scholarly journals A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Zirconia Dental Implants: 10-Year Follow-Up

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Andrea Enrico Borgonovo ◽  
Susanna Ferrario ◽  
Carlo Maiorana ◽  
Virna Vavassori ◽  
Rachele Censi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Single Tooth ◽  
Zirconia Implants

Purpose. The aim is to evaluate the survival and success rates, as well as the marginal bone loss (MBL) and periodontal indexes, of zirconia implants with 10-year follow-up. Materials and Methods. 10 patients were selected and 26 one-piece zirconia implants were used for the rehabilitation of single tooth or partially edentulous ridge. After 10 years, a clinical-radiographic evaluation was performed in order to estimate peri-implant tissue health and marginal bone loss. Results. The survival and success rates were 100%. The average marginal bone loss from baseline to 120 months after surgery was 0.92 ± 0.97 mm. Conclusion. One-piece zirconia dental implants are characterised by high biocompatibility, low plaque adhesion, and absence of microgap that can be related to the clinical success of these implants.

scholarly journals Zirconia Implants in Esthetic Areas: 4-Year Follow-Up Evaluation Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Enrico Borgonovo ◽  
Rachele Censi ◽  
Virna Vavassori ◽  
Oscar Arnaboldi ◽  
Carlo Maiorana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Evaluation Study ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Pocket Depth ◽  
Probing Pocket Depth ◽  
Single Tooth ◽  
Zirconia Implants

Objectives.The aim is to evaluate the survival and success rates, as well as the marginal bone loss (MBL) and periodontal indexes of zirconia implants positioned in the esthetic jaw areas.Materials and Method.13 patients were selected and 20 one-piece zirconia implants were used for the rehabilitation of single tooth or partially edentulous ridge in the esthetic jaw areas. Six months after surgery and then once a year, a clinical-radiographic evaluation was performed in order to estimate peri-implant tissue health and marginal bone loss.Results.The survival and success rates were 100%. The average marginal bone loss from baseline to 48 months after surgery was +2.1 mm. Four years after surgery, the median and the mode for visible Plaque Index and Bleeding On Probing resulted 1 whereas Probing Pocket Depth amounted to 3 mm (SD = ±0.49 mm).Conclusion.One-piece zirconia dental implants are characterized by high biocompatibility, low plaque adhesion, and absence of microgap that can be related to the clinical success of these implants even in the esthetic areas.

scholarly journals Aesthetic Outcomes and Peri-Implant Health of Angled Screw Retained Implant Restorations Compared with Cement Retained Crowns: Medium Term Follow-Up

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Livia Nastri ◽  
Ludovica Nucci ◽  
Vincenzo Grassia ◽  
Rino Miraldi
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Technical Solution ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Single Tooth ◽  
Natural Teeth ◽  
The Aesthetic ◽  
Single Implant ◽  
Single Tooth Implant

Single tooth implant restorations in the aesthetic area are a demanding challenge. If a complete osseointegration is mandatory, the final result has to result in a higher standard of biomimetic and soft tissue health among natural teeth. This outcome is traditionally pursued by cementing crowns over individualized abutments. However, in recent years, the need for controlling peri-implant health and the preference towards a retrievable solution has led to an increase in screw-retained crowns, which is not always applicable when the implant axis is not ideal. In the aesthetic area, the use of a novel technical solution represented by the angled screw channel (ASC) of the abutment has been proposed in order to match the advantages of the screwed solution with the aesthetic demands. The aim of this study was to compare ASC crowns to cemented crowns (CC) in single implant restorations using the white esthetic score (WES) and pink esthetic score (PES) at the crown delivery and at a follow-up of a minimum of 2 years. Peri-implant health and marginal bone loss (MBL) were also evaluated. The mean follow-up was 44.3 months, with a mean MBL of 0.22 mm in the ASC group and 0.29 mm in the CC group. The total WES/PES score was 16.6 for ASC, compared with 17.3 for CC at baseline, and 16.2 and 17.1, respectively, at follow-up. Both of the groups reached a high WES/PES, and this was maintained over time, without signs of peri-implant diseases or bone loss, regardless of the choice of connection. In conclusion, ASC can be adopted in cases where the implant axis is not ideal, with aesthetic and functional results that are comparable to implants restored by cemented crowns.

