Abstract 12722: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy: A Higher Right Ventricle Pacing Percentage Predicts Greater Improvement in Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Lacy ◽  
Jonathan Chandler ◽  
NACHIKET MADHAV APTE ◽  
Seth Sheldon ◽  
Madhu Reddy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Qrs Duration ◽  
Rv Pacing ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) upgrade is indicated for improvement of cardiac function in patients with chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing burden >40% and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. It is uncertain whether the CRT response is different among patients with high (≥90%) versus intermediate (<90%) burden of baseline RV pacing. Hypothesis: To assess the impact of baseline RV pacing percent on ECG and echocardiographic response after CRT upgrade for pacing induced cardiomyopathy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all CRT upgrades for pacing induced cardiomyopathy at our hospital from January 2017 to December 2018. Cohorts were grouped by RV pacing burden ≥90% or <90%. QRS duration, left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF), and left ventricular internal dimension systolic (LVIDs) were assessed at baseline and 3-12 months post CRT upgrade. Results: We included 82 patients (age 74 ± 12 yr., 71% male) who underwent CRT upgrade for pacing induced cardiomyopathy. The RV pacing burden was ≥90% [median 99% (IQR 98-99%)] in 61 patients, and <90% [median 79% (IQR 69-88%)] in 21 patients. There was a trend towards greater reduction in QRS duration in the ≥90% RV pacing group (28 ± 29 ms vs. 22 ± 38 ms, p=0.5). Improvement in LVEF was greater in ≥90% vs. <90% RV pacing group (14.3 ± 10.1% vs. 6.3 ± 10.1%, p=0.003). The association persisted on multivariable adjustment for age, sex and baseline LVEF (p=0.004). There was a trend towards greater % reduction in LVIDs in the ≥90% vs. <90% RV pacing group (6.4 ± 15.5 % vs. 3.9 ± 14.3 %, p=0.5) [Figure]. Conclusions: A higher baseline RV pacing burden predicts a greater improvement in LVEF after CRT upgrade for pacing induced cardiomyopathy.

Cathodic-anodal left ventricular stimulation during cardiac resynchronization therapy: haemodynamic evaluation and electrocardiographic analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Gravellone ◽  
G Dell' Era ◽  
F De Vecchi ◽  
E Boggio ◽  
E Prenna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Right Ventricle ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Biventricular Stimulation ◽  
Qrs Duration

Abstract Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, one third of patients are “non responders”. Cathodic-anodal (CA) left ventricle (LV) capture is a multisite pacing occurring during CRT using both bipolar and quadripolar LV lead. It allows depolarization to arise simultaneously from the cathode and the anode of the bipole located on the LV epicardium, activating a larger volume of myocardium than cathodal pacing alone, thus potentially improving electromechanical synchrony (figure 1). We have previously proven that CA-LV stimulation is feasible and similar to bicathodic multipoint pacing (MPP) in terms of QRS wavefront activation. Purpose We aimed to evaluate both the acute intraprocedural haemodynamic and electrical effects of CA biventricular stimulation (CA-BS), comparing it with right-ventricle only pacing (Right Ventricle-Stimulation: RV-S), single-point CRT (Single Point-Biventricular Stimulation: SP-BS) and multipoint bicathodic biventricular stimulation (Multi Point-Biventricular Stimulation:MP-BS) in de novo CRT implants. Methods Ten patients candidates to CRT (LV ejection fraction ≤35% and left bundle branch block) received a quadripolar LV lead. Four pacing configurations were tested: RV-S, SP-BS, MP-BS and CA-BS, where cathode and the anode were the same electrodes used as cathodes in MP-BS. QRS duration by 12-lead ECG was defined as the time from the earliest ventricular deflection until the return to the isoelectric line. Haemodynamic assessment by radial artery catheterization using Pressure Recording Analytical Method processed the following parameters: dP/dT max (mmHg/msec), systolic arterial pressure (aPsys, mmHg), diastolic arterial pressure (aPdia, mmHg), mean arterial pressure (aPmean, mmHg), Cardiac Index (CI, l/min/m2), Stroke Volume Index (SVI, ml/min/m2). Results dP/dT max and aPmean increased significantly from RV-S to SP-BS (mean dP/dT max 0,82±0,28 versus 0,87±0,29 mmHg/msec, p=0,02; mean aPmean 89±19 versus 93±20 mmHg, p=0,01), but not from RV-S to MP-BS. Comparing RV-S to CA-BS, only aPmean exhibited a significant increase (mean aPmean 89±19 versus 92±20 mmHg, p=0,01). There were no haemodynamic differences between SP-BS, MP-BS and CA-BS. QRS duration reduced significantly from RV-S (167±10 msec) to each biventricular stimulation (135±14 msec, p=0,0002 for SP-BS; 130±17 msec, p=0,0001 for MP-BS; 129±18 msec, p=0,0002 for CA-BS) and from SP-BS to MP-BS and CA-BS (p=0,03 for both), whereas there were no difference comparing MP-BS and CA-BS. Conclusions CA-LV stimulation is not superior to single-point CRT in terms of acute haemodynamic performance, whereas it reduces the duration of ventricular electrical activation, showing an electrohaemodynamic mismatch. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate if acute electrical benefits of CA stimulation can predict chronic benefits, in terms of reverse cardiac remodelling. Cathodic-anodal left ventricular capture Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Septal scar predicts non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Kjellstad Larsen ◽  
J Duchenne ◽  
E Galli ◽  
JM Aalen ◽  
J Bogaert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Scar Burden ◽  
Systolic Volume ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Crt Response

