ◽  
Efferent Neurons ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. In fully awake rabbits the stability of the two eyes was monitored and was sufficient to enable receptive-field analysis of antidromically identified efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in the binocular segment of visual area 1. Efferent neurons analyzed included callosal efferent neurons (CC neurons, n = 52), neurons projecting to visual area 2 (CV2 neurons, n = 35), corticotectal neurons (CT neurons, n = 43), and corticogeniculate neurons (CG neurons, n = 51). Six additional neurons projected a branching axon to both the corpus callosum and visual area 2. 2. Most CC and CV2 neurons were found in layer 2-3 and had receptive fields of the simple type. Only two corticocortical neurons with complex receptive fields were found. Orientation tuning ranges of CC and CV2 simple cells were similar and end stopping was prevalent in both CC (62%) and CV2 (45%) neurons. Axonal conduction velocities of CC and CV2 neurons were low (mean = 3.5 and 1.4 m/s, respectively) and visually nonresponsive CC neurons (19%) had conduction velocities that were significantly lower than visually responsive neurons. Spontaneous firing rates of corticocortical neurons were low (mean less than 1 spike/s) and these neurons responded to a lower range of stimulus velocities than did corticofugal neurons. 3. Most CG neurons had simple receptive fields and none had a complex field. Orientation tuning ranges of these neurons were comparable to those of CC and CV2 neurons, but a significantly smaller proportion (12%) were end stopped. Both spontaneous firing rates (mean = less than 1 spike/s) and axonal conduction velocities (mean = 2.4 m/s) of CG neurons were low and, as was found for CC neurons, visually nonresponsive CG neurons (25%) had significantly lower conduction velocities than did visually responsive neurons. 4. CT neurons had receptive fields that were predominantly complex (37%), motion/uniform (28%), or simple (26%). Conduction velocities (mean = 10.9 m/s) and spontaneous firing rates (mean = 7 spikes/s) of CT neurons of all receptive-field types were much higher than those of CC, CV2, and CG neurons. 5. An additional class of neurons was studied that responded synaptically at a short latency to electrical stimulation of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGNd) with a burst of three or more spikes at frequencies of 600-900 Hz. These neurons showed a high degree of synaptic convergence, also responding synaptically with a high-frequency burst of spikes to stimulation of both visual area 2 and the corpus callosum.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in S-1 forelimb representation of the awake rabbit: receptive fields and axonal properties

1990 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 1477-1498 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. A. Swadlow
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Sensory Stimulation ◽  
Spontaneous Firing ◽  
Firing Rates ◽  
Axonal Conduction ◽  
Receptive Field Properties ◽  
Conduction Velocities ◽  
Efferent Neurons ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Receptive-field properties of antidromically identified efferent neurons within the cutaneous forelimb representation of primary somatosensory cortex (S-1) were examined in fully awake rabbits. Efferent neurons studied included callosal neurons (CC neurons, n = 52), ipsilateral corticocortical neurons (C-IC neurons, n = 48) that project to or beyond the second somatosensory cortical area (S-2), and corticofugal neurons of layer 5 (CF-5 neurons, n = 97) and layer 6 (CF-6 neurons, n = 59) that project to and/or beyond the thalamus. 2. An additional class of neurons was studied that was not activated antidromically from any stimulus site, but which responded synaptically to electrical stimulation of the ventrobasal (VB) thalamus with a burst of three or more spikes at frequencies of 600 to greater than 900 Hz. Most of these neurons also responded synaptically to stimulation of S-2 and the corpus callosum. The action potentials of these neurons were much shorter (mean = 0.45 ms) than those of efferent neurons (mean = 0.95 ms). Such properties have been associated with interneurons found throughout the central nervous system, and these neurons are thereby referred to as suspected interneurons (SINs). 3. CF-5 neurons differed from CC, C-IC, and CF-6 neurons in their spontaneous firing rates, axonal properties, and receptive-field properties. Whereas CF-5 neurons had a mean spontaneous firing rate of 5.5 spikes/s, CC, C-IC, and CF-6 neurons had mean values of less than 1/s. Axonal conduction velocities of CF-5 neurons were much higher (mean = 12.92 m/s) than either CC (mean = 2.15 m/s), C-IC (mean = 1.31 m/s), or CF-6 (mean = 2.53 m/s) neurons. A decrease in antidromic latency (the "supernormal" period) that was dependent on prior impulse activity was seen in the great majority of CC, C-IC, and CF-6 neurons but was either minimal or absent in CF-5 neurons of comparable conduction velocity. A higher proportion of CF-5 neurons (98%) responded to peripheral sensory stimulation than did either CC (75%), C-IC (71%), or CF-6 (51%) neurons. CF-6 and C-IC neurons that did not respond to sensory stimulation had significantly lower axonal conduction velocities and spontaneous firing rates than those that responded to such stimulation. 4. Cutaneous receptive fields were seen in most neurons that could be driven by peripheral stimulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Hindleg targeting during scratching in the locust

