Abstract WP165: Mexican Americans Receive Less Intensive Stroke Rehabilitation Than non Hispanic Whites

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lewis B Morgenstern ◽  
Emma Sais ◽  
Michael Fuentes ◽  
Nneka Ifejika ◽  
Xiaqing Jiang ◽  
...  

Background: Mexican Americans (MAs) have worse neurologic, functional and cognitive outcomes after stroke than non Hispanic whites (NHWs). Stroke rehabilitation is important for outcome. In a population-based study, we sought to determine if allocation of stroke rehabilitation services differed by ethnicity. Methods: Consecutive stroke patients were identified for a three month time period as part of the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi (BASIC) project, Texas, USA. Cases were validated by physicians using source documentation. Patients were followed prospectively for three months following stroke to determine self-reported rehabilitation services. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the study population. Ethnic comparisons of rehabilitation services were made using chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests. Results: Seventy-two subjects (50 MA, 22 NHW) were followed. Mean age, NHW-69 (sd-13), MA-66 (sd-11) years, sex (NHW 55% male, MA 50% male) and median presenting NIHSS (NHW-2.5, MA-3.0) did not differ significantly. There were no ethnic differences in the proportion of patients who were discharged home without rehabilitation services (p=0.9). Among those who received rehabilitation (n=48), the figure shows the distribution of the first place for services. NHWs were more likely to be discharged to inpatient rehabilitation (73%) compared with MAs (30%), p=0.016. MAs (51%) were much more likely to be receive home rehabilitation services compared with NHWs (0%) (p=0.0017). Conclusions: In this population-based study, MAs were more likely to receive home-based rehabilitation while NHWs more likely to get inpatient rehabilitation. This disparity may, in part, explain the worse stroke outcome in MAs.

Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Reeves ◽  
Micah Aaron ◽  
Michael Fuentes ◽  
Lewis Morgenstern ◽  
Lynda Lisabeth

Background: Mexican Americans (MAs) have worse stroke outcomes than non-Hispanic whites (NHWs). One explanation may be ethnic differences in post-stroke rehabilitation; despite its effectiveness, non-clinical factors such as geographic availability may influence use of certain rehabilitation venues. We investigated ethnic differences in availability of stroke rehabilitation venues in a bi-ethnic community. Methods: Stroke survivors were identified through the population-based Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi (BASIC) Project from 2011-2013 in Nueces County, a bi-ethnic, mostly urban community in southeast Texas with a population of 340,000. Addresses of inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) providing stroke rehabilitation were identified by phone/internet and geocoded. Availability was defined as distance to and supply of each type of venue in relation to the survivor’s home. Supply was calculated as the count of each type of venue within a given radius (defined as the 90th percentile of distribution of distances to reflect a reasonable market area). Associations between availability and ethnicity were modeled using linear regression adjusted for census tract-level median household income, proportion <65 years, and population density as obtained from the 2012 American Community Survey. Results: A total of 942 survivors were eligible (62% MA, 38% NHW); 3 IRFs and 21 SNFs were identified. The average distances from the survivors’ homes to an IRF or SNF were 5 miles (SD=6) and 2 miles (SD=3), respectively. Supply was calculated within radii of 16 miles for IRFs and 4 miles for SNFs. The average count of rehabilitation venues within these radii was 2.6 IRFs (SD=0.9) and 7.9 SNFs (SD=4.7). There were no ethnic differences in the distance or supply of IRFs; however, MAs were on average 1 mile (CI:0.6-1.5) closer to and had 0.8 (CI:0.2,1.3) more SNFs within the radius than NHWs. Conclusions: Availability of rehabilitation venues was high for both ethnic groups; however, MAs have greater availability of SNFs compared to NHWs. Additional study is necessary to understand how the availability and quality of services within rehabilitation venues impact post-stroke rehabilitation among MA stroke survivors.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily M Briceño ◽  
Liming Dong ◽  
Lynda D Lisabeth ◽  
Lewis B Morgenstern

Introduction: Mexican Americans (MA) have worse cognitive outcomes following stroke relative to non-Hispanic whites (NHW). In a population-based study we examined whether MAs and NHWs have different cognition just after stroke (baseline) and different cognitive trajectories at 90 days post stroke. Methods: The sample included 598 participants from the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi Project who had ischemic stroke between 2008-2013. Cognitive assessment was the 3MSE (English or Spanish). A change score was calculated (3MSE at 90 days minus 3MSE at baseline). Robust regression was used to examine ethnic differences in cognitive outcomes adjusted for sociodemographics, pre-stroke factors, and clinical stroke characteristics; missing covariate values were imputed with multiple imputation. Results: The sample was 57% MA, 35% NHW, and 8% other race/ethnicity. MAs were younger, had lower educational attainment, and were less likely to have health insurance than NHWs (all p<0.01). MAs showed lower cognitive function at baseline (Table 1) and less cognitive recovery 90 days following stroke compared with NHWs (Table 2), which remained significant after accounting for all covariates (Model 5, Tables 1 and 2). Conclusions: MAs have worse post-stroke baseline cognition and less robust cognitive recovery 90 days following stroke than NHWs. This disparity should be addressed through rehabilitation or other interventions.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia N Hollenhorst ◽  
Lynda D Lisabeth ◽  
Linda C Gallo ◽  
Chia-Wei Hsu ◽  
Sehee Kim ◽  
...  

