UK Monitoring of Problem Drug Users: The Drug Misuse Database – A System Based on Regional Centres

1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 185-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Donmall
Keyword(s):  
2005 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-55
Author(s):  
Emma Wincup ◽  
Rhianon Bayliss ◽  
Gemma Buckland

Addiction ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 96 (10) ◽  
pp. 1455-1463 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Bargagli ◽  
A. Sperati ◽  
M. Davoli ◽  
F. Forastiere ◽  
C. A. Perucci

2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 214-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mervyn London ◽  
Juan Canitrot ◽  
Adrian Dzialdowski ◽  
Robert Bates ◽  
Alan Gwynn

Aims and MethodTo identify the proportion of arrested drug misusers with prior contact with treatment services, police surgeons' records were examined over a 12-month period and compared with the records of the local drug misuse services. Both referrals and those who attended with face-to-face contact were noted.ResultsSixty-seven per cent of drug-related cases had been referred to services prior to arrest and 58% had attended with face-to-face contact on at least one occasion. Homeless and male drug users were more likely to have had no past contact. Police surgeons treated three-quarters of the cases for opiate dependence. Drug misusers were much more likely to have had past contact with services than arrested alcohol misusers, and were more likely to reoffend.Clinical ImplicationsThe evidence base for motivational enhancement in the transient coercive setting of police custody is not established, and arrest referral schemes might not be cost-effective in areas where most cases have had previous contact with services. Local research may contribute to more informed decisions about these treatment-related criminal justice initiatives.


1999 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Dunn ◽  
Cleusa P. Ferri

Epidemiological studies of drug misusers have until recently relied on two main forms of sampling: probability and convenience. The former has been used when the aim was simply to estimate the prevalence of the condition and the latter when in depth studies of the characteristics, profiles and behaviour of drug users were required, but each method has its limitations. Probability samples become impracticable when the prevalence of the condition is very low, less than 0.5% for example, or when the condition being studied is a clandestine activity such as illicit drug use. When stratified random samples are used, it may be difficult to obtain a truly representative sample, depending on the quality of the information used to develop the stratification strategy. The main limitation of studies using convenience samples is that the results cannot be generalised to the whole population of drug users due to selection bias and a lack of information concerning the sampling frame. New methods have been developed which aim to overcome some of these difficulties, for example, social network analysis, snowball sampling, capture-recapture techniques, privileged access interviewer method and contact tracing. All these methods have been applied to the study of drug misuse. The various methods are described and examples of their use given, drawn from both the Brazilian and international drug misuse literature.


2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen M. Johnson ◽  
Meghan Fibbi ◽  
Debra Langer ◽  
Karol Silva ◽  
Stephen E. Lankenau

BMJ ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 337 (jul22 2) ◽  
pp. a478-a478 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bloor ◽  
M. Gannon ◽  
G. Hay ◽  
G. Jackson ◽  
A. H Leyland ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document