scholarly journals Non-Cross Resistant Sequential Single Agent Chemotherapy in First-Line Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Results of a Phase II Study

2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Surmont ◽  
J. G. J. V. Aerts ◽  
K. Y. Tan ◽  
F. Schramel ◽  
R. Vernhout ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Sequential Administration ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Sequential Trials ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Background. sequential chemotherapy can maintain dose intensity and preclude cumulative toxicity by increasing drug diversity.Purpose. to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of the sequential regimen of gemcitabine followed by paclitaxel in first line advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with good performance status (PS).Patients and methods. gemcitabine 1250 mg/ was administered on day 1 and 8 of course 1 and 2; Paclitaxel 150 mg/ on day 1 and 8 of course 3 and 4. Primary endpoint was response rate (RR), secondary endpoints toxicity and time to progression (TTP).Results. Of the 21 patients (median age 56, range 38–80 years; 62% males, 38% females) 10% (2/21) had stage IIIB, 90% (19/21) stage IV, 15% PS 0, 85% PS 1. 20% of patients had a partial response, 30% stable disease, 50% progressive disease. Median TTP was 12 weeks (range 6–52 weeks), median overall survival (OS) 8 months (range 1–27 months), 1-year survival was 33%. One patient had grade 3 hematological toxicity, 2 patients a grade 3 peripheral neuropathy.Conclusions. sequential administration of gemcitabine followed by paclitaxel in first line treatment of advanced NSCLC had a favourable toxicity profile, a median TTP and OS comparable with other sequential trials and might , therefore, be a treatment option for NSCLC patients with high ERCC1 expression.

scholarly journals Biomarkers and Gene Signatures to Predict Durable Response to Pembrolizumab in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3828
Author(s):  
Anello Marcello Poma ◽  
Rossella Bruno ◽  
Iacopo Pietrini ◽  
Greta Alì ◽  
Giulia Pasquini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Pembrolizumab has been approved as first-line treatment for advanced Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with tumors expressing PD-L1 and in the absence of other targetable alterations. However, not all patients that meet these criteria have a durable benefit. In this monocentric study, we aimed at refining the selection of patients based on the expression of immune genes. Forty-six consecutive advanced NSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab in first-line setting were enrolled. The expression levels of 770 genes involved in the regulation of the immune system was analysed by the nanoString system. PD-L1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Patients with durable clinical benefit had a greater infiltration of cytotoxic cells, exhausted CD8, B-cells, CD45, T-cells, CD8 T-cells and NK cells. Immune cell scores such as CD8 T-cell and NK cell were good predictors of durable response with an AUC of 0.82. Among the immune cell markers, XCL1/2 showed the better performance in predicting durable benefit to pembrolizumab, with an AUC of 0.85. Additionally, CD8A, CD8B and EOMES showed a high specificity (>0.86) in identifying patients with a good response to treatment. In the same series, PD-L1 expression levels had an AUC of 0.61. The characterization of tumor microenvironment, even with the use of single markers, can improve patients’ selection for pembrolizumab treatment.

scholarly journals Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ALK-rearranged: a meta-analysis of clinical trials

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao-chuan Ma ◽  
Yi-hong Liu ◽  
Kai-lin Ding ◽  
Yu-feng Liu ◽  
Wen-jie Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Whereas there are many pharmacological interventions prescribed for patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)- rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), comparative data between novel generation ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain scant. Here, we indirectly compared the efficacy and safety of first-line systemic therapeutic options used for the treatment of ALK-rearranged NSCLC. Methods We included all phase 2 and 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any two or three treatment options. Eligible studies reported at least one of the following outcomes: progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), or adverse events of grade 3 or higher (Grade ≥ 3 AEs). Subgroup analysis was conducted according to central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Results A total of 9 RCTs consisting of 2484 patients with 8 treatment options were included in the systematic review. Our analysis showed that alectinib (300 mg and 600 mg), brigatinib, lorlatinib and ensartinib yielded the most favorable PFS. Whereas there was no significant OS or ORR difference among the ALK-TKIs. According to Bayesian ranking profiles, lorlatinib, alectinib 600 mg and alectinib 300 mg had the best PFS (63.7%), OS (35.9%) and ORR (37%), respectively. On the other hand, ceritinib showed the highest rate of severe adverse events (60%). Conclusion Our analysis indicated that alectinib and lorlatinib might be associated with the best therapeutic efficacy in first-line treatment for major population of advanced NSCLC patients with ALK-rearrangement. However, since there is little comparative evidence on the treatment options, there is need for relative trials to fully determine the best treatment options as well as the rapidly evolving treatment landscape.

