scholarly journals Efficacy of ProTaper Retreatment System in Root Canals Obturated with Gutta-Percha Using Two Different Sealers and GuttaFlow

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaya Siotia ◽  
Shashi Rashmi Acharya ◽  
Sunil Kumar Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Area Ratio ◽  
Variance Test ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Silicon Based ◽  
Group 1

Objective. To compare the efficacy of ProTaper retreatment files in removing three different obturating materials.Study Design. Forty-five human, single-rooted premolars were divided into three experimental groups. Group 1 was obturated with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer, Group 2 was obturated with gutta-percha and zinc oxide eugenol sealer, and Group 3 was obturated with GuttaFlow. Retreatment was done using the ProTaper universal rotary retreatment files. Root halves were visualized using magnifying loops at 3X magnification and optical stereomicroscope at 10X magnification. Images were analyzed using AutoCAD 2004 software to calculate area of the remaining debris in the canal. For statistical analysis were used variance test and ANOVA.Results. Total debris/canal area ratio between the three groups showed a statistically significant difference (P<0.001).Conclusion. ProTaper retreatment system did not produce completely clean canals in any of the groups. However, it had the best efficacy towards removing silicon based obturating material GuttaFlow.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Apical Filling after Warm Vertical Compaction using Two Different Endodontic Materials: Resilon® and Gutta-Percha

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-170
Author(s):  
Carla Zogheib ◽  
Etienne Medioni
Keyword(s):  
Group 4 ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Warm Vertical Compaction ◽  
Group 1

ABSTRACT Forty-eight extracted maxillary anterior teeth instrumented with ProTaper system to apical preparations 0.25, 0.40 and 0.60 mm (n = 16 each) were divided into six groups for filling as following: Group 1: Apical preparation 25/100 + gutta-percha/AH Plus sealer, group 2: Apical preparation 25/100 + Resilon/Real Seal, group 3: Apical preparation 40/100 + gutta-percha/AH plus sealer, group 4: Apical preparation 40/100 + Resilon/Real Seal, group 5: Apical preparation 60/100 + gutta-percha/AH plus, group 6: Apical preparation 60/100 + Resilon/Real Seal. All teeth were filled using the warm vertical technique. Horizontal sections at 1, 2 and 3 mm from the apex were observed by SEM under 200 × magnification. Sections were digitally photographed under a stereomicroscope and the images were transferred to a compatible PC for image analysis. The surface area of voids were calculated and compared at all levels; using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Sidak correction and Mann-Whitney U test (p > 0.05). Comparisons within each group (gutta-percha/AH plus and Resilon/Real Seal) showed the presence of voids but there was no significant difference between any level of sectioning for apical preparations of 25 and 40 (p > 0.05). The only difference was in the groups prepared to size 60 and filled with Resilon/ Real Seal which showed significantly more voids than the group filled with gutta-percha/AH plus and especially at the 3 mm level. Conclusion The system Resilon/Real Seal did not achieve better results in terms of sealing ability in the apical third when compared to the conventional gutta-percha/AH plus sealing system. How to cite this article Zogheib C, Naaman A, Medioni E. Evaluation of Apical Filling after Warm Vertical Compaction using Two Different Endodontic Materials: Resilon® and Gutta-Percha. World J Dent 2012;3(2):166-170.

scholarly journals The Effects of Water and Acetone-based Dentin Adhesives on Apical Microleakage

2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oya Bala ◽  
L. Sibel Karadag ◽  
Emin Türköz ◽  
Tansev Mihçioğlu
Keyword(s):  
Adhesive System ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Dentin Adhesives ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Group 1

Abstract In this study, the aim was to assess the in vitro apical microleakage of a resin-based sealer used with two different adhesives. Thirty nine freshly extracted maxillary incisors were used. The teeth were decoronated at the cemento-enamel junction with a water-cooled fissure bur. Chemo-mechanical debridement of the root canals was accomplished with the step-back technique. The smear layer was removed by 19% ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA). The roots were then divided into three experimental groups of thirteen teeth in each. Specimens in group 1 were filled with gutta-percha, AH Plus sealer, and water-based adhesive system (Syntac Single Component). Group 2 specimens were filled with gutta-percha, AH Plus sealer, and acetone-based dentin adhesive (Prime & Bond NT). Specimens of group 3 were filled with only gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer (no adhesive was applied). The teeth were immersed into 2% methylene blue solution. Apical sealing qualities were assessed by measuring the linear dye penetration with a stereomicroscope. Dentin tubule penetration was observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results showed no statistically significant difference between the materials used, however, the leakage in group 2 was less than group 1 and 3. Citation Karadag LS, Bala O, Türköz E, Mihçioğlu T. The Effects of Water and Acetone-based Dentin Adhesives on Apical Microleakage. J Contemp Dent Pract 2004 May;(5)2:093-101.

