scholarly journals Endoscopic Removal of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in the Stomach: A Single-Center Experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingjie Guo ◽  
Xue Jing ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Xueli Ding ◽  
Xiaoyu Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Size ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Risk Classification ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Endoscopic Removal ◽  
Moderate Risk ◽  
Stromal Tumors ◽  
Gastric Gists

Background and Aims. Endoscopic removal of GISTs (gastrointestinal stromal tumors) is recently recognized, but less is known about its efficacy and safety. This study is aimed at assessing the feasibility, clinical efficacy, and safety of the endoscopic removal of gastric GISTs. Patients and Methods. Endoscopic removal (ER) of GISTs was performed in 134 patients at our hospital between January 2015 and January 2019. The clinical features, surgical outcomes, complications, pathological diagnosis, and risk classification were evaluated retrospectively. Results. ER was successful in 131 cases (98%), including 58 by ESD (endoscopic submucosal dissection), 43 by ESE (endoscopic submucosal excavation), 25 by EFTR (endoscopic full-thickness resection), and 5 by STER (submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection). In addition, GISTs of two cases were resected using LECS (laparoscopic and luminal endoscopic cooperative surgery) for the extraluminal and intraluminal growth pattern. The average tumor size was 1.89±1.25 cm (range: 0.5-6.0 cm). Of these patients, 26 cases had a large tumor size (range: 2.0-6.0 cm), and endoscopic removal was successful in all of them. During the procedure, endoclips were used to close the perforation in all cases, without conversion to open surgery. The average length of hospital stay was 5.50±2.15 days (range: 3-10 days). In the risk classification, 106 (79.7%) were of a very low risk, 25 (18.8%) of a low risk, and 2 (1.5%) of a moderate risk. The moderate-risk cases were treated with imatinib mesylate after ER. No recurrence or metastasis was observed during the follow-up period of 23±8 months (range: 3-48 months). Conclusions. The endoscopic treatment is feasible, effective, and safe for gastric GISTs, and individualized choice of approaches is recommended for GISTs.

Clinicopathological Features and Clinical Outcomes of Primary Hepatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Evaluation of a Pooled Case Series

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xing Xu ◽  
Guoliang Zheng ◽  
Zhichao Zheng
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Mitotic Index ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Risk Classification ◽  
Clinicopathological Features ◽  
Stromal Tumors ◽  
Gastric Gists

Abstract Background: Due to the extremely rare incidence, data of clinicopathological features and prognosis of primary hepatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is limited. Methods: 36 cases of hepatic GISTs were from the literature, PUBMED, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and WANFANG DATA, and 1 case came from our center. Clinicopathological features and outcomes were analyzed between 37 hepatic GISTs and 254 gastric GISTs from our center. Results: A majority of hepatic GISTs exceeded 5 cm (83.7%), displayed mixed density (69.4%) and spindle morphology (74.2%) and were classified as high risk (91.4%). Larger tumors of hepatic GISTs were likely to display mixed lesion and tumors with mixed lesion were prone to be classified as high risk. In comparisons to gastric GISTs, hepatic GISTs differed from gastric GISTs in tumor size, main symptoms, histologic type, mitotic index, CD34 expression, NIH risk classification. In patients with hepatic GISTs, 5-year DFS and DSS rates were 19.4% and 53.7%, which were worse than that of gastric GISTs (P＜ 0.001), especially for those with tumor size exceeding 5 cm or mitotic indices exceeding 5/50 HPF (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed location and NIH risk classification were independent prognostic factors for DFS in patients with GISTs, and size and location were significantly associated with DSS. Conclusions: Hepatic GISTs distinguished from gastric GISTs in respect to clinicopathological features and outcomes. Mitotic index exceeding 5/50 HPF or tumor size exceeding 5 cm may be important factor to distinguish hepatic GISTs from gastric GISTs in DFS and DSS.

Outcomes of multivisceral resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 91-91
Author(s):  
Sabha Ganai ◽  
Mitchell Posner ◽  
Vivek N. Prachand ◽  
John C. Alverdy ◽  
Eugene A. Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Size ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Multivisceral Resection ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stromal Tumors ◽  
Gastric Gists ◽  
Disease Free

