scholarly journals Mechanical Thrombectomy Up to 24 Hours in Large Vessel Occlusions and Infarct Velocity Assessment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manabu Inoue ◽  
Takeshi Yoshimoto ◽  
Kanta Tanaka ◽  
Junpei Koge ◽  
Masayuki Shiozawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Growth Velocity ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Late Time ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Excellent Outcome ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Perfusion Weighted Imaging ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background We retrospectively compared early‐ (<6 hours) versus late‐ (6–24 hours) presenting patients using perfusion‐weighted imaging selection and evaluated clinical/radiographic outcomes. Methods and Results Large vessel occlusion patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy from August 2017 to July 2020 within 24 hours of onset were retrieved from a single‐center database. Perfusion‐weighted imaging was analyzed by automated software and final infarct volume was measured semi‐automatically within 14 days. The primary end point was good outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0–2 at 90 days). Secondary end points were excellent outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0–1 at 90 days), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and death. Clinical characteristics/radiological values including hypoperfusion volume and infarct growth velocity (baseline volume/onset‐to‐image time) were compared between the groups. Of 1294 patients, 118 patients were included. The median age was 74 years, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 14, and core volume was 13 mL. The late‐presenting group had more female patients (67% versus 31%, respectively; P =0.001). No statistically significant differences were seen in good outcome (42% versus 53%, respectively; P =0.30), excellent outcome (26% versus 32%, respectively; P =0.51), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (6.5% versus 4.6%, respectively; P =0.74), and death (3.2% versus 5.7%, respectively; P =0.58) between the groups. The late‐presenting group had more atherothrombotic cerebral infarction (19% versus 6%, respectively; P =0.03), smaller hypoperfusion volume (median: 77 versus 133 mL, respectively; P =0.04), and slower infarct growth velocity (median: 0.6 versus 5.1 mL/h, respectively; P =0.03). Conclusions Patients with early‐ and late‐time windows treated with mechanical thrombectomy by automated perfusion‐weighted imaging selection have similar outcomes, comparable with those in randomized trials, but different in infarct growth velocities. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02251665.

scholarly journals Intra-Arterial Adjunctive Medications for Acute Ischemic Stroke During Mechanical Thrombectomy

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 1192-1202
Author(s):  
Vanessa H.E. Chen ◽  
Grace K.H. Lee ◽  
Choon-Han Tan ◽  
Aloysius S.T. Leow ◽  
Ying-Kiat Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Risk Ratio ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Tissue Type ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background and Purpose: In patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion, the role of intra-arterial adjunctive medications (IAMs), such as urokinase, tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator), or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has not been clearly established. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of concomitant or rescue IAM for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion patients undergoing MT. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register databases from inception until March 13, 2020. We analyzed all studies with patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion in the anterior or posterior circulation that provided data for the two treatment arms, (1) MT+IAM and (2) MT only, and also reported on at least one of the following efficacy outcomes, recanalization and 90-day modified Rankin Scale, or safety outcomes, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 90-day mortality. Data were collated in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: Sixteen nonrandomized observational studies with a total of 4581 patients were analyzed. MT only was performed in 3233 (70.6%) patients, while 1348 (29.4%) patients were treated with both MT and IAM. As compared with patients treated with MT alone, patients treated with combination therapy (MT+IAM) had a higher likelihood of achieving good functional outcome (risk ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.03–1.24]) and a lower risk of 90-day mortality (risk ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.72–0.94]). There was no significant difference in successful recanalization (risk ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.99–1.06]) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage between the two groups (risk ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.87–1.46]). Conclusions: In acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion, the use of IAM together with MT may achieve better functional outcomes and lower mortality rates. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to establish the safety and efficacy of IAM as adjunctive treatment to MT.