scholarly journals Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants Restored with Zirconium vis-à-vis Porcelain Fused to Metal: An In Vivo Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 17-21
Author(s):  
Udey Singh Wirring ◽  
Tarun Kalra ◽  
Manjit Kumar ◽  
Ajay Bansal ◽  
Aquib Javaid
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Zirconia Crowns ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Introduction Marginal bone level is the criterion for implant success. Patient expectations for more natural looking implant restorations created the need to restore implants with more esthetically pleasing materials like Zirconia rather than conventional porcelain-fused to-metal (PFM) crowns. The aim of this study was to evaluate marginal bone loss around dental implants clinically and radiographically when restored with Zirconia and PFM prosthesis. Materials and Methods Two groups (control and test) were formed with 14 patients each. In the control group, the subjects were rehabilitated with PFM crowns and in the test group, the subjects were rehabilitated with Zirconia crowns. Rehabilitation was done after the healing period of 3 months. Radiographic evaluation was done at regular (baseline, 3rd, 6th, and 12th month) intervals. Results The results were statistically analyzed. Keeping in mind the limitations of the study, it was revealed that the difference in the crestal bone resorption in both the groups was not significant.

Evaluation of proximal bone loss around 2 commercial brands of SLA-surfaced implants and investigating possible effective factors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abbas Karimi ◽  
Nahid Azizimoghadam ◽  
Elahe Soltanmohamadi Borujeni
Keyword(s):  
Bone Resorption ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Effective Factors ◽  
Preprosthetic Surgery ◽  
Dental Implantation ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: The long term clinical success of dental implants depends on the stability of crestal bone level. Different dental implantation systems focus on micro-and macro-design to reduce late bone resorption. The purpose of this study was to evaluate bone loss at the proximal (mesial and distal) surfaces of SLA implants from 2 different companies. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was done on 48 patients receiving 161 SLA-surfaced (Straumann and Dentium) dental implants. The marginal bone loss was measured at mesial & distal sides of the implants on peri-apical X-ray images. The effective factors considered in this study were patients age, implant brand, time passed from fixture placement, preprosthetic surgery and type of prosthetic treatment that were obtained from patient records & interviews. Results: Average mesial and distal bone loss was 1.50±1.359 and 1.517±1.3465 respectively. Pearson correlation coefficient indicates that 1) time passed from fixture placement, 2) commercial brand, 3) history of pre-prosthetic surgery and 4) age affected the amount of bone loss. Conclusion: SLA-surfaced dental implants showed an acceptable amount of bone resorption and no statistically significant difference was observed between commercial brands.

scholarly journals Scientific Trends in Clinical Research on Zirconia Dental Implants: A Bibliometric Review

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 5534
Author(s):  
Felice Lorusso ◽  
Sammy Noumbissi ◽  
Inchingolo Francesco ◽  
Biagio Rapone ◽  
Ahmad G. A. Khater ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Clinical Research ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Oral Rehabilitation ◽  
Bibliometric Review ◽  
Zirconia Implants

Background: The clinical use of zirconia implants has been shown to increase steadily due to their biological, aesthetic, and physical properties; therefore, this bibliometric study aimed to review the clinical research and co-authors in the field of zirconia dental implant rehabilitation. Methods: We searched Scopus and Web of Science databases using a comprehensive search strategy to 5 October 2020, and independently paired reviewers who screened studies, and collected data with inclusion criteria restricted to clinical research only (either prospective or retrospective). Data on article title, co-authors, number of citations received, journal details, publication year, country and institution involved, funding, study design, marginal bone loss, survival rate, failure, follow-up, and the author’s bibliometric data were collected and evaluated. Results: A total of 29 clinical studies were published between 2008 and 2020 as 41.4% were prospective cohort studies and 48.3% originated from Germany. Most of the included studies had been published in Clinical Oral Implant Research (n = 12), and the most productive institution was the Medical Center of University of Freiburg. The author with the largest number of clinical studies on zirconia implants was Kohal R.J. (n = 10), followed by Spies B.C. (n = 8). Conclusions: This study revealed that zirconia implants have been more prominent in the last ten years, which is a valuable option for oral rehabilitation with marginal bone loss and survival rate comparable to titanium dental implants.