91 Background: Despite the recent introduction of imatinib and laparoendoscopic techniques to the management of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), outcomes remain uncertain in the setting of multivisceral involvement. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 69 consecutive patients who underwent resection of gastric GISTs from October 2002 through August 2011. Median follow-up was 19 months (interquartile range [IQR] 4-37). Results: Patients were 51% female, with a mean age of 65 ± 13 years and BMI of 30 ± 8 kg/m2. Patients undergoing multivisceral resection (n=13) had a longer interval from diagnosis to surgery (7.4 [IQR 1.9 – 15.0] vs. 1.3 [IQR 0.7-3.5] months, p<0.01), greater use of neoadjuvant imatinib (62% vs. 4%, p<0.001), and greater preoperative tumor size (12 ± 8 vs. 4 ± 3 cm, p<0.001) in comparison to gastric-only resections (n=56). Patients were less likely to be managed laparoscopically (8% vs. 71%, p<0.001), had a longer operative time (286 ± 92 vs. 152 ± 65 min, p<0.001), and were less likely to be R0 (69% vs. 98%, p<0.001). While patients undergoing multivisceral resection were more likely to have a pathological complete response to therapy (23% vs. 0, p<0.01), they were also more likely to have metastatic disease present (31% vs. 0, p<0.01). Hospital length of stay was greater (median 8 [IQR 7-9] vs. 3 [IQR 2-6] days, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in grade or mitotic index between groups, or in the use of adjuvant imatinib (54% vs. 23%). Overall survival was less in patients undergoing multivisceral resection (63% vs. 86% at 3 years, p<0.05), as was disease-free survival (52% vs. 71% at 3 years, p<0.05). Median disease-free survival was 50 and 66 months, respectively (p<0.01). Controlling for tumor size, grade, resection status, and the use of neoadjuvant imatinib, multivisceral resection was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (p<0.05). Conclusions: Multivisceral involvement is associated with tumors of greater size, and despite an increased use of neoadjuvant imatinib, it is associated with poor outcome for patients with gastric GISTs.

scholarly journals MRI-Based Radiomics Models for Predicting Risk Classification of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haijia Mao ◽  
Bingqian Zhang ◽  
Mingyue Zou ◽  
Yanan Huang ◽  
Liming Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Risk Classification ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Stromal Tumors ◽  
Mr Sequences

BackgroundWe conduct a study in developing and validating four MRI-based radiomics models to preoperatively predict the risk classification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).MethodsForty-one patients (low-risk = 17, intermediate-risk = 13, high-risk = 11) underwent MRI before surgery between September 2013 and March 2019 in this retrospective study. The Kruskal–Wallis test with Bonferonni correction and variance threshold was used to select appropriate features, and the Random Forest model (three classification model) was used to select features among the high-risk, intermediate-risk, and low-risk of GISTs. The predictive performance of the models built by the Random Forest was estimated by a 5-fold cross validation (5FCV). Their performance was estimated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, summarized as the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for risk classification were reported. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was used to assess the discriminative ability of these radiomics models.ResultsThe high-risk, intermediate-risk, and low-risk of GISTs were well classified by radiomics models, the micro-average of ROC curves was 0.85, 0.81, 0.87 and 0.94 for T1WI, T2WI, ADC and combined three MR sequences. And ROC curves achieved excellent AUCs for T1WI (0.85, 0.75 and 0.82), T2WI (0.69, 0.78 and 0.78), ADC (0.85, 0.77 and 0.80) and combined three MR sequences (0.96, 0.92, 0.81) for the diagnosis of high-risk, intermediate-risk, and low-risk of GISTs, respectively. In addition, LDA demonstrated the different risk of GISTs were correctly classified by radiomics analysis (61.0% for T1WI, 70.7% for T2WI, 83.3% for ADC, and 78.9% for the combined three MR sequences).ConclusionsRadiomics models based on a single sequence and combined three MR sequences can be a noninvasive method to evaluate the risk classification of GISTs, which may help the treatment of GISTs patients in the future.

Outcomes of multivisceral resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10090-10090
Author(s):  
Sabha Ganai ◽  
Mitchell Posner ◽  
Vivek N. Prachand ◽  
John C. Alverdy ◽  
Eugene A. Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Size ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Multivisceral Resection ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Adjuvant Imatinib ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stromal Tumors ◽  
Gastric Gists ◽  
Disease Free