Endovascular therapy versus thrombolysis in patients with large vessel occlusions within the anterior circulation aged ≥80 years

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1053-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Kastrup ◽  
Freimuth Brunner ◽  
Helmut Hildebrandt ◽  
Christian Roth ◽  
Michael Winterhalter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Excellent Outcome ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Poor Outcome ◽  
Clinical And Radiological Outcome ◽  
Stent Retrievers ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background and purposeIn patients with large vessel occlusions, endovascular treatment (ET) has been shown to be superior to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in recent trials. However, the effectiveness of ET in elderly patients is uncertain.MethodsUsing our stroke database, we compared the rates of good outcome (modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤2), excellent outcome (mRS 0–1), poor outcome (mRS 5–6) at discharge, in-hospital death, infarct size, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) in patients aged ≥80 years with distal intracranial carotid artery, M1 and M2 occlusions during two time periods.ResultsFrom January 2008 to October 2012, 217 patients were treated with IVT and, from November 2012 to October 2017, 209 patients received ET with stent retrievers (with or without IVT). Significantly more patients in the ET group than in the IVT group had a good outcome (25% vs 16%, P<0.05), as well as an excellent outcome (12% vs 4%, P<0.01). Significantly fewer patients in the ET group than in the IVT group died (14% vs 22%, P<0.05) or had a poor outcome (35% vs 52%, P<001). The SICH rates were lower after ET than after IVT (1% vs 6%, P<0.01), and the infarct sizes were smaller after ET than after IVT.ConclusionsCompared with IVT, the routine use of ET significantly improved the early clinical and radiological outcome in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusions aged ≥80 years. Nevertheless, poor outcome rates were high so the role of ET needs to be defined further in this population.

scholarly journals Thrombectomy Versus Combined Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu Tong ◽  
Yilong Wang ◽  
Jens Fiehler ◽  
Clayton T. Bauer ◽  
Baixue Jia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Real World ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Practice Setting ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background and Purpose: A recent randomized controlled trial DIRECT-MT (Direct Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy to Revascularize AIS Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Efficiently in Chinese Tertiary Hospitals) compared the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) versus combined intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and MT for acute large vessel occlusion. The current study utilized a prospective, nationwide registry to validate the results of the DIRECT-MT trial in a real-world practice setting. Methods: Subjects were selected from a prospective cohort of acute large vessel occlusion patients undergoing endovascular treatment at 111 hospitals from 26 provinces in China (ANGEL-ACT registry [Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Work Flow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke]) between November 2017 and March 2019. All patients eligible for IVT and receiving MT were reviewed and then grouped according to whether prior IVT or not (MT and combined IVT+MT). After a 1:1 propensity score matching, the outcome measures including the 90-day modified Rankin Scale, successful recanalization, door-to-puncture time, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and intraprocedural embolization were compared. Results: A total of 1026 patients, 600 in the MT group and 426 in the combined group, were included. Among 788 patients identified after matching, there were no significant differences in the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (median, 3 versus 3 points; P =0.82) and successful recanalization (86.6% versus 89.3%; P =0.23) between the two groups; however, patients of the MT group had a shorter door-to-puncture time (median, 112 versus 136 minutes; β=−45.02 [95% CI, −68.31 to −21.74]), lower rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (5.5% versus 10.1%; odds ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.30–0.91]), and embolization (4.6% versus 8.1%; odds ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.30–0.98]) than those of the combined group. Conclusions: This matched-control study largely confirmed the findings of the DIRECT-MT trial in a real-world practice setting, suggesting that MT may carry similar effectiveness to combined IVT+MT for acute large vessel occlusion patients, despite MT alone seems to be associated with a shorter in-hospital delay until procedure, lower risks of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and embolization. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03370939.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke in Patients Aged ≥90 Years

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyohei Fujita ◽  
Kanta Tanaka ◽  
Hiroshi Yamagami ◽  
Takeshi Yoshimoto ◽  
Kazutaka Uchida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scale Score ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Favorable Outcome ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Management Group ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background and Purpose: Outcomes in patients ≥90 years of age with stroke due to large vessel occlusion were compared between endovascular therapy (EVT) and medical management. Methods: Of 2420 acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion in a prospective, multicenter, nationwide registry in Japan, patients aged ≥90 years with occlusion of the internal carotid artery or M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery were included. The primary effectiveness outcome was a favorable outcome at 3 months, defined as achieving a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 or return to at least the prestroke modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 72 hours after onset. Intergroup biases were adjusted by multivariable adjustment with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results: A total of 150 patients (median age, 92 [interquartile range, 90–94] years; median prestroke modified Rankin Scale score, 2 [interquartile range, 0–4]) were analyzed. EVT was performed in 49 patients (32.7%; mechanical thrombectomy, n=43). The EVT group showed shorter time from onset to hospital arrival ( P =0.03), higher Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score ( P <0.01), and a higher rate of treatment with intravenous thrombolysis ( P <0.01) than the medical management group. The favorable outcome was seen in 28.6% of the EVT group and 6.9% of the medical management group ( P <0.01). EVT was associated with the favorable outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 8.44 [95% CI, 1.88–37.97]). Rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were similar between the EVT group (0.0%) and the medical management group (3.9%; P =0.30). Conclusions: Patients who underwent EVT showed better functional outcomes than those with medical management without increased symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages. Given proper patient selection, withholding EVT solely on the basis of the age of patients may not offer the best chance of good outcome. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02419794.