scholarly journals Efficacy and toxicities of combination maintenance therapy in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an up-to-date meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianming Hu ◽  
Jiawei Hu ◽  
Xiaolan Liu ◽  
Long Li ◽  
Xue Bai
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Abstract Background: Single agent maintenance therapy has been approved for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) due to its potential survival benefits, but whether combined maintenance therapy would improve the survival of advanced NSCLC remains undetermined. Methods: Relevant trials were identified by searching electronic databases and conference meetings. Prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing combination maintenance therapy in advanced NSCLC patients were included. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade 3–4 toxicities. Results: A total of 1950 advanced NSCLC patients received combination maintenance treatment from six trials were included for analysis. The use of doublet maintenance therapy in NSCLC patients significantly improved PFS (HR 0.74, 95%CI: 0.59–0.93, P = 0.010), but not for OS (HR 0.95, 95%CI: 0.85–1.07, P = 0.40) in comparison with single agent maintenance therapy. Similar results were observed in sub-group analysis according to treatment regimens. In addition, there was no significantly risk difference between doublet and single agent maintenance therapy in terms of grade 3/4 hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities. Conclusion: The findings of the present study show that doublet combination maintenance therapy is superior to single agent maintenance therapy in terms of PFS, without increased grade 3–4 toxicities. Future prospective studies are recommended to clearly assess the long-term clinical benefit of doublet maintenance therapy and its impact on health-related quality of life.

Two different schedules of docetaxel plus cisplatin as first-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A preliminary result from a randomized phase II study

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7135-7135
Author(s):  
S. Park ◽  
S. Bang ◽  
E. Cho ◽  
D. Shin ◽  
J. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

7135 Background: There has been increasing interest in the use of a weekly administration of docetaxel as a way of reducing its hematologic toxicity. The purpose of this randomized study is to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of docetaxel and cisplatin combination on two schedules in patients with previously untreated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Consenting patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent NSCLC were randomized to receive first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1, plus either weekly (35 mg/m2 on day 1, 8, 15 of a 4-week cycle) or 3-weekly (75 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 3-week cycle) docetaxel, both for up to 6 cycles. Objectives of this randomized phase II trial were response, toxicity and quality of life (QOL; measured with EORTC QLQ-C30). With a two-stage phase II design, the required number of patients was 39 per each arm. Results: Of 85 patients accrued, 71 patients were evaluable for response and 83 for safety. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two arms: male (56 patients); median age (64 years); adenocarcinoma/squamous cell carcinoma (53/32); stage IIIB/IV/recurrent (12/63/10); ECOG performance status 0/1/2 (20/44/21). Median number of chemotherapy cycles was 3 (1–6) for both arms. Median dose intensities were docetaxel 88%, cisplatin 98% in weekly arm, and docetaxel 97%, cisplatin 98% in 3-weekly arm. The objective responses of weekly and 3-weekly arm were 38% (95% CI, 23–53) and 42% (95% CI, 27–57), respectively. There was significantly more grade 3/4 neutropenia (66% v 12%; P < .001) and febrile neutropenia (40% v 7%; P < .001) on 3-weekly arm but less grade 3/4 diarrhea (2% v 14%; P = .05) and severe skin/nail toxicity (5% v 29%; P = .003). No difference in the rates of treatment delay or dose reduction for both arms; however, 19% of day 15 docetaxel were omitted in weekly arm due to toxicity. Conclusions: Both weekly and 3-weekly docetaxel plus cisplatin appear to be active as first-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC, with different safety profiles. Updated results and QOL data, including a prolonged follow-up, will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document