scholarly journals Fracture resistance of immature teeth filled with mineral trioxide aggregate, bioaggregate, and biodentine

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 220-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emre Bayram ◽  
Huda Melike Bayram
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Mineral Trioxide Aggregate ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Immature Teeth ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Group 1

ABSTRACT Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate fracture resistance of teeth with immature apices treated with coronal placement of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), bioaggregate (BA), and Biodentine. Materials and Methods: Forty-one freshly extracted, single-rooted human premolar teeth were used for the study. At first, the root length was standardized to 9 mm. The crown-down technique was used for the preparation of the root canals using the rotary ProTaper system (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) of F3 (30). Peeso reamer no. 6 was stepped out from the apex to simulate an incompletely formed root. The prepared roots were randomly assigned to one control (n = 5) and three experimental (n = 12) groups, as described below. Group 1: White MTA (Angelus, Londrina, Brazil) was prepared as per the manufacturer's instructions and compacted into the root canal using MAP system (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and condensed by pluggers (Angelus, Londrina, Brazil). Group 2: The canals were filled with DiaRoot-BA (DiaDent Group International, Canada). Group 3: Biodentine (Septodont, Saint Maur des Fosses, France) solution was mixed with the capsule powder and condensed using pluggers. Instron was used to determine the maximum horizontal load to fracture the tooth, placing the tip 3 mm incisal to the cementoenamel junction. Mean values of the fracture strength were compared by ANOVA followed by a post hoc test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: No significant difference was observed among the MTA, BA, and biodentine experimental groups. Conclusion: All the three materials tested, may be used as effective strengthening agents for immature teeth.

scholarly journals Influence of gutta-percha points on the filling of simulated lateral canals

2005 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana Machado Barroso ◽  
Laise Daniela Carrasco ◽  
Alexandre Capelli ◽  
Danilo Mathias Zanello Guerisoli ◽  
Paulo César Saquy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Preparation Technique ◽  
Linear Measurements ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Classic Technique ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Group 2

The aim of this study was to investigate, in vitro, the percentage of filling of simulated lateral canals in teeth obturated with TP medium and standardized gutta-percha points. Twenty human mandibular canines were prepared with LA Axxess (SybronEndo) and K³ Endo rotary system (SybronEndo) up to a #50 file, according to the Free Tip Preparation Technique. During instrumentation, the root canals were alternately irrigated with 1% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA. Six artificial lateral canals were prepared at the apical third of each tooth. Then, the teeth were assigned to two groups (n=10): Group 1 - filled with TP medium master gutta-percha points (Dentsply, Mailleffer); Group 2 - filled with standardized master gutta-percha points (Dentsply, Mailleffer). Root canal filling was complemented with AH Plus sealer (Dentsply, Mailleffer) and accessory gutta-percha points (Dentsply, Mailleffer), according to the classic technique. The teeth were radiographed and the images obtained were digitized. Linear measurements of the percentage of filling of the artificial lateral canals in each group were accomplished on the Image Tool 2.02 software. Statistical analysis of the data using Mann-Whitney U non-parametric test evidenced significant difference (p<0.01) between the experimental groups. The group obturated with TP medium points yielded higher percentage of filling of the lateral canals. It may be concluded that the use of master gutta-percha points with larger taper resulted in better filling of the simulated lateral canals, as compared to the use of standardized master gutta-percha points.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Two Rotary Instruments For Gutta Percha Removal During Root Canal Retreatment

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 56-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
JS Dhillon ◽  
A Bhagat ◽  
G Chhabra
Keyword(s):  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Group I ◽  
Rotary Instruments ◽  
Root Canal Retreatment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Research And Education

