scholarly journals Sister Mary Joseph Nodules: A Case Report about a Rare Location of Skin Metastasis

2021 ◽  
pp. 664-670
Author(s):  
Brice Leyrat ◽  
Maureen Bernadach ◽  
Angeline Ginzac ◽  
Sejdi Lusho ◽  
Xavier Durando

Umbilical skin metastases (or Sister Mary Joseph nodules) are rare. Their presence typically indicates the late manifestation of deep-seated abdominopelvic malignancy. They occur mainly in gynecological cancers, and gastrointestinal cancers in men. The most common histology is adenocarcinoma (∼75% of cases), but it can also rarely be squamous cell or undifferentiated carcinoma. These metastases can be present at diagnosis or appear at disease recurrence, and are associated with a very poor prognosis with an average survival of 11 months. We report the clinical case of a 58-year-old man with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and umbilical cutaneous metastasis after receiving first-line chemotherapy. The diagnosis was established upon liver biopsy in July 2019, after the patient presented with a complaint of transfixing abdominal pain. The first-line treatment consisted of six cycles of modified FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. However, in November 2019, computed tomography (CT) scan showed disease progression. Second-line treatment with gemcitabine (Gemzar®) led to a 16% decrease in target lesions. During the fourth cycle, three periumbilical indurated nodules appeared. After six cycles, skin infiltration had increased, and the patient reported his abdominal pain had intensified. Reassessment by CT scan showed an increase in both hepatic and peritoneal disease progression. Third-line treatment with FOLFIRI, started on April 15, 2020, could not control the disease, leading to greater induration and subcutaneous infiltration, which were responsible for the increased pain and ultimate death. Umbilical skin metastases are rare, and they are associated with advanced metastatic disease and a very poor prognosis. Cases reporting Sister Mary Joseph nodules are needed to better understand the conditions and mechanisms of their appearance and dissemination.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brice Leyrat ◽  
Maureen Bernadach ◽  
Angeline Ginzac ◽  
Sejdi Lusho ◽  
Xavier Durando

Abstract BackgroundUmbilical skin metastases (or Sister Mary Joseph nodules) are rare. Their presence typically indicates the late manifestation of deep-seated abdominopelvic malignancy. They occur mainly in gynecological cancers, and gastro-intestinal cancers in men. The most common histology is adenocarcinoma (~ 75% of cases), but it can also rarely be squamous cell or undifferentiated carcinoma. These metastases can be present at diagnosis or appear at disease recurrence, and are associated with a very poor prognosis with an average survival of 11 months.Case presentationWe report the clinical case of a 58-year-old man with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and umbilical cutaneous metastasis after receiving first-line chemotherapy. The diagnosis was established upon liver biopsy in July 2019, after the patient presented with complaint of transfixiant abdominal pain. The first-line treatment consisted of six cycles of modified FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. However, in November 2019, computed tomography (CT) scan showed disease progression. Second-line treatment with gemcitabine (brand name: Gemzar) led to a 16% decrease of target lesions. During the fourth cycle, three periumbilical indurated nodules appeared. After six cycles, skin infiltration had increased and the patient reported his abdominal pain had intensified. Reassessment by CT scan showed an increase in both hepatic and peritoneal disease progression. Third-line treatment with FOLFIRI, started on April 15, 2020, was not able to control the disease, leading to greater induration and subcutaneous infiltration, which were responsible for the increased pain and ultimate death.ConclusionUmbilical skin metastases are rare and they are associated with advanced metastatic disease and a very poor prognosis. Cases reporting Sister Mary Joseph nodules are needed to better understand the conditions and mechanisms of their appearance and dissemination.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS351-TPS351
Author(s):  
Jennifer J. Knox ◽  
Mairead Geraldine McNamara ◽  
Lipika Goyal ◽  
David Cosgrove ◽  
Christoph Springfeld ◽  
...  

TPS351 Background: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) carries a poor prognosis and no first-line treatments are approved. The accepted global standard of care is gemcitabine + cisplatin (GemCis). NUC-1031 is a phosphoramidate transformation of gemcitabine designed to overcome key cancer resistance mechanisms that are associated with gemcitabine. Promising efficacy has been observed with single-agent NUC-1031 in a phase I study in advanced solid tumors and in the phase Ib ABC-08 study of NUC-1031 + cisplatin for first-line treatment of advanced BTC. Of 14 patients enrolled in 2 cohorts (NUC-1031 625 mg/m2 or 725 mg/m2 + cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycle), 1 had a CR and 6 had PRs, resulting in an unconfirmed ORR of 50%. This represents an approximate doubling of ORR over SoC. The combination was well-tolerated with no unexpected AEs or DLTs. The RP2D of NUC-1031 with cisplatin was 725 mg/m2. The tolerability profile, together with encouraging efficacy, suggested NUC-1031 + cisplatin may represent a more effective therapy than GemCis for BTC and led to initiation of a global registrational study. Methods: NuTide:121 is a Phase III, open-label, randomized study of NUC-1031 + cisplatin vs GemCis for first-line treatment of advanced BTC. Patients ≥18 years with histologically- or cytologically-confirmed BTC (including cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder, or ampullary cancer), who have had no prior systemic chemotherapy for locally advanced/metastatic disease, are eligible. A total of 828 patients are being randomized (1:1) to either 725 mg/m2 NUC-1031 or 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine, both with 25 mg/m2 cisplatin, administered on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Primary objectives are OS and ORR. Secondary objectives include PFS, safety, PK and patient-reported quality of life. In addition to the final analysis, three interim analyses, including two designed to support accelerated approval, are planned. The study has passed an initial safety analysis, with no protocol changes required. NuTide:121 is being conducted at approximately 130 sites across North America, Europe and Asia Pacific countries. Clinical trial information: NCT04163900.


