Abstract 13804: Clinical Profile and Outcomes of Myocardial Infarction With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries in Older Adults

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ara H Rostomian ◽  
Derek Q Phan ◽  
Mingsum Lee ◽  
Ray X Zadegan
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Los Angeles ◽  
Coronary Arteries ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽  
Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Kaiser Permanente ◽  
Artery Disease

Introduction: Myocardial Infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) is found in 5%-6% of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). As such, the diagnosis and management of AMI patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) poses a challenge as compared to patients with MI with coronary artery disease (MICAD). Hypothesis: To evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of MINOCA in older patients as compared with MICAD patients, with and without revascularization. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of patients ≥80 years old who underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for AMI between 2009-2019 at Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center. MINOCA was defied as <50% stenosis of coronary arteries on angiography with a troponin level ≥0.05 ng/ml. Patients with MINOCA vs MICAD were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of MINOCA and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to analyze all-cause mortality between cohorts. Results: A total of 259 patients with MINOCA (mean ± SD age 83.8±2.7 years, 68% female) and 687 patients with MICAD (84.7±3.4 years, 40% female) were analyzed. Younger age (odds ratio [OR]=1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.05-1.18), female sex (OR=3.14; CI=2.20-4.48), black race (OR=2.53; CI=1.61-3.98), no history of prior stroke (OR=1.56; CI=1.06-2.33), atrial fibrillation or flutter (OR=2.04; CI:1.38-3.02), lower troponin levels (OR=1.08; CI:1.03-1.11), and lower triglyceride levels per 10 mg/dl increments (OR=1.06; CI:1.03-1.11) increased the odds of having MINCOA as compared to MICAD. At median follow-up of 2.4 years, MINOCA was associated with a lower rate of death (44.8% vs 55.2%, p<0.01) compared to un-revascularized MICAD, but no difference (31.3% vs 40.4%, p=0.68) when compared to re-vascularized MICAD. Conclusions: Patients age ≥80 years with MINOCA have fewer traditional risk factors compared to their counterparts with MICAD and fewer deaths compared to un-revascularized MICAD, but similar mortality compared to revascularized MICAD

scholarly journals Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: The Labyrinth of Investigations. Case Report and Review of the Literature

Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1181
Author(s):  
Paul Simion ◽  
Bogdan Artene ◽  
Ionut Achiței ◽  
Iulian Theodor Matei ◽  
Antoniu Octavian Petriș ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Arteries ◽  
Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Myocardial Infarctions ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Artery Disease

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) accounts for approximately 5–15% of acute myocardial infarctions (MI). This infarction type raises a series of questions about the underlying mechanism of myocardial damage, the diagnostic pathway, optimal therapy, and the outcomes of these patients when compared to MI associated with obstructive coronary artery disease. We present the case of a 60-year-old patient with multiple cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities who is admitted in an emergency setting. The patient is known with a conservatively treated inferior myocardial infarction which occurred 3 months prior, with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Emergency coronary angiography revealed normal epicardial coronary arteries, which led to further investigations of the underlying cause. Considering the absence of epicardial and microvascular spasm, CMR (cardiac magnetic resonance) confirmation of two transmural myocardial infarctions in the territories tributary to coronary arteries, and a high index of myocardial resistance in culprit arteries, we concluded the diagnosis of MINOCA due to the microvascular endothelial dysfunction. Although the concept of MINOCA was devised almost a decade ago, and these patients are an important part of MI presentations, it still represents a diagnostic challenge with multiple explorations required to establish the precise etiology.

scholarly journals Myocardial Infarction with Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA): A Review of the Current Position

Cardiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (9) ◽  
pp. 543-552
Author(s):  
Fuad A. Abdu ◽  
Abdul-Quddus Mohammed ◽  
Lu Liu ◽  
Yawei Xu ◽  
Wenliang Che
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Arteries ◽  
Clinical Evidence ◽  
Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Current Position ◽  
Prevention And Treatment ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Made In

Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) remains a puzzling clinical entity that is characterized by clinical evidence of myocardial infarction (MI) with normal or near-normal coronary arteries on angiography (stenosis <50%). Major advances in understanding this condition have been made in recent years. The precise pathogenesis is poorly understood and is being studied and examined further. Guidelines indicate that MINOCA is a group of heterogeneous diseases with different mechanisms of pathology. Since there are multiple possible pathological mechanisms, it is not certain that the classical secondary prevention and treatment strategy for MI with obstructive coronary artery disease (MI-CAD) is optimal for MINOCA patients. The prognosis and predictors for MINOCA patients remain unclear. Although the prognosis is slightly better for MINOCA patients than for MI-CAD patients, MINOCA isn’t always benign. The aim of this paper was to review the literature and evaluate MINOCA epidemiology, clinical features, etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.

Gender Differences in Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Bergami ◽  
Marialuisa Scarpone ◽  
Edina Cenko ◽  
Elisa Varotti ◽  
Peter Louis Amaduzzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Gender Differences ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Ischemic Heart Disease ◽  
Coronary Arteries ◽  
Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Ischemic Heart ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Artery Disease

: Subjects affected by ischemic heart disease with non-obstructive coronary arteries constitute a population that has received increasing attention over the past two decades. Since the first studies with coronary angiography, female patients have been reported to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease more frequently than their male counterparts, both in stable and acute clinical settings. Although traditionally considered a relatively infrequent and low-risk form of myocardial ischemia, its impact on clinical practice is undeniable, especially when it comes to infarction, where the prognosis is not as benign as previously assumed. Unfortunately, despite increasing awareness, there are still several questions left unanswered regarding diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment. The purpose of this review is to provide a state of the art and an update on current evidence available on gender differences in clinical characteristics, management and prognosis of ischemic heart disease with non-obstructive coronary arteries, both in the acute and stable clinical setting.

