Abstract WMP90: Comparison of Acute Ischemic Stroke Care Between Comprehensive Stroke Centers and Primary Stroke Centers Participating in Get With the Guidelines-Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shumei Man ◽  
Xin Zhao ◽  
Ken Uchino ◽  
Eric E Smith ◽  
Deepak L Bhatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Get With The Guidelines

Abstract 3029: Improved Clinical Outcomes in Medicare Beneficiaries with Acute Ischemic Stroke During Initial Implementation of the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-S) Program 2003-2008

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Song ◽  
Gregg C Fonarow ◽  
Wendy Pan ◽  
DaiWai M Olson ◽  
Adrian F Hernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cardiovascular Event ◽  
Early Period ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Medicare Beneficiaries ◽  
Improvement Programs ◽  
Time Periods ◽  
Get With The Guidelines

Background: The first decade of the 21st century saw several changes in acute ischemic stroke care, including greater use of statins, tobacco cessation counseling, IV rt-PA, formally organized stroke centers, and national performance improvement programs. Changes in clinical outcomes from acute ischemic stroke during this period have not been fully delineated. Methods: We examined the national Medicare dataset to analyze clinical outcomes of ischemic stroke patients at hospitals joining Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-Stroke) from April 1, 2003 to December 12, 2008. We designated three time periods of interest: 1) pre-period (6 months prior to GWTG-S participation, 2) early period (first 6 months of GWTG-Stroke participation), and 3) late period (6 to 18 months after GWTG-Stroke implementation). Clinical outcomes analyzed included discharge to home; inpatient, 30 day, and 1 year mortality; and 30 day and 1 year rehospitalization for stroke, cardiovascular event, and all cause. Results: 139,293 patients from 725 sites were included in the analysis. Mean age was 79.5 years, 41% male, 84% white. Patient demographics were similar across the three time periods, with minimal differences in comorbidities (e.g. diabetes, renal disease). Statistically significant changes between pre and late periods included: lower 30 day mortality (15.3% vs. 13.0%, p<.0001), lower 1 year mortality (28.0% vs 25.5%, p<.0001), lower stroke/TIA rehospitalization at 30 days (3.1% vs. 2.4%, p<.0001) and 1 year (9.2% vs. 8.7%, p<.002), lower rehospitalization for cardiovascular event at 30 days (2.9% vs. 2.3%, p<.0001) and 1 year (15.9% vs. 13.5%, p<.0001), and lower all cause rehospitalization at 30 days (17.4% vs. 15.1%, p<.0001) and 1 year (55.8% vs. 53.0%, p<.0001). Intermediate changes were seen during the early period. Rates of inpatient mortality and discharge to home did not change. Conclusions: During the first 2 years of participation, clinical outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries with acute ischemic stroke among hospitals joining GWTG-Stroke improved substantially, with 15% lower 30 day mortality rates and 24% lower 30 day rehospitalization rates for stroke or TIA. Further study is planned to determine if similar improvements in outcomes occurred at non-participating hospitals during this time frame.

Abstract P887: Lack of Racial, Ethnic, and Sex Disparities in Ischemic Stroke Care Metrics Within a Telestroke Network

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujan T Reddy ◽  
Tzu-Ching Wu ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Mohammad H Rahbar ◽  
Christy Ankrom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Missing Values ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Mt Evaluation ◽  
Sex Disparities ◽  
Get With The Guidelines ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Racial Ethnic

Introduction: Little is known on the impact of telestroke in addressing disparities in acute ischemic stroke care. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of acute ischemic stroke patients evaluated over our 17-hospital telestroke network in Texas from 2015-2018. Patients were described as Non-Hispanic White (NHW) male or female, Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) male or female, or Hispanic (HIS) male or female. Single imputation using fully conditional specification was conducted to impute missing values in NIHSS (N=103). We compared frequency of tPA and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) utilization, door-to-consultation times, door-to-tPA times, and time-to-transfer for patients who went on to MT evaluation at the hub after having been screened for suspected large vessel occlusion at the spoke. Results: Among 3873 patients (including 1146 NHW male (30%) and 1134 NHW female (29%), 405 NHB male (10%) and 491 NHB female (13%), and 358 HIS male (9%) and 339 HIS female (9%) patients) (Table 1), we did not find any differences in door-to consultation time, door-to-tPA time, time-to-transfer, frequency of tPA administration or incidence of MT utilization (Table 1 & 2). Conclusion: There was a lack of racial, ethnic, and sex disparities in ischemic stroke care metrics within our telestroke network. In order to fully understand how telestroke alleviates disparities in stroke care beyond our single-network review, collaboration among networks is needed to formulate a multicenter telestroke database similar to the Get-With-The Guidelines.

