Misfit of Three Different Implant-Abutment Connections Before and After Cyclic Load Application: An In Vitro Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 822-829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Gehrke ◽  
Rafael Delgado-Ruiz ◽  
Juan Frutos ◽  
María Prados-Privado ◽  
Berenice Dedavid ◽  
...  
Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 385
Author(s):  
Igor Smojver ◽  
Marko Vuletić ◽  
Dražena Gerbl ◽  
Ana Budimir ◽  
Mato Sušić ◽  
...  

The microenvironment of the oral cavity is altered when an implant, a biocompatible foreign body, is inserted into the mouth. Bacteria settle in the tissues in and around the implant due to the passage of microorganisms through the microgap at the connection of the implant and prosthetic abutment. To prevent colonization of the implant by microorganisms, one idea is to use sealing and antimicrobial materials to decontaminate the implant–abutment interface and close the microgap. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy and permeability of different types of sealing materials at the implant–abutment interface, under static conditions. Three different sealing material (GapSeal gel, Oxysafe gel and Flow.sil) were used for sealing the implant–abutment interfaces in 60 titanium dental implants, which were first contaminated with a solution containing Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans for 14 days under an aerobic condition. Results showed that a complete seal against bacterial infection was not formed at the implant–abutment interface, while for fungal infections, only GapSeal material helped to prevent microleakage. Findings of this in vitro study reported that application of sealing material before abutment connection may reduce peri-implant bacterial and fungal population compared with the interface without sealing material.


2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helios A. Zeno ◽  
Renan L. Buitrago ◽  
Sidney S. Sternberger ◽  
Marisa E. Patt ◽  
Nick Tovar ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Sergio Alexandre Gehrke ◽  
Berenice Anina Dedavid ◽  
José Manuel Granero Marín ◽  
Luigi Canullo

BACKGROUND: During the masticatory cycle, loads of different intensities and directions are received by the dental structures and/or implants, which can cause micromovements at the junction between the abutment and implant. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the behavior of three different implant connections subjected to different load values using a digital radiography system. Additionally, the torque values for removing the abutment screws were also measured and compared. METHODS: Ninety sets of implant and abutment (IA) were used, divided into three groups according to the type of connection (n = 30 per group): EH group, external hexagon type connection; IH group, internal hexagon connection; and, MT group, Morse taper connection. RESULTS: MT group showed the better vertical misfit behavior at the three intensity of load applied, in comparison with EH and IH groups. In the analysis of torque maintenance (detorque test), MT group showed higher values of detorque when compared with the measured values of EH and IH groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The IA sets of EH and IH groups showed a microgap in all levels of applied loads, unlike the MT group this event was not observed. In the detorque test, MT group increase in the torque values when compared to the initial torque applied, unlike EH and IH groups showed a decrease in the initially torque applied in all conditions tested. A positive correlation was detected between the misfit and detorque values.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 294-294
Author(s):  
Eduardo Claudio Lopes de Chaves E. Mello Dias ◽  
Marcelo Sperandio ◽  
Marcelo Henrique Napimoga

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 747-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubén Agustín-Panadero ◽  
Ana Roig-Vanaclocha ◽  
Antonio Fons-Font ◽  
María Solá-Ruíz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document