2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. e113-e119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chloe Orkin ◽  
Mark Nelson ◽  
Christine Katlama ◽  
Philippe Morlat ◽  
Hansjakob Furrer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (30) ◽  
pp. 3555-3564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktor Grünwald ◽  
Annika Karch ◽  
Markus Schuler ◽  
Patrick Schöffski ◽  
Hans-Georg Kopp ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Doxorubicin is a standard of care in patients with advanced, inoperable soft tissue sarcoma (STS). We tested whether pazopanib has efficacy comparable to that of doxorubicin in elderly patients with STS and offers superior tolerability for hematologic toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients age 60 years or older without previous systemic treatment for progressive advanced or metastatic STS who had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 and adequate organ function were included. Treatment consisted of pazopanib 800 mg once per day or doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks (≤ 6 cycles) after being randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio. Noninferiority was assumed for progression-free survival (PFS), if the upper limit of the 95% CI for the hazard ratio (HR) was less than 1.8. Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were key secondary end points. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (30-item) Quality of Life Questionnaire and geriatric assessment were used to measure patient-reported outcomes. Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves were used for analysis. RESULTS Pazopanib and doxorubicin were given to 81 and 39 patients, respectively. The median age was 71 years (range, 60-88 years). PFS was noninferior (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.53) and the incidence of grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia favored pazopanib. Objective response rates for pazopanib and doxorubicin were 12.3% and 15.4%, respectively. Overall survival did not differ significantly between arms (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.72; P = .735). Geriatric assessment revealed 2 or more comorbidities in 15.8% of the patients and impairment of activities of daily living in 28.3% of patients. CONCLUSION Pazopanib was noninferior to doxorubicin, rendering pazopanib a putative therapeutic option in the first-line treatment of STS in patients age 60 years or older. The distinct adverse event profile may be used to counsel patients and tailor therapy to individual needs.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 350-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Solal-Celigny ◽  
Kevin Imrie ◽  
Andrew Belch ◽  
Katherine Sue Robinson ◽  
David Cunningham ◽  
...  

Abstract Design/Methods: We recently demonstrated in a phase III trial that the addition of rituximab to each of 8 cycles of CVP (R-CVP) chemotherapy significantly improves the clinical outcome of previously untreated patients with stage III/IV CD20 positive follicular NHL when compared to CVP alone (Marcus et al., Blood2005; 105: 1417–23). A multivariate Cox regression analysis of time to progression or death (TTP) showed a treatment benefit in all patient subgroups according to baseline risk factors, except for patients with a baseline hemoglobin level below normal. We now present an updated analysis of all major trial endpoints with 42 months follow-up (FU). Results: A total of 321 patients (median age 53 years) were recruited (159 CVP, 162 R-CVP). Approximately half of the patients had high-risk disease according to the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI, score 3–5). The median TTP was more than doubled for patients receiving R-CVP compared to CVP alone (33.6 months vs 14.5 months, p<0.0001). Median time to new lymphoma treatment or death (TNLT) was 12.3 months in the CVP group and nearly quadrupled to 46.3 months in the R-CVP group (p<0.0001). Superior response rates for R-CVP were confirmed (CR+CRu rate 41% vs 11%, p<0.0001) with a median response duration (DR) of 13.5 months in the CVP arm versus 37.7 months in the R-CVP arm. Median disease free survival (DFS) in complete responders was 44.8 months for patients receiving R-CVP and 20.5 months in patients receiving CVP alone (p=0.0005). Thirty-five patients in the CVP arm and 23 patients in the R-CVP arm have died. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 3-year OS rates were 81% in the CVP arm and 89% in the R-CVP (p=0.07). Importantly, significantly more patients receiving CVP died due to lymphoma progression compared to patients receiving R-CVP (25 vs 12 deaths, p=0.02). Subgroup analysis for TTP, ORR, DR and OS according to risk factors at baseline are ongoing and will be presented. Conclusion: With longer FU, the combination of 8 cycles of rituximab with CVP chemotherapy continues to provide a major benefit as first line treatment for patients with advanced stage follicular NHL. Kaplan Meier plot of time to death due to disease progression Kaplan Meier plot of time to death due to disease progression


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document