Increased inhibitor incidence in severe haemophilia A since 1990 attributable to more low titre inhibitors

2016 ◽  
Vol 115 (04) ◽  
pp. 729-737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathelijn Fischer ◽  
Pia Petrini ◽  
Rolf Ljung ◽  
Anne Rafowicz ◽  
Manuel Carcao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
High Titre ◽  
P Value ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
Birth Cohorts ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Development Inhibitor ◽  
Unselected Cohort

SummaryMany studies have reported an increased incidence of inhibitors in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe haemophilia A after the introduction of recombinant products. It was the objective of this study to investigate whether the inhibitor incidence has increased between 1990 and 2009 in an unselected cohort of PUPs with severe haemophilia A (FVIII < 1 %). Patients were consecutively recruited from 31 haemophilia treatment centres in 16 countries and followed until 50 exposure days or until inhibitor development. Inhibitor development was studied in five-year birth cohorts comparing cumulative incidences. Furthermore the risk for inhibitor development per five-year birth cohort was studied using multivariable Cox regression, adjusting for potential genetic and treatment-related confounders. A total of 926 PUPs were included with a total cumulative inhibitor incidence of 27.5 %. The inhibitor incidence increased from 19.5 % in 1990-1994 (lowest) to 30.9 % in 2000-2004 (highest; p-value 0.011). Low titre inhibitor incidence increased from 3.1 % in 1990-1994 to 10.5 % in 2005-2009 (p-value 0.009). High titre inhibitor incidences remained stable over time. After 2000, risk of all inhibitor development was increased with adjusted hazard ratios 1.96 (95 % CI 1.06-2.83) in 2000-2004 and 2.34 (1.42-4.92) in 2005-2009. Screening for inhibitors was intensified over this 20-year study period from a median of 1.9 to 2.9 tests/year before 2000 to 2.7 to 4.3 tests/ year after 2000. In conclusion, the cumulative inhibitor incidence has significantly increased between 1990 and 2009. The high titre inhibitor incidence has remained stable.

scholarly journals Simoctocog Alfa (Nuwiq) in Previously Untreated Patients with Severe Haemophilia A: Final Results of the NuProtect Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ri J. Liesner ◽  
Aby Abraham ◽  
Carmen Altisent ◽  
Mark J. Belletrutti ◽  
Manuel Carcao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Human Cell Line ◽  
High Titre ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Fourth Generation ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Fviii Inhibitor

Abstract Introduction FVIII inhibitor development is the most serious contemporary treatment complication in haemophilia A, particularly in previously untreated patients (PUPs). No inhibitors developed in clinical trials in previously treated patients treated with simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq), a fourth-generation recombinant FVIII produced in a human cell line. Methods The NuProtect study investigated the immunogenicity of simoctocog alfa in PUPs. NuProtect was a prospective, multinational, open-label, non-controlled, phase III study. PUPs with severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C <1%) of any age and ethnicity were treated with simoctocog alfa for 100 exposure days or a maximum of 5 years. Patients were true PUPs without prior exposure to FVIII concentrates or blood components. Inhibitor titres were measured with the Nijmegen-modified Bethesda assay; cut-off for positivity was 0.6 BU mL−1 (≥0.6 to <5 low-titre, ≥5 high titre). Results A total of 108 PUPs with a median age at first treatment of 12.0 months (interquartile range: 8.0–23.5) were treated with simoctocog alfa. F8 mutation type was known for 102 patients (94.4%) of whom 90 (88.2%) had null F8 mutations and 12 (11.8%) had non-null mutations. Of 105 PUPs evaluable for inhibitor development, 28 (26.7%) developed inhibitors; 17 high titre (16.2%) and 11 low titre (10.5%). No PUPs with non-null F8 mutations developed inhibitors. Conclusion In the NuProtect study, the rate of inhibitor development in PUPs with severe haemophilia A treated with simoctocog alfa was lower than the rate reported for hamster-cell-derived recombinant factor VIII products in other recent clinical trials. No inhibitors were reported in PUPs with non-null F8 mutations.

