scholarly journals Brief Report: Exercise and Blood Pressure in Older Adults—An Updated Look

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
George A. Kelley ◽  
Kristi S. Kelley

Background/Objectives. Raised blood pressure is a major problem in older adults. Using a random-effects model, a recent meta-analysis reported statistically significant reductions in both resting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) as a result of aerobic, resistance, and combined aerobic and resistance exercise in adults ≥65 years. To provide more objective information regarding this nonpharmacologic approach, this study applied more robust methods to this data. Design. Meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials representing 96 groups (52 exercise; 44 control). Setting. Any location where a randomized controlled trial could be conducted. Participants. Adults ≥65 years. Intervention. Trials ≥2 weeks that included aerobic, resistance, and/or combined aerobic and resistance exercise as the intervention. Measurements. The recently developed inverse heterogeneity model (IVhet) was used to pool findings and the Doi plot was used to examine for small-study effects. Absolute and relative differences between the IVhet and random-effects model were also calculated. Data were reported using the mean difference (exercise minus control) with nonoverlapping 95% confidence intervals considered statistically significant. Results. Statistically significant reductions in resting blood pressure were found as a result of aerobic exercise (SBP, -4.7 mmHg, 95% CI, -7.7 to -1.8; DBP, -2.0 mmHg, 95% CI -3.13 to -0.9), SBP but not DBP for resistance training (SBP, -7.0 mmHg, 95% CI, -10.5 to -3.4; DBP, -1.2 mmHg, 95% CI -2.7 to 0.3), and both SBP and DBP for combined aerobic and resistance training (SBP, -5.5 mmHg, 95% CI, -8.3 to -2.7; DBP, -3.7 mmHg, 95% CI -4.8 to -2.7). Conclusions. Exclusive of changes in DBP congruent with resistance training, exercise (aerobic, resistance, and combined aerobic and resistance) reduces resting SBP and DBP in older adults. These findings have practical implications when considering exercise for the prevention and treatment of raised blood pressure in older adults.

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Huaguang Zheng ◽  
Xu Tong ◽  
Liping Liu ◽  
Zixiao Li ◽  
Xiaoling Liao ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: We performed a meta-analysis to compare the outcomes between lower dose and standard dose intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) for acute ischemic stroke in randomized and non- randomized controlled trials. Methods: We searched PubMed for relevant studies and calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) using random effects models.The primary endpoint was good functional outcome[modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-1] at 3 month after stroke onset. Other major end points were all-cause mortality and symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH). Results: From 2010 to 2016, 7 Cohort studies and 1 randomized controlled trial (ENCHANTED trial) were pooled in meta-analysis. The lower tPA strategy was likely to be less effective than the standard dose treatment (OR=0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.04, P=0.136; I 2 =47.9%, P=0.044 in random effects models and OR=0.88; 95% CI 0.88-0.98,P=0.016 ;I 2 =0.0%, P=0.693 in non- random effects models after 2 cohort studies were excluded due to heterogeneity). No difference was found for mortality at 90 days (OR=0.87; 95% CI 0.74-1.03, P=0.102 ;I 2 =0.0%, P=0.635 in non-random effects models)and sICH (OR=1.12; 95% CI 0.68-1.83,P=0.659; I 2 =57.6%, P=0.016 in random effects models and OR=1.23; 95% CI 0.92-1.65, P=0.168; I 2 =0.0%, P=0.547 in non-random effects models after 2 cohort studies were excluded due to heterogeneity ) between lower tPA group and standard dose . Conclusions: The low-dose alteplase strategy was less effective comparable to the standard-dose treatment .The safety was similar between the two strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document