scholarly journals Concordance of apolipoprotein B concentration with the Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins, and Sampson formulas for calculating LDL cholesterol

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter-Jan Briers ◽  
Michel R. Langlois
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuang Li ◽  
Jingxun Chen ◽  
Siyue Wei ◽  
Mei Zhang ◽  
Yushun Chu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The optimum lipid indexes, predicting the coronary lesion in postmenopausal women are not clear. Objective To evaluate the optimum lipid predicter for coronary lesion in routine and advanced lipid tests. Method 300 postmenopausal women were enrolled and assigned into coronary heart disease (CHD) Group (242), and non-CHD Group (58). Routine and advanced lipid indexes were measured with standard laboratory test and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The correlation and predictivities for CHD of routine and advanced lipid indexes were performed with Logistic regression, Spearman correlation analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC). Results Age (hazard ratio (HR) 2.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–5.86, P = 0.03), apolipoprotein B (ApoB) (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.15–1.59, P < 0.001), corrected particles of low-density lipoprotein (LDL-p-corr) (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03–1.06, P < 0.001) and corrected particles of non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL-p-corr) (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01–1.03, P < 0.001) were the risk factors of CHD. LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), LDL-p, LDL-p-corr, HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL-C), non-HDL-p and non-HDL-p-corr were in linear correlation with Gensini score. Advanced lipid indexes LDL-p (area under curve (AUC) = 0.750, P = 0.02), LDL-p-corr (AUC = 0.759, P = 0.02), non-HDL-p (AUC = 0.693, P = 0.03) and non-HDL-p-corr (AUC = 0.699, P = 0.03) were more predictive for CHD than the routine ones (LDL-C and non-HDL-C). Conclusion In postmenopausal women, age, ApoB, LDL-p-corr and non-HDL-p-corr were risk factors of CHD. Compared with traditional lipid items, LDL-p, LDL-p-corr, non-HDL-p and non-HDL-p-corr may be better lipid indexes for CHD in postmenopausal women.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Andrew W. Gardner ◽  
Petar Alaupovic ◽  
Donald E. Parker ◽  
Polly S. Montgomery ◽  
Omar L. Esponda ◽  
...  

Apolipoprotein B is a stronger predictor of myocardial infarction than LDL cholesterol, and it is inversely related to physical activity and modifiable with exercise training. As such, apolipoprotein measures may be of particular relevance for subjects with PAD and claudication. We compared plasma apolipoprotein profiles in 29 subjects with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and intermittent claudication and in 39 control subjects. Furthermore, we compared the plasma apolipoprotein profiles of subjects with PAD either treated (n=17) or untreated (n=12) with statin medications. For the apolipoprotein subparticle analyses, subjects with PAD had higher age-adjusted Lp-B:C (P<0.05) and lower values of Lp-A-I:A-II (P<0.05) than controls. The PAD group taking statins had lower age-adjusted values for apoB (P<0.05), Lp-A-II:B:C:D:E (P<0.05), Lp-B:E + Lp-B:C:E (P<0.05), Lp-B:C (P<0.05), and Lp-A-I (P<0.05) than the untreated PAD group. Subjects with PAD have impaired apolipoprotein profiles than controls, characterized by Lp-B:C and Lp-A-I:A-II. Furthermore, subjects with PAD on statin medications have a more favorable risk profile, particularly noted in multiple apolipoprotein subparticles. The efficacy of statin therapy to improve cardiovascular risk appears more evident in the apolipoprotein sub-particle profile than in the more traditional lipid profile of subjects with PAD and claudication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.govNCT00618670.


1995 ◽  
Vol 240 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.A. Tallis ◽  
M.D.S. Shephard ◽  
S. Sobecki ◽  
M.J. Whiting

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (7) ◽  
pp. 930-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Børge G Nordestgaard ◽  
Anne Langsted ◽  
Samia Mora ◽  
Genovefa Kolovou ◽  
Hannsjörg Baum ◽  
...  

