Effect of Evening Bromazepam Administration on Blood Pressure and Heart Rate in Mild Hypertensive Patients

Pharmacology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Alfredo Costa ◽  
Daniele Bosone ◽  
Matteo Cotta Ramusino ◽  
Giulia Perini ◽  
Natascia Ghiotto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Ambulatory Monitoring ◽  
Night Time ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Hypertensive Patients ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Nocturnal Increase ◽  
Mild Hypertensive

Aim: To assess the effects of chronic evening oral administration of bromazepam alone or in combination with propranolol on ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) in mild hypertensive subjects. Methods: Thirty-seven mild hypertensive patients after a 2-week placebo period were randomized to bromazepam 3 mg, propranolol 40 mg, bromazepam 3 mg plus propranolol 40 mg or placebo for 2 weeks according to a double-blind, double dummy, cross-over design. After each treatment period, 24-h BP and HR ambulatory monitoring was performed by using a non-invasive device. Results: Ambulatory monitoring showed that during night-time SBP and DBP values were unaffected by bromazepam as compared to placebo, whereas SBP was significantly reduced by propranolol both when taken alone and in combination with bromazepam. HR nocturnal values were significantly reduced by propranolol, whereas they were significantly increased by bromazepan both when taken alone (+11.5%, p < 0.05 vs. placebo) and in combination with propranolol (+12.8%, p < 0.05 vs. propranolol). No significant difference in day-time values of SBP, DBP and HR was observed among the 4 treatment groups. Conclusions: In mild hypertensive patients, evening consumption of bromazepam for a 2-week period did not affect BP, while it increased nocturnal HR. Such an increase was observed both when bromazepam was taken alone and in combination with propranolol, which suggests that it depends on a bromazepam mediated decrease in vagal tone. Whatever the mechanism, the HR nocturnal increase might be of clinical relevance, due to the role of high HR as cardiovascular risk factor, particularly in already at risk hypertensive subjects.

Diurnal Blood Pressure Variation in Quadriplegic Chronic Spinal Cord Injury Patients

1991 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Krum ◽  
William J. Louis ◽  
Douglas J. Brown ◽  
Graham P. Jackman ◽  
Laurence G. Howes
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Spinal Cord Injury ◽  
Ambulatory Monitoring ◽  
Pressure Variation ◽  
Night Time ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Blood Pressure Variation ◽  
Neurologically Intact

1. Measurement of blood pressure and heart rate over a 24 h period was peformed in 10 quadriplegic spinal cord injury patients and 10 immobilized, neurologically intact orthopaedic subjects by using the Spacelabs 90207 automated ambulatory monitoring system. 2. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure fell significantly at night in orthopaedic subjects but not in quadriplegic patients, and night-time blood pressures were similar in both groups. 3. Cumulative summation of differences from a reference value (cusum analysis) confirmed a markedly diminished diurnal blood pressure variation in the quadriplegic patients. 4. These findings could not be accounted for on the basis of blood pressure variations during chronic postural change. 5. Heart rate fell significantly at night in both groups. 6. The findings suggest that the increase in blood pressure during waking hours in neurologically intact subjects is a consequence of a diurnal variation in sympathetic activity (absent in quadriplegic patients with sympathetic decentralization) which is independent of changes in physical activity.

The Relationship Between Blood Pressure Variability And Renal Progression In Hypertensive Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (14) ◽  
pp. 80-88
Author(s):  
Huseyin Duru ◽  
Ekrem KARA
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Blood Pressure Measurement ◽  
Rapid Progression ◽  
Night Time ◽  
Hypertensive Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Renal Progression

