Compliance With Acute Stroke Care Quality Measures in Hospitals With and Without Primary Stroke Center Certification: The North Carolina Stroke Care Collaborative

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant healthcare reorganizations, potentially striking standard medical care. We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute stroke care quality and clinical outcomes to detect healthcare system’s bottlenecks from a territorial point of view. Methods: Crossed-data analysis between a prospective nation-based mandatory registry of acute stroke, Emergency Medical System (EMS) records, and daily incidence of COVID-19 in Catalonia (Spain). We included all stroke code activations during the pandemic (March 15–May 2, 2020) and an immediate prepandemic period (January 26–March 14, 2020). Primary outcomes were stroke code activations and reperfusion therapies in both periods. Secondary outcomes included clinical characteristics, workflow metrics, differences across types of stroke centers, correlation analysis between weekly EMS alerts, COVID-19 cases, and workflow metrics, and impact on mortality and clinical outcome at 90 days. Results: Stroke code activations decreased by 22% and reperfusion therapies dropped by 29% during the pandemic period, with no differences in age, stroke severity, or large vessel occlusion. Calls to EMS were handled 42 min later, and time from onset to hospital arrival increased by 53 min, with significant correlations between weekly COVID-19 cases and more EMS calls (rho = 0.81), less stroke code activations (rho = −0.37), and longer prehospital delays (rho = 0.25). Telestroke centers were afflicted with higher reductions in stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, referrals to endovascular centers, and increased delays to thrombolytics. The independent odds of death increased (OR 1.6 [1.05–2.4], p 0.03) and good functional outcome decreased (mRS ≤2 at 90 days: OR 0.6 [0.4–0.9], p 0.015) during the pandemic period. Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Catalonia’s stroke system’s weakest points were the delay to EMS alert and a decline of stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, and interhospital transfers, mostly at local centers. Patients suffering an acute stroke during the pandemic period had higher odds of poor functional outcome and death. The complete stroke care system’s analysis is crucial to allocate resources appropriately.

Download Full-text

Abstract W MP104: Quality of Acute Stroke Care at Primary Stroke Centers Before and After Certification in Comparison to Never-Certified Hospitals

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.45.suppl_1.wmp104 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Nerses Sanossian ◽

May A Kim-Tenser ◽

David S Liebeskind ◽

Justina Breen ◽

Scott Hamilton ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Los Angeles ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Care Quality ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Before And After ◽

Beneficial Impact ◽

Mean Time

Background: Primary Stroke Centers (PSC) provide better acute stroke care than non-PSC hospitals, including faster times to imaging and lytic treatment, and higher rates of lytic delivery. Nationwide less than 1 in 3 hospital has achieved this designation. We aimed to determine the extent to which the better performance at PSC is driven by improvements within hospitals after PSC designation versus better baseline hospital care among facilities seeking PSC certification. Methods: From 2005 to 2012, the NIH Field Administration of Stroke Therapy -Magnesium (FAST-MAG) Phase 3 clinical trial enrolled subjects with likely stroke within 2 hours of onset in a study of prehospital start of a neuroprotective agent. Subjects were routed to 59 community and academic centers in Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Of the original 59 centers, 39 eventually achieved PSC status during the study period. Each subject was classified as enrolled at a PSC before certification (pre-PSC), at a PSC post certification (post-PSC), or at a hospital that never achieved PSC (non-PSC). Results: Of 1700 cases, 529 (31%) were enrolled at pre-PSC, 856 (50%) at post-PSC, and 315 (19%) at non-PSC hospitals. Mean time in minutes from ED arrival to first scan was 33 minutes at post-PSC, 47 minutes at pre-PSC and 49 at non-PSCs [p<0.001 by Mann-Whitney]. Among cases of cerebral ischemia (CI) [N=1223], rates of TPA utilization were 43% at post-PSC, 27% at pre-PSC and 28% at non-PSC hospitals [p<0.001 by X2]. Time in minutes from ED arrival to thrombolysis in treated cases was 71 at post-PSC, 98 at pre-PSC, and 95 at non-PSC hospitals [p<0.001 by Mann-Whitney]. Hospitals that achieved PSC showed improvements in pre-PSC and post-PSC performance on door to imaging time, from 47 to 33 minutes [p=0.014]; percent TPA use in CI, from 27% to 43% [p<0.001], and reduced door-to-needle times, from 98 to 71 minutes [p=0.003]. There was no difference in time to imaging [47 vs. 49 minutes], time to thrombolysis [98 vs. 95 minutes] and percent TPA use [27% vs. 28%] between pre-PSC hospitals and non-PSC hospitals. Conclusions: Better performance of Primary Stroke Centers on acute care quality metrics is primarily driven by a beneficial impact of the PSC-certification process, and not better performance prior to seeking PSC status.