scholarly journals Treatment of Full and Partial Arches with Internal-Conical-Connection Dental Implants: Clinical Results after 5 Years of Follow-Up

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (23) ◽  
pp. 8709
Author(s):  
Diego Lops ◽  
Riccardo Guazzo ◽  
Alessandro Rossi ◽  
Antonino Palazzolo ◽  
Vittorio Favero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Distal Aspect ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Maxilla And Mandible ◽  
Implant Loading

The aim of the present investigation is to evaluate the implant therapy outcomes over a period of 5 years and to analyze several patient risk factors influencing the stability of the peri-implant tissues. Seventy-eight patients were consecutively treated between 2009 and 2017 and restored with implant-supported fixed prostheses. The following inclusion criteria were considered: partial or complete edentulism; residual bone volume of at least 3.3 mm in diameter and 8 mm in length; a favorable relationship between maxilla and mandible; at least a minimum 5 year follow-up for each implant included in the statistical analysis. Intraoral radiographs were taken at implant loading and every 12 months during the follow-up visits. They were subsequently stored on a personal computer and analyzed to determine the changes in bone level. Seventy-eight patients receiving 209 implants completed a minimum follow-up period of 5 years. One-hundred dental implants were inserted in the maxilla while 109 were placed in the mandible. Eleven (14.1%) out of 78 treated patients who received 29 (13.9%) dental implants were considered as drop-outs. On the whole, peri-implantitis was diagnosed in three implants. The average final pocket probing depth at implant level was 2.5 ± 1.2 mm. The average final bone loss after 5 years was 0.3 ± 0.4 mm, both at the mesial and distal aspect of the implant. The effects of the prosthesis type, sex and implant site did not statistically influence the marginal bone loss; on the contrary, a statistically significant difference regarding marginal bone loss was detected between smoker and non-smoker patients (p = 0.021). Implants with internal-conical abutment connection showed stable peri-implant bone levels at the medium-term follow-up. Nevertheless, further prospective long-term clinical studies are necessary to confirm these data.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Success Criteria for Zirconia Dental Implants: A Four-Year Clinical and Radiological Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Enrico Borgonovo ◽  
Rachele Censi ◽  
Virna Vavassori ◽  
Marcello Dolci ◽  
Josè Luis Calvo-Guirado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
First Year ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Bone Preservation ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Marginal Bone Level ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Zirconia Implants

Objectives. The aim was to evaluate survival and success rates, soft tissue health, and radiographic marginal bone loss (MBL) of zirconia implants placed in the esthetic and posterior areas of the jaws and in association with multiple or single implant restorations after at least 6 months of definitive restoration.Material and Methods. 35 one-piece zirconium implants were utilized for single or partially edentulous ridges rehabilitation. All implants received immediate temporary restorations and six months after surgery were definitively restored. Every 6 months after implant placement, a clinical-radiographic evaluation was performed. For each radiograph, the measurements of MBL were calculated.Results. The results showed that the mean MBL at 48-month followup was 1.631 mm. The mean MBL during the first year of loading was not more significant for implants placed in the first molar regions than for those positioned in other areas. Moreover, no differences in marginal bone level changes were revealed for multiple and single implants, whereas MBL in the first year was observed to be slightly greater for implants placed in the maxilla than for those placed in the mandible.Conclusion. Zirconia showed a good marginal bone preservation that could be correlated with one-piece morphology and characteristics of zirconia implants.

scholarly journals Implant Placement Following Crestal Sinus Lift with Sequential Drills and Osteotomes: Five Years after Final Loading Results from a Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Aurea Immacolata Lumbau ◽  
Silvio Mario Meloni ◽  
Marco Tallarico ◽  
Luca Melis ◽  
Giovanni Spano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Sinus Lift ◽  
Combined Approach ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Prosthetic Complications

