scholarly journals Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Meropenem in Neonate with Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Challenge

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven De Keukeleire ◽  
Daniëlle Borrey ◽  
Wim Decaluwe ◽  
Marijke Reynders

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) continues to be a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. We describe the added value of therapeutic drug monitoring by presenting the case of a preterm infant with severe NEC treated with meropenem. Dosing strategy will achieve adequate patient outcome when treating pathogens with elevated MIC. As safe as meropenem is, there are not enough data for 40 mg/kg, every 8 h infused over 4 h; accordingly, strict monitoring of blood levels is mandatory. Based on our findings, a 4 h prolonged infusion of 40 mg/kg meropenem, every 8 h, will achieve an adequate patient outcome.

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Vena ◽  
Patricia Muñoz ◽  
Miriam Mateos ◽  
Jesus Guinea ◽  
Alicia Galar ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S282-S283
Author(s):  
Ginger Anderson ◽  
Christopher Vinnard

Abstract Background Pyrazinamide (PZA) is a key drug for both drug-sensitive and drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB). Patients co-infected with TB and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are more likely to have low blood levels of PZA, associated with inferior outcomes. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with sparse blood sampling is recommended for high-risk groups, including HIV/TB patients, but the accuracy is uncertain. We performed a pharmacokinetic (PK) simulation study to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of TDM for PZA among HIV/TB patients. Methods We recently performed a population PK study among HIV/TB patients in Botswana, identifying a 1-compartment model with first-order elimination. In the current work, we performed an intensive PK simulation (n = 10,000 patients) to determine the accuracy of sparse blood sampling in identifying HIV/TB patients with low PZA blood levels, as defined by the AUC in a dosing interval (AUC0-24) predictive of successful outcome (363 mg*hr/L). PZA dosing followed WHO guidelines with weight-based dosing bands. In secondary analysis, we examined the peak concentration (Cmax) target predictive of 2-month sputum conversion (58 mg/L). To determine the accuracy of sparse sampling (2- and 6-hours), we performed receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis, with bootstrapping (n = 1,000) for 95% confidence intervals (CI), and defined accuracy as the area under the ROC curve. Results In this simulation PK study of PZA among HIV/TB patients, the PZA AUC0-24 fell below the target in 29% of patients, while in 71% of patients the PZA Cmax was below the target. For the AUC0-24 target, the area under the ROC curve was 0.69 (95% CI 0.68–0.70) for a single 2-hour sample, increasing to 0.75 (95% CI 0.74–0.76) for 2- and 6-hour samples. For the Cmax target, diagnostic accuracy was similar for a 2-hour sample (0.87, 95% CI 0.86–0.87) and 2- and 6-hour samples (0.88, 95% CI 0.88–0.89). Conclusion We observed modest diagnostic accuracy of TDM for identifying in silico HIV/TB patients with low PZA AUC0-24, and higher accuracy for low Cmax. By identifying diagnostic performance characteristics of sparse sampling strategies, including optimal cut-offs, the ROC framework can support wider implementation of TDM in high-risk TB populations. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 508-508
Author(s):  
Yoshihide Kawasaki ◽  
Shinnya Takasaki ◽  
Akihiro Ito ◽  
Koji Mitsuzuka ◽  
Shinichi Yamashita ◽  
...  

508 Background: The optimal blood concentration of total Sunitinib (SU) (SU + its active metabolite) is reportedly 50-100 ng/ml at trough levels according to the product literature. This is, however, based on models optimally calculated for Caucasians; hence, the desirable blood concentration for Asian patients, including Japanese, is unclear. We examined trough SU levels in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinomas (mRCC), to determine the preferred concentration of total SU and its doses. We also evaluated the efficacy and dependability of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) through the duration of therapy. Methods: Patients with mRCC scheduled for targeted therapy were prospectively recruited between November 2011 and August 2015. TDM of trough levels for patients treated with SU was performed on a regular basis. For this, blood samples were obtained immediately before administering SU on day 8 and day 15 after the initial administration day. Pre-therapeutic characteristics and post-therapeutic outcomes were evaluated. Relationships between pre-therapeutic characteristics, the dose of SU administered, adverse events (AEs) and total SU concentration at trough levels were determined. Results: Twenty of a total of 31 eligible patients were analyzed. Median patient age was 64 years (52-82), median BMI was 23.58 kg/m2 (17.7-32.78), and the average duration of SU therapy was 5 months (1-40). Seventeen patients were treated with SU as first-line therapy and 3 patients as second-line therapy after interferons. Patients with trough SU levels of over 80 ng/ml following the first course needed to discontinue SU due to AEs. All of the patients who obtained long-term stable disease (SD) or partial response (PR) without any AE > grade 2 were those with trough SU levels of 40-60 ng/ml. Conclusions: Our study suggests that trough total SU levels of 50-100 ng/ml are too high for Japanese people. And 40-80 ng/ml seems to be the preferable trough blood concentration of total SU after the first course of SU therapy in Japanese patients. TDM appears to be effective for the management of patients, to obtain optimal benefits of SU without AEs during therapy.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albrecht Eisert ◽  
Christian Lanckohr ◽  
Janina Frey ◽  
Otto Frey ◽  
Sebastian G. Wicha ◽  
...  

