scholarly journals Circumstances and Outcomes of Sudden Unexpected Death in Patients With High-Risk Myocardial Infarction

Circulation ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 123 (23) ◽  
pp. 2674-2680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siqin Ye ◽  
Matthew Grunnert ◽  
Jens Jakob Thune ◽  
Kent M. Stephenson ◽  
Hajime Uno ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 208-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Trivisano ◽  
M. Bellusci ◽  
A. Terracciano ◽  
L. De Palma ◽  
N. Pietrafusa ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 63-70
Author(s):  
E. D. Belousova ◽  
M. A. Shkolnikova

It is well known that sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is one of the most significant factors of mortality in epileptic patients. There is an increased risk of SUDEP in genetic epileptic encephalopathies (EE), partly because those syndromes are associated with mutations in the “neurocardiac” genes, which have been implicated in both epilepsy and cardiac arrhythmias. In these clinical conditions, functions of ion selective channels (sodium, potassium and etc.) are affected; for example, in children with Dravet syndrome, the risk of SUDEP is 40 times higher than that in children with common epilepsy syndromes. In a murine model of SCN1A epilepsy, a prolongation of QT interval coincided with a seizure; in addition, an excessive excitability of cultured cardiomyocytes was demonstrated. A high risk of SUDEP is characteristic for EE caused by mutation in the SCN8A gene. Other prognostic biomarkers of SUDEP may include mutations in sodium channel genes, such as SCN4A, SCN10A, and SCN11A. Our knowledge about SUDEP associated with potassium channel dysfunctions is still very limited. There are likely some mutations in other genes, that can modify (increase or decrease) the risk of SUDEP in EE. If patients with genetic EE are indeed at a high risk for SUDEP, they must be followed up by cardiologists alongside with neurologists. Provided this hypothesis is proved, any newly diagnosed arrhythmia should be carefully monitored and treated (with medications and/or interventions), in order to improve the survival rate in genetic EE.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Floortje Kanits ◽  
Monique P. L'Hoir ◽  
Magda M. Boere-Boonekamp ◽  
Adèle C. Engelberts ◽  
Edith J. M. Feskens

Background: The incidence of Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy (SUDI) is low in the Netherlands, with an incidence rate of 0.18 per 1,000 live births. Therefore, prevention advice may receive less attention, potentially leading to increasing incidence rates. It is currently unknown whether the risks for SUDI changed in the Netherlands, and if other risk factors might be present. The aim of this study was to examine the current risks and preventive factors for SUDI in Dutch infants, in order to determine if it is necessary to adapt the prevention advice toward the current needs.Methods: A case-control study was conducted comparing SUDI cases aged <12 months from 2014–2020 in the Netherlands (n = 47), to a Dutch national survey control group from 2017 including infants <12 months of age (n = 1,192).Results: Elevated risks for several well-known factors were observed, namely: duvet use (aOR = 8.6), mother smoked during pregnancy (aOR = 9.7), or after pregnancy (aOR = 5.4) and the prone sleeping position (aOR = 4.6). Reduced risks were observed for the well-known factors: room-sharing (aOR = 0.3), sleep sack use (aOR = 0.3), breastfeeding (aOR = 0.3), and the use of a pacifier (aOR = 0.4). For infants <4 months, the risk for SUDI was higher when bed-sharing (aOR = 3.3), and lower when room-sharing (aOR = 0.2) compared to older infants. For older infants, the sleep sack was found to be more protective (aOR = 0.2). A high risk for SUDI when bed-sharing was found when mother smoked, smoked during pregnancy, or if the infant did not receive any breastfeeding (respectively aOR = 17.7, aOR = 10.8, aOR = 9.2).Conclusions: Internationally known factors related to the sudden unexpected death of infants were also found in this study. Relatively new findings are related to specific groups of infants, in which the strengths of these risk factors differed. In a low-incidence country like the Netherlands, renewed attention to the current prevention advice is needed. Furthermore, additional attention for prevention measures in low educated groups, and additional advice specifically targeting high-risk groups is recommended.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document