Abstract 115: Is Routine Patching Necessary Following Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA)?

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas J Gargiulo
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Perioperative Stroke ◽  
Symptomatic Carotid ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patch Closure ◽  
Closure Group

Objectives: Large medicare databases and meta-analyses recommend routine patching following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Routine patching reduces perioperative stroke, carotid thrombosis, and restenosis. This 30 year experience evaluates the long term outcome of CEA with selective patching and without routine postoperative duplex examination. Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective review of all CEAs peformed by two surgeons over a 30 year period (1984-2014). Pre-operative imaging studies, operative reports, physical findings, co-morbid conditions, and pre- and postoperative medications were evaluated. Results: Over a 30-year period, 439 CEAs were performed for symptomatic carotid disease using a selective patch technique depending on gender, internal carotid artery diameter, cardiovascular risk factors, and preoperative arteriogram. In this group of 439 patients, 17 (3.9%) had patch closure of the carotid artery and the other 422 (96.1%) had primary closure. There were 2 (0.47%) perioperative strokes in the primary closure group and 4 (0.95%) patients in this group developed symptomatic carotid restenosis at a mean follow-up of 49.5 months (range 1 to 237 months). There was 1 (5.8%) carotid thrombosis in the patch closure group who also had a perioperative stroke and was serologically positive for a hypercoagulable disorder. The 4 patients who developed symptomatic restenosis had arteriographically proven > 90% stenosis and required repeat CEA. The remaining 418 (99.0%) patients having primary closure remained neurologically asymptomatic (mean follow-up 10.3 years, range 2.5 to 17 years). There was 1 (0.23%) operative death that occurred following the induction of general anesthesia. Conclusions: In this experience, there is no statistically significant difference in restenosis in the primary closure group and selective patch group following CEA. Although this data set is a small, single center, two surgeon, retrospective review, it does not support the generally well accepted view of routine patching following CEA

scholarly journals Patch Angioplasty or Primary Closure Following Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. e96-e101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eline Huizing ◽  
Cornelis Vos ◽  
Robin Hulsebos ◽  
Peter van den Akker ◽  
Gert Borst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Symptomatic Carotid ◽  
Patch Angioplasty ◽  
Eversion Endarterectomy ◽  
Patch Closure ◽  
Symptomatic Stenosis

Objectives Guidelines recommend routine patching to prevent restenosis following carotid endarterectomy, mainly based on studies performed many years ago with different perioperative care and medical treatment compared with current standards. Aim of the present study was to compare primary closure (PRC) versus patch closure (PAC) in a contemporary cohort of patients. Methods Consecutive patients treated by carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic stenosis between January 2006 and April 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcome was restenosis at 6 weeks and 1 year and occurrence of ipsilateral stroke. Secondary outcomes were mortality, complications, and reintervention rates. Results Five hundred carotid artery endarterectomies were performed. Fifty-nine patients were excluded because eversion endarterectomy was performed or because they were asymptomatic. PRC was performed in 349 and PAC in 92 patients. Restenosis at 6 weeks was 6.0% in the PAC group versus 3.0% in the PRC group (p = 0.200). Restenosis at 1 year was 31.6 versus 14.1%, respectively (p = 0.104). No difference was found for stroke (3.4 vs 1.1%, p = 0.319), death (1.1 vs 0.0%, p = 0.584), or other complications (1.1 vs 0.0%, p = 0.584), respectively. Conclusions It remains unclear whether routine patching should be recommended for all patients. A strategy of selective patching compared with routine patching, based on internal carotid artery diameter and other patient characteristics, deserves further investigation.

Carotid artery angioplasty and use of stents in high-risk patients with contralateral occlusions

1999 ◽  
Vol 90 (6) ◽  
pp. 1031-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Mericle ◽  
Stanley H. Kim ◽  
Giuseppe Lanzino ◽  
Demetrius K. Lopes ◽  
Ajay K. Wakhloo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Stent Placement ◽  
Death Rate ◽  
Minor Stroke ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Symptomatic Carotid ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The risks associated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are increased in the presence of contralateral carotid artery (CA) occlusion. The 30-day stroke and death rate for patients in the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) who had contralateral CA occlusion was 14.3%. The authors analyze their experience with angioplasty and/or stent placement in patients with contralateral CA occlusion to determine the safety and efficacy of endoluminal revascularization in this subgroup.Methods. Twenty-six procedures were evaluated in 23 patients with high-grade CA stenosis and contralateral CA occlusion. The first 15 procedures were evaluated retrospectively, and the next 11 prospectively. All patients had severe medical comorbidities and were considered too high risk for CEA, even without considering the contralateral occlusion. Clinical follow-up review was performed an average of 18 months later (median 15 months).Conclusions. The average ipsilateral CA stenosis according to NASCET criteria was 78% preprocedure and 5% postprocedure. There were no changes in neurological or functional outcome immediately postoperatively in any patient. The 30-day postoperative stroke and death rates were zero. However, there was one symptomatic femoral hematoma that resolved without surgery. At follow up, there were three patients who had suffered stroke or death. One patient died secondary to respiratory arrest at 2 months; one died secondary to prostate carcinoma at 12 months; and one patient experienced a minor stroke contralateral to the treated artery at 41 months. Despite the substantial preoperative risk factors in patients in this series, the 30-day stroke and death rate for angioplasty and/or stent placement appears to be lower than that of CEA in patients with contralateral occlusions.