Abstract AIMS To critically evaluate the clinical implications of the use of non-fasting rather than fasting lipid profiles and to provide guidance for the laboratory reporting of abnormal non-fasting or fasting lipid profiles. METHODS AND RESULTS Extensive observational data, in which random non-fasting lipid profiles have been compared with those determined under fasting conditions, indicate that the maximal mean changes at 1–6 h after habitual meals are not clinically significant [+0.3 mmol/L (26 mg/dL) for triglycerides; −0.2 mmol/L (8 mg/dL) for total cholesterol; −0.2 mmol/L (8 mg/dL) for LDL cholesterol; +0.2 mmol/L (8 mg/dL) for calculated remnant cholesterol; −0.2 mmol/L (8 mg/dL) for calculated non-HDL cholesterol]; concentrations of HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein(a) are not affected by fasting/non-fasting status. In addition, non-fasting and fasting concentrations vary similarly over time and are comparable in the prediction of cardiovascular disease. To improve patient compliance with lipid testing, we therefore recommend the routine use of non-fasting lipid profiles, whereas fasting sampling may be considered when non-fasting triglycerides are &gt;5 mmol/L (440 mg/dL). For non-fasting samples, laboratory reports should flag abnormal concentrations as triglycerides ≥2 mmol/L (175 mg/dL), total cholesterol ≥5 mmol/L (190 mg/dL), LDL cholesterol ≥3 mmol/L (115 mg/dL), calculated remnant cholesterol ≥0.9 mmol/L (35 mg/dL), calculated non-HDL cholesterol ≥3.9 mmol/L (150 mg/dL), HDL cholesterol ≤1 mmol/L (40 mg/dL), apolipoprotein A1 ≤1.25 g/L (125 mg/dL), apolipoprotein B ≥1.0 g/L (100 mg/dL), and lipoprotein(a) ≥50 mg/dL (80th percentile); for fasting samples, abnormal concentrations correspond to triglycerides ≥1.7 mmol/L (150 mg/dL). Life-threatening concentrations require separate referral for the risk of pancreatitis when triglycerides are &gt;10 mmol/L (880 mg/dL), for homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia when LDL cholesterol is &gt;13 mmol/L (500 mg/dL), for heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia when LDL cholesterol is &gt;5 mmol/L (190 mg/dL), and for very high cardiovascular risk when lipoprotein(a) &gt;150 mg/dL (99th percentile). CONCLUSIONS We recommend that non-fasting blood samples be routinely used for the assessment of plasma lipid profiles. Laboratory reports should flag abnormal values on the basis of desirable concentration cutpoints. Non-fasting and fasting measurements should be complementary but not mutually exclusive.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Kettunen ◽  
Michael V. Holmes ◽  
Elias Allara ◽  
Olga Anufrieva ◽  
Pauli Ohukainen ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundCETP inhibition reduces vascular event rates but confusion surrounds its low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol effects. We sought to clarify associations of genetic inhibition of CETP on detailed lipoproteins.Methods and ResultsWe used variants associated withCETP(rs247617) andHMGCR(rs12916) expression in 62,400 Europeans with detailed lipoprotein profiling from nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Genetic associations were scaled to 10% lower risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Associations of lipoprotein measures with risk of incident CHD in three population-based cohorts (770 cases) were examined.CETPandHMGCRhad near-identical associations with LDL-cholesterol concentration estimated by Friedewald-equation.HMGCRhad a relatively consistent effect on cholesterol concentrations across all apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins.CETPhad stronger effects on remnant and very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol but no effect on cholesterol concentrations in LDL defined by particle size (diameter 18–26 nm) (-0.02SD 95%CI: -0.10, 0.05 forCETPversus -0.24SD, 95%CI -0.30, -0.18 forHMGCR).CETPhad profound effects on lipid compositions of lipoproteins, with strong reductions in the triglyceride content of all highdensity lipoprotein (HDL) particles. These alterations in triglyceride composition within HDL subclasses were observationally associated with risk of CHD, independently of total cholesterol and triglycerides (strongest HR per 1-SD higher triglyceride composition in very-large HDL 1.35; 95%CI: 1.18, 1.54).ConclusionCETP inhibition does not affect size-specific LDL cholesterol but may lower CHD risk by lowering cholesterol in other apolipoprotein-B containing lipoproteins and lowering triglyceride content of HDL particles. Conventional composite lipid assays may mask heterogeneous effects of lipid-altering therapies.