Aim - Evaluate the efficacy of Pro Taper and Pro Taper Retreatment instruments in the removal of gutta-percha during retreatment of straight root canals in comparison with Hedstrom files. Methodology -The root canals of 30 Maxillary central incisors were instrumented by step back procedure and obturated with lateral condensation before the teeth were randomly divided into three groups of 10 specimens each i.e. Group I-using Hfiles, Group 2- using Pro Taper and Group 3- using Pro Taper retreatment. Radiographs were taken after the filling removal and the canal wall cleanliness was evaluated. Roots were divided into apical, middle and coronal parts and scored on a scale of 0 (no debris), 1(25-50% of walls covered with debris and 3 (>50% of walls covered with debris).Number of fractured instruments were also evaluated in each group. Results-There was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the three groups in terms of the debris seen radio graphically after retreatment. Conclusion - All systems evaluated ex vivo were equally effective in removing gutta percha during retreatment. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjdre.v4i2.20250 Bangladesh Journal of Dental Research and Education Vol.4(2) 2014: 56-60

scholarly journals To Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy, Cleaning Ability of Hand and Two Rotary Systems in Root Canal Retreatment

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 440-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyoti Sachdeva ◽  
Chetan R Patil ◽  
Venugopal Thangala ◽  
Pabbati Ravi Kumar ◽  
Akash Krishna
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Visual Scoring ◽  
Root Canal Retreatment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Hand Instrumentation ◽  
Group 1

ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate and compare the efficacy, cleaning ability of hand and two rotary systems in root canal retreatment. Methodology Sixty extracted premolars were retreated with following systems: Group 1—ProTaper Universal retreatment files, Group 2—ProFile system, Group 3—H-file. Specimens were split longitudinally and amount of remaining gutta-percha on the canal walls was assessed using direct visual scoring with the aid of stereomicroscope. Results were statistically analyzed using ANOVA test. Results Completely clean root canal walls were not achieved with any of the techniques investigated. However, all three systems proved to be effective for gutta-percha removal. Significant difference was found between ProTaper universal retreatment file and H-file, and also between ProFile and H-file. Conclusion Under the conditions of the present study, ProTaper Universal retreatment files left significantly less guttapercha and sealer than ProFile and H-file. Clinical significance Rotary systems in combination with gutta-percha solvents can perform superiorly as compared to the time tested traditional hand instrumentation in root canal retreatment. How to cite this article Shivanand S, Patil CR, Thangala V, Kumar PR, Sachdeva J, Krishna A. To Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy, Cleaning Ability of Hand and Two Rotary Systems in Root Canal Retreatment. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(3):440-444.

scholarly journals Fracture resistance of roots enlarged with various rotary systems and filled with various sealers

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-220
Author(s):  
Selen İnce Yusufoglu ◽  
Melek Akman ◽  
Makbule Bilge Akbulut ◽  
Ayce Ünverdi Eldeniz
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Universal System ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background. This in vitro study compared the fracture resistance of roots instrumented either with ProTaper or One Shape rotary systems and filled with one of the silicate, epoxy resin or silicone-based sealers. Methods. Sixty single-rooted extracted mandibular premolars were decoronated to a length of 13 mm and then randomly divided into two main groups (n=30) in terms of the rotary system used for preparation. Group 1 samples were instrumented with the ProTaper Universal system up to a master apical file of #F2, while samples in group 2 were enlarged with One Shape system. The two main groups were then divided into 3 subgroups in terms of the sealer used (n=10) and filled with gutta-percha (either F2 or MM-GP points) of the rotary system used and one of the sealers as follows: group 1, BioRoot RCS + ProTaper F2 gutta-percha; group 2, AH Plus + ProTaper F2 gutta-percha; group 3, GuttaFlow + ProTaper F2 gutta-percha; group 4, BioRoot RCS+ MM-GP points; group 5, AH Plus + MM-GP points; and group 6, GuttaFlow + MM-GP points. Each specimen then underwent fracture testing by using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min until the root fractured. Data were statistically analyzed. Results. Two-way ANOVA showed no significant differences between the groups. One Shape instruments showed significantly better fracture resistance compared to ProTaper instruments. Statistically, no significant difference was found between AHPlus, GuttaFlow and BioRoot RCS sealers. Conclusion. It can be concluded that the rotary system used for the instrumentation of teeth has some influence on the fracture resistance, while the root canal sealers do not have such an effect.

scholarly journals The Effect of Two Different Polishing Techniques on Microleakage of New Composites in Class V Restorations

