Abstract T P117: Impact of Medicaid Coverage on Utilization of Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesli Skolarus ◽  
James F Burke ◽  
Lewis B Morgenstern ◽  
Will Meurer ◽  
Eric Adelman ◽  
...  

Objective: Optimal post-acute care is associated with improved stroke outcomes. Among working age stroke patients discharged to institutional post-acute care, those with Medicaid are less likely to be discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) than those with private insurance, a finding which may be influenced by state Medicaid coverage. We hypothesized that stroke patients residing in states where Medicaid does not cover IRFs would be less likely to be discharged to an IRF than patients residing in states where Medicaid covers IRFs. Methods: Working age ischemic stroke patients with Medicaid were identified from the 2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) using ICD-9 CM codes 433.x1, 434.x1 and 436. Medicaid coverage of IRFs (yes versus no) was ascertained for 45 states with NIS data by review of state Medicaid websites. The primary outcome was discharge to IRF (versus other discharge destinations). We fit a hierarchical logistic regression model that included patient-level factors (demographics and stroke severity measures (length of stay, t-PA use and Charlson comorbidity score)), and a state policy variable representing whether a State’s Medicaid pays for IRF, with a random intercept for hospital. Based on this model, we estimated the probability of utilization of IRFs in states with Medicaid coverage of IRFs compared to those without. Results: Medicaid did not cover IRFs in 4 (TN, TX, SC, WV) out of 45 states. Compared to stroke patients residing in states with Medicaid coverage of IRF, stroke patients hospitalized in states without Medicaid coverage of IRF were less likely to be discharged to an IRF (12.8% (7.5-18.0%) vs. 19.4% (17.0-21.8%), p=0.02) after adjusting for patient and hospital factors. Conclusion: Working age stroke patients with Medicaid who reside in states where Medicaid does not cover IRFs have less utilization of IRFs than patients residing in states where Medicaid covers IRFs. As the Medicaid population expands under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the number of working age stroke patients increase, careful attention to state Medicaid policy for post-acute care and analysis of its effects are warranted.

Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir R Belagaje ◽  
Kay Zander ◽  
Lisa Thackeray ◽  
Rishi Gupta

Intro: A person with stroke has improved outcomes with post-acute care in an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) or at home compared to those who are discharged to a skilled nursing facility (SNF). However, this research was conducted in an era before acute stroke treatment was fully developed and implemented. In this analysis of a recently completed acute intervention trial, we hypothesize that subjects with similar severity of strokes will have better 90 day outcomes if they are discharged to a IRF or home compared to a SNF. Methods: Using the data from SENTIS, a prospective, multi-center single-blind, randomized trial of use of NeuroFlo technology compared to standard acute stroke therapy, patient demographics, day 4 National Institutes of Health Stroke Scores (NIHSS), and 90 day modified Rankin scores (mRS) was obtained. Severity of stroke was classfied in 3 groups based on NIHSS: less than 8, 8-13, 14+. Disposition following acute hospital care was classified as home, IRF and SNF. A favorable outcome was defined as 90 day mRS ≤ 2. For each stroke severity class, the effect of each disposition on a favorable outcome was calculated. Results: A total of 292 patients were analyzed with a mean age of 65±14 with presenting NIHSS of < 8 in 94/297(31.6%), NIHSS 8-13 in 118/297(39.7%) and 14+ in 85/297(28.6%) of patients. Regardless of day 4 NIHSS, only 2 out of 28 (7.1%) patients who were discharged to SNF achieved a 90 day mRS ≤2, compared to 60/153 (39.2%) in the IRF group (OR 8.02 95%CI[1.83-35.11], p=0.0057). Table 1 shows the distribution of outcomes by post-acute care disposition and day 4 NIHSS. Conclusions: The day 4 NIHSS had an inverse relationship with the likelihood of a favorable outome. Subjects who were discharged home or to an IRF were significantly more likely to have a favorable outcome compared to those who were discharged to a SNF. This analysis supports prior data stating that discharge disposition plays a role in determining outcomes.


Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacy Lender ◽  
Janet Prvu Bettger ◽  
Diane Nutter ◽  