Abstract Background : Sepsis is a severe disease with complex pathophysiology and high mortality. Meropenem is frequently used in sepsis to treat the underlying infection. Studies have shown that standard doses of meropenem are frequently inadequate due to high pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of meropenem is not widely available, and increased empiric dosing recommendations are needed. Methods : We compared two empiric dosing schemes of meropenem using extended infusion (120 minutes) in 32 patients with sepsis in the ICUs at two different hospitals. One regimen was 3x 2 g meropenem/ 24 h for two days, followed by 3x 1 g meropenem/ 24 h; the other regimen was 4x 1 g meropenem/ 24 h. Serum meropenem concentrations were measured for the first 72 h of therapy, and pharmacokinetic modelling was performed to define the percentage of time the dosing interval was above various target minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for each regimen (%fT >MIC ). Results : Both regimens led to a sufficiently high %fT >MIC for pathogens with target MICs below 4 mg/L. When higher MICs were targeted, the %fT >MIC of 4x 1 g meropenem decreased faster than that of 3x 2 g meropenem. At high MICs of 32 mg/L, both dosing regimens failed to provide drug concentrations deemed appropriate for clinical improvement. Conclusions : The results of this pilot study can guide clinicians in their choice of an empirical dosing scheme when prescribing meropenem in the absence of TDM. If pathogens with low MICs (<4 mg/L) are targeted, both dosing regimens are adequate, whereas more resistant clones require higher doses. The control of β-lactam therapy by therapeutic drug monitoring is desirable.


2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (23) ◽  
pp. 1-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shakila Thangaratinam ◽  
Nadine Marlin ◽  
Sian Newton ◽  
Annalise Weckesser ◽  
Manny Bagary ◽  
...  

Background Pregnant women with epilepsy on antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may experience a reduction in serum AED levels. This has the potential to worsen seizure control. Objective To determine if, in pregnant women with epilepsy on AEDs, additional therapeutic drug monitoring reduces seizure deterioration compared with clinical features monitoring after a reduction in serum AED levels. Design A double-blind, randomised trial nested within a cohort study was conducted and a qualitative study of acceptability of the two strategies was undertaken. Stratified block randomisation with a 1 : 1 allocation method was carried out. Setting Fifty obstetric and epilepsy clinics in secondary and tertiary care units in the UK. Participants Pregnant women with epilepsy on one or more of the following AEDs: lamotrigine, carbamazepine, phenytoin or levetiracetam. Women with a ≥ 25% decrease in serum AED level from baseline were randomised to therapeutic drug monitoring or clinical features monitoring strategies. Interventions In the therapeutic drug monitoring group, clinicians had access to clinical findings and monthly serum AED levels to guide AED dosage adjustment for seizure control. In the clinical features monitoring group, AED dosage adjustment was based only on clinical features. Main outcome measures Primary outcome – seizure deterioration, defined as time to first seizure and to all seizures after randomisation per woman until 6 weeks post partum. Secondary outcomes – pregnancy complications in mother and offspring, maternal quality of life, seizure rates in cohorts with stable serum AED level, AED dose exposure and adverse events related to AEDs. Analysis Analysis of time to first and to all seizures after randomisation was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model, and multivariate failure time analysis by the Andersen–Gill model. The effects were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Secondary outcomes were reported as mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios. Results A total of 130 women were randomised to the therapeutic drug monitoring group and 133 to the clinical features monitoring group; 294 women did not have a reduction in serum AED level. A total of 127 women in the therapeutic drug monitoring group and 130 women in the clinical features monitoring group (98% of complete data) were included in the primary analysis. There were no significant differences in the time to first seizure (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.2) or timing of all seizures after randomisation (HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.7 to 2.5) between both trial groups. In comparison with the group with stable serum AED levels, there were no significant increases in seizures in the clinical features monitoring (odds ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.5) or therapeutic drug monitoring group (odds ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.5) associated with a reduction in serum AED levels. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar in both groups, except for higher cord blood levels of lamotrigine (MD 0.55 mg/l, 95% CI 0.11 to 1 mg/l) or levetiracetam (MD 7.8 mg/l, 95% CI 0.86 to 14.8 mg/l) in the therapeutic drug monitoring group than in the clinical features monitoring group. There were no differences between the groups on daily AED exposure or quality of life. An increase in exposure to lamotrigine, levetiracetam and carbamazepine significantly increased the cord blood levels of the AEDs, but not maternal or fetal complications. Women with epilepsy perceived the need for weighing up their increased vulnerability to seizures during pregnancy against the side effects of AEDs. Limitations Fewer women than the original target were recruited. Conclusion There is no evidence to suggest that regular monitoring of serum AED levels in pregnancy improves seizure control or affects maternal or fetal outcomes. Future work recommendations Further evaluation of the risks of seizure deterioration for various threshold levels of reduction in AEDs and the long-term neurodevelopment of infants born to mothers in both randomised groups is needed. An individualised prediction model will help to identify those women who need close monitoring in pregnancy. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN01253916. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 22, No. 23. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.


2002 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 1738-1739 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Einecke ◽  
I Mai ◽  
F Diekmann ◽  
L Fritsche ◽  
H.-H Neumayer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document