Heart Failure Spending Function: An Investment Framework for Sequencing and Intensification of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapies

Author(s):  
Larry A. Allen ◽  
John R. Teerlink ◽  
Stephen S. Gottlieb ◽  
Tariq Ahmad ◽  
Carolyn S.P. Lam ◽  
...  

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is managed with increasing numbers of guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT). Benefits tend to be additive. Burdens can also be additive. We propose a heart failure spending function as a conceptual framework for tailored intensification of GDMT that maximizes therapeutic opportunity while limiting adverse events and patient burden. Each patient is conceptualized to have reserve in physiological and psychosocial domains, which can be spent for a future return on investment. Key domains are blood pressure, heart rate, serum creatinine, potassium, and out-of-pocket costs. For each patient, GDMT should be initiated and intensified in a sequence that prioritizes medications with the greatest expected cardiac benefit while drawing on areas where the patient has ample reserves. When reserve is underspent, patients fail to gain the full benefit of GDMT. Conversely, when a reserve is fully spent, addition of new drugs or higher doses that draw upon a domain will lead to patient harm. The benefit of multiple agents drawing upon varied physiological domains should be balanced against cost and complexity. Thresholds for overspending are explored, as are mechanisms for implementing these concepts into routine care, but further health care delivery research is needed to validate and refine clinical use of the spending function. The heart failure spending function also suggests how newer therapies may be considered in terms of relative value, prioritizing agents that draw on different spending domains from existing GDMT.

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karla L. Loss ◽  
Robert E. Shaddy ◽  
Paul F. Kantor

Pediatric heart failure (HF) is an important clinical condition with high morbidity, mortality, and costs. Due to the heterogeneity in clinical presentation and etiologies, the development of therapeutic strategies is more challenging in children than adults. Most guidelines recommending drug therapy for pediatric HF are extrapolated from studies in adults. Unfortunately, even using all available treatment, progression to cardiac transplantation is common. The development of prospective clinical trials in the pediatric population has significant obstacles, including small sample sizes, slow recruitment rates, challenging endpoints, and high costs. However, progress is being made as evidenced by the recent introduction of ivabradine and of sacubitril/valsartan. In the last 5 years, new drugs have also been developed for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in adults. The use of well-designed prospective clinical trials will be fundamental in the evaluation of safety and efficacy of these new drugs on the pediatric population. The aim of this article is to review the clinical presentation and management of acute and chronic pediatric heart failure, focusing on systolic dysfunction in patients with biventricular circulation and a systemic left ventricle. We discuss the drugs recently approved for children and those emerging, or in use for adults with HFrEF.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherrie Khadanga ◽  
Daniel N Silverman ◽  
Timothy B Plante ◽  
Charles Cubberly ◽  
Johannes Steiner

Intro: Differences in health care delivery between urban and rural populations have been described, but the extent to which this impacts treatment and outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) within a large, rural HF referral network has not been evaluated to date. Objective: To describe differences in guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) usage and cardiovascular (CV) mortality in urban vs rural dwelling individuals with HFrEF in Vermont. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on adult HFrEF patients residing in Vermont referred to University of Vermont Medical Center between January 1, 2015-2017. The study included all patients with a documented EF < 35% on echo. Demographics, risk factors, use of GDMT, and all-cause CV mortality were obtained. Urban and rural designations were based on the ZIP code version of the Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) classification system. Poisson regression analysis was used to compare the relative risk for mortality and use of GDMT by rurality. Results: 838 patients were identified (mean age 71.4 + 12.9 years old; 66.5% male) and divided into 3 RUCA groups (urban, rural, isolated). Adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation and smoking status, no difference was seen in GDMT (table 1) between urban and rural patients (relative risk [RR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.64-1.67). Urban patients were less likely than isolated patients to use GDT (RR, 0.75; 95% CI 0.52-1.08). There was a CV mortality benefit for those in rural (RR, 0.50; 95% CI 0.34-0.73) or isolated areas (RR, 0.74; 95% CI 0.62-0.89) compared to those in urban areas. Conclusion: While GDMT reduces morbidity and mortality in HFrEF patients, it was underutilized throughout Vermont. Findings from this state-wide cohort of decreased CV mortality in rural and isolated areas are contrary to prior studies. This finding highlights the unique socioeconomic environment of Northern New England and has important implications for CHF management and resource allocation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 650-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edoardo Sciatti ◽  
Lucia Dallapellegrina ◽  
Marco Metra ◽  
Carlo Mario Lombardi

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (19) ◽  
pp. 4325
Author(s):  
Alessandro Fucili ◽  
Paolo Cimaglia ◽  
Paolo Severi ◽  
Francesco Giannini ◽  
Alberto Boccadoro ◽  
...  

