Abstract 126: Inside Transitional Care: What Actually Happens During These Visits?

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherry M Bumpus ◽  
Minnie Bluhm ◽  
Rachel Sylvester ◽  
Joshua Dean ◽  
Michaela Steinbacher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transitional Care ◽  
Medical Condition ◽  
Daily Life ◽  
Stress Test ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Clinical History ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Unplanned Readmission ◽  
Post Discharge

Background: Bridging the Discharge Gap Effectively (BRIDGE) is a nurse practitioner (NP) delivered transitional care program designed to provide cardiac patients a timely, guideline-based, first post-discharge visit. BRIDGE follow-up within 14 days of discharge has been shown to reduce early adverse events, including rehospitalization, for ACS patients, at a cost savings. Despite this success, there is little evidence documenting what occurs during these visits. The purpose of this study is to examine the content of first post-discharge visits. Methods: Mixed methods design was used to examine content of BRIDGE visits and assess patient perceptions of rapport with their NP. Visits with 17 ACS patients were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using conventional content analysis to identify themes within and across visits. Patients completed the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) scale and a modified Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ9). Demographic information and details of 30-day readmissions were abstracted from patient charts. Results: Nineteen patients consented; 17 (89%) completed the study. Most were male (14, 73.7%) and white (15, 78.9%). Average age was 61.6 years. One (5%) had an unplanned readmission. NP priorities during visits included clinical history, medication reconciliation, patient education, and referrals. Patients were screened for guideline-driven secondary prevention queues such as physical symptoms, diet, physical activity, and smoking. Patient priorities included questions about daily life (can I play catch with my grandson); clinical questions (can a stress test cause a heart attack); feelings (he feels like dying; I feel helpless), and fear of death (I’m afraid if I go to sleep I might not wake up). On average, NPs contributed 59% of the verbal content of the visits. Patients felt highly connected with NPs (mean PDRQ9 43.05 + 3.1; possible range 5, 45, α=.95) and viewed them as deeply empathic (mean CARE 43.5 + 2.8); possible range 0, 50, α=.94). Discussion: A qualitative approach resulted in nuanced understandings of the content of first post-discharge visits. Patients and NPs have overlapping priorities for these visits. Both concern themselves with managing the medical condition. In addition, patients reveal other priorities, such as how to carry on with daily life and manage feelings and fears. Notably, assessment of psychosocial issues and mental health were absent, suggesting an opportunity to enhance patient care. NPs may be ideally suited to begin filling this gap given their excellent rapport with patients and expertise in motivational interviewing. It is plausible that these factors also contribute to the success of the BRIDGE program in reducing 30-day readmissions. Further research is needed with larger sample sizes and other types of providers to fully assess their impact.

Abstract 097: Effects of BRIDGE Attendance on the Outcomes of Diabetic Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin Fette ◽  
Rachel Krallman ◽  
Colin McMahon ◽  
Daniel Montgomery ◽  
Jennifer Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transitional Care ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Lower Mortality ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Discharge Outcomes

Background: Prior studies have shown that patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have increased risk for developing cardiovascular disease. BRIdging the Discharge Gap Effectively (BRIDGE) is a nurse practitioner-delivered cardiac transitional care program for patients who have been recently discharged following a cardiac event. Previous research has shown BRIDGE to be effective in improving patient outcomes. This study sought to describe differences in outcomes 1) of heart failure (HF), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with and without concomitant DM, and 2) between diabetic patients who did and did not attend BRIDGE. Methods: Retrospective data were abstracted for HF, ACS, and AF patients from 2008-2014. Patients were divided into cohorts based on presence or absence of DM and BRIDGE attendance versus non-attendance. Outcomes (readmissions, ED visits, death) within each primary diagnosis (HF, ACS, AF) were compared between DM and non-DM patients and between those who attended BRIDGE versus those who did not for all DM patients. Results: Of 2197 patients referred to BRIDGE, 723 (32.9%) had concomitant DM. DM patients had similar outcomes to non-DM patients for most post-discharge outcomes; however, DM ACS patients had higher readmission (42.2% v 29.6%, p<0.001) and death (10.5% v. 4.5%, p=0.001) rates within 6 months, and DM AF patients had higher readmission rates within 6 months (52.1% v 37.9%, p=0.006). HF patients with DM who attended BRIDGE had lower mortality rates within 6 months of discharge than those who did not (10.3% vs. 22.1%, p=0.014). No other significant differences in outcomes were seen between BRIDGE attendees and non-attendees. Conclusions: Though not significant, patients with DM had worse post-discharge outcomes than those without DM for all primary diagnoses. In the subset of DM patients, the 30-day readmission rate for ACS patients who attended BRIDGE was half of those who did not attend. Conversely, 30-day readmission rates for HF patients were greater if they attended. This may in part explain the significantly lower mortality rate among BRIDGE attenders with HF, where patients who needed readmission were identified during their BRIDGE appointment. Due to the high prevalence of DM, efforts to tailor transitional care for this population are needed.