Background: Follow-up care with stroke specialists can facilitate patient recovery. To improve care continuity post-stroke the Ohio Coverdell Stroke Program aimed to improve the proportion of hospitalized patients who had a follow-up appointment scheduled with specialty care (neurologist, neurosurgeon or neurology provider) prior to discharge. Methods: Data from Ohio Coverdell Stroke Program hospitals (N=48) were examined to determine the change in performance over a 12-month quality improvement initiative (quarters 1-2=baseline; quarters 3-4=active improvement phase). Admitted stroke patients of any type, planned for discharge home or to a rehabilitation or skilled nursing facility (post-acute care), and with a follow-up appointment ordered or recommended were included. Patients discharged in quarter 4 with and without an appointment scheduled were compared to identify targeted areas for continued improvement. Results: There were 3,920 stroke patients discharged home and 3,530 discharged to post-acute care. Of patients discharged home during the baseline period, 24.4% had a follow-up appointment scheduled before hospital discharge compared with 44.0% of patients in quarter 4 (80.3% improvement). Of patients discharged to post-acute care during baseline, 25.0% had a follow-up appointment scheduled compared with 40.2% of patients in quarter 4 (60.8% improvement). Improvement in the proportion of patients with a follow-up appointment was significant (p<0.001) for those discharged home and to post-acute care. Analysis of patient characteristics showed fewer appointments were scheduled in quarter 4 for patients discharged home who had a stroke type other than ischemic, were White, obese/overweight, or without a history of hypertension (p<0.05; no difference by age, stroke severity, or other co-morbidities). Among those discharged to post-acute care, fewer appointments were scheduled for patients with a NIHSS<5, White, with Medicare, or no history of coronary artery disease or obesity/overweight (p<0.05). Conclusions: Hospital performance with scheduling specialty care follow-up appointments improved significantly; however, there is room for continued improvement particularly with targeted patient sub-groups identified.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 161
Author(s):  
Chong-Chi Chiu ◽  
Jhi-Joung Wang ◽  
Chao-Ming Hung ◽  
Hsiu-Fen Lin ◽  
Hong-Hsi Hsien ◽  
...  

Few papers discuss how the economic burden of patients with stroke receiving rehabilitation courses is related to post-acute care (PAC) programs. This is the first study to explore the economic burden of stroke patients receiving PAC rehabilitation and to evaluate the impact of multidisciplinary PAC programs on cost and functional status simultaneously. A total of 910 patients with stroke between March 2014 and October 2018 were separated into a PAC group (at two medical centers) and a non-PAC group (at three regional hospitals and one district hospital) by using propensity score matching (1:1). A cost–illness approach was employed to identify the cost categories for analysis in this study according to various perspectives. Total direct medical cost in the per-diem-based PAC cohort was statistically lower than that in the fee-for-service-based non-PAC cohort (p < 0.001) and annual per-patient economic burden of stroke patients receiving PAC rehabilitation is approximately US $354.3 million (in 2019, NT $30.5 = US $1). Additionally, the PAC cohort had statistical improvement in functional status vis-à-vis the non-PAC cohort and total score of each functional status before rehabilitation and was also statistically significant with its total score after one-year rehabilitation training (p < 0.001). Early stroke rehabilitation is important for restoring health, confidence, and safe-care abilities in these patients. Compared to the current stroke rehabilitation system, PAC rehabilitation shortened the waiting time for transfer to the rehabilitation ward and it was indicated as an efficient policy for treatment of stroke in saving medical cost and improving functional status.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julianna M. Dean ◽  
Kimberly Hreha ◽  
Ickpyo Hong ◽  
Chih-Ying Li ◽  
Daniel Jupiter ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Despite the success of stroke rehabilitation services, differences in service utilization exist. Some patients with stroke may travel across regions to receive necessary care prescribed by their physician. It is unknown how availability and combinations of post-acute care facilities in local healthcare markets influence use patterns. We present the distribution of skilled nursing, inpatient rehabilitation, and long-term care hospital services across Hospital Service Areas among a national stroke cohort, and we describe drivers of post-acute care service use. Methods We extracted data from 2013 to 2014 of a national stroke cohort using Medicare beneficiaries (174,498 total records across 3232 Hospital Service Areas). Patients’ ZIP code of residence was linked to the facility ZIP code where care was received. If the patient did not live in the Hospital Service Area where they received care, they were considered a “traveler”. We performed multivariable logistic regression to regress traveling status on the care combinations available where the patient lived. Results Although 73.4% of all Hospital Service Areas were skilled nursing-only, only 23.5% of all patients received care in skilled nursing-only Hospital Service Areas; 40.8% of all patients received care in Hospital Service Areas with only inpatient rehabilitation and skilled nursing, which represented only 18.2% of all Hospital Service Areas. Thirty-five percent of patients traveled to a different Hospital Service Area from where they lived. Regarding “travelers,” for those living in a skilled nursing-only Hospital Service Area, 49.9% traveled for care to Hospital Service Areas with only inpatient rehabilitation and skilled nursing. Patients living in skilled nursing-only Hospital Service Areas had more than five times higher odds of traveling compared to those living in Hospital Service Areas with all three facilities. Conclusions Geographically, the vast majority of Hospital Service Areas in the United States that provided rehabilitation services for stroke survivors were skilled nursing-only. However, only about one-third lived in skilled nursing-only Hospital Service Areas; over 35% traveled to receive care. Geographic variation exists in post-acute care; this study provides a foundation to better quantify its drivers. This study presents previously undescribed drivers of variation in post-acute care service utilization among Medicare beneficiaries—the “traveler effect”.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Geri Sanfillippo ◽  
Brian Olkowski ◽  
Hermann Christian Schumacher ◽  
David Dafilou ◽  
Colleen Bowski ◽  
...  

