Abstract 19008: Is Cold Pressor Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Testing Useful for Detection of Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction?

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherwin Dela Cruz ◽  
Janet Wei ◽  
Chrisandra Shufelt ◽  
Puja Mehta ◽  
Andre Rogatko ◽  
...  

Background: Coronary endothelial dysfunction is typically assessed by invasive coronary reactivity testing (CRT) to measure coronary blood flow ([[Unable to Display Character: &#8710;]]CBF) and diameter responses to acetylcholine (Ach). We evaluated if cold pressor testing (CPT) during noninvasive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) measurement of myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) reflects invasive measurements with Ach and CPT in subjects suspected of having endothelial dysfunction. Methods: CRT was performed in 137 symptomatic women using incremental infusions of Ach in the left coronary artery for 3 minutes and with CPT using ice pack on their hand and forearm for 2 minutes. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed 5 mm distal to the Doppler wire positioned in the proximal left anterior descending artery. In 132 women, [[Unable to Display Character: &#8710;]]CBF was calculated from average peak velocity and vessel cross sectional area. Invasive CPT could not be completed on 4 women. All women underwent CPT CMRI (1.5 T) to measure MPRI as a ratio of stress and rest upslopes of the whole myocardium. Five definitions of normal invasive CPT and Ach diameter response (dilation > 0, 5, 10, 15 or 20%) were compared to two abnormal definitions (≤ 0 or - 5%) of endothelial function. Normal [[Unable to Display Character: &#8710;]]CBF was defined as ≤ 50%. We used Wilcoxon Two-Sample statistical test to compare MPRI in each group. Results: CPT MPRI was significantly different in those with normal versus abnormal invasive Ach when Ach diameter response was defined as ≥ 20% or < - 5 % (p=0.04), though not with other thresholds (Table). Conclusion: Noninvasive CPT CMRI may not be useful for detection of endothelial dysfunction in symptomatic women as no significant difference in MPRI was found in those with normal and abnormal invasive CRT. However, there may be a role for CPT MPRI in detecting endothelial dysfunction at higher thresholds of normal diameter response. Additional investigation will evaluate CPT CMRI and cardiovascular outcomes.

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (01) ◽  
pp. 045-051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tahir Tak ◽  
Camilla M. Jaekel ◽  
Shahyar M. Gharacholou ◽  
Marshall W. Dworak ◽  
Scott A. Marshall

AbstractDoxorubicin is a standard treatment option for breast cancer, lymphoma, and leukemia, but its benefits are limited by its potential for cardiotoxicity. The primary objective of this study was to compare cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) versus echocardiography (ECHO) to detect a reduction in left ventricular ejection function, suggestive of doxorubicin cardiotoxicity. We studied eligible patients who were 18 years or older, who had breast cancer or lymphoma, and who were offered treatment with doxorubicin with curative intent dosing of 240 to 300 mg/m2 body surface area between March 1, 2009 and October 31, 2013. Patients underwent baseline CMRI and ECHO. Both imaging studies were repeated after four cycles of treatment. Ejection fraction (EF) calculated by both methods was compared and analyzed with the inferential statistical Student's t test. Twenty-eight eligible patients were enrolled. Two patients stopped participating in the study before undergoing baseline CMRI; 26 patients underwent baseline ECHO and CMRI. Eight of those 26 patients declined posttreatment studies, so the final study population was 18 patients. There was a significant difference in EF pre- and posttreatment in the CMRI group (p = 0.009) versus the ECHO group that showed no significant differences in EF (p = NS). It appears that CMRI is superior to ECHO for detecting doxorubicin-induced reductions in cardiac systolic function. However, ECHO is less expensive and more convenient for patients because of its noninvasive character and bedside practicality. A larger study is needed to confirm these findings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document