Abstract 12650: Unexpected Response to Atrial Fibrillation Reduction in Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamid Assadi ◽  
Hossein Shenasa ◽  
Shahriar Heidary ◽  
Mohammad Shenasa
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Systolic Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
P Value ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Group I ◽  
Before And After

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is known to improve left ventricular (LV) systolic function and symptoms of systolic heart failure. The effect of CRT on atrial fibrillation (AF) burden is less clarified. Methods: 18 patients mean age of 77 ± 11 (72% male) underwent CRT implantations. There were no changes to concomitant anti-arrhythmic medication and permanent AF patients were excluded. Echocardiograms were obtained six month before and after device implantation. LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end diastolic dimension (LVEDd), left atrial (LA) dimension, and magnitude of mitral regurgitation (MR) were measured by echocardiogram before and after CRT. The burden of AF was evaluated by 24-hour Holter monitoring before and by device arrhythmic log after implantation. There were no concomitant medication changes. The results were later divided into presence (Group I) and absence (Group II) of paroxysmal or persistent AF. No patient was in permanent AF at the time of CRT implantation. Results: LVEF improved after CRT in both groups. Patients with AF showed the most beneficial effects of LVEF with average improvement of 41% (P-value=0.004) in comparison to 13% improvement in patients without AF (P-value=0.044). The LVEDd was improved by 11.9% in patients with AF (P-value=0.01) while it was improved by only 5.6% in patients without AF (P-value=0.08). LA Dimension was decreased by 4.4% in patients with AF (P-value=0.038). MR was reduced on average from moderate to mild for both groups. The number of AF episodes and duration of the AF were also decreased in all of our AF patients. The pre and post effect of CRT in patients with and without AF is shown in the table below: Conclusions: The AF burden in patients who received CRT was significantly reduced. There were excellent correlations between improvement of LVEF, LVEDd, LA dimension, and AF burden. This may be due to LV and LA remodeling. Further studies need to elaborate the mechanisms of this finding.

scholarly journals Importance of systematic right ventricular assessment in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates: a machine-learning approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Galli ◽  
V Le Rolle ◽  
OA Smiseth ◽  
J Duchenne ◽  
JM Aalen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Systolic Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Supervised Machine Learning ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Crt Response

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Despite having all a systolic heart failure and broad QRS, patients proposed for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are highly heterogeneous and it remains extremely complicated to predict the impact of the device on left ventricular (LV) function and outcomes. Objectives We sought to evaluate the relative impact of clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic data on the left ventricular (LV) remodeling and prognosis of CRT-candidates by the application of machine learning (ML) approaches. Methods 193 patients with systolic heart failure undergoing CRT according to current recommendations were prospectively included in this multicentre study. We used a combination of the Boruta algorithm and random forest methods to identify features predicting both CRT volumetric response and prognosis (Figure 1). The model performance was tested by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). We also applied the K-medoid method to identify clusters of phenotypically-similar patients. Results From 28 clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic-derived variables, 16 features were predictive of CRT-response; 11 features were predictive of prognosis. Among the predictors of CRT-response, 7 variables (44%) pertained to right ventricular (RV) size or function. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion was the main feature associated with prognosis. The selected features were associated with a very good prediction of both CRT response (AUC 0.81, 95% CI: 0.74-0.87) and outcomes (AUC 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75-0.93) (Figure 1, Supervised Machine Learning Panel). An unsupervised ML approach allowed the identifications of two phenogroups of patients who differed significantly in clinical and parameters, biventricular size and RV function. The two phenogroups had significant different prognosis (HR 4.70, 95% CI: 2.1-10.0, p < 0.0001; log –rank p < 0.0001; Figure 1, Unsupervised Machine Learning Panel). Conclusions Machine learning can reliably identify clinical and echocardiographic features associated with CRT-response and prognosis. The evaluation of both RV-size and function parameters has pivotal importance for the risk stratification of CRT-candidates and should be systematically assessed in patients undergoing CRT. Abstract Figure 1

scholarly journals P797 Assessment of right ventricular systolic function with 3D echocardiography following cardiac resynchronization therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Jenei ◽  
E Papp ◽  
M Clemens ◽  
Z Csanadi
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
3D Echocardiography ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Ventricular Systolic Function ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background In approximately 30-40% of cases, the left ventricular systolic function does not improve following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT; non-responders). Currently, the role of right ventricular (RV) systolic function is not yet completely clear in the background. Our aim was to assess the RV systolic function with 3D echocardiography in CRT patients. Methods We selected 19 patients who received CRT in our department between May and June 2017, and whose 1-year follow-up data were available. We characterized several 2D parameters of RV systolic function, such as RV free wall strain (RV GLSFW), annular s’ wave velocity (TDI s), tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), RV fractional area change (RV FAC). A number of 3D parameters were also assessed, such as RV ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic (ESV) volumes, using a dedicated RV analysis software. Moreover, we measured the LV EF and considered the patients "responder", when the LV EF improved with at least 10% after CRT implantation. Results From 19 patients, 12 was identified as responders (R) and 7 as non-responders (NR). No significant difference was seen in the mean age of patients in the two groups (NR: 68 ± 6 year; R: 67 ± 9 year, p = 0.76), however, the proportion of male individuals was higher in the NR group (8/12 vs. 1/7). The RV EF was higher in the R group (41 ± 8% vs.29 ± 10%; p = 0.012), while the EDV or ESV did not differ between the two groups. The RV GLSFW (–21.2 ± 7% vs.–13.9 ± 7%, p = 0.045) and the TAPSE (16.8 ± 5 mm vs.11.4 ± 3 mm, P = 0.03) values were significantly different between the two groups. Based on logistic regression analysis, the RV EF was an independent predictor of non-respondence. Conclusions The lower RV EF indicates non-respondence to CRT, however, it is not associated with RV dilation, i.e.adverse remodelling. These results suggest mechanical abnormality of RV function in the background of impaired EF.