1997 ◽  
Vol 200 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Matheson
Keyword(s):  
Tactile Stimulation ◽  
Schistocerca Gregaria ◽  
Sensory Information ◽  
Sensory Receptors ◽  
Mechanical Constraints ◽  
Metathoracic Ganglion ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
Stimulus Site ◽  
Site Of Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

Intact locusts (Schistocerca gregaria) respond to tactile stimulation of their folded wings with rhythmic scratching movements of the ipsilateral hindleg that are directed towards the site of stimulation. For example, sites near the base of a wing elicit anteriorly directed scratches, whereas sites near the distal end of a wing elicit posteriorly directed scratches. Locusts also scratch in response to tactile stimulation of a wing that is held outstretched in a posture similar to that normally adopted during flight, but they fail to alter their leg targeting to compensate for this changed position of the stimulus site. Instead, they scratch at an empty point in space near the abdomen, where the stimulus site would have been if the wing was folded in the resting posture. This inappropriate scratching does not result from mechanical constraints on the hindleg's movement, from stimulation of abdominal sensory receptors, or from an absence of sensory information from the outstretched wing. It also persists when the metathoracic ganglion that controls movements of the hindlegs is isolated from the remainder of the central nervous system (CNS). Targeted scratching of sites on the wings of locusts therefore appears to be fixed relative to body coordinates and does not take into account alterations of the target wing's position.

scholarly journals Electrical stimulation of the nucleus basalis of meynert: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical data

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Nazmuddin ◽  
Ingrid H. C. H. M. Philippens ◽  
Teus van Laar
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Lewy Body Dementia ◽  
Clinical Situation ◽  
Nucleus Basalis ◽  
Nucleus Basalis Of Meynert ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Stimulation Of

AbstractDeep brain stimulation (DBS) of the nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM) has been clinically investigated in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Lewy body dementia (LBD). However, the clinical effects are highly variable, which questions the suggested basic principles underlying these clinical trials. Therefore, preclinical and clinical data on the design of NBM stimulation experiments and its effects on behavioral and neurophysiological aspects are systematically reviewed here. Animal studies have shown that electrical stimulation of the NBM enhanced cognition, increased the release of acetylcholine, enhanced cerebral blood flow, released several neuroprotective factors, and facilitates plasticity of cortical and subcortical receptive fields. However, the translation of these outcomes to current clinical practice is hampered by the fact that mainly animals with an intact NBM were used, whereas most animals were stimulated unilaterally, with different stimulation paradigms for only restricted timeframes. Future animal research has to refine the NBM stimulation methods, using partially lesioned NBM nuclei, to better resemble the clinical situation in AD, and LBD. More preclinical data on the effect of stimulation of lesioned NBM should be present, before DBS of the NBM in human is explored further.

scholarly journals VI. —Anaphylaxis and anaphylatoxins

1923 ◽  
Vol 211 (382-390) ◽  
pp. 273-315 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Guinea Pig ◽  
Anaphylactic Shock ◽  
The Body ◽  
Muscle Fibres ◽  
Direct Stimulation ◽  
Fundamental Conception ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
Stimulation Of

In the study of the phenomena of anaphylaxis there are certain points on which some measure of agreement seems to have been attained. In the case of anaphylaxis to soluble proteins, with which alone we are directly concerned in this paper, the majority of investigators probably accept the view that the condition is due to the formation of an antibody of the precipitin type. Concerning the method, however, by which the presence of this antibody causes the specific sensitiveness, the means by which its interaction with the antibody produces the anaphylactic shock, there is a wide divergence of conception. Two main currents of speculation can be discerned. One view, historically rather the earlier, and first put forward by Besredka (1) attributes the anaphylactic condition to the location of the antibody in the body cells. There is not complete unanimity among adherents of this view as to the nature of the antibody concerned, or as to the class of cells containing it which are primarily affected in the anaphylactic shock. Besredka (2) himself has apparently not accepted the identification of the anaphylactic antibody with a precipitin, but regards it as belonging to a special class (sensibilisine). He also regards the cells of the central nervous system as those primarily involved in the anaphylactic shock in the guinea-pig. Others, including one of us (3), have found no adequate reason for rejecting the strong evidence in favour of the precipitin nature of the anaphylactic antibody, produced by Doerr and Russ (4), Weil (5), and others, and have accepted and confirmed the description of the rapid anaphylactic death in the guinea-pig as due to a direct stimulation of the plain-muscle fibres surrounding the bronchioles, causing valve-like obstruction of the lumen, and leading to asphyxia, with the characteristic fixed distension of the lungs, as first described by Auer and Lewis (6), and almost simultaneously by Biedl and Kraus (7). But the fundamental conception of anaphylaxis as due to cellular location of an antibody, and of the reaction as due to the union of antigen and antibody taking place in the protoplasm, is common to a number of workers who thus differ on details.

