scholarly journals Lower Risk of Dementia in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Taking Non‐Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants: A Nationwide Population‐Based Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin‐Yi Hsu ◽  
Peter Pin‐Sung Liu ◽  
An‐Bang Liu ◽  
Shu‐Man Lin ◽  
Huei‐Kai Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Incident Cases

Background A higher risk of developing dementia is observed in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Results are inconsistent regarding the risk of dementia when patients with AF use different anticoagulants. We aimed to investigate the risk of dementia in patients with AF receiving non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with those receiving warfarin. Methods and Results We conducted a nationwide population‐based cohort study of incident cases using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. We initially enlisted all incident cases of AF and then selected those treated with either NOACs or warfarin for at least 90 days between 2012 and 2016. First‐ever diagnosis of dementia was the primary outcome. We performed propensity score matching to minimize the difference between each cohort. We used the Fine and Gray competing risk regression model to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia. We recruited 12 068 patients with AF (6034 patients in each cohort). The mean follow‐up time was 3.27 and 3.08 years in the groups using NOACs and warfarin, respectively. Compared with the HR for the group using warfarin, the HR for dementia was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.73–0.92; P =0.0004) in the group using NOACs. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that users of NOAC aged 65 to 74 years, with a high risk of stroke or bleeding were associated with a lower risk of dementia than users of warfarin with similar characteristics. Conclusions Patients with AF using NOACs were associated with a lower risk of dementia than those using warfarin. Further randomized clinical trials are greatly needed to prove these findings.

scholarly journals Effectiveness, Safety, and Major Adverse Limb Events in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Concomitant Diabetes Mellitus Treated with Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Hsin Chan ◽  
Hsin-Fu Lee ◽  
Pei-Ru Li ◽  
Jia-Rou Liu ◽  
Tze-Fan Chao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Atherosclerotic Burden

Abstract Background: Evidence of adverse clinical outcomes for non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOACs) and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes mellitus are limited. We investigated the effectiveness, safety, and major adverse limb events for NOACs versus warfarin among diabetic AF patients. Methods: In this nationwide retrospective cohort study collected from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, we identified a total of 20,967 and 5,812 consecutive AF patients with diabetes taking NOACs and warfarin from June 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017, respectively. We used propensity-score stabilized weighting to balance covariates across study groups. Results: NOAC was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR):0.88; [95% confidential interval (CI):0.78-0.99]; P =0.0283), major adverse limb events (aHR:0.72;[95%CI:0.57-0.92]; P =0.0083), and major bleeding (aHR:0.67;[95%CI:0.59-0.76]; P <.0001) compared to warfarin. NOACs decreased MACE in patients of 75 but not in those aged <75 years ( P interaction=0.01), and in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) compared to those without IHD ( P interaction<0.01). For major adverse limb events, the advantage of risk reduction for NOAC over warfarin persisted in high risk subgroups including age 75 years, chronic kidney disease, IHD, peripheral artery disease, or use of concomitant antiplatelet drugs. Conclusion: NOACs were associated with a lower risk of effectiveness, safety, and major adverse limb events than warfarin among diabetic AF patients. Thromboprophylaxis with NOACs should be considered in the diabetic AF population with a high atherosclerotic burden.

scholarly journals Discontinuation of non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a population-based cohort study using primary care data from The Health Improvement Network in the UK

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. e031342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Ruigómez ◽  
Pareen Vora ◽  
Yanina Balabanova ◽  
Gunnar Brobert ◽  
Luke Roberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
First Year ◽  
The Uk

ObjectiveTo determine discontinuation rates, patterns of use and predictors of discontinuation of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in the first year of therapy.DesignPopulation-based cohort study.SettingUK primary care.Population11 481 patients with NVAF and a first prescription (index date) for apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban (January 2012 to December 2016) with at least 1 year of follow-up and at least one further NOAC prescription in the year following the index date were identified. 1 year rates and patterns of discontinuation were described.Primary and secondary outcome measuresOutcome measures were the percentage of patients who, in the first year from starting NOAC therapy, discontinued with their oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy (discontinuation was defined as a gap in OAC therapy of >30 days); switched OAC within 30 days; discontinued and reinitiated OAC therapy. Predictors of discontinuation were also evaluated.Results1 year discontinuation rates according to the index NOAC were 26.1% for apixaban, 40.0% for dabigatran and 29.6% for rivaroxaban. Reinitiation rates were 18.1% for apixaban, 21.7% for dabigatran and 17.3% for rivaroxaban, and switching rates were 2.8% for apixaban, 8.8% for dabigatran and 4.9% for rivaroxaban. More than 93% of reinitiations were with the index NOAC. Patients starting on dabigatran were more likely to switch OAC therapy than those starting on apixaban; ORs 4.28 (95% CI 3.24 to 5.65) for dabigatran and 1.89 (95% CI 1.49 to 2.39) for rivaroxaban. Severely reduced renal function was a predictor of any discontinuation, OR 1.77 (95% CI 1.28 to 2.44).ConclusionWhile the majority of patients with NVAF in the UK initiating NOAC treatment received continuous therapy in the first year of treatment, a substantial proportion of patients experienced gaps in treatment leaving them less protected against thromboembolism during these periods.