Introduction: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services bundled payment for care improvement advanced (BPCI-A) program incentivizes providers to better coordinate care, reduce expenses, and improve quality. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of improving post-acute care coordination after stroke on quality and resource utilization in the BPCI-A program. Methods: Capital Health collaborated with post-acute providers to improve communication, identify criteria for early supported discharge to the community, expedite home health and outpatient services, reduce readmissions, and initiate advanced care planning. The redesigned post-acute care coordination program was implemented at Capital Health’s primary and comprehensive stroke center. Quality outcomes and resource utilization measures for patients enrolled in the BCPI-A program were compared to BPCI-A eligible patients prior to program implementation. Results: Forty-three patients enrolled in the BCPI-A program were compared to 77 patients eligible for enrollment. Clinical and demographic characteristics were similar (p>.05). After program implementation, 21.5% fewer patients were discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation facility (p=.024) and 14% more patients were discharged to inpatient hospice (p<.001). On average, post-acute cost decreased $16,608 per patient (p=.007) resulting in a $16,820 reduction in the 90-day cost per episode (p=.011). The 90-day hospital readmission rate decreased insignificantly by 14.1% from 23.4% to 9.3% (p=.056). Hospital cost, hospital length of stay and the 90-day mortality rate were unchanged (p>.05). Conclusion: The coordination of post-acute services facilitates care transitions after stroke. The identification of patients meeting criteria for early supported discharge to the community or admission to inpatient hospice helped reduce post-acute cost without increasing 90-day readmission or mortality.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 59-59
Author(s):  
Indrakshi Roy ◽  
Amol Karmarkar ◽  
Amit Kumar ◽  
Meghan Warren ◽  
Patricia Pohl ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: The incidence of hip fracture in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) is 2.7 times higher than it is in those without ADRD. Care complexity, including extensive post-acute rehabilitation, increases substantially in patients with ADRD after hip fracture. However, there are no standardized post-acute care utilization models for patients with ADRD after hip fracture. Additionally, there is a lack of knowledge on how post-acute utilization varies by race/ethnicity, in this population. OBJECTIVES: To investigate racial differences in post-acute care utilization following hip fracture related hospitalization in patients with ADRD. METHODS: A secondary analysis was conducted on 120,179 older adults with ADRD with incident hip fracture, using 100% Medicare data (2016-2017). The primary outcome was post-acute discharge dispositions (skilled nursing facility [SNF], inpatient rehabilitation facility [IRF], and Home Health Care [HHC]) across various racial groups. Multinomial logistic regression examined the association between race and post-acute discharge dispositions after accounting for patient-level covariates. RESULTS: Compared to non-Hispanic Whites, minority racial groups have significantly lower odds of being discharged to SNF, IRF, or HHC, as compared to home. Adjusted odds ratio for Hispanics discharged to SNF was 0.28 (CI=0.24-0.31), to IRF was 0.46 (CI=0.39-0.52) and HHC was 0.64 (95% CI =0.54-0.75), as compared to home. CONCLUSION: ADRD patients have higher risk of hip fracture. Findings from this study will provide insight on how to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in post-acute care utilization in vulnerable populations and improve quality of care and health outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 19-19
Author(s):  
Erin Colligan ◽  
Brittany Branand

Abstract Post-acute care (PAC) is a component of health-care utilization and spending that is subject to the discretion of providers. Prior research has demonstrated that Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) recognize PAC as a logical target for increased efficiency and cost savings. As part of the evaluation of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Next Generation ACO (NGACO) Model, we investigated NGACOs’ approaches to PAC services and the impact of these efforts on utilization and cost using a mixed-methods study design. We conducted interviews and surveys with NGACO leadership and providers and performed a difference-in-differences analysis of utilization and spending based on Medicare claims data. We found that NGACOs focused specifically on establishing partnerships with skilled nursing facilities (SNF) to facilitate transitions in care by establishing new channels of communication, sharing performance data, embedding staff in SNFs, and (in some cases) sharing financial risk. We observed a statistically significant decrease in SNF spending, a trend toward fewer SNF days, and statistically significantly lower expenditures for other PAC settings (e.g., inpatient rehabilitation and long-term acute care facilities). These findings suggest that NGACOs have contributed to improving transitions in care and diverting beneficiaries from intensive PAC settings. Nonetheless, the reduction in PAC spending alone did not translate to a decline in total cost of care. Future ACOs may need to expand their focus to the inpatient utilization and spending that precedes PAC in order to impact total cost of care.


2019 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 271-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Ning Peng ◽  
Li-Ju Chen ◽  
Wan-Hsuan Lu ◽  
Shu-Ling Tsai ◽  
Liang-Kung Chen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document