Inhibitor treatment by rituximabin congenital haemophilia A

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (02) ◽  
pp. 151-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Escuriola Ettingshausen ◽  
R. Linde ◽  
G. Kropshofer ◽  
L.-B. Zimmerhackl ◽  
W. Kreuz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
High Titre ◽  
Clotting Factor ◽  
Severe Bleeding ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Concomitant Treatment ◽  
Bleeding Tendency ◽  
Severe Haemophilia

SummaryThe development of neutralizing alloanti-bodies (inhibitors) to factor VIII (FVIII) is one of the most serious complications in the treatment of haemophiliacs. Inhibitors occur in approximately 20 to 30% of previously untreated patients (PUPs), predominantly children, with severe haemophilia A within the first 50 exposure days (ED). Immune tolerance induction (ITI) leads to complete elimination of the inhibitor in up to 80% of the patients and offers the possibility to restore regular FVIII prophylaxis. However, patients with high titre inhibitors, in whom standard ITI fails, usually impose with high morbidity and mortality and therefore prompting physicians to alternate therapy regimens. Rituximab, an anti-CD 20 monoclonal antibody has been successfully used in children and adults for the management of B-cell mediated disorders. We report on the use of a new protocol including rituximab in two adolescents with severe haemophilia A and high titre inhibitors, severe bleeding tendency and high clotting factor consumption after failing standard ITI. Both patients received a concomitant treatment with FVIII according to the Bonn protocol, cyclosporine A and immunoglobulin. Treatment with rituximab resulted in a temporary B-cell depletion leading to the disappearance of the inhibitor. FVIII recovery and half-life turned towards normal ranges. In patient 1 the inhibitor reappeared 14 months after the last rituximab administration. In patient 2 complete immune tolerance could be achieved for 60 months. Bleeding frequency diminished significantly and clinical joint status improved in both patients. In patient 1 the treatment course was complicated by aspergillosis and hepatitis B infection. Conclusion: Rituximab may be favourable for patients with congenital haemophilia, high-titre inhibitors and a severe clinical course in whom standard ITI has failed. Prospective studies are required to determine safety, efficacy and predictors of success.

Risk Factors for the Progression from Low to High Titres in 260 Children with Severe Haemophilia A and Newly Developed Inhibitors

2017 ◽  
Vol 117 (12) ◽  
pp. 2274-2282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Elisa Mancuso ◽  
Kathelijn Fischer ◽  
Elena Santagostino ◽  
Johannes Oldenburg ◽  
Helen Platokouki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
High Titre ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
Immune Tolerance Induction ◽  
Potential Risk Factors

AbstractIn children with severe haemophilia A, inhibitors to factor VIII (FVIII) usually develop during the first 50 treatment exposure days and are classified as low or high titre depending on the peak inhibitor titre being greater or less than 5 Bethesda units/mL (BU/mL). Classification of the inhibitor may change with time, as some low-titre inhibitors progress to high titre following re-exposure to FVIII concentrate. The aim of this study was to investigate potential risk factors for such a progression in children with severe haemophilia A and newly diagnosed inhibitors. This study was a follow-up study of the PedNet Registry and included 260 children with severe haemophilia A and inhibitors born between 1990 and 2009 and recruited consecutively from 31 haemophilia centres. Clinical and laboratory data were collected from the date of each child's first positive inhibitor test for at least 3 years. At the time of first positive inhibitor test, 49% (n = 127) had low-titre inhibitors, with 50% of them progressing to high titre and only 25% maintaining low titres. The FVIII gene (F8) mutation type was known in 247 patients (95%), and included 202 (82%) null mutations. The progression to high-titre inhibitors was associated with null F8 mutations (odds ratio [OR]: 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0–6.5), family history of inhibitors (OR: 7.2; 95% CI: 1.8–28.4) and the use of high-dose immune tolerance induction, defined as ≥100 IU FVIII concentrate/kg/d (OR: 3.9; 95% CI: 1.5–10.0). These results suggest that high-dose immune tolerance induction should be avoided as the initial strategy in patients who develop low-titre FVIII inhibitors.

scholarly journals Case report of nasal pseudotumor – a rare presentation in severe haemophilia A with high titre inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-14
Author(s):  
Prakas Kumar Mandal ◽  
Malini Garg ◽  
Debasis Gantait ◽  
Utpal Jana
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Young Child ◽  
Factor Viii ◽  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
Financial Constraints ◽  
Surgical Excision ◽  
High Titre ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
Rare Presentation

