Abstract P1-11-14: Breast conserving therapy and mastectomy revisited: overall and breast cancer-specific survival and the influence of age, stage, receptor status and comorbidities in 143,376 patients

Author(s):  
M Lagendijk ◽  
MC van Maaren ◽  
S Saadatmand ◽  
LJA Strobbe ◽  
P Poortmans ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 142 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirelle Lagendijk ◽  
Marissa C. van Maaren ◽  
Sepideh Saadatmand ◽  
Luc J.A. Strobbe ◽  
Philip M.P. Poortmans ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 107327482097666
Author(s):  
Ping Yu ◽  
Hailin Tang ◽  
Yutian Zou ◽  
Peng Liu ◽  
Wenwen Tian ◽  
...  

Breast-conserving therapy was once a contraindication in young breast cancer patients (aged ≤40 years). Emerging studies suggest that breast-conserving therapy and mastectomy could achieve similar prognosis in this population. However, the effect of molecular subtype disparity on surgical strategy in these patients remains unclear. Data from 8656 young patients (aged ≤40 years) diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between in 2010 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate subtype-dependent relationships between the surgical method and survival. Of the 8656 patients, 4132 (47.7%) underwent breast-conserving therapy and 4524 (52.3%) underwent mastectomy. The median follow-up period was 30.0 months. Patients in the breast-conserving therapy group demonstrated better overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival than those in the mastectomy group (both p < 0.05). Patients with different molecular subtypes exhibited significant differences in overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival ( p < 0.001). Patients with luminal subtypes experienced better overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival than those with the triple-negative subtype. Multivariate analysis revealed that overall mortality risk of the breast-conserving therapy group was lower than that of the mastectomy group among HR(+)HER-2(-) and HR(-)HER-2(-) patients (overall mortality risk of 36.3% [adjusted hazard ratio = 0.637 {95% confidence interval = 0.448–0.905}, p = 0.012] and 36.0% [adjusted hazard ratio = 0.640 {95% confidence interval = 0.455–0.901}, p = 0.010] respectively.) The breast cancer-specific mortality risk was also lower by a percentage similar to that of the overall mortality risk. In the HR(+)HER-2(+) group, the surgical method was an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer-specific survival (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.275 [95% confidence interval = 0.089–0.849], p = 0.025), while there was a trend that patients with breast-conserving therapy had better overall survival than those with mastectomy ( p = 0.056). In the HR(-)HER-2(+) group, no significant difference was observed in overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival ( p = 0.791 and p = 0.262, respectively). Breast-conserving therapy resulted in significantly better prognosis in patients with luminal and triple-negative subtypes, while no significant difference was observed in patients with the HER-2 enriched subtype. These results may be helpful in informing clinically precise decision-making for surgery in this population.


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (30) ◽  
pp. 4891-4898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaheenah Dawood ◽  
Kristine Broglio ◽  
Ana M. Gonzalez-Angulo ◽  
Aman U. Buzdar ◽  
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi ◽  
...  

Purpose Overall, breast cancer mortality has been declining in the United States, but survival studies of patients with stage IV disease are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate trends in and factors affecting survival in a large population-based cohort of patients with newly diagnosed stage IV breast cancer. Patients and Methods We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry to identify female patients with stage IV breast cancer diagnosed between 1988 and 2003. Patients were divided into three groups according to year of diagnosis (1988 to 1993, 1994 to 1998, and 1999 to 2003). Survival outcomes were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox models were fit to determine the characteristics independently associated with survival. Results We identified 15,438 patients. Median age was 62 years. Median follow-up was 16 months, 18 months, and 11 months in periods 1988 to 1993, 1994 to 1998, and 1999 to 2003, respectively. Median breast cancer–specific survival was 23 months. In the multivariate model, earlier year of diagnosis, grade 3 disease, increasing age, being unmarried, hormone receptor–negative disease, and no surgery were all independently associated with worse overall and breast cancer–specific survival. With each successive year of diagnosis, black patients had an increasingly greater risk of death compared with white patients (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.06; P = .031). Conclusion The survival of patients with newly diagnosed stage IV breast cancer has modestly improved over time, but these data suggest that the disparity in survival between black and white patients has increased.


2018 ◽  
Vol 171 (2) ◽  
pp. 383-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy Evans ◽  
Yee Ting Sim ◽  
Celine Pourreyron ◽  
Alastair Thompson ◽  
Lee Jordan ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (9) ◽  
pp. 776-785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chitra Joseph ◽  
Sara Al-Izzi ◽  
Mansour Alsaleem ◽  
Sasagu Kurozumi ◽  
Michael S Toss ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Retinoid X Receptor Gamma (RXRG) is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily and plays a role in tumour suppression. This study aims to explore the prognostic significance of RXRG in breast cancer. Methods Primary breast cancer tissue microarrays (n = 923) were immuno-stained for RXRG protein and correlated with clinicopathological features, and patient outcome. Results Nuclear RXRG expression was significantly associated with smaller tumour size (p = 0.036), lower grade (p < 0.001), lobular histology (p = 0.016), lower Nottingham Prognostic Index (p = 0.04) and longer breast cancer-specific survival (p < 0.001), and longer time to distant metastasis (p = 0.002). RXRG expression showed positive association with oestrogen receptor (ER)-related biomarkers: GATA3, FOXA1, STAT3 and MED7 (all p < 0.001) and a negative correlation with the Ki67 proliferation marker. Multivariate analysis demonstrated RXRG protein as an independent predictor of longer breast cancer-specific survival and distant metastasis-free survival. In the external validation cohorts, RXRG expression was associated with improved patients’ outcome (p = 0.025). In ER-positive tumours, high expression of RXRG was associated with better patient outcome regardless of adjuvant systemic therapy. ER signalling pathway was the top predicted master regulator of RXRG protein expression (p = 0.005). Conclusion This study provides evidence for the prognostic value of RXRG in breast cancer particularly the ER-positive tumours.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document