scholarly journals The effects of centralisation of vascular surgical services in the Bath, Bristol and Weston area on the carotid endarterectomy pathway

2017 ◽  
Vol 99 (8) ◽  
pp. 617-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Partridge ◽  
M Brooks ◽  
C Curd ◽  
V Davis ◽  
C Oates ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Royal Infirmary ◽  
Surgical Team ◽  
Symptomatic Carotid ◽  
Surgical Services ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ischaemic Attack ◽  
Provision Of Care

Introduction Patients who experience a transient ischaemic attack are at the highest risk of having a subsequent stroke immediately after their symptoms. A carotid endarterectomy should be performed on symptomatic, surgically suitable patients who present with a greater than 50% North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial stenosis of the internal carotid artery within 2 weeks of their symptoms. This study aimed to determine whether the effectiveness of the carotid endarterectomy pathway has been impacted by the centralisation of vascular surgical services in the Bath, Bristol and Weston area. Materials and Methods From October 2013 to October 2015, critical steps in the patient carotid endarterectomy pathway that vascular surgeons from the Royal United Hospital Bath, Bristol Royal Infirmary and North Bristol NHS Trust input into the Royal College of Surgeons National Vascular Registry were collected. The dates of patient’s symptoms, referral, first scan, surgical team review and surgery were analysed. Results Carotid endarterectomy data was collected for 261 patients. Overall, no significant difference in median time (days) from symptom to surgery from precentralisation data compared with post-centralisation data was seen (P = .175), with 65% patients meeting the national target of symptom to surgery in less than 14days. Discussion and Conclusion Centralisation has not significantly impacted the overall efficiency of the carotid endarterectomy pathway. This study highlights areas where improvement across the vascular network is required. This includes addressing the 35% patients that are not currently meeting the 14-day target and standardising the provision of care to outlying communities. Further follow-up is required to assess the longer term effects of centralisation.

scholarly journals Comprehensive comparison of carotid endarterectomy primary closure and patch angioplasty: A single-institution experience

2022 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Nirmeen Zagzoog ◽  
Ali Elgheriani ◽  
Ahmed Attar ◽  
Radwan Takroni ◽  
Majid Aljoghaiman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Recurrent Stenosis ◽  
Doppler Ultrasound Imaging ◽  
Patch Angioplasty ◽  
Comprehensive Comparison ◽  
Patch Closure

Background: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is an effective intervention for the treatment of high-grade carotid stenosis. Technical preferences exist in the operative steps including the use patch for arteriotomy closure. The goals of this study are to compare the rate of postoperative complications and the rate of recurrent stenosis between patients undergoing primary versus patch closure during CEA. Methods: Retrospective chart review was conducted for patients who underwent CEA at single institution. Vascular surgeons mainly performed patch closure technique while neurosurgeons used primary closure. Patients’ baseline characteristics as well as intraprocedural data, periprocedural complications, and postprocedural follow-up outcomes were captured. Results: Seven hundred and thirteen charts were included for review with mean age of 70.5 years (SD = 10.4) and males representing 64.2% of the cohort. About 49% of patients underwent primary closure while 364 (51%) patients underwent patch closure. Severe stenosis was more prevalent in patients receiving patch closure (94.5% vs. 89.4%; P = 0.013). The incidence of overall complications did not differ between the two procedures (odds ratio = 1.23, 95% confidence intervals = 0.82–1.85; P = 0.353) with the most common complications being neck hematoma, strokes, and TIA. Doppler ultrasound imaging at 6 months postoperative follow-up showed evidence of recurrent stenosis in 15.7% of the primary closure patients compared to 16% in patch closure cohort. Conclusion: Both primary closure and patch closure techniques seem to have similar risk profiles and are equally robust techniques to utilize for CEA procedures.