Objective: To evaluate the effect of 24 hour systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) variability (BPV) on renal progression in hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) Methods: A total 59 hypertensive patients (mean age: 54.2±14.6 years, 50.8% male) with CKD who underwent 24 hours ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) were included. Data on SBP, DBP, BPV coefficients (VC) for SBP (SBP-CV) and DBP (DBP-CV) were recorded. A decrease in e-GFR of <5 ml/min/year was considered as normal renal progression and a decrease in ≥5 ml/min/year was considered as rapid renal progression. Results: Overall, 40.6% of the patients had uncontrolled HT, while 45.8% had non-dipper pattern. Mean±SD daytime and night-time SBP and SBP-VC values were 135.3±17.9 mmHg, 128.6±23.0 mmHg, 11.7±2.8 and 9.5±3.6, respectively. Mean±SD daytime and nigh-time DBP and DBP-VC values were 84.5±13.4 mmHg, 77.2±16.1 mmHg, 13.8±3.8 and 12.0±3.7, respectively. Rapid renal progression was detected in 25.4% of patients with no significant difference in daytime, night-time and total SBP, SBP-VC, DBP and DBP-VC values between patients with rapid vs. natural renal progression. The regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, presence of DM, baseline e-GFR and dipping status revealed no significant impact of SBP-VC and DBP-VC in predicting rapid progression (p> 0.05). Conclusion: In conclusion, our finding revealed no significant association between BPV and renal progression in hypertensive patients with CKD. Larger scale prospective, randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up are needed to clarify this issue.

The Influence of Physical Activity on Arterial Pressure during Ambulatory Recordings in Man

1980 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. B. Rowlands ◽  
T. J. Stallard ◽  
R. D. S. Watson ◽  
W. A. Littler
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Ambulatory Blood Pressure ◽  
Physical Activities ◽  
Hypertensive Patients ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hypotensive Therapy

1. Ambulatory blood pressure recordings were made over a 48 h period on six hypertensive patients. The conditions of study were standardized, particularly with regard to physical activity, and during one period of each day the patients were randomly allocated to be active or inactive. 2. Results show that blood pressure was highest during physical activity and lowest during sleep. There was no significant difference between the arterial pressures measured during the same physical activities carried out at the same time each day. However, during the same time on consecutive days when activity was randomized, there was a significant difference between the pressure recordings during physical activity compared with those during inactivity. Heart rate changes showed a similar trend during the randomized period. 3. Physical activity and sleep have a profound effect on continuous arterial blood pressure recordings and these are independent of time alone. These observations should be taken into account when using this ambulatory system to assess hypotensive therapy.

scholarly journals Comparison the Sedation Effect and Satisfaction of Two Combinations, Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl with Midazolam and Fentanyl, in Patients Undergoing Bronchoscopy

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Kamali ◽  
Sepideh Sarkhosh ◽  
Hosein Kazemizadeh
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Oxygen Saturation ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Arterial Oxygen Saturation ◽  
Mean Blood Pressure ◽  
Arterial Oxygen ◽  
P Value ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare sedative effects of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl with midazolam and fentanyl in patients undergoing bronchoscopy. Methods: This study was a double-blind randomized clinical trial that was performed on 92 patients who referred to Amir al Momenin Hospital in Arak for bronchoscopy and underwent ASA 1 or 2 underlying grading procedure. Patients were randomly divided into two groups of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl (D) midazolam and fentanyl (M). Primary vital signs including hypertension and arterial oxygen saturation were monitored and recorded. Then all patients were injected with 2 μg / kg fentanyl as a painkiller and after 3 minutes 30 μg dexmedetomidine in syringe with code A and midazolam 3 mg in syringe with code B were injected to patients by an anesthesiologist. Then the two groups were compared in terms of pain at injection, conscious relaxation, satisfaction of operation, recovery time, hypotension and arterial oxygen saturation and drug side effects and data were analyzed by using statistical tests. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of mean age and sex distribution. According to the results of this study, there was no significant difference between the two groups in mean blood pressure (P-value = 0.6) and mean heart rate (P-value = 0.4) at the time of bronchoscopy, but at 5 and 10 minutes after bronchoscopy there was a significant difference, mean blood pressure and heart rate were significantly lower in dexmedetomidine group. Conclusion: Both dexmedetomidine and midazolam drug groups contributed to the development of stable and sedative hemodynamics and satisfaction in patients undergoing bronchoscopy, however, the dexmedetomidine and fentanyl group showed a significant decrease in blood pressure and heart rate compared to midazolam and fentanyl and a weaker decrease in arterial oxygen saturation, and patients with bronchoscopy were more satisfied in the dexmedetomidine group.

