scholarly journals Earth Pressure on Retaining Wall with Surface-Inclined Cohesive Fill Based on Principal Stress Rotation

Geofluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Hengli Wang ◽  
Zhengsheng Zou ◽  
Jian Liu ◽  
Xinyu Wang
Keyword(s):  
Principal Stress ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Horizontal Component ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Principal Stress Rotation ◽  
Passive Earth Pressure ◽  
Stress Rotation ◽  
Earth Pressures ◽  
Inclined Surface

When considering the friction and bonding force between the back of the retaining wall and the horizontal fill behind the wall, the principal stress of the soil element near the vertical back of the retaining wall is no longer vertical and horizontal but deflects to a certain extent. When the surface of the backfill becomes inclined, the principal stress of the soil behind the wall deflects in a more complicated way. In this paper, the cohesion of the soil element in the fill with an inclined surface is assumed, and the formulas for calculating the active and passive earth pressures of the retaining wall with inclined cohesive backfill are derived by rotating the principal stress of the soil element behind the wall. The proposed method is compared with the existing algorithm, and the influences of the inclination and the cohesion of the fill are analyzed. The results show that the proposed method is more universal. Both the active and passive earth pressures increase rapidly with the increase of the inclination of the fill. The active earth pressure and its horizontal component decrease with the increase of the cohesion of the fill, while the passive earth pressure and its horizontal component increase with the increase of the cohesion of the fill.

Estimation of Active Earth Pressure on Retaining Wall with Translation Mode

2013 ◽  
Vol 639-640 ◽  
pp. 682-687
Author(s):  
Qing Guang Yang ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Jie He ◽  
Shan Huang Luo
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Friction Angle ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Action Point ◽  
Layer Analysis ◽  
Earth Pressures ◽  
Reduction Coefficient ◽  
Point Of Intersection ◽  
Theoretical Results

Considering the movement effect of translation mode，friction angle reduction coefficient and method of bevel-layer analysis,estimation of active earth pressures is deduced for cohesiveless soil retaining wall with translation mode.In order to validate the feasibility of the proposed approach，a model test for active earth pressures was conducted in laboratory;and the proposed method was used to analyze this model. Experimental and theoretical results indicate that the curve of active earth pressure increases firstly and decreases then along the depth of retaining wall with different values of s/sc,and it has a point of intersection with the curve of Coulomb active earth pressure at the depth of 0.6H，where H is the wall height. Further study indicates that the action point position of the active earth pressure is higher than 1/3 times wall height.

Analysis of Passive Earth Pressure and Displacements of Retaining Walls Using Pseudo-Dynamic Approach

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-109
Author(s):  
B. Munwar Basha ◽  
G. L. Sivakumar
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Method ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Passive Earth Pressure ◽  
Planar Mechanisms ◽  
Composite Failure ◽  
Earth Pressures ◽  
Planar Failure ◽  
Seismic Accelerations ◽  
The Comparative Study

Using additional dynamic parameters in the pseudo-static method like shear wave and primary wave velocities of soil, phase change in the shear and primary waves, and soil amplification for seismic accelerations, one can benefit from another useful tool called pseudo-dynamic method to solve the problem of earth pressures. In this study, the pseudo-dynamic method is used to compute the seismic passive earth pressures on a rigid gravity retaining wall by considering both the planar failure and composite failure (log-spiral and planar) mechanisms. To validate the present formulation, passive earth pressure computed by the present method are compared with those given by other authors. Seismic passive earth pressure coefficients are provided in tabular form for different parameters. The sliding and rotational displacements are also computed and results of the comparative study showed that the assumption of planar failure mechanism for rough soil-wall interfaces significantly overestimates passive earth pressure and underestimate the sliding and rotational displacements.

Arch with Various Wall Movements in Active Earth Pressure Abstract

2015 ◽  
Vol 1089 ◽  
pp. 286-291
Author(s):  
Chao Tian ◽  
Yong Gang Li ◽  
Zhi Xiong Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Principal Stress ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Limit State ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Principal Stresses ◽  
Arching Effect ◽  
Curve Change ◽  
Soil Arch ◽  
Minor Principal Stress

For the retaining wall in translation, in this paper the writers present the minor principal stresses trajectory which named minor principal stress arches. By discussing the results of the various arch curves in arching effect with different displacements of retaining wall which include the arch curves in ultimate model of soil and the arch curves in none limit state of soil. It gets the soil arch curve change rule under different state of the displacements, different friction angles and different height: the arch curve turn gentle when the displacements increase.

Unified Solution of Coulomb’s Active Earth Pressure for Unsaturated Soils without Crack

2012 ◽  
Vol 170-173 ◽  
pp. 755-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Biao Liang ◽  
Jun Hai Zhao ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Chang Guang Zhang ◽  
Su Wang
Keyword(s):  
Principal Stress ◽  
Unsaturated Soils ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Friction Angle ◽  
Matric Suction ◽  
Intermediate Principal Stress ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Soil Pressure

Based on the unified solution of shear strength in terms of double stress state variables for unsaturated soils, whilst considering the effect of the intermediate principal stress rationally, the unified solution of Coulomb’s active earth pressure for unsaturated soils without cracks is developed. Comparability of the solution is analyzed and influencing characteristic of each factor is obtained. The research result indicates that: the intermediate principal stress and matric suction have obvious impacts on Coulomb’s active earth pressure for unsaturated soils; Coulomb’s active earth pressure has been decreasing until zero with the increase of unified strength theory parameter and matric suction; Coulomb’s active earth pressure increases with the increase of grading angle of retaining wall and slop angle of backfill, but decreases with the increase of matric suction, effective internal friction angle and matric suction angle, while external friction angle has no obvious influence. The proposed unified solution of Coulomb’s active earth pressure enjoys a wider application, and unified solution of Rankine’s active earth pressure is just the special case. The results are of great significance to soil pressure determination such as slope and foundation pit, and to retaining structures design.