scholarly journals Practical Utilisation of Octapharma FVIII Concentrates in Previously Untreated and Minimally Treated Haemophilia a Patients Entering Routine Clinical Treatment with Nuwiq®, Octanate® or Wilate® — the Protect-NOW Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5034-5034
Author(s):  
Johannes Oldenburg ◽  
Anna Pavlova ◽  
Susan Halimeh ◽  
Robert Klamroth ◽  
Joris Versteden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Effectiveness ◽  
Real Life ◽  
High Titre ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction/Objective: The development of FVIII inhibitors remains the greatest challenge to the treatment of previously untreated patients (PUPs) with haemophilia A. Uncontrolled studies in PUPs have suggested that immunogenicity of FVIII concentrates varies between different products. In the SIPPET study, the first and only large randomised controlled study to examine the impact of FVIII product type on immunogenicity, the cumulative incidence of high-titre inhibitors in PUPs and minimally treated patients (MTPs) treated with hamster cell-derived recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) products was 28.4%, compared with 18.6% for plasma-derived FVIII/von Willebrand factor (pdFVIII/VWF) products [1]. However, SIPPET did not include all currently available FVIII products, limiting the applicability of its conclusions to the current haemophilia treatment landscape. In previous clinical studies of true PUPs treated with the pdFVIII/VWF concentrates octanate® [2] and wilate®, the cumulative incidences of high-titre inhibitors were 8.0% and 11.3%, respectively. For the human-cell derived rFVIII Nuwiq®, the cumulative incidence of high-titre inhibitors was 12.8% (data from a preplanned interim analysis) [3]. These incidences suggest a favourable immunogenicity profile compared to products in the SIPPET study. However, there is a need for more real-life data on treatment effectiveness and safety in PUPs and MTPs. The ongoing, non-interventional, multi-centre Protect-NOW study is a prospective and retrospective study evaluating real-life treatment patterns, effectiveness and safety, including inhibitor development, in PUPs and MTPs with severe haemophilia A who are treated with Octapharma's pdFVIII or rFVIII products. Methods: One hundred and forty PUPs (no previous treatment) and MTPs (<5 previous EDs with other FVIII products) with severe haemophilia A of all ages and ethnicities will be studied for 100 EDs or up to 3 years. Treatment effectiveness will be evaluated for regular prophylaxis, treatment of bleeding episodes, and surgical prophylaxis. Optional sub-studies, including epitope mapping, detection of non-neutralising inhibitors, and gene mutation analysis, will assess factors potentially associated with inhibitor development and eradication in patients with severe haemophilia A. Optional sub-studies will be carried out at the central laboratory at the Institute of Experimental Haematology in Bonn. Protect-NOW is planned to include around 17 countries and 50 centres worldwide. In the US, the Protect-NOW will be performed as part of the ATHN-8 study. Results: Recruitment is ongoing, with seven patients recruited at two German centres to date. The study has been approved by central and/or local ethics committees in Germany, US, UK, Spain and Russia, and is under ethical review in Canada. Final data collection is expected in 2022. Conclusions: Protect-NOW will collect real-life clinical experience with Octapharma's FVIII products in PUPs and MTPs. This study will contribute real-world data to the current debate on the relevance of FVIII concentrate type in inhibitor induction. ReferencesPeyvandi F et al. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:2054-64.Klukowska A et al. Haemophilia 2018; 24:221-28.Liesner R et al. Haemophilia 2018; 24: 211-20. Disclosures Oldenburg: Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Swedish Orphan Biovitrum: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Biogen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biotest: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria, Research Funding; Grifols: Honoraria, Research Funding. Pavlova:Octapharma: Honoraria; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria. Halimeh:Bayer healthcare, Baxalta Innovations, Biotest, CSL Behring, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, LFB, Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer Healthcare, Baxalta Innovations, Biotest, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer: Research Funding. Klamroth:Baxalta (Shire), Bayer, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer, Shire, and SOBI: Research Funding; Baxalta (Shire), Bayer, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer, Shire, and SOBI: Consultancy. Versteden:Octapharma AG: Employment. Jansen:Octapharma: Employment. Belyanskaya:Octapharma AG: Employment.