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Pang ◽  
Dick Chan ◽  
Sandy Hamilton ◽  
Vijay Tenneti ◽  
Gerald Watts ◽  
...  

Background: Type 2 diabetic subjects often have hypertriglyceridemia and an increased concentration of apolipoprotein B-48 (apoB-48) in circulation, particularly during the postprandial period. There is an accumulating body of evidence to suggest that apoB-48 plays a central role in the development of atherosclerosis. Statins are the frontline therapy to reduce cardiovascular risk, however, a large residual risk still remains. This residual risk suggests that additional therapeutic interventions may be required to further reduce CVD risk. Aim: To investigate the effect of niacin on the metabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (TRL) apoB-48 in men with type 2 diabetes on background statin therapy. Methods: Twelve type 2 diabetic men were recruited for this randomized, cross-over design study. Patients required a statin-treated low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol of less than 2.5 mmol/L to enter the trial. Patients were then randomized to rosuvastatin alone or rosuvastatin plus niacin (titrated up from 1 to 2 g daily) for a period of 12 weeks and then were crossed over to the alternate therapy with a 3 week washout period in between. Metabolic studies were performed at the end of each treatment period. A bolus intravenous infusion of D3-leucine was administered as subjects consumed a standardised high-fat liquid meal. Blood samples were collected over 24 hours and TRL apoB-48 tracer/tracee ratios were measured using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Kinetic parameters, including fractional catabolic rate (FCR) and production rate (PR), were derived using a multicompartmental model. Results: Niacin significantly reduced triglyceride, plasma cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and apoB (all p<0.005). TRL apoB-48 concentration was lower with niacin (8.24 ± 1.98 vs 5.48 ± 1.14 mg/L, p=0.03). ApoB-48 FCR was not altered with niacin (8.78 ± 1.04 vs 9.17 ± 1.26 pools/day; p=0.79). Basal apoB-48 PR (3.21 ± 0.34 vs 2.50 ± 0.31 mg/kg/day; p=0.04) and postprandial apoB-48 PR were significantly lower (1.35 ± 0.19 vs 0.84 ± 0.12 mg/kg; p=0.02) on niacin. Conclusion: Niacin reduces TRL apoB-48 concentration by lowering basal and postprandial apoB-48 PR. This effect on apoB-48 metabolism may be beneficial for reducing atherogenic postprandial TRL particles and may provide CVD risk benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes.


1991 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-300
Author(s):  
G Huet ◽  
M C Dieu ◽  
A Martin ◽  
G Grard ◽  
J M Bard ◽  
...  

Abstract We describe a disorder in which low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and apolipoprotein B are in low concentration (0.47 mmol/L and 0.28 g/L, respectively) and chylomicrons are still present in plasma after an 18-h fast. The d less than 1.006 fraction was isolated by flotation ultracentrifugation and the apolipoproteins were analyzed by electrophoresis, immunoblotting with anti-apolipoprotein B-100 antiserum, and isoelectric focusing. In the d less than 1.006 fraction of the fasting serum, we found an apolipoprotein B form with the same apparent molecular mass as apolipoprotein B-48 and similar in amount to apolipoprotein B-100 (respective percentages, 46% and 54%). The monosialylated form of the apolipoprotein C-III was severely decreased. After an oral fat load, the repartition of the two species of apolipoprotein B did not change greatly (respective percentages, 60% and 40%), and the concentration of serum triglyceride increased only from 1.20 to 1.65 mmol/L.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document