Abstract 14936: Prevention of Contrast-induced Nephropathy by Inferior Vena Cava Ultrasonography-guided Hydration in Chronic Heart Failure Patients

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanming Yan ◽  
Mingfang Ye ◽  
qin chen ◽  
yukun luo

Introduction: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a common complication resulting from the administration of contrast media. This study was designed to determine whether inferior vena cava ultrasonography (IVCU)-guided hydration can reduce the risk of CIN in chronic heart failure patients undergoing coronary angiography or coronary angiography with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than standard hydration. Methods: This prospective clinical trial enrolled 207 chronic heart failure patients from February 2016 to November 2017, who were randomly assigned to either IVCU-guided hydration group (n = 104) or the routine hydration group (n = 103). In the IVCU-guided group, the hydration infusion rate was set according to inferior vena cava diameter (IVC-D) determined by IVCU; while the control group received intravenous infusion of 0.9% saline at 0.5 ml/((kg·h)). Serum creatinine (SCr) was measured before and 48-72 hours after procedure. All patients were followed up for 18 months. The incidence of nephropathy and major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were also compared between two groups. Results: Statistically significant difference between two groups regarding the occurrence of CIN were observed (12.5% vs. 29.1%, p = 0.003); The hydration volume of the IVCU-guided group is significantly higher than routine group (p<0.001). In addition, patients receiving IVCU-guided hydration had significantly lower risk of developing MACCE compared with patients in control group during 18 months follow-up (14.4% vs. 27.2%, p = 0.027). Conclusions: IVCU-guided hydration is superior to standard hydration in prevention of CIN and substantially reduce longtime composite major adverse events.

Cardiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yuanming Yan ◽  
Mingfang Ye ◽  
Xianfeng Dong ◽  
Qin Chen ◽  
Huashan Hong ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a common complication resulting from the administration of contrast media. This study was designed to determine whether inferior vena cava (IVC) ultrasonography (IVCU)-guided hydration can reduce the risk of CIN in chronic heart failure patients undergoing coronary angiography or coronary angiography with percutaneous coronary intervention compared with standard hydration. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This prospective clinical trial enrolled 207 chronic heart failure patients from February 2016 to November 2017, who were randomly assigned to either the IVCU-guided hydration group (<i>n</i> = 104) or the routine hydration group (<i>n</i> = 103). In the IVCU-guided group, the hydration infusion rate was set according to the IVC diameter determined by IVCU, while the control group received intravenous infusion of 0.9% saline at 0.5 mL/(kg·h). Serum Cr was measured before and 48–72 h after the procedure. All patients were followed up for 18 months. The incidence of nephropathy and major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) was also compared between the 2 groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the occurrence of CIN was observed (12.5 vs. 29.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.004). The hydration volume of the IVCU-guided group was significantly higher than that of the routine group (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). In addition, patients receiving IVCU-guided hydration had significantly lower risk of developing MACCEs than patients in the control group during the 18-month follow-up (14.4 vs. 27.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.027). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our findings support that IVCU-guided hydration is superior to standard hydration in prevention of CIN and may substantially reduce longtime composite major adverse events.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 510-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Curbelo ◽  
Maria Aguilera ◽  
Pablo Rodriguez-Cortes ◽  
Paloma Gil-Martinez ◽  
Carmen Suarez Fernandez

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. S70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Hafidz Muhammad Iqbal ◽  
Bayan Soujeri ◽  
Hawkey Sean ◽  
Daniel Levin ◽  
Muhammad Zaid Iskandar ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Kalina ◽  
Marilyn Bartley ◽  
Mark Cipolle ◽  
Glen Tinkoff ◽  
Scott Stevenson ◽  
...  

The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma challenged the trauma community to improve a 22 per cent average removal rate for retrievable inferior vena cava filters (r-IVCFs). Since 2006, we maintained a “filter registry” documenting all IVCFs placed in trauma patients. Our goal was to improve removal rates for r-IVCF. Patients receiving an IVCF before implementation of filter registry, 2003–2005, comprised the control group. Patients receiving an IVCF after implementation of filter registry, 2006–2009, comprised the study group. Data obtained included age, gender, Injury Severity Score (ISS), length of stay (LOS), mortality, filter inserted, placement indication, removal rates, and reasons why removal did not occur. Fisher exact test and chi square were used for nominal variables. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to define predictors of removing and not removing an IVCF. Three hundred seven patients received an IVCF, 142 preregistry and 165 post-registry. No significant difference existed between groups in age, gender, ISS, placement indication, or mortality. A significant difference existed between groups in LOS and presence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism. A total of 98.2 per cent of postregistry patients received a Günther Tulip filter and all retrievals were performed by Interventional Radiology. Retrieval rates improved, 15.5 to 31.5 per cent post registry ( P < 0.001). No differences existed in lost to follow-up (LTF) between groups. Univariate analysis identified age, IVC clot, DVT, and LTF as predictors for not removing a filter. Stepwise logistic regression revealed the filter registry independently predicts the removal of an r-IVCF. A filter registry is effective in improving rates of removal for r-IVCFs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document