Driving Restrictions and Early Arrhythmias in Patients Receiving a Secondary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (DREAM-ICD-II study)

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Steinberg ◽  
Nicolas Dognin ◽  
Amit Sodhi ◽  
Catherine Champagne ◽  
John A. Staples ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Cardiac Event ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Industrialized Countries ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Driving Restrictions ◽  
Tertiary Care Centers ◽  
First 90 Days ◽  
Over Time

Background: Regulatory authorities of most industrialized countries recommend 6-months of private driving restriction after implantation of a secondary prevention ICD. These driving restrictions result in significant inconvenience and social implications. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence rate of appropriate device therapies in contemporary recipients of a secondary prevention ICD. Methods: A retrospective study at three Canadian tertiary care centers enrolling consecutive patients with new secondary prevention ICD implants between 2016-2020. Results: 721 patients were followed for a median of 760 days (324, 1190). The risk of recurrent ventricular arrhythmia was highest during the first three months after device insertion (34.4%), and decreased over time (10.6% between 3−6 months, 11.7% between 6-12 months). The corresponding incidence rate per 100 patient-days was 0.48 (95% CI 0.35-0.64) at 90 days, 0.28 (95% CI 0.18−0.48) at 180 days and 0.20 (95% CI 0.13−0.31) between 181-365 days after ICD insertion (p<0.001). The cumulative incidence of arrhythmic syncope resulting in sudden cardiac incapacitation was 1.8% within the first 90 days and subsequently dropped to 0.4% between 91-180 days (p<0.001) after ICD insertion. Conclusions: The incidence rate of appropriate therapies resulting in sudden cardiac incapacitation in contemporary recipients of a secondary prevention ICD is much lower than previously reported, and significantly declines after the first three months. Lowering driving restrictions to three months after the index cardiac event seems safe and revision of existing guidelines recommending should be considered in countries still adhering to a 6-months period. Existing restrictions for private driving after implantation of a secondary prevention ICD should be reconsidered.

scholarly journals 124. Six-year Longitudinal Analysis of an Inpatient Infectious Diseases Telemedicine Service at a Community Hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S191-S192
Author(s):  
Nupur Gupta ◽  
Adit B Sanghvi ◽  
John Mellors ◽  
Rima Abdel-Massih
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Medical Officer ◽  
Rural Hospital ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Observation Study ◽  
Patient Acuity ◽  
Telemedicine Service ◽  
Tertiary Care Centers ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background Telemedicine (TM) has emerged as a viable solution to extend infectious disease (ID) expertise to communities without access to this specialty.1 TM allows clinicians in rural settings to connect with specialists at distant sites and provide the best care for their patients, often eliminating the need for hospital transfers. Here, we describe the experience from one of the longest standing inpatient Tele-ID consult services using live audio-video (AV) visits with the assistance of a telepresenter. Methods Longitudinal data were collected from a 126-bed rural hospital in Pennsylvania that had no access to ID consultation before 2014. Live AV consults during business hours began in 2014 and telephonic physician to physician consults were made available 24/7. All ID consult data were extracted from the hospital electronic health record between 2014 to 2019. Key outcomes assessed included the number of consult encounters, total hospital length of stay (LOS), discharges to home, transfer to tertiary care centers, and readmission rates at 30 days. Results Most consulted patients were Caucasians, and females with an average age of 64.7 years (Table 1). The number of unique consult encounters increased annually from 111 in 2014 to 469 in 2019 (Table 1). The Charlson Comorbidity Score and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index also increased each year beginning in 2016 (Table 1). By contrast, LOS decreased each year as did the 30-day readmission rate (Table 2). Most patients were not transferred (average 89.4% over 6 years) to tertiary care centers and more than half were discharged to home each year (Table 2). Conclusion This longitudinal 6-year observation study of an inpatient TM ID service at a rural hospital showed remarkable annual growth in consult encounters (total growth &gt;400%). Despite increasing patient acuity, overall hospital LOS decreased over time (10.2 to 8.2 days). Patient transfers to tertiary care centers remained low (average 10.5% over 6 years) as did 30-day readmissions (average 16.3% over 6 years). The majority of patients were discharged to home (average 61.3% over 6 years). These findings show that a rural inpatient TM ID consult service can expand over time and is an effective alternative for hospitals without access to ID expertise. Disclosures John Mellors, MD, Abound Bio (Shareholder)Accelevir Diagnostics (Consultant)Co-Crystal Pharmaceuticals (Shareholder)Gilead (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Merck (Consultant) Rima Abdel-Massih, MD, Infectious Disease Connect (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Chief Medical Officer)