scholarly journals The effect of a pharmacy-led transitional care program on medication-related problems post-discharge: A before—After prospective study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. e0213593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Daliri ◽  
Jacqueline G. Hugtenburg ◽  
Gerben ter Riet ◽  
Bart J. F. van den Bemt ◽  
Bianca M. Buurman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Transitional Care ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Post Discharge

Abstract 095: Lessons Learned from the BRIDGE Registry: Major Findings From 8 Years of BRIDGE

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan Bradford ◽  
Rachel Krallman ◽  
Colin McMahon ◽  
Daniel Montgomery ◽  
Eva Kline-Rogers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transitional Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Unplanned Readmission ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Comorbidity Scores

Background: Readmissions after cardiac hospitalizations are frequent and costly in the United States. Delays in follow-up and lack of adherence to guidelines may contribute to high unplanned readmission rates. Bridging the Discharge Gap Effectively (BRIDGE) is a nurse practitioner (NP) led, transitional care clinic for cardiac patients, aimed at reducing readmissions. Data on patients referred to BRIDGE has been collected since 2009; herein we report a summary of significant findings from these data. Methods: A qualitative review of results and conclusions from all published abstracts, oral presentations, and papers from the BRIDGE registry (June 2008-August 2015) was conducted. Content analysis was used to synthesize findings across studies. Results: Data from 3982 patients referred to BRIDGE have been collected. Seven themes were identified in the analysis of BRIDGE publications. During BRIDGE, NPs focused on medical history, symptoms, medication management (in 24.8% of visits), patient education, and referrals. In addition to addressing provider priorities, addressing patient concerns (daily living and clinical questions, feelings and fears) was highly salient, resulting in a high level of patient-NP connectedness as evidenced by high patient-reported scores on the Consultation and Relational Empathy scale (mean 43.5 ± 2.8; possible range 0, 50) and the Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (mean 43.05 ± 3.1; possible range 5, 45). Readmissions within 30 days were consistently lower for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients who attended BRIDGE compared to those who did not (6.4% v. 13.1%; p<0.01); similar results were not seen in heart failure (HF) (15.4% v. 15.7%; p=0.944) or atrial fibrillation (AF) (8.5% v. 5.2%; p=0.343) patients. A spike in HF readmissions was seen between 8-14 days post-discharge, suggesting the need for a sooner appointment. However, follow-up within 7 days of discharge did not show reduced readmissions in HF patients. AF readmissions were also difficult to avoid; in a subset of AF patients readmitted within 30 days, 51.1% (n=23) were readmitted for non-AF diagnoses. High risk patients (i.e. those with an adverse event before BRIDGE) were older, had higher Charlson comorbidity scores, and were more likely to have depression. However, marriage was associated with fewer readmissions. Conclusions: Data from the BRIDGE registry have shown that clinic attendance reduced ACS readmissions; has characterized older, depressed patients with higher Charlson comorbidity scores as being those most likely to be readmitted; and has identified areas for improvement in transitional care (e.g. AF and HF) where readmissions are difficult to avoid. Continuous quality improvement and real-time monitoring of patient outcomes have translated this research into more prompt transitional care, illustrating the importance of registry-based research.