Inhibitor treatment by rituximabin congenital haemophilia A

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (02) ◽  
pp. 151-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Escuriola Ettingshausen ◽  
R. Linde ◽  
G. Kropshofer ◽  
L.-B. Zimmerhackl ◽  
W. Kreuz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
High Titre ◽  
Clotting Factor ◽  
Severe Bleeding ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Concomitant Treatment ◽  
Bleeding Tendency ◽  
Severe Haemophilia

SummaryThe development of neutralizing alloanti-bodies (inhibitors) to factor VIII (FVIII) is one of the most serious complications in the treatment of haemophiliacs. Inhibitors occur in approximately 20 to 30% of previously untreated patients (PUPs), predominantly children, with severe haemophilia A within the first 50 exposure days (ED). Immune tolerance induction (ITI) leads to complete elimination of the inhibitor in up to 80% of the patients and offers the possibility to restore regular FVIII prophylaxis. However, patients with high titre inhibitors, in whom standard ITI fails, usually impose with high morbidity and mortality and therefore prompting physicians to alternate therapy regimens. Rituximab, an anti-CD 20 monoclonal antibody has been successfully used in children and adults for the management of B-cell mediated disorders. We report on the use of a new protocol including rituximab in two adolescents with severe haemophilia A and high titre inhibitors, severe bleeding tendency and high clotting factor consumption after failing standard ITI. Both patients received a concomitant treatment with FVIII according to the Bonn protocol, cyclosporine A and immunoglobulin. Treatment with rituximab resulted in a temporary B-cell depletion leading to the disappearance of the inhibitor. FVIII recovery and half-life turned towards normal ranges. In patient 1 the inhibitor reappeared 14 months after the last rituximab administration. In patient 2 complete immune tolerance could be achieved for 60 months. Bleeding frequency diminished significantly and clinical joint status improved in both patients. In patient 1 the treatment course was complicated by aspergillosis and hepatitis B infection. Conclusion: Rituximab may be favourable for patients with congenital haemophilia, high-titre inhibitors and a severe clinical course in whom standard ITI has failed. Prospective studies are required to determine safety, efficacy and predictors of success.

Inhibitor development in haemophilia according to concentrate

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (05) ◽  
pp. 968-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riita Lassila ◽  
Flora Peyvandi ◽  
Gabriele Calizzani ◽  
Alex Gatt ◽  
Thierry Lambert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Calculated Data ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Clotting Factor ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Haemophilia B ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Recombinant Fviii ◽  
Set Up

SummaryInhibitor development represents the most serious side effect of haemophilia treatment. Any difference in risk of inhibitor formation depending on the product used might be of clinical relevance. It was this study’s objective to assess inhibitor development according to clotting factor concentrate in severe haemophilia A and B. The European Haemophilia Safety Surveillance (EUHASS) was set up as a study monitoring adverse events overall and according to concentrate. Since October 2008, inhibitors were reported at least quarterly. Number of treated patients was reported annually, specifying the number of patients completing 50 exposure days (Previously Untreated Patients, PUPs) without inhibitor development. Cumulative incidence, incidence rates and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Data from October 1, 2008 to December 31, 2012 were analysed for 68 centres that validated their data. Inhibitors developed in 108/417 (26 %; CI 22–30 %) PUPs with severe haemophilia A and 5/72 (7 %; CI 2–16%) PUPs with severe haemophilia B. For Previously Treated Patients (PTPs), 26 inhibitors developed in 17,667 treatment years [0.15/100 treatment years; CI 0.10–0.22) for severe haemophilia A and 1/2836 (0.04/100; (CI 0.00–0.20) for severe haemophilia B. Differences between plasma-derived and recombinant concentrates, or among the different recombinant FVIII concentrates were investigated. In conclusion, while confirming the expected rates of inhibitors in PUPs and PTPs, no class or brand related differences were observed.

Innowacyjna metoda prowadzenia ITI za pomocą preparatu czynnika VIII z frakcją Fc u pacjentów z hemofilią A z obecnością inhibitora czynnika VIII – przegląd literaturowy

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maciej Trzaska ◽  
Marek Karwacki ◽  
Paweł Łaguna ◽  
Michał Matysiak
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Immunological Tolerance ◽  
Therapeutic Benefit ◽  
High Titre ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
First Time

Eradication of factor VIII inhibitors using Immune tolerance induction (ITI) treatment is the standard of care for severe haemophilia A patients presenting with factor VIII inhibitors, but is not always effective. A description of the potential immunological tolerance effect of the IgG Fc domain of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc), as well as published experience with rFVIIIFc for ITI in patients with severe haemophilia A and high-titre inhibitors. Review of published literature describing cases of ITI with rFVIIIFc in patients with severe haemophilia A and high-titre inhibitors between November 2015 and June 2018. Four publications has been found. Of 56 patients with haemophilia A who presented with FVIII inhibitors, 28 achieved a negative Bethesda titre (< 0.6) after ITI treatment using rFVIIIFc. Additional patients continued on rFVIIIFc ITI at the time of publication, while a few were reported to have switched to bypass therapy alone or other factors . For those still undergoing ITI, longer follow-up is needed to determine final outcomes. No adverse events were reported. Based on literature review, preliminary evidence of FVIIIFc use in high risk, first-time ITI suggests rapid time to tolerization. For rescue ITI, rFVIIIFc showed therapeutic benefit in some patients who previously failed ITI. These findings give hope but highlight the need for further evaluation in ongoing clinical trials.