Download Full-text

Abstract W P334: VA Healthcare System Responses to National Stroke Care Reorganization

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.45.suppl_1.wp334 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Teresa M Damush ◽

Kristine K Miller ◽

Laurie Plue ◽

Arlene A Schmid ◽

Laura Myers ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Nurse Managers ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Structured Interviews ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Major Barrier ◽

Ongoing Work ◽

Final Sample ◽

Cross Training ◽

Stroke Center

Aims: In 2011, the VA released the Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) Directive which mandated reorganization of acute stroke care, including self-designation as Primary (P), Limited Hours (LH), or Supporting (S) stroke center. We conducted interviews across stroke centers to understand barriers and facilitators faced in response. Methods: The final sample included 38 (84% invited) facilities: 9 P, 24 LH, and 5 S facilities. In total, 107 persons were interviewed including ED Chiefs, Chiefs of Neurology, ED Nurse Managers/Nurses and other staff. Semi-structured interviews were based on the AIS Directive. Completed interviews were transcribed and analyzed using Nvivo 10. Results: Barriers reported were a lack of personnel assigned to coordinate the facility response to the directive. Data collection and lack of staff were likewise commonly reported as barriers. For thrombolysis measures, the low number of eligible Veterans was another major barrier. LH and S facilities reported some unique barriers: access to radiology and neurology services; EMS diverting stroke patients to nearby stroke centers, maintaining staff competency, and a lack of stroke clinical champions. Some solutions applied included cross training X-ray technicians to provide head CT coverage, developing stroke order sets and templates, and staff training. Larger facilities added a stroke code pager system and improved upon its use, and established ED nurses to become first alerts for an acute stroke patient. LH and S facilities also responded by attempting to secure additional services and by establishing formal transfer agreements to improve Veteran tPA access. Conclusions: The AIS Directive brought focused attention to reorganizing and improving stroke care across a range of facility types. Larger VA facilities tended to follow established practices for organizing stroke care, but the unique LH designation presented challenges to consistently organize systems. Since Veterans have financial interest in presenting to a VA facility, ongoing work to organize VA care and to improve access to thrombolysis at smaller VA facilities is needed. This protocol was supported by Genentech Inc. Protocol ML 28238, VA HSRD QUERI Rapid Response Project 11-374, and the VA Stroke QUERI Center.

Download Full-text

Abstract P855: Importance of Compliance in Dysphagia Screening in Acute Stroke Care

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p855 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Patty Noah ◽

Melanie Henderson ◽

Rebekah Heintz ◽

Russell Cerejo ◽

Christopher T Hackett ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Aspiration Pneumonia ◽

Hemorrhagic Stroke ◽

Oral Intake ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Chi Square ◽

Stroke Center

Introduction: Dysphagia occurs in up to two thirds of stroke patients and can lead to serious complications such as aspiration pneumonia, which is also linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Evidence-based guidelines recommend a bedside dysphagia assessment before oral intake in stroke patients regardless of initial stroke severity. Several studies have described registered nurses’ competency in terms of knowledge and skills regarding dysphagia screening. We aimed to examine the rate of aspiration pneumonia compared to the rate of dysphagia screening. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data at a single tertiary stroke center was carried out between January 2017 and June 2020. Data comparison was completed utilizing ICD-10 diagnosis codes to identify aspiration pneumonia in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients. The data was reviewed to compare the compliance of a completed dysphagia screen prior to any oral intake to rate of aspiration pneumonia. Chi square tests were used to assess proportion differences in completed dysphagia screen and proportion of aspiration pneumonia diagnosis in the ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients. Results: We identified 3320 patient that met inclusion criteria. 67% were ischemic strokes, 22% were intracerebral hemorrhages and 11% were subarachnoid hemorrhages. Compliance with dysphagia screening decreased from 94.2% (n=1555/1650) in 2017-2018 to 74.0% (n=1236/1670) in 2019-2020, OR=0.17 (95%CI 0.14 - 0.22), p < 0.0001. Aspiration pneumonias increased from 58 (3.5%) in 2017-2018 to 77 (4.6%) in 2019-2020, but this difference was not statistically significant, OR=0.75 (95%CI 0.53 - 1.07), p = 0.11. Conclusion: We noted that the decrease in compliance with completing a dysphagia screen in patients with acute stroke prior to any oral intake was associated with a higher trend of aspiration pneumonia.