scholarly journals Tenecteplase Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. 3440-3451
Author(s):  
Steven J. Warach ◽  
Adrienne N. Dula ◽  
Truman J. Milling
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Time Window ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Bolus Administration ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Qualitative Synthesis ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Meta Analyses

Tenecteplase is a fibrinolytic drug with higher fibrin specificity and longer half-life than the standard stroke thrombolytic, alteplase, permitting the convenience of single bolus administration. Tenecteplase, at 0.5 mg/kg, has regulatory approval to treat ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction, for which it has equivalent 30-day mortality and fewer systemic hemorrhages. Investigated as a thrombolytic for ischemic stroke over the past 15 years, tenecteplase is currently being studied in several phase 3 trials. Based on a systematic literature search, we provide a qualitative synthesis of published stroke clinical trials of tenecteplase that (1) performed randomized comparisons with alteplase, (2) compared different doses of tenecteplase, or (3) provided unique quantitative meta-analyses. Four phase 2 and one phase 3 study performed randomized comparisons with alteplase. These and other phase 2 studies compared different tenecteplase doses and effects on early outcomes of recanalization, reperfusion, and substantial neurological improvement, as well as symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 3-month disability on the modified Rankin Scale. Although no single trial prospectively demonstrated superiority or noninferiority of tenecteplase on clinical outcome, meta-analyses of these trials (1585 patients randomized) point to tenecteplase superiority in recanalization of large vessel occlusions and noninferiority in disability-free 3-month outcome, without increases in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or mortality. Doses of 0.25 and 0.4 mg/kg have been tested, but no advantage of the higher dose has been suggested by the results. Current clinical practice guidelines for stroke include intravenous tenecteplase at either dose as a second-tier option, with the 0.25 mg/kg dose recommended for large vessel occlusions, based on a phase 2 trial that demonstrated superior recanalization and improved 3-month outcome relative to alteplase. Ongoing randomized phase 3 trials may better define the comparative risks and benefits of tenecteplase and alteplase for stroke thrombolysis and answer questions of tenecteplase efficacy in the >4.5-hour time window, in wake-up stroke, and in combination with endovascular thrombectomy.

Abstract TP195: Pre-Stroke Cognitive Impairment is Associated With Poor Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated With Mechanical Thrombectomy

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Kanamaru ◽  
Satoshi Suda ◽  
Junya Aoki ◽  
Kentaro Suzuki ◽  
Yuki Sakamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Poor Outcome ◽  
Poor Outcome Group ◽  
Outcome Group ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: It is reported that pre-stroke cognitive impairment is associated with poor functional outcome after stroke associated with small vessel disease. However, it is not clear that pre-stroke cognitive impairment is associated with poor outcome in patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy. Method: We enrolled 127 consecutive patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke from December 2016 to November 2018. Pre-stroke cognitive function was evaluated using the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE). We retrospectively compared poor outcome (a score of 3 to 6 on the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days) group (n=75) with good outcome (a score of 0, 1, or 2 on the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days) group (n=52) and examined that IQCODE could be the predictor of PO. Result: IQCODE was significantly higher in poor outcome group than in good outcome group (89 vs. 82, P=0.0012). Moreover, age (77.2 years old vs. 71.6 years old, P= 0.0009), the percentage of female (42.7% vs. 17.3%, P= 0.0021), complication of hypertension (HT, 68.0% vs. 44.2%, P=0.0076), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission (20 vs. 11, P<0.0001), the percentage of postoperative intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH, 33.3% vs. 15.4%, P=0.0233) were higher in poor outcome group than in good outcome group, too. However, there was no significant difference between poor outcome and good outcome groups in occlusion site (P= 0.1229), DWI-ASPECTS (P= 0.2839), the duration from onset to recanalization (P=0.4871) and other risk factors. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that IQCODE, HT and NIHSS at admission were associated with poor outcome (P= 0.0128, P=0.0061 and P<0.0001, respectively). Conclusion: Cognitive impairment could be associated with poor outcome in patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy.