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority Norwegian Health Association Background Scar in the left ventricular (LV) posterolateral wall is associated with poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The impact of septal scar, however, has been less thoroughly investigated. As recovery of septal function seems to be an important effect of CRT, we hypothesized that CRT response depends on septal viability. Aim The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between septal scar and volumetric response to CRT, and to compare the impact of scar located in septum to scar located in the posterolateral wall. Methods 128 patients with symptomatic heart failure undergoing CRT implantation based on current guidelines (ejection fraction 30 ± 8%, QRS-width 164 ± 17 ms) were included in the study. Volumes and ejection fraction were measured by echocardiography using the biplane Simpson’s method at baseline and six months follow up. Non-response was defined as less than 15% reduction in end-systolic volume. Scar was assessed by late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance, and reported as percentage scar per regional myocardial volume. Numbers are given in [median ;10-90% percentile]. Results Scar was present in 62 patients (48%). Scar burden was equal in septum [0% ;0-34%] and the posterolateral wall [0% ;0-36%], p = 0.10. 31 patients (24%) did not respond to CRT. The non-responders had higher scar burden than the responders in both septum [16% ;0-57% vs 0% ;0-23%, p &lt; 0.001] and the posterolateral wall [6% ;0-74% vs 0% ;0-22%, p &lt; 0.001]. In univariate regression analysis both septal and posterolateral scars correlated with non-response to CRT (r = 0.51 and r = 0.33, respectively). However, combined in a multivariate model only septal scar remained a significant marker of non-response (p &lt; 0.001), while posterolateral scar did not (p = 0.23). Septal scar ≥ 7.1% predicted non-response with a specificity of 81% and a sensitivity of 70% by receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. The area under the curve was 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.70 – 0.89) (Figure). Conclusions Septal scar is more closely associated with volumetric non-response to CRT than posterolateral scar. Future studies should explore the correlation between regional scar burden and different functional parameters, and how they relate to CRT response. Abstract Figure. Septal scar predicts non-response to CRT

Minimally Invasive Surgical Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: An Intermediate-Term Follow-Up Study

2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel S. Corvera ◽  
John D. Puskas ◽  
Vinod H. Thourani ◽  
Robert A. Guyton ◽  
Omar M. Lattouf
Keyword(s):  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Inotropic Support ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
Qrs Duration

Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves symptoms, quality of life, and ejection fraction in selected patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and interventricular conduction delay. Transvenous insertion of left ventricular (LV) pacing leads via the coronary sinus is unsuccessful in 8–10% of patients. This study describes intermediate-term follow up of minimally invasive surgical techniques for CRT as a viable alternative after failed transvenous lead insertion. Methods From March 2001 to October 2005, fifty-four patients with NYHA Class III–IV symptoms, QRS duration 181 ± 40 milliseconds, and LV ejection fraction 19.7 ± 8.0% underwent a total of 56 minimally invasive LV lead placements via thoracoscopic video assistance (n = 38) or minithoracotomy (n = 17). One patient required full thoracotomy after a previous video-assisted thoracoscopic procedure. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography was used to assess changes in LV function. Results Acute thresholds for the active lead measured 1.10 ± 0.62 V, with R-wave amplitude of 12.3 ± 6.6 mV and impedance of 631 ± 185 Ohm. Thirty-day mortality was 5%. There were no perioperative myocardial infarctions or strokes. Five patients required transfusion, 3 had exacerbation of prior renal insufficiency, 5 had pulmonary complications, and 8 required inotropic support for more than 48 hours. Intermediate-term follow up (mean 20 ± 16 months, range 11 days to 55 months) revealed 3 patients with lead failure requiring additional surgical intervention. Hospitalization due to worsening CHF occurred in 5 patients, and 2 of these patients required intravenous inotropic support. QRS duration decreased to 146 ± 36 milliseconds postoperatively (P < 0.001). Conclusion Minimally invasive surgical lead placement safely and effectively accomplishes cardiac resynchronization using either thoracoscopic or minithoracotomy techniques.