scholarly journals Relationship between left bundle branch block patterns and super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 4227
Author(s):  
N. E. Shirokov ◽  
V. A. Kuznetsov ◽  
V. V. Todosiychuk ◽  
A. M. Soldatova ◽  
D. V. Krinochkin
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Left Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Interventricular Septum ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Doppler Imaging ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Septal Wall ◽  
Group I

Aim. To assess a relationship of left bundle branch block (LBBB) patterns defined by electrocardiography (ECG) and echocardiography with super-response (SR) to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).Material and methods. Sixty patients (mean age, 54,5±10,4 years) were examined at baseline and during follow-up (10,6±3,6 months). Patients were divided into groups: group I (n=31) — decrease of left ventricular end-systolic volume (ESV) ≥30% (super-responders) and II group (n=29) — decrease of LV ESV <30% (non-super-responders). Three strain-markers of LBBB assessed by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) were used: early contraction of basal or midventricular segment in the septal wall and early stretching of basal or midventricular segment in the lateral wall (marker 1); early peak contraction of the septal wall occurred in the first 70% of the systolic ejection phase (marker 2, septal flash (SF)); early stretching wall that showed peak contraction after aortic valve closure (marker 3). The classical LBBB pattern was defined if all three strain-markers were present. The heterogeneous LBBB pattern was defined if two from three strain-markers were present.Results. At baseline, groups did not differ in main clinical characteristics, including QRS width and LBBB assessed by ECG. Mechanical abnormalities were found only in group I: SF (32,3% vs 0,0%; p=0,001) and apical rocking (19,4% vs 0,0%; p=0,024), as well as classic LBBB mechanical pattern (20,8% vs 0,0%; p=0,05). The complex of heterogeneous LBBB mechanical pattern (odds ratio (OR), 7,512; 95% CI, 1,434-39,632; р=0,025), interventricular mechanical delay (OR, 1,037; 95% CI, 1,005-1,071; р=0,017) and longitudinal strain of interventricular septum mid segment (OR, 0,726; 95% CI, 0,540-0,977; р=0,035) had an independent relationship with SR. According to the ROC analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of model in SR prediction were 77,3% and 91,3% (AUC=0,862; p<0,001).Conclusion. SR is associated with both LBBB mechanical patterns assessed by STE and TDI. LBBB defined by ECG did not have significant association with SR to CRT.

Abstract 1604: Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Differs Between Patients With and Without Previous Right Ventricular Pacing

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea M Thelen ◽  
Christopher L Kaufman ◽  
Kevin V Burns ◽  
Daniel R Kaiser ◽  
Aaron S Kelly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Radial Strain ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Doppler Imaging ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Peak Displacement

Background: Previous large studies on the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure have generally excluded patients previously paced from the right ventricle (RV). Previously RV paced patients (RVp) can exhibit an iatrogenic cause of dyssynchrony and reduced systolic function and thus, may respond differently to CRT than patients not previously RV paced (nRVp). The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that RVp patients have greater improvements in left ventricular systolic function, volumes, and dyssynchrony in response to CRT than nRVp. Methods: Standard echocardiograms with tissue Doppler imaging were performed before and after chronic CRT in RVp (n = 21, 16 male) and nRVp (n = 70, 54 male) heart failure patients. Ejection fraction (EF), left ventricular end diastolic (LVEDV) and systolic (LVESV) volumes were calculated using the biplane Simpson’s method. Longitudinal dyssynchrony was calculated as the standard deviation of time to peak displacement (TT-12) of 12 segments in the apical views. Using mid-ventricular short axis views and speckle-tracking methods, radial dyssynchrony (Rad dys ) was calculated as the maximal time difference between six myocardial segments for peak radial strain. Echo response was defined as ≥ 15% reduction in LVESV. Results are reported as mean ± SD. Results: Significant baseline differences (p < 0.05) were observed between groups (RVp vs. nRVp) for age (74 ± 13 vs. 67 ± 13 year), follow-up time (6.1 ± 1.8 vs. 4.6 ± 2.1 months), LVEDV (154.3±50.8 vs.185.3±56.9 mL), and a trend for LVESV (112.4 ± 40.6 vs. 134.9 ± 47 mL, p = 0 .05). No differences were observed for EF, etiology of heart failure, and dyssynchrony measures between groups at baseline. Echo response rate was significantly ( p < 0.05) greater in RVp (76%) than nRVp (57%). After adjusting for baseline differences, RVp had greater improvement in EF (14 ± 9 vs. 8 ± 7%, p < 0.05) and LVESV (−33 ± 18 vs. −20 ± 21%, p < 0.05). After adjustment for follow-up time, no difference was observed for change in dyssynchrony between groups. Conclusion: RVp patients upgraded to CRT exhibit greater improvements in systolic function and ventricular remodeling as compared to nRVp patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document