2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 18-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meserret Baseren ◽  
Filiz Yalcin ◽  
Yonca Korkmaz
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Class V ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Nanohybrid Composite ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Silicon Based ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Aim The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of polishing systems on the microleakage of a nanofill, a nanohybrid, and a microhybrid composite in Class V cavities. Methods and Materials Preparations were made at the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) of 36 extracted human premolars. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups and restored with new resin composites according to the manufacturers’ instructions as follows: Group 1, Filtek Supreme & Single Bond; Group 2, Grandio & Solobond; and Group 3, Artemis & Excite. The restorations were finished with diamond finishing burs. The restored/finished teeth were randomly divided into two groups and polished using the following systems: Super-Snap (Al2O2 coated, abrasive disc system, fine grit, and extra fine grit) and Astropol/Astrobrush (silicon-based abrasive polisher point and polisher brush). All specimens were thermocycled 1000 times with a 10 second dwell time. They were immersed in 0.5% aqueous basic fuchsin dye for 24 hours and then sectioned buccal-lingual-longitudinally through the center of both restorations of each tooth and evaluated under a stereomicroscope at 30X magnification. The degree of dye penetration was quantified. Result No significant difference in leakage scores was observed in enamel margins (p=0.456, Kruskall Wallis test), but dentin margins were significantly affected by the different polishing systems (p=0.037, Kruskall Wallis test). The lower leakage scores were recorded for Astropol/Astrobrush polishing systems. The nanofill composite showed the least leakage among the test groups in this study. The most leakage was observed in nanohybrid composite resin (p<0.05, Mann Whitney U test). Conclusions Under the conditions of this in vitro study: the microleakage resistance of composites at enamel margins is not significantly affected by the different polishing systems; the lowest leakage scores were recorded for Astropol/Astrobrush polishing techniques in different types of composites; and the ranking of the composite materials from most to least leakage at the dentin margins according to polishing techniques was Grandio >Artemis > Filtek Supreme. Citation Yalcin F, Korkmaz Y, BasŞeren M. The Effect of Two Different Polishing Techniques on Microleakage of New Composites in Class V Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006 November;(7)5:018-025.

scholarly journals Apical extrusion of debris by manual and mechanical instrumentation

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilia E. Leonardi ◽  
Diana M. Atlas ◽  
Guillermo Raiden
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Apical Extrusion ◽  
Working Length ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

The aim of the present study was to assess the presence of apically extruded debris and evaluate the influence of canal curvature on the amount of debris produced by manual and mechanical techniques. Forty single-rooted mature teeth with 15 to 30 degree of root canal curvature were selected. The presence of only one foramen was confirmed using a magnifying lens. A size 15 K-file was placed up to the apical foramen to determine the patency. Working length was determined with the same instrument, 1 mm short of the foramen. According to the employed technique, the groups were labeled as follows: Group 1 - Manual instrumentation with Mor-flex files; Group 2 - Mechanical instrumentation with Cursor and Mor-flex files; Group 3 - Manual instrumentation with Flexi-cut files; Group 4 - Mechanical instrumentation with Cursor and Flexi-cut files. During instrumentation, the root canals were irrigated with 20 mL. Debris extruded through the apical foramen was collected using the Myers and Montgomery technique. The values (in mg) were: Group 1: 0.422 ± 0.683; Group 2: 0.688 ± 0.795; Group 3: 0.409 ± 0.323; Group 4: 0.810 ± 0.708. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA at 5% significance level. There was no statistically significant difference among the groups (p<0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between slight and moderate curvatures in terms of the amount of extruded debris (p>0.05).

scholarly journals The assessment of the filling material remaining on root canal walls after using protaper universal rotary retreatment system with or without a solvent

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 204-208
Author(s):  
Sînziana Adina Scărlătescu ◽  
◽  
Irina Maria Gheorghiu ◽  
Stana Păunica ◽  
Paula Perlea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Universal System ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Times ◽  
Group 1

The purposes of retreatment are to eliminate the cause for failure of initial endodontic treatment and to preserve the tooth as well. The aim of this study is a comparative evaluation of efficacy of Protaper rotaty retreatment instruments for gutta-percha removal with or without solvents specific both to the sealer and gutta-percha. Materials and methods: Forty single-rooted extracted teeth were randomly divided into 4 groups according to different methods of retreatment. The teeth were prepared with Protaper Universal system (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and filled using lateral condensation of gutta-percha and AH Plus (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany). All root canal fillings were removed using Protaper Universal Retreatment system (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). During the retreatment procedure, in group 1 Resosolv (Pierre Rolland, Merignac, France) was used; in group 2 eucalyptol was used, in group 3 Endosolv E (Septodont, Paris, France) was used and in group 4 no solvent was used. The times required for retreatments and radiographycal evaluation after retreatment were recorded. Results: All root canals showed filling material remnants and group 1 with specific solvent for AH Plus recorded the shortest time. Conclusions: Although it is not possible to eliminate the entire filling material on the canal walls, the duration of retreatment was reduced by the use of a solvent specific to the sealer compared with a gutta-percha solvent or no solvent.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document