Background and Aims: We studied informal (non-paid) caregiving after stroke in a population-based study to determine if differences occurred between Mexican Americans (MAs) and non-Hispanic whites (NHWs). MAs are a less affluent population than NHWs. Family members who provide caregiving may need to interrupt educational and occupational goals to provide this care, which may perpetuate socioeconomic disparities between minority and majority populations. Methods: Between October, 2014 and December, 2016, stroke subjects in Texas, USA, were interviewed 90 days after stroke to determine if family or friends provided informal, unpaid caregiving, and for which activities of daily living (ADLs) they required help. Chi-square tests were used to assess the association of ethnicity and whom provided the caregiving, as well as ethnicity and the ADLs for which they required help. Ethnic differences between MAs and NHWs in receiving informal caregiving were determined using logistic regression. The odds ratio (OR, 95% CI) is reported with NHW as the referent group. Results: 473 subjects answered the caregiving questions. There were no significant differences among the two ethnic groups with respect to age, sex, NIHSS score, marital status, or insurance. MAs were more likely to require help compared with NHWs for walking (p=0.0008), bathing (p=0.0004), hygiene (p=0.0018), eating (p=0.0059), dressing (p<0.0001), moving (p=0.0015) and toileting (p=0.0007). Among all subjects, 144 (30%) received informal caregiving (35% of 300 MAs versus 22% of 173 NHWs). There were no significant ethnic differences among which family member provided the caregiving. MAs were more likely to have informal caregiving OR=1.87 (95% CI 1.11-3.13) adjusted for age, sex, NIHSS, education, insurance and marital status. Conclusions: In this population-based study, MAs required more help than NHWs for assistance with ADLs, and MAs were more likely to receive this help through informal, unpaid caregiving than NHWs. Efforts to help minority and low-resource populations provide stroke care are needed.


2010 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 773-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Colantonio ◽  
G Gerber ◽  
M Bayley ◽  
R Deber ◽  
H Kim ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (14) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liming Dong ◽  
Emily Briceno ◽  
Lewis B. Morgenstern ◽  
Lynda D. Lisabeth

Background The study investigated sex differences in cognitive outcomes at 90 days after first‐ever stroke using data from a population‐based sample. Methods and Results The study sample consisted of 1227 participants from the 2009–2016 Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi project (south Texas, United States) who had first‐ever ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage and survived 90 days after stroke. Poststroke cognitive function was assessed by the Modified Mini‐Mental State Examination (3MSE) (range: 0–100; dementia: <78). The associations of sex with dichotomized and continuous outcomes were examined using logistic regression and tobit regression, respectively. Inverse probability weighting and multiple imputation were used to deal with missing data. The study sample was evenly distributed by sex, and primarily composed of Mexican Americans (59.1%) and non‐Hispanic whites (34.1%). Women scored 2.96 points worse on the 3MSE than men at 90 days poststroke (95% CI, −3.99 to −1.93). The prevalence of dementia was 27.6% for men (95% CI, 23.5%–31.6%) and 35.6% for women (95% CI, 31.5%–39.7%), and the unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of dementia comparing women with men was 1.45 (95% CI, 1.24–1.69). The association was attenuated after adjustment for sociodemographic, stroke, and prestroke characteristics (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.61–1.09). Conclusions Women had worse cognitive outcomes than men at 90 days poststroke. The differences were attributable to sociodemographic and prestroke characteristics, especially widowhood status. Potential mechanisms linking widowhood to dementia in the acute poststroke stage warrant further investigation to inform interventions addressing the unique care needs of women stroke survivors with dementia and cognitive dysfunction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 968-975.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon P. Watt ◽  
Miryoung Lee ◽  
Jen-Jung Pan ◽  
Michael B. Fallon ◽  
Rohit Loomba ◽  
...  

Nutrients ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Costas Anastasiou ◽  
Mary Yannakoulia ◽  
Meropi Kontogianni ◽  
Mary Kosmidis ◽  
Eirini Mamalaki ◽  
...  