scholarly journals Effectiveness, Safety, and Major Adverse Limb Events in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Concomitant Diabetes Mellitus Treated with Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Hsin Chan ◽  
Hsin-Fu Lee ◽  
Pei-Ru Li ◽  
Jia-Rou Liu ◽  
Tze-Fan Chao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Research Database

Abstract Background: Evidence of adverse clinical outcomes for non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOACs) and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes mellitus are limited. We investigated the effectiveness, safety, and major adverse limb events for NOACs versus warfarin among diabetic AF patients.Methods: In this nationwide retrospective cohort study collected from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, we identified a total of 20,967 and 5,812 consecutive AF patients with diabetes taking NOACs and warfarin from June 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017, respectively. We used propensity-score stabilized weighting to balance covariates across study groups.Results: NOAC was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR):0.88; [95% confidential interval (CI):0.78-0.99]; P=0.0283), major adverse limb events (MALE) (aHR:0.72;[95%CI:0.57-0.92]; P=0.0083), and major bleeding (aHR:0.67;[95%CI:0.59-0.76];P<.0001) compared to warfarin. NOACs decreased MACE in patients of 75 but not in those aged <75 years (P interaction=0.01), and in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) compared to those without IHD (P interaction<0.01). For major adverse limb events, the advantage of risk reduction for NOAC over warfarin persisted in high risk subgroups including age 75 years, chronic kidney disease, IHD, peripheral artery disease, or use of concomitant antiplatelet drugs. Conclusion: Among diabetic AF patients, NOACs were associated with a lower risk of thromboembolism, major bleeding, and major adverse limb events than warfarin. Thromboprophylaxis with NOACs should be considered in the diabetic AF population with a high atherosclerotic burden.

P4793Comparing the effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin in the elderly Asian patients with atrial fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T F Chao ◽  
J N Liao ◽  
G Y H Lip ◽  
S A Chen
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Research Database

Abstract Background Stroke prevention in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) can be challenging. Comparisons of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in the elderly, at different age strata (age 65–74, 75–89, ≥90) in the daily practice have not been well described, particularly in Asians. We aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of NOACs compared warfarin for stroke prevention in elderly patients with AF. Methods A total of 64,169 AF patients aged ≥65 years receiving NOACs or warfarin prescription were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The risks of adverse events were compared between NOACs and warfarin in all patients age ≥65 and specifically, with different age strata; that is 65–74 years, 75–89 years and >90 years. Results Overall NOACs were associated with a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.869, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.812–0.931), ICH (aHR 0.524, 95% CI 0.456–0.601), major bleeding (aHR 0,824, 95% CI 0.776–0.875), mortality (aHR 0.511, 95% CI 0.491–0.532) and composite adverse events (aHR 0.646, 95% CI 0.625–0.667) compared to warfarin. There was heterogeneity in treatment effect for NOACs versus warfarin in different age strata, but the results still favored NOACs even among the very elderly (>90 years). The absolute risk difference and reductions in ICH and composite adverse events with NOAC use were even greater among the elderly compared to warfarin (Figure). Conclusions Compared to warfarin, NOACs were associated with a significantly lower risk of adverse events, with heterogeneity in treatment effects among different age strata. Overall, the clear safety signal in favor of NOACs over warfarin was evident irrespective of age strata, being most marked in the most elderly.

scholarly journals Recommendations on the Use of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (Based on 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide)

Kardiologiia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 68-79
Author(s):  
L. V. Popova ◽  
T. B. Kondratieva ◽  
M. B. Aksenova ◽  
T. V. Khlevchuk ◽  
M. Z. Kanevskaya
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Advanced Liver Disease ◽  
Clinical Variants

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) – direct oral anticoagulants – are getting the ever-broadening use in clinical practice. However, many problems related to optimal use of NOACs in specific clinical situations remain unresolved. European Heart Rhythm Association in April 2018 issued the renovated recommendations on the use of NOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation. The authors of recommendations presented some specific clinical variants for which they formulated practical advices based on the evidence obtained in randomized clinical trials. They also outlined the indications for use of NOACs, formulated practical start-program and scheme of subsequent follow-up management of patients taking NOACs. Recommendations contain information on pharmacokinetics of NOACs and their interactions with other drugs, consideration of feasibility of NOACs use in patients with chronic renal insufficiency or advanced liver disease. Many other practical problems are covered as well.  