scholarly journals A previously treated severe haemophilia A patient developed high-titre inhibitor after vaccinations

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 205873842093461
Author(s):  
Zekun Li ◽  
Zhenping Chen ◽  
Xiaoling Cheng ◽  
Xinyi Wu ◽  
Gang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
High Titre ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
Danger Signal ◽  
Inflammatory Microenvironment ◽  
Varicella Zoster ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
The Relationship

The factor VIII (FVIII)-neutralizing antibody (inhibitor) seen in 25%–30% of patients with severe haemophilia A (SHA). Vaccination is a non-genetic risk factor of inhibitor development as ‘danger signal’ which may provide a pro-inflammatory microenvironment to increase FVIII immunogenicity. We reported a previously treated SHA patient postponed the first vaccination to 15-month age received diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus intramuscularly. At 18-month age, the patient received Hepatitis A intramuscularly and Varicella Zoster Virus subcutaneously with 2 weeks interval and FVIII infusion was given <24 h prior for each. Successive bleedings occurred 1 week later with inefficacy of FVIII replacement. High-titre inhibitor was tested at 117 exposure days. This case suggested that continuous vaccinations in close proximity to FVIII could induce inhibitor. The relationship between vaccination and FVIII immunogenicity still needs to be revealed by further study.

scholarly journals Inhibitor development in previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia: A comparison of included patients and outcomes between a clinical study and a registry‐based study

Haemophilia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 809-816
Author(s):  
Carla J. Jonker ◽  
Katrien Oude Rengerink ◽  
Arno W. Hoes ◽  
Peter G. M. Mol ◽  
H. Marijke Berg
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
Inhibitor Development

Type and intensity of FVIII exposure on inhibitor development in PUPs with haemophilia A

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (05) ◽  
pp. 958-967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Elisa Mancuso ◽  
Elena Santagostino ◽  
Gili Kenet ◽  
Mohssen Elalfy ◽  
Susanne Holzhauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Intensity ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Patient Level ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Statistical Approaches ◽  
The Impact

SummaryThe impact of treatment-related factors on inhibitor development in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with haemophilia A is still debated. We present the results of a collaborative, individual patient data meta-analytic project. Eligible data sources were published cohorts of PUPs for which patient-level data were available. The exposures of interest were factor (F)VIII type (recombinant [rFVIII] vs plasma-derived [pdFVIII]) and treatment intensity (≥ vs < 150 IU/kg/week) at first treatment. Family history of inhibitors, F8 mutations, age, treatment regimen (on-demand vs prophylaxis), secular trend and surgery were analysed as putative confounders using different statistical approaches (multivariable Cox regression, propensity score analyses, CART). Analyses accounted for the multi-centre origin of the data. We included 761 consecutive, unselected PUPs with moderate to severe haemophilia A from 10 centres in Egypt, Germany, Israel and Italy. A total of 27 % of patients developed inhibitors; 40 % and 22 % of patients treated with rFVIII and pdFVIII (unadjusted HR 2.2, 95 % CI 1.6–2.9), respectively; 51 % and 24 % of patients receiving high-and low-intensity treatment (unadjusted HR 2.9, 95 % CI 2.0–4.2), respectively. In adjusted analyses, only treatment intensity remained an independent predictor; the effect of FVIII type was largely due to confounding, but with a significant interaction between FVIII type and treatment intensity. This patient-level meta-analysis confirms, across different statistical approaches, that high-intensity treatment is a strong risk factor for inhibitor development. The possible role of FVIII type in subgroups is suggested by the test for interactions but could not be proven because of the limited subgroups sample sizes.

Improved prediction of inhibitor development in previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia A

Haemophilia ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Hashemi ◽  
K. Fischer ◽  
K. G. M. Moons ◽  
H. M. Berg ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
Inhibitor Development
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document