scholarly journals A Comparative Chemical Study of Calcium Silicate-Containing and Epoxy Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Przemysław Reszka ◽  
Alicja Nowicka ◽  
Mariusz Lipski ◽  
Włodzimierz Dura ◽  
Agnieszka Droździk ◽  
...  

Objective.The present study assessed the chemical elements in two novel calcium silicate-containing root canal sealers, BioRoot RCS and Well-Root ST, compared to a calcium silicate-containing root canal sealer that has been on the market for several years, MTA Fillapex, and epoxy resin-based sealer AHPlus.Material and Methods.The sealers were mixed and manipulated according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Twelve cylindrical molds (inner diameter 4 mm; height 3 mm) were placed on a glass petri dish and packed with the materials. The dish was transferred to an incubator. After 72 h the molds were examined by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis.Results.BioRoot RCS and Well-Root ST had high peaks of calcium, zirconium, oxygen, carbon, silicon, and chlorine. Well-Root ST also had sodium, magnesium, aluminum, and titanium peaks. MTA Fillapex and AHPlus had carbon, oxygen, calcium, titanium, and bismuth peaks. A silicon peak was also observed for MTA Fillapex, and zirconium and tungsten peaks for AHPlus.Conclusion.BioRoot RSC had the highest degree of purity. The clinical implication of metals contained in the other sealers needs to be investigated.

Author(s):  
Gabriela Cardoso Ferreira ◽  
Lucas Siqueira Pinheiro ◽  
Júlia Silveira Nunes ◽  
Roberta Almeida Mendes ◽  
Cláudia Daniela Schuster ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seo Ryeong Kim ◽  
Sang Won Kwak ◽  
Ju‐Kyung Lee ◽  
Hye‐Jin Goo ◽  
Jung‐Hong Ha ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Gözde Kandemir Demirci ◽  
Mehmet Emin Kaval ◽  
Seniha Miçooğulları Kurt ◽  
Burcu Serefoglu ◽  
Pelin Güneri ◽  
...  

Abstract Root canal sealers should have optimum adhesion to the root dentin, low cytotoxicity, sufficient radiopacity and high dimensional stability, which depend mainly on their chemical composition. The aims of this study were to evaluate the chemical composition of Syntex (Cerkamed, Stalowa Wola, Poland), Adseal (Meta Biomed, Cheongju-si, Korea), Sealapex (SybronEndo, Scafati, Italy), MTA Fillapex (Angelus, Londrina, Brazil) and GuttaFlow Bioseal (Coltene/Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland) and to determine their radiopacity comparatively. Stainless steel molds with an inner diameter of 5 mm and a depth of 2 mm were constructed. Tested root-canal sealers were mixed and poured into the molds. Following setting, digital periapical radiographs of the specimens (n=12) were taken under standard exposure conditions and the mean gray-values of specimens were measured using a computer graphics program. Then the specimens were examined by scanning electron microscopy, and Energy-dispersive X-ray analysis was performed. The data were analyzed using One-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak multi-comparison test (p = 0.05). Sealapex showed higher calcium peak than MTA Fillapex, GuttaFlow Bioseal, Adseal and Syntex sealers. MTA Fillapex contained a highest amount of tungstate. Sealapex presented the highest radiopacity value among the tested materials (p < 0.05), whereas MTA Fillapex was the least radiopaque material (p < 0.05). Each root canal sealer contains different compositions of radiopacifiers including bismuth oxide, calcium tungstate and zirconium oxide. The tested root canal sealers had radiopacity values above the ISO-specified limit. Sealapex was the most radiopaque root canal sealer followed by GuttaFlow Bioseal, Syntex, Adseal and MTA Fillapex.


1979 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 558-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdel Rahim Mohammad ◽  
Osama Younis ◽  
Milton Siskin
Keyword(s):  
X Ray ◽  

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Verardino de CAMARGO ◽  
Yara Terezinha Corrêa SILVA-SOUSA ◽  
Rodrigo Presotto Ferreira da ROSA ◽  
Jardel Francisco MAZZI-CHAVES ◽  
Fabiane Carneiro LOPES ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin-Na Lee ◽  
Ji-Uk Hong ◽  
Se-Min Kim ◽  
Ji-Hyun Jang ◽  
Hoon-Sang Chang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document