scholarly journals A Meta-Analysis of Nutritional Supplementation for Management of Hospitalized Alcoholic Hepatitis

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 463-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramy Antar ◽  
Phil Wong ◽  
Peter Ghali
Keyword(s):  
Biochemical Parameters ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Nutritional Therapy ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Nutritional Supplementation ◽  
Mortality Benefit ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Balanced Diet ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies ◽  
Diet Versus

BACKGROUND: Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is associated with a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Malnutrition accompanies this condition and may be both a consequence of and contributor to the pathology. Many trials have investigated the benefits of providing supplemental nutrition in the management of patients with ALD. The present study is a meta-analysis of the available evidence.METHOD: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies comparing nutritional supplementation plus a normal hospital diet versus diet alone.RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled studies including 262 patients with ALD were identified. Pooled analysis revealed no statistical difference in mortality between groups given special nutritional therapy versus a normal balanced diet (OR 0.80 [95% CI 0.42 to 1.52]). In addition, nutrition did not significantly improve ascites (OR 1.29 [95% CI 0.52 to 3.20]) or any biochemical parameters. However, encephalopathy showed a significant improvement or resolution (OR 0.24 [95% CI 0.06 to 0.93]).CONCLUSION: Nutritional supplementation provided no mortality benefit in patients with ALD, and neither ascites nor biochemical parameters significantly improved. However, encephalopathy was significantly ameliorated and, therefore, nutritional supplementation should be encouraged in that setting.

Effectiveness of ketamine-propofol sedation for reducing respiratory adverse events compared to propofol sedation: A Meta-Analysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Wen ◽  
Shibiao Chen ◽  
Lili Zhao ◽  
Yang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Respiratory Depression ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Central Apnea ◽  
Propofol Sedation ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract ObjectiveThe objective of our review was to determine whether ketamine-propofol had an advantage in reducing respiratory adverse events compared to propofol for procedural sedation.MethodsElectronic databases including Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline, Embase, Google Scholar were searched to identify potential studies. All randomized controlled studies from their inception to May 2020 comparing ketamine-propofol sedation with propofol sedation were identified. Pooled analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted using Stata software. The quality assessment of all included studies was completed by using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias.ResultsA total of 21 studies involving 3669 individuals were included. The most common respiratory adverse events (all reported per 100 sedations) were: hypoxia(KP 10.9%; P 17.0%), respiratory depression(KP 6.9%; P 14.9%), central apnea(KP 5.9%; P 8.0%). Pooling these 21 studies, subjects with ketamine-propofol had significant lower incidence of respiratory adverse events than those with propofol (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.41–0.74). When stratified by study population, no significant difference was observed in reducing respiratory adverse events between ketamine-propofol sedation and propofol sedation among children (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.46–1.20). However, significant differences were discerned definitely among adults(RR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.39–0.60).ConclusionIn summary, Our results suggested hypoxia, respiratory depression, central apnea were most common respiratory adverse events in propofol sedation. However, ketamine-propofol sedation had an advantage in reducing the incidence of respiratory adverse events compared with propofol sedation, especially in adults.

Relationship between total plasma homocysteine and the risk of aneurysms – a meta-analysis

VASA ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Hanji Zhang ◽  
Dexin Yin ◽  
Yue Zhao ◽  
Yezhou Li ◽  
Dejiang Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Single Species ◽  
Total Plasma ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Healthy Participants

Summary: Our meta-analysis focused on the relationship between homocysteine (Hcy) level and the incidence of aneurysms and looked at the relationship between smoking, hypertension and aneurysms. A systematic literature search of Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase databases (up to March 31, 2020) resulted in the identification of 19 studies, including 2,629 aneurysm patients and 6,497 healthy participants. Combined analysis of the included studies showed that number of smoking, hypertension and hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy) in aneurysm patients was higher than that in the control groups, and the total plasma Hcy level in aneurysm patients was also higher. These findings suggest that smoking, hypertension and HHcy may be risk factors for the development and progression of aneurysms. Although the heterogeneity of meta-analysis was significant, it was found that the heterogeneity might come from the difference between race and disease species through subgroup analysis. Large-scale randomized controlled studies of single species and single disease species are needed in the future to supplement the accuracy of the results.