Many lifestyle factors have been linked to cognitive function but little is known about their combined effect. An overall lifestyle pattern for people living in the Mediterranean basin has been proposed, including diet, but also physical activity, sleep and daily living activities with social/intellectual aspects. We aimed to examine the associations between a combination of these lifestyle factors and detailed cognitive performance. A total of 1716 participants from the Hellenic Longitudinal Investigation of Ageing and Diet (HELIAD), a population-based study of participants ≥65 years, were included in this analysis. Lifestyle factors were evaluated using standard, validated questionnaires and a Total Lifestyle Index (TLI) was constructed. Cognitive outcomes included mild cognitive impairment (MCI) diagnosis, a composite z-score (either continuous or with a threshold at the 25th percentile) and z-scores for five cognitive domains. A higher TLI was associated with 65% reduced odds for MCI in the non-demented individuals and 43% reduced odds for low global cognition when MCI participants were excluded, a risk reduction equivalent to 9 and 2.7 fewer years of ageing, respectively. Each lifestyle factor was differentially associated with domain-specific cognitive performance. Our results suggest that a TLI, more so than single lifestyle parameters, may be related to cognitive performance.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynda D Lisabeth ◽  
Devin Brown ◽  
Xingyu Zhang ◽  
Sehee Kim ◽  
Erin Case ◽  
...  

Introduction: Elevated stroke rates in Mexican Americans (MA) compared with non-Hispanic whites (NHW) persisted over the first decade of the 21 st century. Our objective was to investigate recent trends in ischemic stroke (IS) rates by ethnicity and age using data from a longstanding population-based study. Methods: ISs were identified in the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi (BASIC) Project (2000-2017) and validated by neurologists using a clinical definition. Race-ethnicity was from medical records. Annual population counts from the US Census estimated the at-risk population. Poisson regression was used to model sex-adjusted rate trends by ethnicity and age. Time was modeled using linear and quadratic terms. Ethnic differences were assessed using interaction terms between ethnicity and time. Results: 4,883 ISs were identified (median age 70 (IQR:59-80); 56% MA). Trends varied by ethnicity and age (figure). In those 45-59, rates increased substantially in NHWs (104%; p<0.001 for rate difference 2000-2017) but decreased in MAs (-21.4%; p=0.04 for rate difference 2000-2017) such that, for the first time, rates were higher in NHWs. In those 60-74, rates declined in both ethnic groups through 2010-2011 but then increased and more steeply in NHWs thereafter. In those ≥75, rates declined in MAs, declined sharply in NHWs through 2012 and then increased. Conclusions: New patterns in stroke have emerged. Ethnic disparities have declined as a result of increasing rates in NHWs most notably in midlife. Reasons for increasing rates in recent years are unclear but suggest renewed attention to prevention.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lewis B Morgenstern ◽  
Lynda Lisabeth ◽  
River Gibbs ◽  
Sehee Kim ◽  
Charles Agyemang

Background/Objective: We studied the association of being born outside of the U.S. (immigrant) or born in the U.S. (non-immigrant) with 90 day post-stroke outcomes in a population-based stroke study in Texas. Methods: Stroke cases from 2008-2016 were identified from the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi (BASIC) project. Outcomes among survivors included ADL/IADL score (higher scores worse) for functional assessment, 3MSE (cognition, lower scores worse), and NIHSS Score (neurologic, higher scores worse). Weighted linear regression models were used to assess the effect of immigration status on the outcomes. Analysis was completed using multiple imputation and inverse probability weighting to account for differential attrition. Results: Of 935 Mexican Americans available for analysis, 83 were immigrants and 852 were non-immigrants. Immigrants had resided in the U.S. on average 47 years. Immigrants were significantly older (69 vs. 66 years), more likely male (60% vs. 49%), more likely to have atrial fibrillation and have less education than non-immigrants (all p<0.05). No differences in hypertension, diabetes, cholesterol, insurance, smoking or other comorbidities existed. The Table provides the data from the fully adjusted models. Immigrants had better functional outcome (mean difference (MD) = -0.22; p=0.02), and no difference for neurologic outcome (MD= -0.15; p=0.15). There was an association of worse cognitive outcome in immigrants (MD= -5.25; p=0.009), however, the association was explained by attenuated after the adjustment for the lower educational attainment in immigrants (MD= -0.79; p=0.64). Conclusions: In this community, there was no evidence of worse stroke outcome among Mexican American immigrants, who had lived in the U.S. for decades, compared with non-immigrants. Further studies of more recent immigrant populations are warranted.


Neurology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (15) ◽  
pp. 1438-1445 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. J. Mateen ◽  
K. A. Josephs ◽  
M. R. Trenerry ◽  
M. D. Felmlee-Devine ◽  
A. L. Weaver ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document