Analysis of active earth pressure against rigid caissons backfilled with crushed rock and sand

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 1216-1228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyuho Paik ◽  
Myung Sagong ◽  
Hyungjoo Lee
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Slope Angle ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Crushed Rock ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Active Force ◽  
Marine Structures ◽  
Earth Pressures ◽  
Backfill Materials ◽  
New Formulation

Arching effects in backfill materials generate a nonlinear active earth-pressure distribution behind a rough, rigid retaining wall. There are several analyses for estimating the nonlinear active earth pressures on a retaining wall exerted by a homogeneous backfill in the presence of arching. However, it is not possible to use these analyses for a caisson backfilled with crushed rock and sand, which is common in marine structures. In this study, a new formulation is proposed for calculating the nonlinear active earth pressure acting on a caisson backfilled with crushed rock and sand. The new formulation allows important insights, including the dependence of the slope angle of the crushed rock – sand interface that minimizes the active force and overturning moment on the caisson on the shear strengths of the crushed rock and sand and the geometry of the problem.

scholarly journals Active Earth Pressure against Rigid Retaining Walls for Finite Soils in Sloping Condition considering Shear Stress and Soil Arching Effect

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Weidong Hu ◽  
Kangxing Liu ◽  
Xinnian Zhu ◽  
Xiaolong Tong ◽  
Xiyu Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Shear Stress ◽  
Principal Stress ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Soil Arching ◽  
Soil Layers ◽  
Arching Effect ◽  
Soil Arching Effect ◽  
Application Point

The horizontal differential layer element method was used to study the active earth pressure of the finite-width soil formed by the rigid retaining wall for the embankment or adjacent foundation pits. The cohesionless soil was taken as the research object, and the soil arch theory was introduced based on the translation mode of rigid retaining wall and the linear sliding fracture surface. The minor principal stress line was assumed as circular, considering the deflected principal stress as soil arching effect. The shear stress between level soil layers in the failure wedge was calculated, and the differential level layer method was modified. Then, the theoretical formula of the active earth pressure, the resultant earth pressure, and the point of application of resultant earth pressure were obtained using this revised method. The predictions by the proposed formula were compared with the existing methods combined with the cases. It is shown that the resultant finite pressure increases gradually and approaches to Coulomb active earth pressure values when the soil is infinite, with the increase of the ratios of the backfill width to height. Moreover, the horizontal pressure for limited soils is distributed nonlinearly along the wall height. Considering the shear stress between level soil layers and the soil arching effect, the position of application point of the resultant active earth pressure by the proposed formulation is higher than that of Coulomb’s solution. The wall is rougher, and the resultant pressure will be smaller. The application point distance from the bottom of the wall will increase. Finally, an experiment was conducted to verify the distribution of the active earth pressure for finite soil against rigid retaining wall, and the research results agree well with those of the experimented observations.

Analysis of Passive Earth Pressure and Displacements of Retaining Walls Using Pseudo-Dynamic Approach

2012 ◽  
pp. 43-65
Author(s):  
B. Munwar Basha ◽  
G. L. Sivakumar
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Method ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Passive Earth Pressure ◽  
Planar Mechanisms ◽  
Composite Failure ◽  
Earth Pressures ◽  
Planar Failure ◽  
Seismic Accelerations ◽  
The Comparative Study

Using additional dynamic parameters in the pseudo-static method like shear wave and primary wave velocities of soil, phase change in the shear and primary waves, and soil amplification for seismic accelerations, one can benefit from another useful tool called pseudo-dynamic method to solve the problem of earth pressures. In this study, the pseudo-dynamic method is used to compute the seismic passive earth pressures on a rigid gravity retaining wall by considering both the planar failure and composite failure (log-spiral and planar) mechanisms. To validate the present formulation, passive earth pressure computed by the present method are compared with those given by other authors. Seismic passive earth pressure coefficients are provided in tabular form for different parameters. The sliding and rotational displacements are also computed and results of the comparative study showed that the assumption of planar failure mechanism for rough soil-wall interfaces significantly overestimates passive earth pressure and underestimate the sliding and rotational displacements.

Estimation of the Passive Earth Pressure with Inclined Cohesive Backfills: The Effect of Intermediate Principal Stress is Considered

2010 ◽  
Vol 168-170 ◽  
pp. 1370-1376
Author(s):  
We Long Yu ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Xiu Hua Sun ◽  
Rui Lin Hu ◽  
Xin Wei
Keyword(s):  
Principal Stress ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Ground Surface ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Intermediate Principal Stress ◽  
Strength Theory ◽  
Passive Earth Pressure ◽  
Unified Strength Theory ◽  
Retaining Structure ◽  
Lateral Earth Pressure

Estimating passive earth pressure accurately is very important when designing retaining wall. Based on the unified strength theory and plane strain assumption, an analytical solution has been developed to determine the passive lateral earth pressure distribution on a retaining structure when the backfill is cohesive and inclined considering the effect of the intermediate principal stress. The solution derived encompasses both Bell’s equation (for cohesive or cohesionless backfill with a horizontal ground surface) and Rankine’s solution (for cohesionless backfill with an inclined ground surface).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document