scholarly journals Research on Multiattribute Comprehensive Evaluation of Intelligent Judicial Decision System

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Gang Zhao ◽  
Jifa Wang ◽  
Huibin Shi
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Intelligent Systems ◽  
Comprehensive Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Judicial Decision ◽  
Entropy Weight ◽  
Scoring Method ◽  
Judicial Decision Making ◽  
Decision Making System ◽  
Evaluation Index Systems

When dealing with cases, judges must consult a large number of relevant materials and carefully consider before they can write the final judgment. So, we want to use intelligent systems to assist the judicial system in handling cases. The essence of the system is automatic text classification. The system can predict the judgment result according to the previous prediction and can also provide support for judicial judgment and individual litigation. Because the evaluation of intelligent judicial decision-making system has the characteristics of complexity and fuzziness, we establish a comprehensive evaluation model of intelligent judicial decision-making system with subjective and objective combination by introducing the TOPSIS model. In the experiment, firstly, we use nine multiattribute comprehensive evaluation index systems such as acquisition cost and use cost to grade the indexes. Secondly, AHP and entropy weight methods are used to calculate the subjective weight and objective weight of the index, respectively; the combined weight of the index is determined according to the expert forced scoring method, the attribute measurement function of a single index is constructed according to the classification of the index, the comprehensive attribute measurement is calculated, and the comprehensive evaluation grade is judged according to the attribute identification standard. Finally, taking the intelligent judicial decision-making system as the research object, combined with the system report and expert score, this paper makes a multiattribute comprehensive evaluation and analysis of the intelligent judicial decision-making system and analyzes the results. The final experimental results show that the evaluation results of the model are reasonable and consistent with the actual situation, which verifies the adaptability of the combined weighted attribute recognition model in the multiattribute comprehensive evaluation of intelligent judicial judgment system. This result provides ideas and theoretical follow-up work for the intelligent judgment of judicial cases and has certain significance for the development of the field of judicial judgment.

The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Judicial Behavior

2017 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Separation Of Powers ◽  
Comprehensive Evaluation ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Background Characteristics ◽  
Judicial Decision ◽  
Judicial Decision Making ◽  
Institutional Dynamics ◽  
Judicial Appointments ◽  
Judicial Impact

The chapters in this handbook reflect on aspects of judicial decision-making in U.S. courts, with a focus on the factors and institutional dynamics that shape the choices judges make. The authors have provided chapters that describe existing research on multiple aspects of the decision-making process and environment, including chapters on judicial appointments and elections, court personnel (law clerks), trial and appellate processes, precedent and case selection, lawyers, litigants and interest groups, intergovernmental dynamics and the separation of powers, judicial attitudes and background characteristics, public opinion, and judicial impact and the implementation of court decrees. These chapters offer a comprehensive evaluation of the existing literature both for students who are new to these areas of behavioral research, as well as for scholars interested in identifying avenues for future research.

Comprehensive evaluation of kraft pulp properties from fast-growing woods

TAPPI Journal ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 34-39
Author(s):  
AIYU QU ◽  
YANHUI AO ◽  
JUN YAN ◽  
GUIGAN FANG
Keyword(s):  
Kraft Pulp ◽  
Comprehensive Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Evaluation Index System ◽  
Evaluation Index ◽  
Wood Cellulose ◽  
Fuzzy Matrix ◽  
Fast Growing ◽  
Pulp Properties ◽  
Evaluation Index Systems

To develop new wood cellulose resources and fast-growing pulpwood plantation fiber sources, it is very important to evaluate their pulping properties. A comprehensive multi-index pulping-suitability evaluation model is investigated in this paper by considering four fast-growing wood species. First, a new evaluation-index system for kraft pulp was developed based on traditional evaluation-index systems. Then, the membership degree of every index was analyzed to obtain a fuzzy matrix. The proportional contribution of each parameter to the main pulping properties could then be determined. Finally, a comprehensive evaluation model of kraft pulp properties was developed. The model is reliable compared with traditional assessment methods. The results confirmed the feasibility and rationality of developing new wood cellulose resources and fast-growing pulpwood plantations using fuzzy comprehensive evaluations.

Context Effects in Judicial Decision Making

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski ◽  
Chris Guthrie ◽  
Andrew J. Wistrich
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Context Effects ◽  
Judicial Decision ◽  
Judicial Decision Making

scholarly journals Interpreting change through legal culture: the case of the Irish exclusionary rule

Legal Studies ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Claire Hamilton
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Macro Level ◽  
Judicial Decision ◽  
Exclusionary Rule ◽  
Judicial Decision Making ◽  
The Common ◽  
Law Of Evidence

Abstract The changes to the Irish exclusionary rule introduced by the judgment in People (DPP) v JC mark an important watershed in the Irish law of evidence and Irish legal culture more generally. The case relaxed the exclusionary rule established in People (DPP) v Kenny, one of the strictest in the common law world, by creating an exception based on ‘inadvertence’. This paper examines the decision through the lens of legal culture, drawing in particular on Lawrence Friedman's distinction between ‘internal’ and ‘external’ legal culture to help understand the factors contributing to the decision. The paper argues that Friedman's concept and, in particular, the dialectic between internal and external legal culture, holds much utility at a micro as well as macro level, in interrogating the cultural logics at work in judicial decision-making.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document