Integrative physiological assessment of cerebral hemodynamics and metabolism in acute ischemic stroke

2021 ◽  
pp. 0271678X2110337
Author(s):  
Jui-Lin Fan ◽  
Ricardo C Nogueira ◽  
Patrice Brassard ◽  
Caroline A Rickards ◽  
Matthew Page ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Cerebral Autoregulation ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Prognostic Markers ◽  
Important Determinant ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Contentious Issue ◽  
Ischemic Tissue ◽  
Physiological Assessment

Restoring perfusion to ischemic tissue is the primary goal of acute ischemic stroke care, yet only a small portion of patients receive reperfusion treatment. Since blood pressure (BP) is an important determinant of cerebral perfusion, effective BP management could facilitate reperfusion. But how BP should be managed in very early phase of ischemic stroke remains a contentious issue, due to the lack of clear evidence. Given the complex relationship between BP and cerebral blood flow (CBF)—termed cerebral autoregulation (CA)—bedside monitoring of cerebral perfusion and oxygenation could help guide BP management, thereby improve stroke patient outcome. The aim of INFOMATAS is to ‘ identify novel therapeutic targets for treatment and management in acute ischemic stroke’. In this review, we identify novel physiological parameters which could be used to guide BP management in acute stroke, and explore methodologies for monitoring them at the bedside. We outline the challenges in translating these potential prognostic markers into clinical use.

Abstract WP399: Reduced Cost and Decreased Length of Stay Associated with Acute Ischemic Stroke Care Provided by Nurse Practitioners: A Single Primary Stroke Center Experience

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah Roering ◽  
Michelle Peterson ◽  
Muhammad Shah Miran ◽  
Melissa Freese ◽  
Kenneth Shea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Medical Provider ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Stroke Center

Background: Nurse practitioner (NP) have a wider role in modern stroke centers providing quality evidence based care to patients in both in and outpatient settings for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients. We studied the outcome measures, length of stay (LOS) and cost before and after implementation of nurse practitioners as the primary medical provider in a community based stroke center. Methods: St Cloud hospital is acute care hospital with dedicated stroke service responsible for workup and management of all patients admitted with AIS and TIA. From March 2014-March 2015, all patients were primarily managed by stroke neurologists with or without support of NP, representing physician driven arm. From June 2015-March 2016 all non-critical patients were managed primarily by NP, representing the NP driven arm of care. For this analysis, we excluded all patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage or intracerebral hemorrhage. Using ICD codes, we abstracted LOS and hospitalization cost for all patients, and compared between two arms. Results: A total of 822 patients were included in physician arm and 336 in NP arm. The mean age was 72±14 years for both arms, and 54.4% were male in physician arm and 57.4% were male in NP arm. The mean total LOS for the physician arm was 3.1 ±3.3 days while 2.9±3.6 for NP arm (p=0.6). The total cost for physician arm was $11,286.70 ±$10,920.90 while the NP arm was $10,277.30± $10,142.30 (p=0.1). Conclusion: There is a trend towards lower cost and length of stay with implementation of NP as primary stroke provider for patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke.

scholarly journals Outcome of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke in the First Year after the Establishment of a Stroke Care Unit

2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-105
Author(s):  
Yuichi Komaba ◽  
Nobuto Nakajima ◽  
Kouichi Nomura ◽  
Genki Mizukoshi ◽  
Eiko Sunami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
First Year

Abstract T P188: Equivalency in Intravenous Thrombolytic Treatment Rates Between Primary Stroke Centers and Non-Primary Stroke Centers Through the Use of Telestroke

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Archit Bhatt ◽  
Elizabeth Barban ◽  
Leslie Corless ◽  
Tamela Stuchiner ◽  
Amit Kansara
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Bivariate Analysis ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Patient Arrival ◽  
History Of