Abstract 339: Insights into Readmission Rates of Atrial Fibrillation Patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Vasko ◽  
Rachel Sylvester ◽  
William Froehlich ◽  
Meghana Subramanian ◽  
Alison Wiles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Transitional Care ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Bridge Program ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Care Models

Purpose and Background: Bridging the Discharge Gap Effectively (BRIDGE) is an NP-driven transitional care program for cardiovascular patients. It has demonstrated lower rates of readmission for patients with acute coronary syndrome who participated, but a similar benefit was not seen for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. We sought to assess differences between AF patients who participated in the BRIDGE program and those who did not. Methods: Retrospective review of all patients referred to BRIDGE with a primary discharge diagnosis of AF was conducted (n=148). An equal number of BRIDGE attendees was randomly matched to non-attendees (n=36). Univariate techniques were used to compare groups. Results: Of 148 AF patients referred to BRIDGE, 84 (56.8%) attended BRIDGE, 36 (24.3%) saw cardiologists or PCPs for their first post-discharge follow-up, and 28 (18.9%) saw other providers or had unknown follow up. There was no significant difference in median time to follow up (12.5 days for attendees vs 9.0 days for non-attendees, p=0.503). Of the 72 patients reviewed, 17 (23.6%) were readmitted within 30 days (Table 1). Non-attendees were more likely (85.7% vs 40% p=0.134) to be readmitted with AF/related diagnoses as compared to attendees. More than half of 30-day readmissions for BRIDGE attendees were unrelated to AF (n=6, 60.0%). There was a trend toward greater incidence of comorbid CAD, HTN, CHF, or vascular disease among BRIDGE attendees, compared to non-attendees. Conclusion: Readmission patterns vary in AF patients; comorbid conditions play a role in early 30-day readmissions for AF patients despite adequate transitional care. NP-driven transitional care models, compared to traditional follow-up with a physician provider, may help identify additional issues related to comorbidities, leading to readmission. A larger sample is needed to better understand this dichotomy and to determine what measures can be taken to enhance the BRIDGE program for AF patients.

Abstract TMP107: Impact of a Stroke Transitional Care Navigator at a Comprehensive Stroke Center

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren T Larsen ◽  
Alexandra Lesko ◽  
Elizabeth Baraban
Keyword(s):  
Transitional Care ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Unplanned Readmission ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Individualized Care ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

Background: The Stroke Transitional Care Navigator (STCN), was implemented at our Comprehensive Stroke Center (CSC) in January 2017 in order to bridge care from the inpatient to outpatient setting. The STCN nurse meets with patients prior to discharge to address secondary stroke risk factors and discuss the follow up plan in an effort to improve patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether implementation of a STCN improved compliance with follow up stroke neurology care and reduced unplanned readmissions and Emergency Department (ED) visits. Methods: Retrospective data review, included ischemic stroke or ICH patients, 18 or over, discharged from February 2017 through February 2018. Subarachnoid hemorrhages and hospice discharges were excluded. Patients were grouped into a “Followed’ cohort if they had documented contact with the STCN prior to discharge or within 30 days; otherwise they were categorized as “Not Followed”. Outcomes of interest were percentage of patients compliant with attending an outpatient visit with a stroke provider within 45 or 120 days post-discharge and percentage of unplanned readmission and ED visits 30 days post-discharge. Analyses comparing those with and without STCN contact were performed using Fisher’s Exact test and Pearson’s chi square test. Results: There were 689 patients that met inclusion criteria with 47.2% (n=325) in the Followed and 52.8% (n=364) in the Not-Followed cohorts. The Followed cohort was more likely to comply with attending a follow-up visit within 45-days (67.2% vs. 32.8%, p<.001) as well as 120 days of discharge (61.0% vs 39.0%, p<.001). No differences were found between the Followed and Not Followed cohorts for readmissions (9.5% vs. 11.5%, p=.394) or ED visits (9.5% vs. 10.2%, p=.783). Conclusion: The STCN had a significant positive impact on patients returning to clinic for follow up stroke neurology care. Though follow up care has been shown to reduce readmission rates in some studies, in this study there was no impact on 30-day readmissions or ED visits. Given the unique, individualized care and coordination provided by the STCN, which is very well received by patients and providers, qualitative measures may be more useful in the future to determine the effectiveness of the STCN.