Carotid endarterectomy: neither shunting nor patching technique

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 446-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aram Baram ◽  
Goran Majeed ◽  
Allaa Subhi Abdel-Majeed
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenosis ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Artery Stenosis ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Total Occlusion ◽  
Patch Angioplasty ◽  
Bilateral Carotid

Introduction The role of carotid shunting in carotid endarterectomy is controversial. Many studies have concluded that patch angioplasty is preferable to primary closure, while others found that it had no value. The aim of this study was to report the results of our first series of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy with a non-shunting technique and primary closure of the arteriotomy. Methods From October 2014 to October 2017, 63 patients with unilateral or bilateral carotid artery stenosis underwent carotid endarterectomy. There were 48 males and 15 females, the mean age was 63.16 years, and all were symptomatic. Conventional endarterectomy was performed without a shunt in all cases. All arteriotomies were closed primarily. We analysed the early and late outcomes of this procedure with at least 18 months of follow-up. Results Diabetes was the most frequent comorbidity. Most of the patients had a history of transient ischemic attack (49.2%) or stroke (44.4%). All patients had significant (moderate to severe) carotid artery stenosis. Postoperatively, 2 (3.2%) patients developed ischemic stroke, one (1.6%) suffered hypoglossal nerve injury, and one had a postoperative cervical hematoma. During follow-up, one patient developed asymptomatic total occlusion of the endartrectomized carotid artery at 18 months. Conclusion Carotid endarterectomy without shunting is a safe procedure. The short- and longer-term outcomes are not significantly inferior to those of the routine or selective shunting technique, and the rate of restenosis is not higher than that of patch angioplasty closure.

Evaluation of Aortic Zone 2 Proximal Landing Accuracy During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Following Carotid-Subclavian Revascularization

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-360
Author(s):  
Sally H. J. Choi ◽  
Gary K. Yang ◽  
Keith Baxter ◽  
Joel Gagnon
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Common Carotid Artery ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Average Distance ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Technical Accuracy ◽  
Corrective Procedures

Background: Adequate seal for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) commonly requires landing in zone 2, but can prove to be challenging due to the tortuous and angulated anatomy of the region. Objectives: Our objective was to determine the proximal landing accuracy of zone 2-targeted TEVARs following carotid-subclavian revascularization (CSR) and its impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: Retrospective review of patients that underwent CSR for zone 2 endograft delivery at a tertiary institute between January 2008 and March 2018 was conducted. Technical outcomes were assessed by examining the incidence of intraoperative corrective maneuvers, 1a endoleaks and reinterventions. Distance to target and incidence of LSA stump filling were examined as radiographic markers of landing accuracy. Results: Zone 2-targeted TEVAR with CSR was performed in 53 patients for treatment of dissections (49%), aneurysms (30%) or trauma (21%). Nine (17%) cases required intraoperative corrective procedures: 5 (9%) proximal cuffs due to type 1a endoleak and 4 (8%) left common carotid artery (LCCA) stenting due to inadvertent coverage. Cases performed using higher resolution hybrid fluoroscopy machine compared to mobile C-arm were associated with increased proximal cuff use (OR 8.8; 95% CI 1.2-62.4). Average distance between the proximal edge of the covered graft to LCCA was 8 ± 1 mm and larger distances were not associated with higher rates of 1a endoleak. Twenty-eight (53%) cases of antegrade LSA stump filling were noted on follow-up imaging, but were not associated with higher rates of reinterventions (OR 0.8, 95% CI [0.2-4.6]). Three (6%) patients had a stroke within 30 days and 4 (8%) patients expired within 1 month. Intraoperative corrective maneuvers, post-operative 1a endoleak and reinterventions were not associated with higher rates of stroke or mortality. Conclusion: Using current endografts and imaging modalities, zone 2-targeted TEVARs have suboptimal technical accuracy.

Cognitive Performance in Elderly Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy or Carotid Artery Stenting: A Twelve-Month Follow-Up Study

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 244-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.T. Feliziani ◽  
M.C. Polidori ◽  
P. De Rango ◽  
F. Mangialasche ◽  
R. Monastero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Cognitive Performance ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Follow Up Study

scholarly journals Surface Replacement Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty: A Case Series

Hand ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 669-674
Author(s):  
Pieter W. Jordaan ◽  
Duncan McGuire ◽  
Michael W. Solomons
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Surface Replacement ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: In 2012, our unit published our experience with a pyrocarbon proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) implant. Due to high subsidence rates, a decision was made to change to a cemented surface replacement proximal interphalangeal joint (SR-PIPJ) implant. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the change to a cemented implant would improve the subsidence rates. Methods: Retrospective review of all patients who had a cemented SR-PIPJ arthroplasty performed from 2011 to 2013 with at least 12 months follow-up. Results: A total of 43 joints were included with an average follow-up of 26.5 months. There was a significant ( P = .02) improvement in arc of motion with an average satisfaction score of 3.3 (satisfied patient). Subsidence was noted in 26% of joints with a significant difference in range of motion ( P = .003) and patient satisfaction ( P = .001) between the group with and without subsidence. Conclusions: The change to a cemented implant resulted in satisfied patients with an improvement in range of motion. The rate of subsidence improved but remains unacceptably high.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document