10090 Background: Despite the recent introduction of imatinib and laparoendoscopic techniques to the management of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), outcomes remain uncertain in the setting of multivisceral involvement. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 73 consecutive patients who underwent resection of gastric GISTs from October 2002 through December 2011. Median follow-up was 22 months (interquartile range [IQR] 6-37). Results: Patients were 51% female, with a mean age of 65 ± 12 years and BMI of 30 ± 8 kg/m2. Patients undergoing multivisceral resection (n=14) had a longer interval from diagnosis to surgery (7.3 [IQR 1.9 – 15.0] vs. 1.3 [IQR 0.7-4.2] months, p<0.01), greater use of neoadjuvant imatinib (64% vs. 3%, p<0.0001), and greater preoperative tumor size (12 ± 8 vs. 4 ± 3 cm, p<0.0001) in comparison to gastric-only resections (n=59). Patients were less likely to be managed laparoscopically (7% vs. 71%, p<0.0001), had a longer operative time (310 ± 117 vs. 145 ± 62 min, p<0.0001), and were less likely to be R0 (71% vs. 98%, p<0.001). While patients undergoing multivisceral resection were more likely to have a pathological complete response to therapy (29% vs. 0, p<0.001), they were also more likely to have metastatic disease present (29% vs. 0, p<0.001). Hospital length of stay was greater (median 8 [IQR 6-9] vs. 3 [IQR 2-6] days, p<0.0001). There were no significant differences in grade or mitotic index between groups. There was greater use of adjuvant imatinib (64% vs. 25%, p<0.05). Overall survival was less in patients undergoing multivisceral resection (64% vs. 87% at 3 years, p<0.05), as was disease-free survival (52% vs. 71% at 3 years, p<0.05). Median overall and disease-free survival were 43 and 22 months after multivisceral resection for gastric GISTs. Controlling for tumor size, grade, resection status, and the use of neoadjuvant imatinib, multivisceral resection and use of adjuvant imatinib were both independent predictors of disease-free survival (p<0.05). Conclusions: Multivisceral involvement is associated with tumors of greater size and, despite an increased use of neoadjuvant imatinib, it is associated with poor outcome for patients with gastric GISTs.

scholarly journals Safety of Regular-Dose Imatinib Therapy in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Undergoing Dialysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryota Niikura ◽  
Takako Serizawa ◽  
Atsuo Yamada ◽  
Shuntaro Yoshida ◽  
Mariko Tanaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Tarry Stool ◽  
Dialysis Patients ◽  
Stromal Tumors ◽  
Duodenal Gist ◽  
Johnson Syndrome ◽  
Old Japanese ◽  
Steven Johnson Syndrome

The number of cancer patients undergoing dialysis has been increasing, and the number of these patients on chemotherapy is also increasing. Imatinib is an effective and safe therapy for KIT-positive gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), but the efficacy and safety of imatinib in dialysis patients remain unclear. Because clinical trials have not been conducted in this population, more investigations are required. We report on a 75-year-old Japanese man undergoing dialysis who presented with massive tarry stool from a duodenal GIST. The duodenal GIST was 14 cm in diameter with multiple liver and bone metastases. The patient underwent an urgent pancreaticoduodenectomy to achieve hemostasis. After surgery, he was administered imatinib 400 mg/day. No severe adverse event including myelosuppression, congestive heart failure, liver functional impairment, intestinal pneumonia, or Steven-Johnson syndrome occurred, and the liver metastasis remained stable for 4 months. During chemotherapy, hemodialysis continued three times per week without adverse events. We suggest that regular-dose imatinib is an effective and safe treatment in patients with GIST undergoing dialysis. In addition, we present a literature review of the effectiveness and safety of imatinib treatment in dialysis patients.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A “Benign” Tumor with Hepatic Metastasis after 11 Years

1998 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Ballarini ◽  
Mattia Intra ◽  
Andrea Pisani Ceretti ◽  
Francesco Prestipino ◽  
Filippo Maria Bianchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Hepatic Metastasis ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Cellular Proliferation ◽  
Malignant Potential ◽  
Mitotic Count ◽  
Proliferation Index ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) constitue the largest category of primary non-epithelial neoplasms of the stomach and small bowel. They are characterized by a remarkable cellular variability and their malignant potential is sometimes difficult to predict. Very recent studies, using mitotic count and tumor size as the best determinants of biological behavior, divide GISTs into three groups: benign, borderline and malignant tumors. We report on a male patient who underwent a right hepatectomy for a large metastasis 11 years after the surgical treatment of an antral-pyloric gastric neoplasm, histologically defined as leiomyoblastoma and with clinical, morphological and immunohistochemical features of benignity (low mitotic count, tumor size < 5 cm, low cellular proliferation index). Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of the hepatic metastasis showed the cellular proliferation index (Ki-67) to be positive in 25% of neoplastic cells, as opposed to the primary gastric tumor in which Ki-67 was positive in only 5% of neoplastic cells. In conclusion, although modern immunohistochemical techniques are now available to obtain useful prognostic information, the malignant potential of GISTs is sometimes difficult to predict: neoplasms clinically and histologically defined as benign could metastasize a long time after oncologically correct surgical treatment. Therefore, benign GISTs also require consistent, long-term follow-up.