The aim of this retrospective study was to clinically evaluate the five-year outcomes of implants placed following a combined approach to the sinus, consisting of sequential drills and osteotomes. Medical records of patients with implants placed in combination with crestal sinus lift using sequential drills and osteotomes, with a residual alveolar bone crest between 4 to 8 mm, and a follow-up of at least five years after final loading, were evaluated. Outcomes were implant and prosthetic survival and success rates, any complication, and marginal bone loss. Data from 96 patients (53 women and 43 men; mean age 54.7 years; range 23–79 years) were collected. A total of 105 single implants were analyzed. After five years of function, two implants were lost and two prostheses failed. No major biological or prosthetic complications occurred. At the five-year examination, the marginal bone loss was 1.24 ± 0.28 mm. Within the limitations of this retrospective study it can be concluded that implants placed following a combined approach to the sinus consisting of sequential drills and osteotomes seem to be a viable option for the treatment of posterior atrophic edentulous maxilla.

scholarly journals Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (20) ◽  
pp. 10715
Author(s):  
Odontuya Dorj ◽  
Hsi-Kuei Lin ◽  
Eisner Salamanca ◽  
Yu-Hwa Pan ◽  
Yi-Fan Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Natural Teeth ◽  
Marginal Bone Level

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of opposite tooth conditions on change in marginal bone level (MBL) around submerged dental implants. Materials and methods: The study included healthy patients with one or two implants. Structures opposite implants were either natural teeth (NT) or fixed restorations (FRs). MBLs were measured on digital periapical radiographs at the mesial and distal aspects of each implant. Results: Sixty implants were inserted by the 3-year follow-up. Mean MBLs for NT were 0.21 ± 0.33 mm before prosthetic loading and 0.30 ± 0.41 mm 3 years later (p = 0.001). Mean MBLs with FRs were 0.36 ± 0.45 mm before loading and 0.53 ± 0.50 mm 3 years later (p < 0.001). Changes in mean MBL from the 6-month follow-up to the 1- and 3-year follow-ups were statistically significant (p < 0.01) for implants opposite NT. However, changes in mean MBL from the 6-month follow-up to the 1-year (p = 0.161) and 3-year follow-ups (p = 1.000) were not significant for implants opposite FRs. Between baseline and the 3-year follow-up, MBL change was relatively small and did not differ regarding NT and FRs. Conclusion: Bone loss was greater if submerged dental implants were opposed by FRs. MBLs around submerged implants continued to change after 3 years if NT opposed implants.

Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Maxilla With Tilted Implants: Review of the Literature

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 625-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Peñarrocha-Oltra ◽  
Eugenia Candel-Martí ◽  
Javier Ata-Ali ◽  
María Peñarrocha-Diago
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
High Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Atrophic Maxilla ◽  
Clinical Series ◽  
Implant Loading

We review the evidence-based literature on the use of tilted implants in the rehabilitation of patients with maxillary atrophy. Studies from 1999 to 2010 on patients with atrophic maxilla rehabilitated with tilted implants were reviewed. Clinical series with at least 10 patients rehabilitated using tilted implants and a follow-up of at least 12 months after prosthetic load were included. Case reports and studies with missing data were excluded. In each study the following was assessed: surgical technique, prosthesis type, timing of implant loading, success rate and marginal bone loss of tilted and axial implants, complications and patient satisfaction level. Thirteen studies were included, reporting a total of 782 tilted and 666 axial implants in 319 patients. Success rates went from 91.3% to 100% for axial implants and from 92.1% to 100% for tilted implants; radiographic marginal bone loss went from 0.4 mm to 0.92 mm in tilted implants and from 0.35 mm to 1.21 mm in axial implants. No statistically significant differences were found in any of the studies. No surgical complications and only minor prosthetic complications were reported. High patient satisfaction was found with all types of prosthesis (full-arch fixed, partial fixed and overdentures) placed over tilted implants. The literature on tilted implants shows that implants placed with this technique, both used alone and combined with axially placed implants, and rehabilitated with different prosthetic options have high success rates, minimal complications and high patient satisfaction. However, lack of homogeneity among studies and relatively short follow-up periods for most studies make necessary more studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document