5968Adherence to driving restrictions among patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: insights from a nationwide register-linked survey study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Bjerre ◽  
S M Rosenkranz ◽  
M Schou ◽  
C Jons ◽  
B T Philbert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Driving Restrictions ◽  
Driver's License ◽  
Icd Shock

Abstract Background Patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) are restricted from driving following initial implantation or ICD shock. It is unclear how many patients are aware of, and adhere to, these restrictions. Purpose To investigate knowledge of, and adherence to, private and professional driving restrictions in a nationwide cohort of ICD patients. Methods A questionnaire was distributed to all living Danish residents ≥18 years who received a first-time ICD between 2013 and 2016 (n=3,913). During this period, Danish guidelines recommended 1 week driving restriction following ICD implantation for primary prevention, and 3 months following either ICD implantation for secondary prevention or appropriate ICD shock, and permanent restriction of professional driving and driving of large vehicles (>3.5 metric tons). Questionnaires were linked with relevant nationwide registries. Logistic regression was applied to identify factors associated with non-adherence. Results Of 2,741 questionnaire respondents, 92% (n=2,513) held a valid private driver's license at time of ICD implantation (85% male; 46% primary prevention indication; median age: 67 years (IQR: 59–73)). Of these, 7% (n=175) were actively using a professional driver's license for truck driving (n=73), bus driving (n=45), taxi driving (n=22), large vehicle driving for private use (n=54), or other purposes (n=32) (multiple purposes allowed). Only 42% of primary prevention patients, 63% of secondary prevention patients, and 72% of patients who experienced an appropriate ICD shock, recalled being informed of any driving restrictions. Only 45% of professional drivers recalled being informed about specific professional driving restrictions (Figure). Most patients (93%, n=2,344) resumed private driving after ICD implantation, more than 30% during the driving restriction period: 34% of primary prevention patients resumed driving within 1 week, 43% of secondary prevention patients resumed driving within 3 months, and 30% of patients who experienced an appropriate ICD shock resumed driving within 3 months. Professional driving was resumed by 35%. Patients who resumed driving within the restricted periods were less likely to report having received information about driving restrictions (all p<0.001) (Figure). In a multiple logistic regression model, non-adherence was predicted by reporting non-receipt of information about driving restrictions (OR: 3.34, CI: 2.27–4.03), as well as male sex (OR: 1.53, CI: 1.17–2.01), age ≥60 years (OR: 1.20, CI: 1.02–1.64), receipt of a secondary prevention ICD (OR: 2.2, CI: 1.80–2.62), and being the only driver in the household (OR: 1.29, CI: 1.05–1.57). Conclusion In this nationwide survey study, many ICD patients were unaware of the driving restrictions, and many ICD patients, including professional drivers, resumed driving within the restricted periods. More focus on communicating driving restrictions might improve adherence. Acknowledgement/Funding Danish Heart Foundation, Arvid Nilsson Foundation, Fraenkels Mindefond

scholarly journals Risk of subsequent ventricular arrhythmia is higher in primary prevention patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator than in secondary prevention patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
You Zhou ◽  
Shuang Zhao ◽  
Keping Chen ◽  
Wei Hua ◽  
Yangang Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Ventricular Arrhythmia ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Home Monitoring ◽  
Icd Therapy ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Because of previous ventricular arrhythmia (VA) episodes, patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for secondary prevention (SP) are generally considered to have a higher burden of VAs than primary prevention (PP) patients. However, when PP patients experienced VA, the difference in the prognosis of these two patient groups was unknown. Methods The clinical characteristics and follow-up data of 835 ICD patients (364 SP patients and 471 PP patients) with home monitoring feature were retrospectively analysed. The incidence rate and risk of subsequent VA and all-cause mortality were compared between PP patients after the first appropriate ICD therapy and SP patients. Results During a mean follow-up of 44.72 ± 20.87 months, 210 (44.59%) PP patients underwent appropriate ICD therapy. In the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the PP patients after appropriate ICD therapy were more prone to VA recurrence and all-cause mortality than SP patients (P<0.001 for both endpoints). The rate of appropriate ICD therapy and all-cause mortality in PP patients after the first appropriate ICD therapy was significantly higher than that in SP patients (for device therapy, 59.46 vs 20.64 patients per 100 patient-years; incidence rate ratio [IRR] 2.880, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.305–3.599; P<0.001; for all-cause mortality, 14.08 vs 5.40 deaths per 100 patient-years; IRR 2.607, 95% CI: 1.884–3.606; P<0.001). After propensity score matching for baseline characteristics, the risk of VA recurrence in PP patients with appropriate ICD therapy was still higher than that in SP patients (41.80 vs 19.10 patients per 100 patient-years; IRR 2.491, 95% CI: 1.889–3.287; P<0.001), but all-cause mortality rates were similar between the two groups (12.61 vs 9.33 deaths per 100 patient-years; IRR 1.352, 95% CI: 0.927–1.972; P = 0.117). Conclusions Once PP patients undergo appropriate ICD therapy, they will be more prone to VA recurrence and death than SP patients.