Use of antihypertension agents for the suppression of arterial pulse pressure waveforms in patients with intracranial aneurysms

2006 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 531-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carole L. Turner ◽  
Ian B. Wilkinson ◽  
Peter J. Kirkpatrick
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Pulse Pressure ◽  
Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Augmentation Index ◽  
Isosorbide Mononitrate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Significant Difference

Object Patients with intracranial aneurysms tend toward raised blood pressure and abnormal pulse pressure profiles. The authors have investigated the influence of three antihypertension agents on blood pressure and pulse pressure waveforms in patients with known intracranial aneurysms, with a view to assessing the potential benefits of longterm antihypertension therapy on the progression of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Methods Nineteen patients with a mean age of 56 years (range 38–76 years) were recruited for this study. All patients had confirmed intracranial aneurysms. A double-blind, randomized, crossover study was performed using perindopril, irbesartan, isosorbide mononitrate, and a placebo. Blood pressure and pulse pressure waveforms were assessed at the end of each 4-week treatment period. Perindopril and irbesartan were well tolerated. For all measured parameters except heart rate (p = 0.03), no significant difference between baseline and placebo was identified. Each drug when compared with placebo reduced peripheral arterial blood pressure. Perindopril significantly decreased mean blood pressure by 10 mm Hg (p = 0.004), irbesartan by 9 mm Hg (p = 0.004), and isosorbide mononitrate by 13 mm Hg (p = 0.005). The administration of each drug effected a significant reduction in the carotid artery augmentation index (AIX) compared with baseline values (perindopril p = 0.01, irbesartan p = 0.0002, and isosorbide mononitrate p = 0.03). There was also a significant difference in the AIX between irbesartan and the placebo (p = 0.05). Compared with the placebo, there was a significant difference in AIX (adjusted for heart rate) following the administration of irbesartan (p = 0.003) and isosorbide mononitrate (p = 0.01), but not with perindopril (p = 0.17). Conclusions Irbesartan appears to be the most effective treatment for the combined suppression of blood pressure and AIX in patients with intracranial aneurysms and has a high degree of patient tolerance.

Effect of Diazepam on 24-Hour Blood Pressure and Heart Rate in Healthy Young Volunteers

Pharmacology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 101 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 86-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo Costa ◽  
Daniele Bosone ◽  
Annalisa Zoppi ◽  
Angela D&apos;Angelo ◽  
Natascia Ghiotto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Vagal Tone ◽  
Chronic Administration ◽  
Night Time ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Hypnotic Agent

Aim: To assess the effects of evening chronic administration of diazepam on 24-h blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) in healthy young adults. Methods: This randomized double blind, cross-over study evaluated the effects of diazepam 5 mg or placebo, both ingested in the evening, on 24-h ambulatory BP and HR in healthy subjects aged 21–30. Results: A total of 30 subjects were included in the analysis. At the end of 4-week diazepam intake, an increase in 24-h HR mean values was found (+5.2 beats/min, p < 0.05). Analysis of subperiods showed that diazepam produced a 10.1% increase in night-time HR (+6.1 beats/min, p < 0.01) without affecting BP. A significant HR rise (+4.9 beats/min, p < 0.05) and SBP reduction (–3.8 mm Hg, p < 0.05) were observed in the morning hours. The HR increase persisted in day-time hours (+4.6 beats/min, p < 0.05), while BP values resulted unaffected. Conclusions: In healthy subjects, diazepam taken as a hypnotic agent induces a significant HR increase, possibly mediated by a decrease in vagal tone. This effect might be of clinical relevance due to the role that HR plays as an independent cardiovascular risk factor.

scholarly journals Hemodynamic response in laparoscopic cholecystectomy after magnesium sulphate versus clonidine administration