Abstract P64: Right Ventricular Outflow Septal Pacing as Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Right Bundle-Branch Block: Results in 62 Patients

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip E Schrumpf ◽  
Michael Giudici ◽  
Deborah Paul ◽  
Roselyn Krupa ◽  
Cynthia Meirbachtol
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Right Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Qrs Complex ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Ventricular Performance ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Qrs Duration

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy has been shown to improve left ventricular performance in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and a left-sided interventricular conduction delay. This is performed by placing a pacing lead on the lateral left ventricular wall to stimulate the area normally stimulated by the left bundle branch. In patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB), pacing the right bundle branch could also result in resynchronization. Previous studies have shown that right ventricular outflow septal (RVOS) pacing does, in fact, utilize the native conduction system. Methods: 62 consecutive patients, 46 male/16 female, aged 75 +/− 10.5 yr, with RBBB and indications for pacing, underwent RVOS lead placement using commercially available pacing systems. The patients subsequently underwent bedside A-V optimization to achieve the narrowest QRS duration and most “normal” QRS complex. Echocardiography was performed to evaluate changes in wall motion comparing baseline with optimal pacing. Results: Baseline mean QRS duration 146 +/− 20.9 ms Optimized mean QRS duration 111 +/− 20.5 ms Average decrease in QRS duration -35 +/− 21.5 ms p < 0.001 Echocardiography demonstrated improvement in septal contraction abnormalities. Conclusions: 1) RVOS pacing in RBBB patients can significantly narrow the QRS complex on ECG. 2) Septal contraction abnormalities due to RBBB can be improved with RVOS pacing and optimal A-V timing. 3) Further studies are warranted to evaluate this therapy in a heart failure population.

scholarly journals Narrower QRS may be enough to respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy in lightweight patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 835-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiko Nakai ◽  
Hiroaki Mano ◽  
Yukitoshi Ikeya ◽  
Yoshihiro Aizawa ◽  
Sayaka Kurokawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Conduction Disturbances ◽  
Body Sizes ◽  
Qrs Duration ◽  
Crt Response

AbstractA prolonged QRS duration (QRSd) is promising for a response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The variation in human body sizes may affect the QRSd. We hypothesized that conduction disturbances may exist in Japanese even with a narrow (< 130 ms)-QRS complex; such patients could be CRT candidates. We investigated the relationships between QRSd and sex and body size in Japanese. We retrospectively analyzed the values of 338 patients without heart failure (HF) (controls) and 199 CRT patients: 12-lead electrocardiographically determined QRSd, left ventricular diastolic and systolic diameters (LVDd and LVDs), body surface area (BSA), body mass index (BMI), and LVEF. We investigated the relationships between the QRSd and BSA, BMI, and LVD. The men’s and women’s BSA values were 1.74 m2 and 1.48 m2 in the controls (p < 0.0001), and 1.70 m2 and 1.41 m2 in the CRT patients (p < 0.0001). The men’s and women’s QRSd values were 96.1 ms and 87.4 ms in the controls (p < 0.0001), and 147.8 ms and 143.9 ms in the CRT group (p = 0.4633). In the controls, all body size and LVD variables were positively associated with QRSd. The CRT response rate did not differ significantly among narrow-, mid-, and wide-QRS groups (83.6%, 91.3%, 92.4%). An analysis of the ROC curve provided a QRS cutoff value of 114 ms for CRT responder. The QRSd appears to depend somewhat on body size in patients without HF. The CRT response rate was better than reported values even in patients with a narrow QRSd (< 130 ms). When patients are considered for CRT, a QRSd > 130 ms may not be necessary, and the current JCS guidelines appear to be appropriate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document