AbstractHaemophilia patients with inhibitors suffer from increased morbidity and mortality due to the ineffectiveness of factor VIII replacement. Pseudotumors are rare but dangerous complications in these patients, and nasal pseudotumors are even rarer. Here, we present the case of a young child with severe haemophilia A with high titre inhibitors who developed a nasal pseudotumor. When immune tolerance therapy was not possible due to financial constraints, he was treated with FEIBA prophylaxis and rituximab. The pseudotumor was managed with surgical excision. We conclude that epistaxis in haemophiliacs can be due to an underlying nasal pseudotumor, and highlight the use of rituximab for the eradication of inhibitors.

scholarly journals Desmopressin treatment combined with clotting factor VIII concentrates in patients with non-severe haemophilia A: protocol for a multicentre single-armed trial, the DAVID study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e022719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisette M Schütte ◽  
Marjon H Cnossen ◽  
Reinier M van Hest ◽  
Mariette H E Driessens ◽  
Karin Fijnvandraat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Combination Treatment ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Clotting Factor ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Concentrate Treatment ◽  
Factor Viii Concentrates ◽  
Von Willebrand

IntroductionHaemophilia A is an inherited bleeding disorder characterised by factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency. In patients with non-severe haemophilia A, surgery and bleeding are the main indications for treatment with FVIII concentrate. A recent study reported that standard dosing frequently results in FVIII levels (FVIII:C) below or above FVIII target ranges, leading to respectively a bleeding risk or excessive costs. In addition, FVIII concentrate treatment carries a risk of development of neutralising antibodies. An alternative is desmopressin, which releases endogenous FVIII and von Willebrand factor. In most patients with non-severe haemophilia A, desmopressin alone is not enough to achieve FVIII target levels during surgery or bleeding. We hypothesise that combined pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided administration of desmopressin and FVIII concentrate may improve dosing accuracy and reduces FVIII concentrate consumption.Methods and analysisIn the DAVID study, 50 patients with non-severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C ≥0.01 IU/mL) with a bleeding episode or undergoing surgery will receive desmopressin and FVIII concentrate combination treatment. The necessary dose of FVIII concentrate to reach FVIII target levels after desmopressin administration will be calculated with a population PK model. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients reaching FVIII target levels during the first 72 hours after start of the combination treatment. This approach was successfully tested in one pilot patient who received perioperative combination treatment.Ethics and disseminationThe DAVID study was approved by the medical ethics committee of the Erasmus MC. Results of the study will be communicated trough publication in international scientific journals and presentation at (inter)national conferences.Trial registration numberNTR5383; Pre-results.

Inhibitor development in haemophilia according to concentrate

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (05) ◽  
pp. 968-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riita Lassila ◽  
Flora Peyvandi ◽  
Gabriele Calizzani ◽  
Alex Gatt ◽  
Thierry Lambert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Calculated Data ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Clotting Factor ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Haemophilia B ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Recombinant Fviii ◽  
Set Up

SummaryInhibitor development represents the most serious side effect of haemophilia treatment. Any difference in risk of inhibitor formation depending on the product used might be of clinical relevance. It was this study’s objective to assess inhibitor development according to clotting factor concentrate in severe haemophilia A and B. The European Haemophilia Safety Surveillance (EUHASS) was set up as a study monitoring adverse events overall and according to concentrate. Since October 2008, inhibitors were reported at least quarterly. Number of treated patients was reported annually, specifying the number of patients completing 50 exposure days (Previously Untreated Patients, PUPs) without inhibitor development. Cumulative incidence, incidence rates and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Data from October 1, 2008 to December 31, 2012 were analysed for 68 centres that validated their data. Inhibitors developed in 108/417 (26 %; CI 22–30 %) PUPs with severe haemophilia A and 5/72 (7 %; CI 2–16%) PUPs with severe haemophilia B. For Previously Treated Patients (PTPs), 26 inhibitors developed in 17,667 treatment years [0.15/100 treatment years; CI 0.10–0.22) for severe haemophilia A and 1/2836 (0.04/100; (CI 0.00–0.20) for severe haemophilia B. Differences between plasma-derived and recombinant concentrates, or among the different recombinant FVIII concentrates were investigated. In conclusion, while confirming the expected rates of inhibitors in PUPs and PTPs, no class or brand related differences were observed.