Radiomics of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors; Risk Classification Based on Computed Tomography Images – A Pilot Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. e6
Author(s):  
Milea Timbergen ◽  
Martijn P.A. Starmans ◽  
Melissa Vos ◽  
Michel Renckens ◽  
Dirk J. Grünhagen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Risk Classification ◽  
Stromal Tumors ◽  
Computed Tomography Images

Neoadjuvant imatinib and organ preservation in locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10550-10550 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Hohenberger ◽  
O. Oladeji ◽  
T. Licht ◽  
A. Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss ◽  
J. Jakob ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Size ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Organ Preservation ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Stromal Tumors ◽  
Local Recurrences ◽  
Tumor Boards ◽  
Exon 9

10550 Background: We assessed the outcome of patients with locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) undergoing preoperative therapy with imatinib. Methods: 36 patients with biopsy proven GIST (23 f, 13 m, median age 58 (27–85) yrs, 31 primary tumors, 5 local recurrences) of the esophagus/EGJ (n=5), stomach (n=17), duodenum (n=2), small bowel (n=3), or rectum (n=9) were treated with imatinib 400mg/d for 6 mos. preop. Six pts had been found unresectable at exploratory lap. and no pt. had signs of metastases on CT/MRI and/or FDG-PET. Average tumor size was 10.5 cm (4–28 cm). According to Consensus two tumors were low risk, 11 intermediate, and 23 were high risk for aggressive behaviour. 33 pts were symptomatic. Extent of surgery, local outcome, morbidity and response to therapy were analyzed; median follow-up is 22 mos. Results: Median treatment duration was 11 mos. (range 2–31 mos). Successful dose adjustment for exon 9 mutation to 800 mg imatinib/d was used in two pts. 33 pts. completed the treatment schedule, two died from unrelated disease, another one had to be operated for tumor rupture. Of the remaining 33, median tumor size shrank to 55 mm. Two elderly patients refused surgery and continued with the drug; one pt. was found still unresectable. Complete tumor removal was possible in 28 pts without operative mortality, but two pts showed previously undetected peritoneal spread (R2 resection). Histologically, one pCR and 11 near CR/good PRs were found. The extent of resection found 5 of 6 inoperable pts now resectable and in 21/25 pts a less extensive procedure could be performed in comparison to recommendations by previous tumor boards (segmental gastric resection for gastrectomy, avoidance of pancreatectomy, transanal resection instead of colo-anal anastomosis). Two local recurrences were detected at 31 and 44 mos. postop. Conclusions: Locoregionally advanced GIST can be treated successfully with upfront imatinib at 400mg/ (800 mg in exon 9 mutation). Substantial tumor shrinkage facilitates radical but conservative surgery and results in organ-preservation in the overwhelming majority of patients. PET monitoring proved very helpful and added to CT/MRI evaluation. Long-term results on survival and metastatic spread have to be awaited. [Table: see text]

Biological and clinical significance of cytogenetic abnormalities in low-risk and high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors

2002 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bastian Gunawan ◽  
Frank Bergmann ◽  
Jörg Höer ◽  
Claus Langer ◽  
Volker Schumpelick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽  
Stromal Tumors

scholarly journals Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Alexandria University Experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maher Soliman
Keyword(s):  
Risk Score ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Multivariate Analyses ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Margin Status ◽  
High Power Field ◽  
Mesenchymal Tumors ◽  
Male Predominance ◽  
Stromal Tumors

Abstract Introduction Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) that can arise in any parts of the GIT. The clinical behavior and prognosis of GISTs remain unpredictable. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of GISTs. Methods The medical files of 93 patients with nonmetastatic GIST presented to our hospital were reviewed. The clinical and pathological parameters, treatment, and follow-up data were collected and correlated to survival outcome using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results The median age of patients was 48.9 years with a slight male predominance. Abdominal pain (39.8%) was the commonly presenting symptom. About 60% of GISTs originated from the stomach and 22% from the small intestine. Tumors stained positive for CD117 in 95.7%. The median diameter of the tumors was 7 cm. Mitotic counts were < 5/50 high power field in 55.9% of tumors. About 44% of patients had high risk tumors. All patients underwent surgery and about 60.2% of patients received adjuvant imatinib mesylate.The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 74.5 and 80%, respectively. Margin status, tumor site, tumor size, mitotic counts, and risk score were significantly associated with DFS and OS in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusion Surgery is the mainstay treatment for nonmetastatic GISTs. Tumor size, tumor location, margin status, mitotic count, and risk score were predictive factors for DFS and OS of GISTs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document