scholarly journals Molecular Picture of Adhesive Interface

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 42-47
Author(s):  
Keiji TANAKA
Keyword(s):  
Adhesive Interface ◽  
Molecular Picture

Electro-active pi-Conjugated Oligomers and Polymers A Molecular Picture of Charge-Transfer Processes

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 388 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Beljonne ◽  
J. Cornil ◽  
J. L. Brèdas ◽  
V. Coropceanu
Keyword(s):  
Charge Transfer ◽  
Semiconductor Devices ◽  
Conjugated Oligomers ◽  
Transfer Processes ◽  
Pi Conjugated ◽  
Information And Communication ◽  
Inorganic Semiconductor ◽  
Molecular Picture

<span>Inorganic semiconductor devices such as transistors have been instrumental in shaping the development of our society of information and communication. Recently, the electronics and photonics technologies have opened their materials base to organics, in particular p-conjugated oligomers and polymers. The goal with organics-based devices is not necessarily to attain or exceed the level of performance of inorganic semiconductor technologies...</span>

scholarly journals One Way to Verify the Molecular Picture of Exotic Hadrons: From $$\pmb {DK}$$ to $$\pmb {DDK/D{\bar{D}}^{(*)}K}$$

2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tian-Wei Wu ◽  
Ming-Zhu Liu ◽  
Li-Sheng Geng
Keyword(s):  
Exotic Hadrons ◽  
Molecular Picture

A full molecular picture of F8 intron 1 inversion created with optical genome mapping

Haemophilia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Somayyeh Fahiminiya ◽  
Georges‐Etienne Rivard ◽  
Patrick Scott ◽  
Alexandre Montpetit ◽  
François Bacot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genome Mapping ◽  
Intron 1 ◽  
Intron 1 Inversion ◽  
Molecular Picture

scholarly journals Nano-Hardness of Adhesive Interface between Er:YAG Laser-Irradiated Dentin and 4-META/MMA-TBB Resin

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koya Aizawa ◽  
Atsushi Kameyama ◽  
Junji Kato ◽  
Yutaka Oda ◽  
Yoshito Hirai
Keyword(s):  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Adhesive Interface

scholarly journals Nectin ectodomain structures reveal a canonical adhesive interface

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 906-915 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver J Harrison ◽  
Jeremie Vendome ◽  
Julia Brasch ◽  
Xiangshu Jin ◽  
Soonjin Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adhesive Interface

scholarly journals Microleakage beneath Ceramic and Metal Brackets Bonded with a Conventional and an Antibacterial Adhesive System

2006 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 1028-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neslihan Arhun ◽  
Ayca Arman ◽  
Sevi Burçak Çehreli ◽  
Serdar Arıkan ◽  
Erdem Karabulut ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adhesive System ◽  
White Spot Lesions ◽  
Adhesive Interface ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ceramic Brackets ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Ceramic Bracket ◽  
Nail Varnish

Abstract Objective: To assess microleakage of a tooth-adhesive-bracket complex when metal or ceramic brackets were bonded with a conventional and an antibacterial self-etching adhesive. Materials and Methods: Forty freshly extracted human premolars were randomly assigned to four equal groups and received the following treatments: group 1 = Transbond XT + metal bracket, group 2 = Transbond XT + ceramic bracket, group 3 = Clearfil Protect Bond + ceramic bracket, and group 4 = Clearfil Protect Bond + metal bracket. After photopolymerization, the teeth were kept in distilled water for 1 month and thereafter subjected to thermal cycling (500 cycles). Specimens were further sealed with nail varnish, stained with 0.5% basic fuchsin for 24 hours, sectioned and examined under a stereomicroscope, and scored for marginal microleakage for the adhesive-tooth and bracket-adhesive interfaces from incisal and gingival margins. Statistical analysis was accomplished by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction. Results: All groups demonstrated microleakage between the adhesive-enamel and bracket-adhesive interfaces. A significant difference was observed among all groups (P &lt; .05) for the microleakage between the bracket-adhesive interface. Metal brackets exhibited significantly more microleakage than did ceramic brackets between the bracket-adhesive interface with either of the adhesives. Clearfil Protect Bond exhibited results similar to Transbond XT. Clearfil Protect Bond may be a choice of adhesive in bracket bonding because of its antibacterial activity and similar microleakage results with the orthodontic adhesive. Conclusions: Metal brackets cause more leakage between an adhesive-bracket interface, which may lead to lower clinical shear bond strength and white-spot lesions.

scholarly journals A molecular view of cisplatin's mode of action: interplay with DNA bases and acquired resistance

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 5155-5171 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Paula M. Marques ◽  
Diego Gianolio ◽  
Giannantonio Cibin ◽  
John Tomkinson ◽  
Stewart F. Parker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mode Of Action ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Dna Bases ◽  
Detailed Interpretation ◽  
Molecular Picture

A definite molecular picture of cisplatin's MOA is presented, including a detailed interpretation of the glutathione-mediated drug scavenging process.

Influence of dentin pre-treatment with NaOCl on the morphology of adhesive interface of self-etching adhesive systems

2006 ◽  
Vol 253 (4) ◽  
pp. 1929-1933
Author(s):  
Carina Sinclér Delfino ◽  
Regina Guenka Palma-Dibb
Keyword(s):  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Adhesive Interface ◽  
Pre Treatment

Influence of different contaminants and cleansing agents on bond strength and in situ degree of conversion of composite-adhesive interface

2021 ◽  
pp. 102932
Author(s):  
Emanuela Gaviolli ◽  
Elenusa Oltramari Vieira ◽  
Felipe Dornelles da Silva ◽  
Luiz Felipe Valandro ◽  
Sailer Santos dos Santos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Degree Of Conversion ◽  
Adhesive Interface
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document