Signals and noise in the elasmobranch electrosensory system

1999 ◽  
Vol 202 (10) ◽  
pp. 1349-1355 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.C. Montgomery ◽  
D. Bodznick
Keyword(s):  
Direct Current ◽  
Noise Suppression ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Sensory System ◽  
Mate Recognition ◽  
Common Mode ◽  
Central Processing ◽  
Temporal Properties ◽  
Efferent Neurons ◽  
Bioelectric Fields

Analyzing signal and noise for any sensory system requires an appreciation of the biological and physical milieu of the animal. Behavioral studies show that elasmobranchs use their electrosensory systems extensively for prey detection, but also for mate recognition and possibly for navigation. These biologically important signals are detected against a background of self-generated bioelectric fields. Noise-suppression mechanisms can be recognized at a number of different levels: behavior, receptor anatomy and physiology, and at the early stages of sensory processing. The peripheral filters and receptor characteristics provide a detector with permissive temporal properties but restrictive spatial characteristics. Biologically important signals probably cover the range from direct current to 10 Hz, whereas the bandwidth of the receptors is more like 0.1-10 Hz. This degree of alternating current coupling overcomes significant noise problems while still allowing the animal to detect external direct current signals by its own movement. Self-generated bioelectric fields modulated by breathing movement have similar temporal characteristics to important external signals and produce very strong modulation of electrosensory afferents. This sensory reafference is essentially similar, or common-mode, across all afferent fibers. The principal electrosensory neurons (ascending efferent neurons; AENs) of the dorsal octavolateralis nucleus show a greatly reduced response to common-mode signals. This suppression is mediated by the balanced excitatory and inhibitory components of their spatial receptive fields. The receptive field characteristics of AENs determine the information extracted from external stimuli for further central processing.

T2-T5 spinothalamic neurons projecting to medial thalamus with viscerosomatic input

1985 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. S. Ammons ◽  
M. N. Girardot ◽  
R. D. Foreman
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Cell Group ◽  
Spinothalamic Tract ◽  
Medial Thalamus ◽  
Dorsal Nucleus ◽  
Afferent Fibers ◽  
C Fiber ◽  
Antidromic Responses ◽  
Alpha Chloralose ◽  
Stimulation Of

Spinothalamic tract neurons projecting to medial thalamus (M-STT cells), ventral posterior lateral nucleus (VPL) of the thalamus (L-STT cells), or both thalamic regions (LM-STT cells) were studied in 19 monkeys anesthetized with alpha-chloralose. Twenty-seven M-STT cells were antidromically activated from nucleus centralis lateralis, nucleus centrum medianum, or the medial dorsal nucleus. Stimulation of VPL elicited antidromic responses from 22 cells and 13 cells were activated from both VPL and medial thalamus. Antidromic conduction velocities of M-STT cells were significantly slower than those of L-STT or LM-STT cells. M-STT cells were located in laminae I, IV, V, and VII with greater numbers found in the deepest laminae. L-STT cells were located mostly in lamina IV, whereas most LM-STT cells were found in lamina V. Twenty-four of 27 M-STT cells, all L-STT cells, and all LM-STT cells received input from both cardiopulmonary sympathetic and somatic afferent fibers. WDR cells were most common among the L-STT and LM-STT groups, whereas HT cells were the most common class in the M-STT cell group. Excitatory receptive fields of M-STT cells were large, and often bilateral. Receptive fields of L-STT cells were simple and never bilateral. Receptive fields of LM-STT cells could be similar to M-STT or L-STT cells. Thirty-three percent of the M-STT cells, 37% of the L-STT cells, and 62% of the LM-STT cells had inhibitory receptive fields. Inhibition was elicited most often by a noxious pinch of the hindlimbs. Sixteen of 23 (70%) M-STT cells received C-fiber cardiopulmonary sympathetic input in addition to A-delta-fiber input. The other 7 cells received only A-delta-fiber input. Only 45% of the L-STT cells and 38% of the LM-STT cells received both A-delta- and C-fiber inputs. The maximum number of spikes elicited by A-delta-input was related to segmental locations for L-STT cells with greatest responses in T2 and lesser responses in more caudal segments; however, no such trend was apparent for M-STT cells or for responses to C-fiber input for either group. Electrical stimulation of the left thoracic vagus nerve inhibited 7 of 18 M-STT cells, 10 of 16 L-STT cells, and 6 of 12 LM-STT cells. These results are the first description of visceral input to cells projecting to medial thalamus.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document