scholarly journals A Multicenter Study of Clostridium difficile Infection—Related Colectomy, 2000—2006

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 470-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amelia M. Kasper ◽  
Humaa A. Nyazee ◽  
Deborah S. Yokoe ◽  
Jeanmarie Mayer ◽  
Julie E. Mangino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
The United States ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Tertiary Care Centers ◽  
Design And Methods ◽  
Study Hospital ◽  
Community Onset ◽  
Over Time

Objective.To assess Clostridium difficile infection (CDI)-related colectomy rates by CDI surveillance definitions and over time at multiple healthcare facilities.Setting.Five university-affiliated acute care hospitals in the United States.Design and Methods.Cases of CDI and patients who underwent colectomy from July 2000 through June 2006 were identified from 5 US tertiary care centers. Monthly CDI-related colectomy rates were calculated as the number of CDI-related colectomies per 1,000 CDI cases, and cases were categorized according to recommended surveillance definitions. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate risk factors for CDI-related colectomy.Results.In total, 8,569 cases of CDI were identified, and 75 patients underwent CDI-related colectomy. The overall colectomy rate was 8.7 per 1,000 CDI cases. The CDI-related colectomy rate ranged from 0 to 23 per 1,000 CDI episodes across hospitals. The colectomy rate for healthcare-facility-onset CDI was 4.3 per 1,000 CDI cases, and that for community-onset CDI was 16.5 per 1,000 CDI cases (P < .05). There were significantly more CDI-related colectomies at hospitals B and C (P < .05).Conclusions.The overall CDI-related colectomy rate was low, and there was no significant change in the CDI-related colectomy rate over time. Onset of disease outside the study hospital was an independent risk factor for colectomy.

Appropriate and inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator interventions during secondary prevention

2008 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.B.J. Van Der Velden ◽  
W. Huybrechts ◽  
B. Adriaensens ◽  
J. Ector ◽  
H. Ector ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator

scholarly journals Effect of first-line biologic initiation on glucocorticoid exposure in children hospitalized with new-onset systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: emulation of a pragmatic trial using observational data

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosemary G. Peterson ◽  
Rui Xiao ◽  
Hannah Katcoff ◽  
Brian T. Fisher ◽  
Pamela F. Weiss
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Biologic Therapy ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Pragmatic Trial ◽  
Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Source Population ◽  
First Line ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Over Time ◽  
New Onset

Abstract Background Glucocorticoid exposure is a significant driver of morbidity in children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA). We determined the effect of early initiation of biologic therapy (IL-1 or IL-6 inhibition) on glucocorticoid exposure in hospitalized patients with new-onset sJIA. Methods We emulated a pragmatic sequence of trials (“pseudo-trials”) of biologic initiation in children (≤ 18 years) hospitalized with new-onset sJIA utilizing retrospective data from an administrative database from 52 tertiary care children’s hospitals from 2008 to 2019. Eligibility window, treatment assignment and start of follow-up between biologic and non-biologic study arms were aligned for each pseudo-trial. Patients in the source population could meet eligibility criteria at several timepoints. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to determine the effect of biologic initiation on in-hospital glucocorticoid exposure. Results Four hundred sixty-eight children met eligibility criteria, of which 19% received biologic therapy without preceding or concomitant initiation of immunomodulatory medications. This proportion significantly increased over time during the study period (p <  0.01). 1451 trial subjects were included across 4 pseudo-trials with 71 assigned to the biologic arm and 1380 assigned to the non-biologic arm. After adjustment, there was a trend toward decreased odds of glucocorticoid initiation in the biologic arm compared to the non-biologic arm (OR 0.39, 95% CI [0.13, 1.15]). Conclusion Biologic initiation in children hospitalized with new-onset sJIA significantly increased over time and may be associated with reduced glucocorticoid exposure. The increasing use of first-line biologic therapy may lead to clinically relevant reductions in treatment-related adverse effects of glucocorticoid-reliant therapeutic approaches.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document