scholarly journals Mechanistic Insights of an Immunological Adverse Event Induced by an Anti-KIT Antibody Drug Conjugate and Mitigation Strategies

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (14) ◽  
pp. 3465-3474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence L'Italien ◽  
Olivia Orozco ◽  
Tinya Abrams ◽  
Lisa Cantagallo ◽  
Anu Connor ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Philippos Apolinario Costa ◽  
Andrea Patricia Espejo-Freire ◽  
Kenneth Chen Fan ◽  
Thomas Arno Albini ◽  
Georgios Pongas

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2510-2510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emiliano Calvo ◽  
James M. Cleary ◽  
Victor Moreno ◽  
Maryella Gifford ◽  
Lisa Roberts-Rapp ◽  
...  

2510 Background: ABBV-221 is a 2nd-generation antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting EGFR based on the 1st-generation ADC ABT-414. ABT-414 shows efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM) patients (pts) with EGFR amplification in ongoing studies. ABBV-221 is an affinity matured monoclonal antibody against EGFR linked to the toxin MMAE. ABBV-221 has higher affinity for overexpressed EGFR than ABT-414, potentially allowing it to target a broader range of tumor types. Methods: This is a Phase 1, multicenter study to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RPTD) of ABBV-221. Pts are required to have an EGFR-dependent cancer to be eligible. Starting dose of ABBV-221: 0.3 mg/kg IV infused over 3 hrs for each 21-day cycle, with alternate dosing schedules utilized (2 wks on, 1 wk off or weekly) to mitigate infusion reactions. Results: As of 11 January 2017, 42 pts were treated (13 colon, 5 head & neck (H&N) cancer, 5 non-small cell lung cancer, 5 GBM, 2 breast, 12 other). Ten dose escalation cohorts have been completed with the last cleared dose 4.5 mg/kg per cycle. Tumor tissue samples were evaluated for EGFR protein expression by IHC, EGFR and EGFR ligand mRNA expression by RNAseq, and the results compared to outcome. The most common adverse event (AE) was infusion reaction in 18/42 pts (43%); 3 pts experienced severe infusion reactions. Several mitigation strategies were used to permit continued dose escalation. The other most common AE was fatigue in 17/42 pts (41%). Only 1 pt had keratitis (Grade 4). Sixteen pts (38%) had stable disease (SD), including 4 pts who remained on study longer than 6 months. One H&N pt who has received 2 cycles of ABBV-221 had an unconfirmed partial response and continues to be treated. This pt had high levels of both EGFR and EGFR ligand. Preliminary pharmacokinetics (PK) analysis suggests ABBV-221 exposures are approximately dose-proportional. Conclusions: Safety, PK, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy data of ABBV-221 warrant further study in this population. Infusion reactions have been manageable and primarily a first dose phenomenon. The duration of SD in pts with refractory solid tumors is encouraging. Clinical trial information: NCT02365662.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (13) ◽  
pp. 1091-1109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Melo ◽  
Agostinho Lemos ◽  
Antonio J. Preto ◽  
Jose G. Almeida ◽  
Joao D.G. Correia ◽  
...  

Cancer has become one of the main leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. One of the critical drawbacks of current cancer therapeutics has been the lack of the target-selectivity, as these drugs should have an effect exclusively on cancer cells while not perturbing healthy ones. In addition, their mechanism of action should be sufficiently fast to avoid the invasion of neighbouring healthy tissues by cancer cells. The use of conventional chemotherapeutic agents and other traditional therapies, such as surgery and radiotherapy, leads to off-target interactions with serious side effects. In this respect, recently developed target-selective Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) are more effective than traditional therapies, presumably due to their modular structures that combine many chemical properties simultaneously. In particular, ADCs are made up of three different units: a highly selective Monoclonal antibody (Mab) which is developed against a tumour-associated antigen, the payload (cytotoxic agent), and the linker. The latter should be stable in circulation while allowing the release of the cytotoxic agent in target cells. The modular nature of these drugs provides a platform to manipulate and improve selectivity and the toxicity of these molecules independently from each other. This in turn leads to generation of second- and third-generation ADCs, which have been more effective than the previous ones in terms of either selectivity or toxicity or both. Development of ADCs with improved efficacy requires knowledge at the atomic level regarding the structure and dynamics of the molecule. As such, we reviewed all the most recent computational methods used to attain all-atom description of the structure, energetics and dynamics of these systems. In particular, this includes homology modelling, molecular docking and refinement, atomistic and coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations, principal component and cross-correlation analysis. The full characterization of the structure-activity relationship devoted to ADCs is critical for antibody-drug conjugate research and development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document