Innowacyjna metoda prowadzenia ITI za pomocą preparatu czynnika VIII z frakcją Fc u pacjentów z hemofilią A z obecnością inhibitora czynnika VIII – przegląd literaturowy

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maciej Trzaska ◽  
Marek Karwacki ◽  
Paweł Łaguna ◽  
Michał Matysiak
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Immunological Tolerance ◽  
Therapeutic Benefit ◽  
High Titre ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
First Time

Eradication of factor VIII inhibitors using Immune tolerance induction (ITI) treatment is the standard of care for severe haemophilia A patients presenting with factor VIII inhibitors, but is not always effective. A description of the potential immunological tolerance effect of the IgG Fc domain of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc), as well as published experience with rFVIIIFc for ITI in patients with severe haemophilia A and high-titre inhibitors. Review of published literature describing cases of ITI with rFVIIIFc in patients with severe haemophilia A and high-titre inhibitors between November 2015 and June 2018. Four publications has been found. Of 56 patients with haemophilia A who presented with FVIII inhibitors, 28 achieved a negative Bethesda titre (< 0.6) after ITI treatment using rFVIIIFc. Additional patients continued on rFVIIIFc ITI at the time of publication, while a few were reported to have switched to bypass therapy alone or other factors . For those still undergoing ITI, longer follow-up is needed to determine final outcomes. No adverse events were reported. Based on literature review, preliminary evidence of FVIIIFc use in high risk, first-time ITI suggests rapid time to tolerization. For rescue ITI, rFVIIIFc showed therapeutic benefit in some patients who previously failed ITI. These findings give hope but highlight the need for further evaluation in ongoing clinical trials.

The long-term course of factor VIII inhibitors in patients with congenital haemophilia A without immune tolerance induction

2011 ◽  
Vol 105 (01) ◽  
pp. 59-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila Caram ◽  
Roberta Grazielle de Souza ◽  
Júlio Carepa de Sousa ◽  
Tatiana Araújo Pereira ◽  
Ana Maria do Amaral Cerqueira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Factor Viii ◽  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
Clotting Factor ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Immune Tolerance Induction ◽  
Inhibitor Titre ◽  
Very High

SummaryThe development of alloantibodies that inhibit or neutralise the function of factor VIII is considered the most serious complication of the treatment of congenital haemophilia A. In order to describe their course without immune tolerance induction (ITI), we documented data on all performed inhibitor tests with dates as well as on clotting factor infusions of all consecutive patients who were treated in our centre between 1993 and 2006. Patients were tested every 7.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.6–7.8). A ‘sustained negative inhibitor status’ was defined as consistent non-positive inhibitor measurements for two years or longer. A total of 60/486 (12%) patients tested had a positive inhibitor titre in two or more occasions. Most of the patients (56%) with a maximum inhibitor titre of < 5 Bethesda unit (BU)/ml (named “low titre inhibitor”) developed a sustained negative inhibitor status. Among patients with high (5–9.9 BU/ml) and very high (≥ 10 BU/ ml) inhibitor titres, the proportions were 50% and 3%, respectively. Our findings suggest that ITI might not be needed for all patients with non-transient inhibitors, especially when their maximum inhibitor titre is below 10 BU/ml. Further studies in countries where ITI is not available are needed to examine predictors of the natural sustained negative inhibitor status.

scholarly journals A previously treated severe haemophilia A patient developed high-titre inhibitor after vaccinations

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 205873842093461
Author(s):  
Zekun Li ◽  
Zhenping Chen ◽  
Xiaoling Cheng ◽  
Xinyi Wu ◽  
Gang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
High Titre ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
Danger Signal ◽  
Inflammatory Microenvironment ◽  
Varicella Zoster ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
The Relationship

The factor VIII (FVIII)-neutralizing antibody (inhibitor) seen in 25%–30% of patients with severe haemophilia A (SHA). Vaccination is a non-genetic risk factor of inhibitor development as ‘danger signal’ which may provide a pro-inflammatory microenvironment to increase FVIII immunogenicity. We reported a previously treated SHA patient postponed the first vaccination to 15-month age received diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus intramuscularly. At 18-month age, the patient received Hepatitis A intramuscularly and Varicella Zoster Virus subcutaneously with 2 weeks interval and FVIII infusion was given <24 h prior for each. Successive bleedings occurred 1 week later with inefficacy of FVIII replacement. High-titre inhibitor was tested at 117 exposure days. This case suggested that continuous vaccinations in close proximity to FVIII could induce inhibitor. The relationship between vaccination and FVIII immunogenicity still needs to be revealed by further study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document