scholarly journals Mobile Interventional Stroke Teams Improve Outcomes in the Early Time Window for Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob R. Morey ◽  
Xiangnan Zhang ◽  
Naoum Fares Marayati ◽  
Stavros Matsoukas ◽  
Emily Fiano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scale Score ◽  
Time Window ◽  
Early Time ◽  
National Institutes Of Health ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Late Time ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy

Background and Purpose: Endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke is a time-sensitive intervention. The use of a Mobile Interventional Stroke Team (MIST) traveling to Thrombectomy Capable Stroke Centers to perform endovascular thrombectomy has been shown to be significantly faster with improved discharge outcomes, as compared with the drip-and-ship (DS) model. The effect of the MIST model stratified by time of presentation has yet to be studied. We hypothesize that patients who present in the early window (last known well of ≤6 hours) will have better clinical outcomes in the MIST model. Methods: The NYC MIST Trial and a prospectively collected stroke database were assessed for patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy from January 2017 to February 2020. Patients presenting in early and late time windows were analyzed separately. The primary end point was the proportion with a good outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2) at 90 days. Secondary end points included discharge National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and modified Rankin Scale. Results: Among 561 cases, 226 patients fit inclusion criteria and were categorized into MIST and DS cohorts. Exclusion criteria included a baseline modified Rankin Scale score of >2, inpatient status, or fluctuating exams. In the early window, 54% (40/74) had a good 90-day outcome in the MIST model, as compared with 28% (24/86) in the DS model ( P <0.01). In the late window, outcomes were similar (35% versus 41%; P =0.77). The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at discharge was 5.0 and 12.0 in the early window ( P <0.01) and 5.0 and 11.0 in the late window ( P =0.11) in the MIST and DS models, respectively. The early window discharge modified Rankin Scale was significantly better in the MIST model ( P <0.01) and similar in the late window ( P =0.41). Conclusions: The MIST model in the early time window results in better 90-day outcomes compared with the DS model. This may be due to the MIST capturing high-risk fast progressors at an earlier time point. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03048292.

Identifying the predictors of first-pass effect and its influence on clinical outcome in the setting of endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: Results from a multicentric prospective registry

2020 ◽  
pp. 174749302092305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Di Maria ◽  
Maéva Kyheng ◽  
Arturo Consoli ◽  
Jean-Philippe Desilles ◽  
Benjamin Gory ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Lower Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Excellent Outcome ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Thrombectomy Device

Background The first-pass effect, defined as a complete or near-complete recanalization after one pass (first-pass effect) of a mechanical thrombectomy device, has been related to better clinical outcome than good recanalization after more than one pass in acute ischemic stroke. We searched for predictors of first-pass effect by analyzing the results within a large prospective multicentric registry. Methods We included patients treated by mechanical thrombectomy for isolated anterior intracranial occlusions. A multi-variate logistic regression analysis was carried out to search for predictors of first-pass effect. We also analyzed the percentage of patients with 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 2, excellent outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale 0 to 1), 24-h NIHSS change, and 90-day all-cause mortality. Results Among the 1832 patients included, clinical outcome at 90 days was significantly better in first-pass effect patients (50.6% vs. 38.9% in patients without first-pass effect), with a center-adjusted OR associated with first-pass effect of 1.74 (95%CI, 1.24 to 1.77). Older age, a lower systolic blood pressure, an MCA-M1 occlusion, higher DWI-ASPECTS at admission, mechanical thrombectomy under local anesthesia, and combined first-line device strategy were independent predictors of first-pass effect. Conclusions In this study, a strategy combining thrombectomy and thrombo-aspiration was more effective than other strategies in achieving first-pass effect. In addition, we confirm that clinical outcome was better in patients with first-pass effect compared to non-first-pass effect patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document