Abstract 011: Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) and Risk of Clinical Diabetes in American Black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander Postmenopausal Women.

Circulation ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 125 (suppl_10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian H Chen ◽  
Kathleen Brennan ◽  
Atsushi Goto ◽  
Yiqing Song ◽  
Najib Aziz ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Recent prospective studies have shown a strong inverse association between sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) levels and risk of clinical diabetes in Whites. However, it remains unknown whether this relation extends to other racial/ethnic populations. METHODS: We evaluated the association between baseline levels of SHBG and risk of clinical diabetes in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. Over a median follow-up of 5.9 years, 542 postmenopausal women developed clinical diabetes (338 Blacks, 128 Hispanics, 76 Asians) and were matched to 1,110 controls (707 Blacks, 249 Hispanics, 154 Asians). To complement our protein-level findings, we also genotyped 5 SHBG polymorphisms. We performed Mendelian randomization analysis to assess the potential causal relation between SHBG levels and risk of clinical diabetes. RESULTS: Overall, higher levels of SHBG at baseline were associated with a significantly lower risk of clinical diabetes (Relative risk [RR]=0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.15-0.39 for highest versus lowest quartile of SHBG, adjusted for BMI and other known diabetes risk factors). The associations remained consistent across ethnic groups (p-for-heterogeneity=0.72): RR=0.29 (95%CI=0.16-0.54) for Blacks, RR=0.26 (95%CI=0.09-0.74) for Hispanics, and RR=0.32 (95%CI=0.06-1.73) for Asians, comparing highest to lowest quartiles of SHBG. In addition, SHBG polymorphisms affected diabetes risk proportional to serum SHBG levels. Mendelian randomization analysis confirmed the significant direct effect of SHBG on diabetes development (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective cohort of postmenopausal women, we observed a robust, inverse relation between serum levels of SHBG and clinical diabetes risk in American Blacks, Hispanics, and Asian/Pacific Islanders. Genetic variants associated with SHBG levels demonstrated a similar relationship, providing support for a causal role of SHBG in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes.

2012 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
pp. 1457-1466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian H Chen ◽  
Kathleen Brennan ◽  
Atsushi Goto ◽  
Yiqing Song ◽  
Najib Aziz ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Recent prospective studies have shown a strong inverse association between sex hormone–binding globulin (SHBG) concentrations and risk of clinical diabetes in white individuals. However, it remains unclear whether this relationship extends to other racial/ethnic populations. METHODS We evaluated the association between baseline concentrations of SHBG and clinical diabetes risk in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. Over a median follow-up of 5.9 years, we identified 642 postmenopausal women who developed clinical diabetes (380 blacks, 157 Hispanics, 105 Asians) and 1286 matched controls (777 blacks, 307 Hispanics, 202 Asians). RESULTS Higher concentrations of SHBG at baseline were associated with a significantly lower risk of clinical diabetes [relative risk (RR), 0.15; 95% CI, 0.09–0.26 for highest vs lowest quartile of SHBG, adjusted for BMI and known diabetes risk factors]. The associations remained consistent within ethnic groups [RR, 0.19 (95% CI, 0.10–0.38) for blacks; RR, 0.17 (95% CI, 0.05–0.57) for Hispanics; and 0.13 (95% CI, 0.03–0.48) for Asians]. Adjustment for potential confounders, such as total testosterone (RR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.07–0.19) or HOMA-IR (RR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14–0.48) did not alter the RR substantially. In addition, SHBG concentrations were significantly associated with risk of clinical diabetes across categories of hormone therapy use (never users: RRper SD = 0.42, 95% CI, 0.34–0.51; past users: RRper SD = 0.53;, 95% CI, 0.37–0.77; current users: RRper SD = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.46–0.69; P-interaction = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS In this prospective study of postmenopausal women, we observed a robust, inverse relationship between serum concentrations of SHBG and risk of clinical diabetes in American blacks, Hispanics, and Asians/Pacific Islanders. These associations appeared to be independent of sex hormone concentrations, adiposity, or insulin resistance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e001841
Author(s):  
Vanita R Aroda ◽  
Costas A Christophi ◽  
Sharon L Edelstein ◽  
Leigh Perreault ◽  
Catherine Kim ◽  
...  

IntroductionSex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels are reported to be inversely associated with diabetes risk. It is unknown whether diabetes prevention interventions increase SHBG and whether resultant changes in SHBG affect diabetes risk. The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether intensive lifestyle intervention (ILS) or metformin changed circulating SHBG and if resultant changes influenced diabetes risk in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP).Research design and methodsThis is a secondary analysis from the DPP (1996–2001), a randomized trial of ILS or metformin versus placebo on diabetes risk over a mean follow-up of 3.2 years. The DPP was conducted across 27 academic study centers in the USA. Men, premenopausal and postmenopausal women without hormone use in the DPP were evaluated. The DPP included overweight/obese persons with elevated fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance. Main outcomes measures were changes in SHBG levels at 1 year and risk of diabetes over 3 years.ResultsILS resulted in significantly higher increases (postmenopausal women: p<0.01) or smaller decrements (men: p<0.05; premenopausal women: p<0.01) in SHBG compared with placebo or metformin. Changes in SHBG were primarily attributable to changes in adiposity. There were no consistent associations of change in SHBG with the risk of diabetes by treatment arm or participant group.ConclusionsLifestyle intervention may be associated with favorable changes in circulating SHBG, which is largely due to changes in adiposity. Changes in circulating SHBG do not independently predict reductions in diabetes incidence.


2016 ◽  
Vol 101 (7) ◽  
pp. 2844-2852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loes Jaspers ◽  
Klodian Dhana ◽  
Taulant Muka ◽  
Cindy Meun ◽  
Jessica C. Kiefte-de Jong ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document