scholarly journals OCT Findings in MINOCA

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. 2759
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Bryniarski ◽  
Pawel Gasior ◽  
Jacek Legutko ◽  
Dawid Makowicz ◽  
Anna Kedziora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery Spasm ◽  
Morphological Characteristics ◽  
Artery Dissection ◽  
Plaque Disruption ◽  
Artery Disease

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) is a working diagnosis for patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease on coronary angiography. It is a heterogenous entity with a number of possible etiologies that can be determined through the use of appropriate diagnostic algorithms. Common causes of a MINOCA may include plaque disruption, spontaneous coronary artery dissection, coronary artery spasm, and coronary thromboembolism. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an intravascular imaging modality which allows the differentiation of coronary tissue morphological characteristics including the identification of thin cap fibroatheroma and the differentiation between plaque rupture or erosion, due to its high resolution. In this narrative review we will discuss the role of OCT in patients presenting with MINOCA. In this group of patients OCT has been shown to reveal abnormal findings in almost half of the cases. Moreover, combining OCT with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was shown to allow the identification of most of the underlying mechanisms of MINOCA. Hence, it is recommended that both OCT and CMR can be used in patients with a working diagnosis of MINOCA. Well-designed prospective studies are needed in order to gain a better understanding of this condition and to provide optimal management while reducing morbidity and mortality in that subset patients.

scholarly journals Screening for coronary artery disease in early surgical treatment of acute aortic valve infective endocarditis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wiebe G Knol ◽  
Ali R Wahadat ◽  
Jolien W Roos-Hesselink ◽  
Nicolas M Van Mieghem ◽  
Wilco Tanis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽  
Perioperative Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Estimated Risk ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract OBJECTIVES In patients with unknown coronary status undergoing surgery for acute infective endocarditis (IE), the need to screen for coronary artery disease (CAD) and the risk of embolization during invasive coronary angiography (ICA) are debated. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a non-invasive alternative in these patients. We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of ICA and CCTA to diagnose CAD, and the necessity to treat CAD to prevent CAD-related postoperative complications. METHODS In this single-centre retrospective cohort study, all patients with acute aortic IE between 2009 and 2019 undergoing surgery were selected. Outcomes were any clinically evident embolization after preoperative ICA, in-hospital mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction or unplanned revascularization and postoperative renal function. RESULTS Of the 159 included patients, CAD status was already known in 14. No preoperative diagnostics for CAD was done in 46/145, a CCTA was performed in 54/145 patients and an ICA in 52/145 patients. Significant CAD was found after CCTA in 22% and after ICA in 21% of patients. In 1 of the 52 (2%) patients undergoing preoperative ICA, a cerebral embolism occurred. The rate of perioperative myocardial infarction or unplanned revascularization in patients not screened for CAD was 2% (1 out of 46 patients). CONCLUSIONS Although the risk of embolism after preoperative ICA is low, it should be carefully weighed against the estimated risk of CAD-related perioperative complications. CCTA can serve as a gatekeeper for ICA in most patients with acute aortic IE.

Abstract 129: Chest Pain Characteristics of Myocardial Infarction With Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) in Comparison to Myocardial Infarction With Coronary Artery Disease (MI-CAD)

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sivabaskari Pasupathy ◽  
Rosanna Tavella ◽  
Margaret Arstall ◽  
Derek Chew ◽  
Matthew Worthley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Arteries ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Arm Pain ◽  
Retrosternal Pain ◽  
Pain Characteristics ◽  
Artery Disease

Background: Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is being increasingly recognized with the frequent use of angiography following Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI); yet there is little evaluation of these patients in the literature. The current study is a prospective, contemporary analysis of clinical features and chest pain characteristics between patients with MINOCA and Myocardial Infarction with coronary artery disease (MI-CAD). Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography for AMI (as per the Third Universal AMI Definition) in South Australian public hospitals from January 2012 - December 2013 were included. Data was captured by Coronary Angiogram Database of South Australia (CADOSA), a comprehensive registry compatible with the NCDR ® CathPCI ® Registry. The AMI patients were classified as MI-CAD or MINOCA on the basis of the presence or absence of a significant stenosis (≥50%) on angiography. Results: From 3,431 angiography procedures undertaken for AMI, 359 (11%) were classified as MINOCA. MINOCA patients were younger (59 ± 15 vs. 64 ± 13, p <0.01) and more likely to be female (60% vs. 26%, p<0.01), with age adjusted analysis revealing less cardiovascular risk factors in MINOCA compared to MICAD: current smoker (21% vs. 35%, p< 0.01), hypertension (56% vs. 65%, p<0.01), dyslipidaemia (46% vs. 61%, p<0.01), and diabetes (20% vs. 32%, p<0.01). Analysis of presenting chest pain characteristics showed no significant differences between MICAD and MINOCA for the presence of retrosternal pain (81% vs. 82%, p>0.05,) or shoulder pain (27% vs. 26%, p>0.05) respectively, however MINOCA patients were less likely to experience arm pain (33% vs. 40%, p<0.01). In regards to precipitating factors, emotional stress was more common (14% vs. 5%, p<0.001) and exertion related chest pain was less common (27% vs. 40%, p<0.001) in MINOCA patients. Quality of pain for MINOCA and MICAD was similar with the most frequent descriptors being burning (11% vs. 9%, p>0.05), sharp 21% vs. 23%, p>0.05) and tightness (41% vs. 44%, p>0.05). In addition, there were no significant differences observed between groups in relieving factors and duration of chest pain Conclusions: In contemporary cardiology practice, MINOCA presentation is more common than previously appreciated, with younger women frequently implicated. Delineating a MINOCA patient from MICAD on the basis of chest pain characteristics is not feasible.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document