Abstract 338: BRIDGE: A Post-Discharge Transitional Care Model in over 1600 Cardiac Patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Sylvester ◽  
Minnie Bluhm ◽  
William Froehlich ◽  
Meghana Subramanian ◽  
Alison Wiles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transitional Care ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Clinic Visit ◽  
Cardiac Patients ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Charlson Comorbidity Score ◽  
History Of

Background: Current legislation imposes financial penalties for high 30-day readmissions for AMI. BRIDGE is a NP-led, post-discharge transitional care program for cardiac patients, aimed at ensuring prompt follow up (f/u; in 14 days) and care coordination. Herein we report the effect of BRIDGE on readmissions in over 1600 cases. Methods: Retrospective data was abstracted for patients referred to BRIDGE including demographics, comorbidities, medications, days to f/u, and 6-month outcomes by diagnosis. Results: Of 1955 patients referred to the BRIDGE clinic, 271 (13.9%) were excluded for adverse events prior to their visit (ED visit n=60, readmission n=193, or death n=14) or missing data (n=4). 1210 (71.9%) of patients from the remaining sample (n=1684) attended BRIDGE. Diagnoses included: ACS (n=462, 27.6%); angina (n=207, 12.4%); CAD (n=196, 11.7%); AFib (n=247, 14.7%); CHF (n=316, 18.9%); or other (n=256, 15.2%). With the exception of mental health disorders (35.4% v. 29.1%, p=.012) there were no baseline differences (including the Charlson Comorbidity Score) between non-attendees and attendees (Table 1). ACS attendees, compared to non-attendees, had a trend toward lower 30, 60, and 90 day readmission rates (Table 2). This was not observed for other diagnoses. Conclusions: A NP based transitional care clinic visit early post-discharge appears to reduce early readmissions for patients with an ACS, but in this study did not impact other cardiac conditions. Also, patients with a history of substance abuse or depression are significantly less likely to attend BRIDGE appointments. To avoid a lapse in care, these patients may need prompt f/u with their PCP or cardiologist to help reduce early readmissions.

Progressive Mobility As a Team Effort in Transitional Care

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 62-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret M. Ecklund ◽  
Jill W. Bloss
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Transitional Care ◽  
Interdisciplinary Collaboration ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facility ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Nursing Facility ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
Core Culture ◽  
The Continuum

With changing health care, progressive care nurses are working in diverse practice settings to meet patient care needs. Progressive care is practiced along the continuum from the intensive care unit to home. The benefits of early progressive mobility are examined with a focus on the interdisciplinary collaboration for care in a transitional care program of a skilled nursing facility. The program’s goals are improved functional status, self-care management, and home discharge with reduced risk for hospital readmission. The core culture of the program is interdisciplinary collaboration and team partnership for care of patients and their families.

scholarly journals Traveling the Path to Stroke Caregiver Readiness

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 255-255
Author(s):  
Barbara Lutz ◽  
Michelle Camicia
Keyword(s):  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Transitional Care ◽  
Inpatient Rehabilitation ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Stroke Survivor ◽  
Case Managers ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Rehabilitation Care ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Emotional Strain

Abstract Family members are often poorly prepared to assume the caregiving role post-stroke leaving them feeling overwhelmed, frustrated, and abandoned by the healthcare system leading to physical, mental, and emotional strain. To address this, we developed and tested the Preparedness Assessment for the Transition Home after stroke (PATH-s) instrument based on a theoretical framework for improving stroke caregiver readiness. Consecutive studies were conducted over the past 10 years to 1) develop the caregiver readiness theoretical model identifying gaps in caregiver preparation in 80 interviews with caregivers and stroke survivors as they transitioned home from inpatient rehabilitation care; 2) develop and validate the PATH-s instrument with 183 caregiver-stroke survivor dyads, and 3) develop and implement a corresponding catalogue of interventions developed in consultation with 5 expert rehabilitation nurse case managers to improve stroke caregiver readiness. The Improving Caregiver Readiness Model has 2 preparedness domains; commitment and capacity and six sub-domains. In a factor analysis each domain/sub-domain subscale in the PATH-s demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (a=0.69-0.86). The overall mean score was 3.11 (range 1.68 to 4.00) with high internal consistency reliability (a=0.90). The PATH-s is highly correlated with the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale. The stroke survivor’s total FIM score at discharge had a small but significant correlation with the PATH-s. Case managers find the PATH-s results and corresponding interventions helpful in tailoring transitional care plans. Caregivers worldwide describe the negative impacts of providing stroke care post-discharge. The Path to Stroke Caregiver Readiness Program shows promise for improving stroke caregiver preparation for discharge home.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document