After almost a decade of stagnation in clinical research for HF treatment, five large randomized trials recently published have supported the use of four new classes of drugs, namely: angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor, sodium–glucose co-transporters 2 inhibitors, soluble guanylate cyclase modulators, and myosin activators. Each treatment has proved to be beneficial for both long-term outcomes and quality of life. Beside their clinical relevance, all these novel treatments have a different mechanism of action beyond the usual neuro-hormonal blockage. These different pathways, together with the unquestionable clinical evidence, advocate a re-thinking of HF treatment and of the appropriate drug to integrate with the existing standard therapy, according to different characteristics of HFrEF patients. This study aimed to offer a synthetic overview of the mechanisms of action of the new drugs and to propose a more personalized approach, considering patients’ characteristics and safety profiles. To this end, we have identified seven profiles for patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and two for pre-discharge patients.


ANALES RANM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (138(01)) ◽  
pp. 44-51
Author(s):  
Juan Tamargo

Heart failure (HF) represents an important healthcare problem due to its high prevalence, high rates of hospitalization and mortality, and significant healthcare costs. HF comprises a heterogeneous group of syndromes with different pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and response to treatment. In recent years, multiple therapeutic targets implicated in the pathogenesis of HF have been identified and numerous drugs have been developed against multiple targets. But despite important advances in the pharmacological treatment of HF with reduced ejection fraction, no treatment has convincingly shown to date to reduce mortality in HF patients with preserved ejection fraction. Furthermore, the vast majority of drugs that appeared very promising in animal models or in phase 2 clinical trials have not been able to be commercialized due to their lack of efficacy and / or safety in large phase 3 clinical trials. In this article we analyze the objectives of the treatment of HF, the progress made in recent years and the possible causes that could explain our repeated failures.


Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 245
Author(s):  
Meg Fraser ◽  
Melinda Mutschler ◽  
Christie Newman ◽  
Kerry Sackman ◽  
Batul Mehdi ◽  
...  

Purpose: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is changing healthcare delivery around the world with hospital systems experiencing a dramatic decline in patient volumes. Surveying our center’s heart failure (HF) clinic population, we aimed to understand our patients’ perception of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and care delivery preferences. Methods: Patients with chronic HF presenting either in-person or virtually were approached to complete a ten question, anonymous, voluntary survey. Acutely decompensated patients and heart transplant recipients were excluded. Results: 109 patients completed the survey. Average age was 62 ± 14 years, 67% were male, and 59% had HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Overall, patients were worried about contracting COVID-19 and believed they were prone to more severe infection given their underlying HF. However, they were not hesitant to initiate healthcare contact for symptoms and preferred in-person appointments over virtual visits. Although the difference did not reach statistical significance, female patients and those with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) were more concerned. Conclusions: Patients with HF are concerned about their increased risk of contracting COVID-19. However, they are actively seeking healthcare contact and prefer in-person over virtual visits.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_C) ◽  
pp. C176-C183
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Di Tano ◽  
Andrea Di Lenarda ◽  
Massimo Iacoviello ◽  
Fabrizio Oliva ◽  
Stefano Urbinati ◽  
...  

Abstract Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization and improve symptoms in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction compared with enalapril. After 7 years since the publication of the results of PARADIGM-HF, further insight has been gained with potential new indications. Two prospective randomized multicentre studies (PIONEER-HF and TRANSITION) in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF) have shown an improved clinical outcome and biomarker profile as compared with enalapril, and good tolerability, safety, and feasibility of initiating in-hospital administration of S/V. Furthermore, some studies have highlighted the favourable effects of S/V in attenuating adverse myocardial remodelling, supporting an early benefit after treatment. Observational data from non-randomized studies in AHF report that in-hospital and pre-discharge prescription of evidence-based drugs associated with better survival still remain suboptimal. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has also negatively impacted on outpatient activities. Therefore, hospitalization, a real crossroad in the history of heart failure, must become a management and therapeutic opportunity for our patients. The objective of this ANMCO position paper is to encourage and facilitate early S/V administration in stabilized patients during hospitalization after an AHF episode, with the aim of improving care efficiency and clinical outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document