The NOACs: clinical pharmacology

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 268-272
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Weitz
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Active Site ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Affinity

The limitations of vitamin K antagonists prompted the development of new oral anticoagulants that could be administered in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. Focusing on thrombin and factor Xa because of their prominent roles in coagulation, structure-based design led to the development of small molecules that bind to the active site pockets of these enzymes with high affinity and specificity. Four non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are now licensed: dabigatran, which inhibits thrombin, and rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, which inhibit factor Xa. In phase III randomized clinical trials that included over 100,000 patients these agents have proven to be at least as effective as vitamin K antagonists for prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and for treatment of venous thromboembolism, and to produce less bleeding, particularly less intracranial bleeding.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsin-Fu Lee ◽  
Lai-Chu See ◽  
Pei-Ru Li ◽  
Jia-Rou Liu ◽  
Tze-Fan Chao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Peripheral Artery ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Aims  To investigate the effectiveness, safety, and outcomes of lower limb events for non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. warfarin among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease (PAD). Methods and results In this nationwide retrospective cohort study collected from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, a total of 5768 and 2034 consecutive AF patients with PAD patients taking NOACs or warfarin were identified from 1 June 2012 to 31 December 2017, respectively. We used propensity score stabilized weighting to balance covariates across study groups. In the cohort, there were 89% patients were taking low-dose NOAC (dabigatran 110 mg twice daily, rivaroxaban 10–15 mg daily, apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily, or edoxaban 30 mg daily). Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant was associated with a comparable risk of ischaemic stroke, and a lower risk of acute myocardial infarction [hazard ratio (HR): 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42–0.87; P = 0.007], lower extremity thromboembolism (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.44–0.72; P &lt; 0.0001), revascularization procedure (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.47–0.72; P &lt; 0.0001), lower limb amputation (HR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.23–0.46; P &lt; 0.0001), and all major bleeding (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.50–0.80; P = 0.0001) than warfarin after weighting. The advantage of NOACs over warfarin persisted in high-risk subgroups including patients of ≥75 years of age, diabetes, renal impairment, or use of concomitant antiplatelet agent. Conclusion  This population-based study indicated that NOACs were associated with a comparable risk of ischaemic stroke, and a significantly lower risk of major adverse limb events and major bleeding than warfarin among AF patients with concomitant PAD. Therefore, thromboprophylaxis with NOACs may be considered for such patients.

scholarly journals Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Concomitant Hyperthyroidism

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (9) ◽  
pp. 2893-2904
Author(s):  
Yi-Hsin Chan ◽  
Lung-Sheng Wu ◽  
Lai-Chu See ◽  
Jia-Rou Liu ◽  
Shang-Hung Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Asian Patients

Abstract Objective Patients with hyperthyroidism were excluded from the randomized clinical trials of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Methods We performed a nationwide retrospective cohort study using data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. We enrolled 3213 and 1181 NVAF patients with hyperthyroidism who were taking DOACs and warfarin, respectively, from June 1, 2012 to December 31, 2017. We also enrolled 53 591 and 16 564 NVAF patients without hyperthyroidism, taking DOACs and warfarin, respectively. We used propensity score stabilized weights (PSSWs) to balance covariates across the study groups. We also used 1:4 matching on both taking DOACs, with (n = 3213) and without hyperthyroidism (n = 12 852); and both taking warfarin, with (n = 1181) and without hyperthyroidism (n = 4724). Results After PSSW, DOAC had a comparable risk of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (IS/SE) and a lower risk of major bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65; 95% confidential interval [CI], 0.44–0.96; P = 0.0295) than warfarin among patients with hyperthyroidism. There were comparable risks of IS/SE and major bleeding between those patients with and without hyperthyroidism. However, among patients taking warfarin, those with hyperthyroidism had a lower risk of IS/SE than those without hyperthyroidism (HR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43–0.86; P = 0.0050). Conclusion Among NVAF Asian patients with concomitant hyperthyroidism, DOACs may be an effective and safer alternative to warfarin. Thromboprophylaxis with DOACs may be considered for such patients, and it is important to validate this finding in further prospective study.

scholarly journals Comparison of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban for effectiveness and safety in atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ole-Christian W Rutherford ◽  
Christian Jonasson ◽  
Waleed Ghanima ◽  
Fabian Söderdahl ◽  
Sigrun Halvorsen
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Nationwide Study ◽  
Hazard Ratios

Abstract Aims The aim of this study was to compare the risk of stroke or systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) using dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban in routine clinical practice. Methods and results Using nationwide registries in Norway from January 2013 to December 2017, we established a cohort of 52 476 new users of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with AF. Users of individual NOACs were matched 1:1 on the propensity score to create three pairwise-matched cohorts: dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban (20 504 patients), dabigatran vs. apixaban (20 826 patients), and rivaroxaban vs. apixaban (27 398 patients). Hazard ratios (HRs) for the risk of stroke or SE and major bleeding were estimated. In the propensity-matched comparisons of the risk of stroke or SE, the HRs were 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76–1.02] for dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban, 0.88 (95% CI 0.75–1.02) for dabigatran vs. apixaban, and 1.00 (95% CI 0.89–1.14) for apixaban vs. rivaroxaban. For the risk of major bleeding, the HRs were 0.75 (95% CI 0.64–0.88) for dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban, 1.03 (95% CI 0.85–1.24) for dabigatran vs. apixaban, and 0.79 (95% CI 0.68–0.91) for apixaban vs. rivaroxaban. Conclusion In this nationwide study of patients with AF in Norway, we found no statistically significant differences in risk of stroke or SE in propensity-matched comparisons between dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. However, dabigatran and apixaban were both associated with significantly lower risk of major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document