Background: Research has shown that subjects evaluated at (Primary Stroke Centers) PSCs are more likely to receive rt–PA than those evaluated at non–PSCs. It is unknown if telestroke evaluation affects rt-PA rates at non-PSCs. We hypothesized that with a robust telestroke system rt-TPA rates among PSCs and non-PSCs are not significantly different. Methods and Results: Data were obtained from the Providence Stroke Registry from January 2010 to December 2012. We identified ischemic stroke patients (n=3307) who received care in Oregon and Southwest Washington, which include 2 PSCs and 14 non-PSCs. Intravenous rt–PA was administered to 7.3% (n=242) of ischemic patients overall, 8.4% (n=79) at non–PSCs and 6.9% (n=163) at PSCs (p=.135). Stroke neurologists evaluated 5.2 % (n=172) of all ischemic stroke patients (n=3307) were evaluated via telestroke robot. Our analysis included AIS (Acute Ischemic Stroke) patients, those presenting within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. We identified 1070 AIS discharges from 16 hospitals of which 77.9 % (n=833) were at PSCs and 22.1 % (n=237) non-PSCs. For acute ischemic stroke patients (AIS) patients, those presenting within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, 22.1% (n=237) received rt-PA; 21.5% (n=74) presented at non–PSCs and 23.7% (n=163) presented at PSCs. Among AIS, bivariate analysis showed significant differences in treatment rates by race, age, NIHSS at admit, previous stroke or TIA, PVD, use of robot, smoking and time from patient arrival to CT completed. Using multiple logistic regression adjusting for these variables, treatment was significantly related to admit NIHSS (AOR=1.67, p<.001), history of stroke (AOR=.323, p<.001), TIA (AOR=.303, p=.01) and PVD (AOR=.176, p=.02), time to CT (.971, p<.001), and use of robot (7.76, p<.001). PSC designation was not significantly related to treatment (p=.06). Conclusions: Through the use of a robust telestroke system, there are no significant differences in the TPA treatment rates between non-PSC and PSC facilities. Telestroke systems can ensure stroke patients access to acute stroke care at non-PSC hospitals.

Abstract WP280: Use of Strategies to Improve Door-to-Needle Times with Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Acute Ischemic Stroke by US Hospitals: Findings from the Target: Stroke Survey

Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregg C Fonarow ◽  
Eric E Smith ◽  
Xin Zhao ◽  
Eric D Peterson ◽  
Ying Xian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Tissue Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Ct Scanner ◽  
Critical Pathways ◽  
Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Tissue Plasminogen

Background: The benefits of intravenous tissue-plasminogen activator (tPA) in acute ischemic stroke are time-dependent and several strategies have been reported to be associated with more rapid door-to-needle (DTN) times. However, the extent to which hospitals are utilizing these strategies has not been well studied. Methods: We surveyed 304 hospitals joining Target: Stroke regarding their baseline use of strategies to reduce door-to-needle times in the 1/2008-2/2010 timeframe (prior to the initiation of Target: Stroke). The survey was developed based on literature review and expert consensus for strategies identified as being associated with shorter DTN times and further refined after pilot testing. Categorical responses are reported as frequencies. Results: Hospitals participating in the survey were 50% academic, median 163 (IQR 106-247) ischemic stroke admissions per year, median 10 (IQR 6-17) tPA treated patients per year, and had median 79 minute (IQR 71-89) DTN times. By survey, 214 of 304 hospitals (70%) reported initiating or revising strategies to reduce DTN times in the prior 2 years. Reported use of the different strategies varied in frequency, with use of ischemic stroke critical pathways, CT scanner located in the Emergency Department, and tPA being stored in the Emergency Department being the strategies least frequently employed (Table). As part of Target: Stroke participation, 279 of 304 hospitals (91.5%) indicated they planned to have a dedicated team focused on reducing DTN times. Conclusions: While most US hospitals participating in this survey report use of the strategies to improve the timeliness of tPA administration for acute ischemic stroke, significant variation exists. Further research is needed to understand which of these strategies are most effective in improving acute ischemic stroke care.