Download Full-text

Ten Years of Improving Acute Stroke Management in a Metropolitan Area: A Population-Based Quantification of Quality Indicators

European Neurology ◽

10.1159/000518428 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-11

Author(s):

Anna Alegiani ◽

Michael Rosenkranz ◽

Leonie Schmitz ◽

Susanne Lezius ◽

Günter Seidel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Quality Indicators ◽

Metropolitan Area ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Care Quality ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Stroke Units ◽

Stroke Treatment ◽

Acute Stroke Treatment ◽

Over Time

Background and Purpose: Rapid access to acute stroke treatment improves clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke. We aimed to shorten the time to admission and to acute stroke treatment for patients with acute stroke in the Hamburg metropolitan area by collaborative multilevel measures involving all hospitals with stroke units, the Emergency Medical Services (EMS), and health-care authorities. Methods: In 2007, an area-wide stroke care quality project was initiated. The project included mandatory admission of all stroke patients in Hamburg exclusively to hospitals with stroke units, harmonized acute treatment algorithms among all hospitals, repeated training of the EMS staff, a multimedia educational campaign, and a mandatory stroke care quality monitoring system based on structured data assessment and quality indicators for procedural measures. We analyzed data of all patients with acute stroke who received inhospital treatment in the city of Hamburg during the evaluation period from the quality assurance database data and evaluated trends of key quality indicators over time. Results: From 2007 to 2016, a total of 83,395 patients with acute stroke were registered. During this period, the proportion of patients admitted within ≤3 h from symptom onset increased over time from 27.8% in 2007 to 35.2% in 2016 (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients who received rapid thrombolysis (within ≤30 min after admission) increased from 7.7 to 54.1% (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Collaborative stroke care quality projects are suitable and effective to improve acute stroke care.

Download Full-text

Abstract T MP75: Facilities Available in Chinese Hospitals From China Stroke Research Network

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.46.suppl_1.tmp75 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Chunjuan Wang ◽

Zixiao Li ◽

Yilong Wang ◽

Yong Jiang ◽

Xingquan Zhao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Mainland China ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Research Network ◽

Level Of Care ◽

Minimum Level ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Stroke Research ◽

Primary Stroke Center ◽

Stroke Center

Background and Purpose: Stroke is the first leading cause of death in China and millions of patients were admitted to various levels of hospitals each year. However, it is unknown how many of these hospitals are able to provide an appropriate level of care for stroke patients since the certification program of comprehensive stroke center (CSC) and primary stroke center (PSC) has not been initiated in China. Method: In 2012, we selected all 554 hospitals that joined into the China Stroke Research Network (CSRN) to start a survey. These hospitals were from 31 provinces or municipalities, covered nearly the entire Mainland China. A six-page questionnaire was sent to each of them to obtain the stroke facility information. We used the same criteria and definitions for CSC, PSC, and minimum level for any hospital ward (AHW) admitting stroke patients with that of the European Stroke Facilities Survey. Results: For all the hospitals in CSRN, 521 (94.0%) returned the questionnaire, 20 (3.8%) met criteria for CSC, 179 (34.4%) for PSC, 64 (12.3%) for AHW, and 258 (49.5%) met none of them and provided a lower level of care. Hospitals meeting criteria for CSC, PSC, AHW, and none of them admitted 70 052 (8.8%), 334 834 (42.2%), 88 364 (11.1%), and 299 806 (37.8%) patients in the whole of last year. There was no 24-hour availability for brain CT scan in 4.3% of hospitals not meeting criteria for AHW, while neither stroke care map nor stroke pathway for patients admission in 81.0% of them. Conclusions: Less than two fifths of Chinese hospitals admitting acute stroke patients have optimal facilities, and nearly half even the minimum level is not available. Our study suggests that only one half acute stroke patients are treated in appropriate centers in China, facilities for hospitals admitting stroke patients should be enhanced and certification project of CSCs and PSCs may be a feasible choice.

Download Full-text