scholarly journals Dose-Response Relationship between Endurance Training Prescription Variables and Increases in Aerobic Performance of Healthy and Unhealthy Middle and Very Old Individuals Aged 70 Years and Older: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Sarah Cheour ◽  
Chouaib Cheour ◽  
Nicola Luigi Bragazzi ◽  
Liye Zou ◽  
Armin H. Paravlic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Endurance Training ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Aerobic Performance ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Very Old ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies

Background: The objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to quantify the effectiveness of endurance training (ET) on aerobic performance (i.e., peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak)) in healthy and unhealthy middle and very old adults aged 70 years and older, and to provide dose–response relationships of training prescription variables (in terms of frequency, and volume). Methods: Several scholarly databases (i.e., PubMed/MEDLINE, SpringerLink, ScienceDirect Journals, and Taylor & Francis Online—Journals) were searched, identifying randomized controlled studies that investigated the effectiveness of ET on VO2peak in older adults. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated. Results: In terms of changes differences between experimental and control group, ET produced significant large effects on VO2peak performance (SMD = 2.64 (95%CI 0.97–4.31)). The moderator analysis revealed that “health status” variable moderated ET effect onVO2peak performance. More specifically, ET produced larger SMD magnitudes on VO2peak performance in healthy compared with unhealthy individuals. With regard to the dose–response relationships, findings from the meta-regression showed that none of the included training prescription variables predicted ET effects on VO2peak performance. Conclusions: ET is an effective mean for improving aerobic performance in healthy older adults when compared with their unhealthy counterparts.

Abstract P209: Dose-Response Relationship Between Dietary Intake of Alpha-linolenic Acid and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies

Circulation ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 135 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingkai Wei ◽  
Yuzhi Xi ◽  
Ruixue Hou ◽  
Alysse Kowalski ◽  
Hao Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Response ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Response Relationship ◽  
Alpha Linolenic Acid ◽  
Dose Response Relationship ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Chd Risk ◽  
Reduced Risk

Introduction: Previous studies show that alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) is associated with reduced risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). However, it remains unclear whether and how dietary ALA doses are related to CHD. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that higher dietary ALA intake is associated with a greater reduction in risk of CHD. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for prospective studies examining the association between dietary ALA intake and CHD risk. Dietary ALA intake was assigned or measured by self-report. Outcomes were reported as total and fatal CHD and/or myocardial infarction, which were obtained from blinded endpoint assessments or medical records. Two-stage fixed-effects dose-response meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the association between increasing ALA intake (relative to study-specific referents) and CHD. Results: Fifteen published articles were identified and included in the meta-analysis (13 cohort studies and 2 randomized controlled trials). The pooled analysis was based on 310,768 individuals with 12,049 events with a mean length of follow-up of 9.6 years. The analysis showed a J-shaped curve between ALA intake and relative risk of total CHD (Chi-square=21.08, p<0.001). ALA intake from 0.3-1.4g/day showed reduced risk of total CHD, while intake ≥2.5g/day was associated with increased risk of CHD, compared to people without ALA intake (Figure 1A). Approximately 1g/day of ALA intake was associated with the lowest risk of total CHD. ALA intake was linearly associated with fatal CHD - every 1g/day increase in ALA intake was associated with an 11% decrease in fatal CHD risk (95% CI: -0.16, -0.05) (Figure 1B). Conclusion: The J-shaped dose-response relationship based on our pooled analysis suggests that 1g/day of dietary ALA may be optimal for total CHD prevention. Though a higher dietary ALA intake was associated with reduced risk of fatal CHD, the excess total CHD risk at higher ALA intakes warrants further investigation, especially through randomized controlled trials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document