Abstract 3186: Comparative analysis of different total RNA sequencing approaches

Author(s):  
Christine J. Sumner ◽  
Daniela Munafo ◽  
Larry McReynolds ◽  
Brad Langhorst ◽  
Ping Liu ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen L. Beck ◽  
Niina Haiminen ◽  
David Chambliss ◽  
Stefan Edlund ◽  
Mark Kunitomi ◽  
...  

AbstractIn this work, we hypothesized that shifts in the food microbiome can be used as an indicator of unexpected contaminants or environmental changes. To test this hypothesis, we sequenced the total RNA of 31 high protein powder (HPP) samples of poultry meal pet food ingredients. We developed a microbiome analysis pipeline employing a key eukaryotic matrix filtering step that improved microbe detection specificity to >99.96% during in silico validation. The pipeline identified 119 microbial genera per HPP sample on average with 65 genera present in all samples. The most abundant of these were Bacteroides, Clostridium, Lactococcus, Aeromonas, and Citrobacter. We also observed shifts in the microbial community corresponding to ingredient composition differences. When comparing culture-based results for Salmonella with total RNA sequencing, we found that Salmonella growth did not correlate with multiple sequence analyses. We conclude that microbiome sequencing is useful to characterize complex food microbial communities, while additional work is required for predicting specific species’ viability from total RNA sequencing.


2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1877-1884
Author(s):  
Yumi Kawamura ◽  
Shinsuke Koyama ◽  
Ryo Yoshida

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsutaro Hayashi ◽  
Haruka Ozaki ◽  
Yohei Sasagawa ◽  
Mana Umeda ◽  
Hiroki Danno ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 709-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Z Levin ◽  
Moran Yassour ◽  
Xian Adiconis ◽  
Chad Nusbaum ◽  
Dawn Anne Thompson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 299 ◽  
pp. 8-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Strieskova ◽  
Iveta Gazdaricova ◽  
Michal Kajsik ◽  
Katarina Soltys ◽  
Jaroslav Budis ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 465S-465S ◽  
Author(s):  
ULISTAIR G. Paice ◽  
MATTHEW E. REILLY ◽  
JASPAUL S. MARWAY ◽  
ADRIAN B. BONNER ◽  
VICTOR R. PREEDY

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Guo ◽  
Shilin Zhao ◽  
Quanhu Sheng ◽  
Mingsheng Guo ◽  
Brian Lehmann ◽  
...  

The most popular RNA library used for RNA sequencing is the poly(A) captured RNA library. This library captures RNA based on the presence of poly(A) tails at the 3′ end. Another type of RNA library for RNA sequencing is the total RNA library which differs from the poly(A) library by capture method and price. The total RNA library costs more and its capture of RNA is not dependent on the presence of poly(A) tails. In practice, only ribosomal RNAs and small RNAs are washed out in the total RNA library preparation. To evaluate the ability of detecting RNA for both RNA libraries we designed a study using RNA sequencing data of the same two breast cancer cell lines from both RNA libraries. We found that the RNA expression values captured by both RNA libraries were highly correlated. However, the number of RNAs captured was significantly higher for the total RNA library. Furthermore, we identify several subsets of protein coding RNAs that were not captured efficiently by the poly(A) library. One of the most noticeable is the histone-encode genes, which lack the poly(A) tail.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document