Abstract MP25: Inequities in Interhospital Transfer for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the United States: Lower Odds for Women and the Underinsured

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M Oh ◽  
Daniela Markovic ◽  
Amytis Towfighi
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Multinomial Logistic Regression ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Multinomial Logistic Model ◽  
Lower Odds ◽  
Interhospital Transfer

Background: Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) may undergo interhospital transfer (IHT) for higher level of care. Although the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act stipulates that patients should be transferred to and accepted by referral hospitals if indicated, it offers few concrete guidelines, making it vulnerable to bias. We hypothesized that (1) IHT for AIS has increased over recent years and (2) minorities, women, and those without insurance had lower odds of IHT. Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample, adults (>18 yrs) with a primary diagnosis of AIS from 2010 to 2017 (n=770,970) were identified, corresponding to a weighted sample size of 3,798,440. Those transferred to another acute hospital were labeled IHT. Yearly rates of IHT were assessed. Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of IHT (vs. not transferred) were compared in 2014-2017 vs. 2010-2013 using a multinomial logistic model, adjusting for socioeconomic, medical, and hospital characteristics. Multinomial logistic regression was used to determine odds of IHT by race/ethnicity, sex, and insurance status, adjusting for the above characteristics. Results: From 2010 to 2017, the proportion of IHT declined from 3.2% (SE 0.2) to 2.9% (SE 0.1). Comparing IHT in 2014-2017 to 2010-2013 showed lower odds of IHT (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88-0.99), but this difference did not remain significant in the fully adjusted model. Fully adjusted OR showed that black patients were more likely than white patients to undergo IHT (AOR 1.13, 1.07-1.20). Women were less likely than men to be transferred (AOR 0.89, 0.86-0.92). Compared to those with private insurance, those with Medicaid (AOR 0.86, 0.80-0.91), self-pay (0.64, 0.59-0.70), and no charge (0.64, 0.46-0.88) were less likely to undergo IHT. Conclusions: Adjusted odds of IHT for AIS did not change significantly. Blacks were more likely than whites to be transferred; however, women and the uninsured/underinsured were less likely to be transferred. Further studies are needed to further understand these inequities and develop interventions and policies to ensure that all individuals have equitable access to stroke care, regardless of their race, sex, or ability to pay.

Abstract 5: Do Stroke Centers Reduce Mortality for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke? An Instrumental Variable Analysis

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Xian ◽  
Robert G Holloway ◽  
Katia Noyes ◽  
Manish N Shah ◽  
Bruce Friedman
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
New York State ◽  
Selection Effect ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Instrumental Variable Analysis ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Stroke Center

Background: Although the establishment of stroke centers based on the Brain Attack Coalition recommendations has great potential to improve quality of stroke care, little is known about whether stroke centers improve health outcomes such as mortality. Methods: Using 2005-2006 New York State Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System data, we identified 32,783 hospitalized patients age 18+ with a principal diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke (ICD-9 433.x1, 434.x1 and 436). We compared in-hospital mortality and up to one year all-cause mortality between New York State Designated Stroke Centers and non-stroke center hospitals. Because patients were not randomly assigned to hospitals, stroke centers might treat different types of patients than other hospitals (a selection effect). We used a “natural randomization” approach, instrumental variable analysis (differential distance was the instrument), to control for this selection effect. To determine whether the mortality difference was specific to stroke care, we repeated the analysis using a different group of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage (N=53,077). Results: Of the 32,783 stroke patients, nearly 50% (16,258) were admitted to stroke centers. Stroke centers had lower unadjusted in-hospital mortality and 30-, 90-, 180-, and 365-day all-cause mortality than non-stroke centers (7.0% vs. 7.8%, 10.0% vs. 12.6%, 14.6% vs. 17.5%, 18.0% vs. 21.0%, 22.4% vs. 26.2%, respectively). After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, comorbidities, and the patient selection effect, stroke centers were associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality. The adjusted differences were -2.6%, -2.7%, -1.8%, and -2.3% for 30-, 90-, 180- and 365-day mortality (all p<0.05). The adjusted difference in in-hospital mortality was -0.8% but was not statistically significant. In a specificity analysis of patients with GI hemorrhage, stroke centers had slightly higher mortality. Conclusions: Hospitals that are Designated Stroke Centers had lower mortality for acute ischemic stroke than non-stroke center hospitals. The mortality benefit was specific to stroke and was not observed for GI hemorrhage. Providing stroke centers nationwide has the potential to reduce mortality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document