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 3239
Author(s):  
Vijaya P. Borkar Patil ◽  
Mayuri Ganeshrao Tambakhe ◽  
Sunil Shankarrao Lawhale ◽  
Jayshree J. Upadhye
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Magnesium Sulfate ◽  
Magnesium Sulphate ◽  
Hemodynamic Response ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Vasopressin Release ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Background: Magnesium and clonidine both inhibit catecholamine and vasopressin release. They also attenuate hemodynamic response to pneumoperitoneum.Methods: This randomized double-blind study was designed to assess which agent attenuates hemodynamic stress response to pneumoperitoneum better in 70 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Results: After the administration of drug, heart rate in group M was mean 84.29 while in group C was mean 79.89. Thus, there was more fall in Heart rate in C group. After intubation, heart rate at 1min, 3 min, 5 min was 101.20, 96.69, 93.94 respectively in group M and in C group was 96.37, 85.83, 86.17 respectively with p values (0.12, 0.001, 0.008). After giving drug, there was fall in blood pressure in both groups but in C group, there was significant fall in systolic blood pressure. There was no significant difference in the mean diastolic BP in both the groups immediately at intubation (76.17±10.74 for group M and 78.86±10.48 for group C with p>0.05) as also at 3 min (63.29±8.76 for M group and 65.14±11.705 for clonidine with p>0.05) and 5 min (63.03±7.909 for magnesium sulphate and 67.69±13.588 for clonidine with p>0.05) following intubation. Thus, the rise in mean diastolic BP was statistically similar in both Group M and Group C. There was no significant difference in the mean for MAP in both the groups immediately at intubation (88.86±12.76 for magnesium sulphate and 91.74±11.59 for clonidine) as also at 3 min (73.17±10.019 for M and 75.80±12.849 for C group. But at 5 min (71.71±9.11 for magnesium sulphate and 77.66±13.715 for clonidine) following intubation with p<0.05 which is significant.Conclusions: Administration of magnesium sulfate or clonidine attenuates hemodynamic response to pneumoperitoneum. Although magnesium sulfate produces hemodynamic stability comparable to clonidine, clonidine blunts the hemodynamic response to pneumoperitoneum more effectively.

scholarly journals The role of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hypertensive patients with normal-tension glaucoma

2015 ◽  
Vol 143 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 525-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Marjanovic ◽  
Marija Marjanovic ◽  
Vesna Stojanov ◽  
Paraskeva Hentova-Sencanic ◽  
Vujica Markovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Blood Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Normal Tension Glaucoma ◽  
Ophthalmological Examination ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Hypertensive Patients ◽  
Ambulatory Bp Monitoring ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Rate Oscillations

Introduction. Extreme dippers are patients with a nocturnal fall of blood pressure (BP) of more than 20%, dippers have normal diurnal rhythm and decrease of BP of 10-15%, while patients with a nocturnal BP fall of less than 10% are considered to be non-dippers. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring results of normaltension glaucoma (NTG) patients with NTG suspects, as well as to determine whether NTG patients are more prone to daytime/nighttime systemic arterial BP and heart rate oscillations in comparison to NTG suspects. Methods. This was a prospective, cross-sectional and observational study of 57 hypertensive patients (39 female and 18 male), all examined at the Eye and the Cardiology Clinic, Clinical Center of Serbia in Belgrade, between November 2011 and March 2012. Before 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, complete ophthalmological examination was performed (intraocular pressure was measured with both Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometer, as well as with computerized perimetry and Heidelberg retinal tomography). Results. There was no statistically significant difference between NTG patients and NTG suspects both in systolic daytime (131.86-141.81 mmHg, SD=?14.92 vs. 129.67-141.83 mmHg, SD=?13; p=0.53) and nighttime measurements (117.1-129.7 mmHg, SD=?18.96 vs. 112.11-127.59 mmHg, SD=?16.53; p=0.53) as well as diastolic daytime (74.55-80.37 mmHg, SD=?8.72 vs. 75.19-82.41 mmHg, SD=?7.72; p=0.58) and nighttime measurements (65.66-71.48 mmHg, SD=?8.73 vs. 67.12-73.78 mmHg, SD=?7.11; p=0.34). There was no statistically significant difference between NTG patients and NTG suspects in heart rate during the day (72.73-76.36 beats per minute [bpm], SD=?5.44 vs. 72.15-76.45 bpm, SD=?4.59; p=0.43) nor during the night (64.4-71.9 bpm, SD=?6.74 vs. 68.02-72.48 bpm, SD=?4.76; p=0.11). Conclusion. No statistically significant difference was found between NTG patients and NTG suspects in regard to their systolic and diastolic BP measured both during daytime and nighttime. NTG patients had lower nocturnal BP fall (both systolic and diastolic) than NTG suspects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document